Richard Hall
At the end of this book you will understand that strategic decisions are the big ones you cannot afford to get wrong or take in isolation to the big vision the company has. In addition, you will be able to become a more decisive executive who thinks more simply, clearly and creatively.
There is a man called Michael Porter who is regarded as being the ‘god of strategy’. I regard his writing, if not his thinking, which is very good, as impenetrably dull. I imagine this courtroom with the judge intoning, ‘Your sentence for missing budget is a year reading nothing but Michael Porter…’ and, in the back of my head, I hear the music ‘oh Mr Porter what shall I do?’ The answer to that question is – just keep it simple.
Every half decent manager wants to make better, clearer, better informed and more effective decisions. But, does the process have to be so devastatingly prosaic and jaw-achingly dull? In truth, good decisions are hard to make. On our metaphorical gravestone we might like it to say, ‘They made good decisions’. But good decisions are rare because we do not use our brains very well.
We lurch from opinion to contradiction to fudge. We try to please everyone. We make everyone cross. And we feel frustrated.
Here, in half an hour, are a few tips that will change your skill as a decision maker and make you much, much better. We will start by releasing the supressed humanity that you have and getting you to think about the human beings whom the strategic thinking on which you have embarked will affect.
Too much management is about things, transactions and numbers. Far too little is about relationships, people and the long term. If you get that, then I will have done a good job. If you get that and apply it to your important decisions, I will have done a great one.
Strategic decision making is the big important stuff. We are talking (often) global, long-term and life-changing. Big betting-your-house-on-it strategic decisions require great decision-making techniques. And it is hard because the human brain is a brilliant, sometimes erratic and irrational, organ.
The poverty of success in the creation of strategy is a global problem. Increasingly, the British search for talent in countries outside the UK is paying dividends. People hired from countries like the USA, New Zealand, South Africa and Canada have been successful in recent years but now, provided you speak English to a good standard, it is your talent and strategic nous that boards are looking for, so you could be a native of anywhere at all. The world of management is really global now.
Strategic decisions are, by definition, big and important ones. They are the sort of decisions that change lives. Decisions like where to locate a new airport, whether to build a high-speed rail system or how to organise the NHS are all huge strategic decisions.
Get serious. A strategic decision is a biggie. One that really matters and that links into the big plan you have. And you cannot make it without understanding the impact it might have.
Strategic decisions involve a clear understanding of quite complex issues like:
Understanding the drivers of change is not simple and, generally, there will be disagreement about this by experts. Factors like ageing populations, political stability or educational standards (if they are declining in a given country, is this a reason to avoid building a plant there or will it create, by default, a low-cost basic labour force?) need thinking through and you will need to take a view as to whether they have high or low impact relevance to your decision making.
Also, we often find it difficult to be collectively rational, let alone individually rational about big issues. There are three reasons we find it so hard:
The biggest problem is in failing to get all your stakeholders on board with what you want (and need) to do. It is going to be tiring, it can be frustrating, but put in the hours and be nice. Do not and you will fail.
We need to take a big step back to see the future trends. And put things into context.
Decisions and strategies are created in a place, at a time and with a cast of people that influences whether they will work or not. Context is all. A great strategy in 2005 may be a really silly one in 2015 or 2020. We live in disruptive times. Old rules do not apply. In making the really big strategic decisions, you need to have two sets of eyes: those of the obsessive expert working together with the smiling, sceptical outsider who asks ‘Why?’ and ‘Why not?’ a lot.
Context is everything. It is too easy to be distracted by issues that we cannot control. The question to ask is, ‘What are the realities of our own specific world?’
The most successful people I have known have been obsessive experts in their field, whether it is wine, media or food (yes, I confess I was an advertising person – straight out of Mad Men – how did you guess? Was it the mention of wine, media and food?) Being deeply knowledgeable about your own world will enable you to focus on the drivers for change more easily, but beware. You need new eyes as well – people who ask difficult questions and are not particularly fond of cows – especially sacred ones.
You need two things – deep knowledge allied to dispassionate scepticism. You need what and how working closely with why. Do not try and do this all by yourself. Strategic decisions are not made in an ivory tower.
As an exercise, sit down and work out what the key drivers of change are in your specific business sector. Now rank them in order of your ability to influence them.
In my experience, the key drivers group into:
The world we live in is rougher, tougher and faster moving than it used to be. We need to separate the day-to-day trivial decisions from those that are strategically significant. Most of all, we need to understand that paradigms are being shattered in virtually every market sector and that there is more disruption to normal business than ever. This is the context in which we live. Forget about smelling the coffee; start smelling the napalm instead.
Complacency is your enemy. Complacency in failing to realise everything is changing, that none of us are impervious to being attacked on many fronts.
We make hundreds of decisions every year – who to hire (or fire); how to control costs; how ambitious we should make that plan; how upbeat to make that presentation; whether to go on that presentation course; how much work to do this weekend; whether to cancel my holiday; how to placate my boss; how to get on better with the finance director; how to remember an important anniversary.
Set out the number of ‘do I go left or right?’ decisions that you have in a working day. Lots of them, of course. But the ones that really, really matter are fewer and need to be treated very seriously. Decisions like how to change our factories so we reduce the cost of bread and, at the same time, make it stay fresher longer are strategic ones. Whether to make just more brown or white bread is a tactical decision.
Our challenges are all about us: if we can overcome the desire that many of us have to be liked and to be perceived as right; if we can overcome the characteristic dogmatism of having made up our minds, refusing to change, even when circumstances say we should; if we can be driven to succeed for the company (not ourselves) and be genuinely humble, too, then all will be well. But do not underestimate the difficulties of all this.
Make no mistake. Strategic decisions are hard. They are hard for personal reasons and normal human weaknesses. There is a lethal cocktail of confusion and uncertainty in all our lives.
Assess how thin-skinned you are. Unless we are honest about our vulnerability, we will be less effective decision makers. Worse than that, we will just make decisions tactically (for short-term popularity) rather than strategically (for long-term gain).
Test yourself now
Let us develop each of those so we can find ways of overcoming the problems of being either depicted as a mad bull in a china shop or a wet-fish-of-an-apology sort of decision maker.
The default mode of the human brain is wandering about. The mode we strategic decision makers need is one of focus and risk assessment. This, allied to the ability to change direction if the situation changes. As John Maynard Keynes (one of the most influential economists of the 20th century) said: ‘If circumstances change I change my mind – what do you do?’
If only the RBS board had backed off from the ABN Amro deal in 2008; if only Lord Richard Beeching had not taken those decisions about the rail network in 1965; if only Tesco had thought harder about the changing context in which it was operating in 2011 when Tim Leahy retired.
The challenge of being prepared to take the flack for a late-in-the-day change of mind or change of heart is huge. Be prepared, nonetheless. Better to be derided briefly than destroyed.
Change your mind, if the situation changes. Never commit yourself without wriggle room. Never be too dogmatic. Better to lose a deal than lose your company and your credibility.
Understanding what is going on in these uncertain times requires a lot of really deep thought. We do not think deeply enough – actually, we do not think enough period. It is hard, it is tiring and it requires the use of intellectual muscles we do not often use. Far easier to be a superhero and leap on our actionmobile and accelerate off to the Decision Dome. Business is full of ‘three hours sleep, ten meetings a day, never been so busy in my life people’. There are too few leaders of the kind Jim Collins (author of Good to Great) described as ‘Level 5’. He defined a Level 5 as: ‘an executive in whom genuine personal humility blends with intense professional will’.
