0%

Sharing Best Practices across industries and functions is an accepted approach to continuous improvement. The Benchmarking trend of the 1990s has evolved with the help of competitive analysis, performance excellence awards, and other corporate recognition programs into an ongoing documentation of what works. Bob Camp introduced benchmarking against a Best Practice based on his work at Xerox in the 1980s. Case studies abound documenting Best Practice functions and processes. Some case studies use the words “Best Practice” without evidence that the process, results, or methods are, indeed, superior. What is missing is a comprehensive model for assessing and writing a Best Practice that provides sufficient information to use as an effective benchmark. This book provides that comprehensive model.

Today’s consumers expect products and services to be of high quality, reliable, and user-friendly. This is the result of years of continuous improvement and innovation by producers. Although many organizations strive for excellent results, there is still room for improvement. Unfortunately, leaders don’t always have methods and tools to measure or assess that degree of excellence. If leaders could use a tool to discover how good their approaches and methods are, and how excellent their achieved results are, they could plan further improvements. The goal is to achieve excellent results. The tool described in this book guides leaders to achieve that excellence.

Table of Contents

  1. Cover
  2. Half-Title
  3. Title
  4. Copyright
  5. Dedication
  6. Contents
  7. Foreword
  8. Acknowledgments
  9. Authors
  10. SECTION I DESCRIPTION OF THE BEST-TOOL
    1. 1 Introduction
    2. 1.1 Why a Book on the Subject of “Best Practice”?
    3. 1.2 What Are the Advantages of the Application of the BEST-Method and BEST-Tool for the Reader?
    4. 1.3 But There Is More …
    5. 1.4 Additional Applications of the BEST-Tool
    6. 1.5 The Book Focuses on Two Potential Audiences for Three Major Purposes
    7. 1.6 Benchmarking, Best Practices, and Excellent Results
    8. 1.7 Objectives, Benchmarking, and Definitions
    9. 1.8 BEST-Method and BEST-Tool
    10. 1.9 Structure of the Book
    11. 2 The BEST-Method
    12. 2.1 Definition of Best Practice
    13. 2.2 Key Concepts in the Definition of a Best Practice
    14. 2.3 Characteristics of a Best Practice
    15. 2.4 Best Practice versus Best Technical Product
    16. 2.5 BEST-Method and BEST-Tool
    17. 2.6 Documenting a Best Practice
    18. 2.7 Measurement of Excellence
    19. 2.8 Enabler
    20. 2.9 The PDCA-Method
    21. 2.10 Results
    22. 2.11 Organizational Maturity
    23. 2.12 Benefits of the BEST-Tool
    24. 2.13 Use of Case Studies for Demonstrating the BEST-Tool
    25. 2.14 Why We Use Older Case Studies
    26. 2.15 Conclusion
    27. 3 The BEST-Tool: Checklist of Criteria for the Assessment of a Best Practice
    28. 3.1 Assessment of the Approaches Used in a Best Practice
    29. 3.1.1 Enabler
    30. 3.1.2 Plan
    31. 3.1.3 Do
    32. 3.1.4 Check
    33. 3.1.5 Act
    34. 3.2 Assessment of the Achieved Results
    35. 3.2.1 Results
    36. 3.2.2 Test of Results Criteria on a Real-Life Example
    37. 3.2.3 Conclusion
    38. 3.3 Assessment of the Management of the Best Practice Process
    39. 3.3.1 Definition of a Process
    40. 3.4 Assessment of the Format of a Best Practice
    41. 3.5 Use of the BEST-Tool (Complete and Detailed Checklist)
    42. 3.6 Use of the BEST Quick Scan Tool
    43. 3.7 Experiences, Tips, and Tricks
    44. 3.7.1 Incomplete Best Practices
    45. 3.7.2 Complete Best Practices
    46. 3.7.3 Scores
    47. 3.7.4 Realistic Tool
    48. 4 Writing a Best Practice
    49. 4.1 What Is a Best Practice?
    50. 4.2 A High-Level Sequence for Developing and Writing a Best Practice
    51. 4.3 Documenting a Best Practice Case Study
    52. 4.3.1 Title
    53. 4.3.2 Subject
    54. 4.3.3 Author
    55. 4.3.4 Context
    56. 4.3.5 Description of the Method and Results
    57. 4.3.6 Measurement Method
    58. 4.3.7 Process Description
    59. 4.3.8 Maturity of the Process
    60. 4.3.9 Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and Results
    61. 4.3.10 Distribution of the Results
    62. 4.3.11 Cause and Effect
    63. 4.3.12 Assessment of Enabler and Results
    64. 4.3.13 Limiting Conditions
    65. 4.3.14 Date and Revision Number
    66. 4.4 How Many Best Practices?
  11. SECTION II USE OF THE BEST-TOOL
    1. 5 Use of the Detailed BEST-Tool: Three Case Studies
    2. 5.1 Case Study 1 Organizational Culture Change at Lion Nathan (Australia)
    3. 5.1.1 Who is Lion Nathan?
    4. 5.1.2 Organization of Lion Nathan
    5. 5.1.3 History
    6. 5.1.4 Three Pillars of Cultural Transformation Strategy
    7. 5.1.5 Leadership Drives Cultural Transformation
    8. 5.1.6 Human Synergistics Measurement Instruments
    9. 5.1.7 Organizational Culture Inventory® (OCI®)
    10. 5.1.8 Cultural Transformation is Done in Five Phases:
    11. 5.1.9 Life Styles Inventory™ (LSI 1 and LSI 2)
    12. 5.1.10 Assessment of Case Study: Lion Nathan
    13. 5.1.11 Important Preliminary Remarks
    14. 5.1.12 Building Block: Enabler
    15. 5.1.12.1 Analysis of the Plan Step of the BEST-Method
    16. 5.1.12.2 Analysis of the Do Step of the BEST-Method
    17. 5.1.12.3 Analysis of the Check Step of the BEST-Method
    18. 5.1.12.4 Analysis of the Act Step of the BEST-Method
    19. 5.1.13 Building Block: Results
    20. 5.1.13.1 Scope and Relevance
    21. 5.1.13.2 Segmentation
    22. 5.1.13.3 Targets
    23. 5.1.13.4 Comparison with Benchmarks
    24. 5.1.14 Building Block: Management of Process
    25. 5.1.15 Building Block: Process Format
    26. 5.1.16 Summary of the Assessment of the Lion Nathan Case Study and Conclusion
    27. 5.2 Case Study 2: Corporate Social Responsibility at Loblaw
    28. 5.2.1 Who is Loblaw?
    29. 5.2.2 Loblaw Companies CSR Vision
    30. 5.2.3 Loblaw Purpose
    31. 5.2.4 Core Values of Loblaw
    32. 5.2.5 The Way of Doing business
    33. 5.2.6 Loblaw CSR Pillars
    34. 5.2.7 CSR Annual Reports
    35. 5.2.8 Long-Term Targets and Stakeholder Engagement
    36. 5.2.8.1 Long-Term Targets
    37. 5.2.8.2 Stakeholder Engagement
    38. 5.2.9 What Customers Tell Loblaw
    39. 5.2.10 Insights from Valued Stakeholders
    40. 5.2.11 Moving Forward in Reduction of the Carbon Footprint
    41. 5.2.12 Improving Energy Efficiency and Cutting Carbon Emissions
    42. 5.2.13 Converting Refrigerants and Reducing Leak Intensity
    43. 5.2.14 Building Energy Consumption
    44. 5.2.15 Converting Fleet to Electric
    45. 5.2.16 Reducing and Diverting Waste
    46. 5.2.17 Important Preliminary Remark
    47. 5.2.18 Assessment of the Loblaw CSR Case Study
    48. 5.2.19 Building Block 1: Enabler (22 criteria and 44 characteristics)
    49. 5.2.19.1 Analyze the Plan Phase of the BEST-Method
    50. 5.2.19.2 Analyze the Do-Step of the BEST-Method
    51. 5.2.19.3 Analysis of the Check Step of the BEST-Method
    52. 5.2.19.4 Analysis of the Act Step of the BEST-Method
    53. 5.2.20 Results (7 criteria and 20 characteristics)
    54. 5.2.21 Management of Process (nine criteria)
    55. 5.2.22 Maturity of the Management of the Process
    56. 5.2.23 Assessment of the Format of the Best Practice of Loblaw
    57. 5.2.24 Summary of the Assessment of the CSR Loblaw Case Study and Conclusion
    58. 5.2.25 Good Practice
    59. 5.3 Case Study 3 Dream Hotel
    60. 5.3.1 Organization of the Company
    61. 5.3.2 Description of the Key Process Check-out
    62. 5.3.3 Conclusion
    63. 6 Application of BEST Quick Scan Tool on Case Studies
    64. 6.1 Business Process Benchmarking: Finding and Implementing Best Practices (Robert Camp)
    65. 6.1.1 Case Study: Housekeeping System Cycle Time Reduction at The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company
    66. 6.1.1.1 Who Is The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company?
    67. 6.1.1.2 Assessment of the Case Study The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company
    68. 6.1.1.3 Conclusion
    69. 6.2 Case Studies from Healthy Workplaces: A Selection of Global Good Practices
    70. 6.2.1 Case study: Lån & Spar Bank Denmark
    71. 6.2.1.1 Who Is Lån & Spar Bank?
    72. 6.2.1.2 Health in Business Strategy
    73. 6.2.1.3 Assessment of Case Study Lån & Spar Bank
    74. 6.2.1.4 Conclusion
    75. 6.2.2 Case Study: GlaxoSmithKline UK
    76. 6.2.2.1 Who Is GSK?
    77. 6.2.2.2 Health in Business Strategy
    78. 6.2.2.3 Assessment of Case Study GSK
    79. 6.2.2.4 Conclusion
    80. 6.2.3 Case Study: Baxter International Inc. USA
    81. 6.2.3.1 Who Is Baxter?
    82. 6.2.3.2 Health in Business Strategy
    83. 6.2.3.3 Assessment of Case Study Baxter International Inc. USA
    84. 6.2.3.4 Conclusion
    85. 6.2.3.5 Conclusions from Healthy Workplaces: A Selection of Global Good Practices
    86. 6.3 Case Studies from APQC CONNECTING PEOPLE TO CONTENT: Create, Surface, and Share Knowledge for a Smarter Organization
    87. 6.3.1 Preface
    88. 6.3.2 Case study: Nalco
    89. 6.3.2.1 Initial Comment
    90. 6.3.2.2 Who Is Nalco?
    91. 6.3.2.3 Assessment of Case Study Nalco
    92. 6.3.2.4 Conclusion Case Study Nalco
    93. 6.3.3 Case study: MWH Global Inc.
    94. 6.3.3.1 Who Is MWH Global Inc.?
    95. 6.3.3.2 Assessment of Case Study MWH Global Inc.
    96. 6.3.3.3 Conclusion Case MWH Global Inc.
    97. 6.3.3.4 Global Conclusion on the APQC Case Studies (Nalco and MWH Global Inc.)
    98. 6.3.4 Case Study: Already Doing It and Not Knowing It
    99. 6.3.4.1 Who Is Metro Public Health Department (MPHD) Nashville, Tennessee?
    100. 6.3.4.2 Assessment of Case Study Metro Public Health Department (MPHD) Nashville, Tennessee
    101. 6.3.4.3 Conclusion of the Nashville, TN Case Studies
    102. 6.3.5 Case Study: Why Is Singapore’s School System So Successful and Is It a Model for the West?
    103. 6.3.5.1 Assessment of Case Study Singapore’s School System
    104. 6.3.5.2 Conclusion
    105. 6.3.5.3 Additional Comments
    106. 6.4 Case Study: HR Certification Institute & Top Employers Institute
    107. 6.4.1 About HRCI
    108. 6.4.2 About Top Employers Institute
    109. 6.4.3 Assessment of the Case Study HR Certification Institute & Top Employers Institute
    110. 6.4.3.1 Summary Assessment of Case Study 9 (see Figure 6.6)
    111. 6.4.4 Conclusion of the Assessment of HRCI & TEI
    112. 6.5 Case Study: ExxonMobil Safety, Health, and the Workplace
    113. 6.5.1 Who Is ExxonMobil?
    114. 6.5.2 Assessment of Case Study ExxonMobil Safety, Health, and the Workplace
    115. 6.5.3 Conclusion
    116. 6.6 Observations Gained from the Assessment of Ten BEST Quick Scan Studies
    117. 7 Orange County Health Department Case Study
    118. 7.1 Original Case Study: Orange County Health Department, STD Quality Improvement Case Study
    119. 7.2 The Situation
    120. 7.3 Step 1: Describe the Problem
    121. 7.4 Step 2: Describe the Current Process
    122. 7.5 Step 3: Identify Root Cause(s) of the Problem
    123. 7.6 Step 4: Develop a Solution and Action Plan
    124. 7.7 Step 5: Implement the Solution
    125. 7.8 Step 6: Review and Evaluate Results of the Change
    126. 7.9 Step 7: Reflect and Act on Learnings
    127. 7.10 Looking Back: Fall 2008
    128. 7.11 Apply the BEST-Method: Updating to 2019
    129. 7.11.1 Improvement: Trends
    130. 7.11.2 Area for Improvement: Stakeholders
    131. 7.11.3 Improvement Audit
    132. 7.12 Looking Back: Experiences from 2008 till 2019
    133. 7.12.1 2019 Assessment of Case Study Orange County Health Department, STD Quality Improvement
    134. 7.12.2 Full BEST-Tool Assessment of Orange County Health Department STD Blood Draw Process Case Study
    135. 7.12.3 Current Status of Best Practice: Summer 2019
    136. 7.12.4 Conclusion
    137. 7.13 Lessons Learned
    138. 8 Conclusion
    139. 8.1 Lessons Learned
    140. 8.2 Complete Best Practice
    141. 8.3 Facts and Figures
    142. 8.4 Definitions
    143. 8.5 Is This Approach Bureaucracy?
    144. 8.6 “Poor” Best Practices
    145. 8.7 Journey toward Excellence
    146. 8.8 Pitfalls
    147. 8.9 Super Quick Assessment
    148. 8.10 Choice of the CEO
    149. 8.11 Static or Dynamic?
  12. Appendix
  13. Index
3.141.41.187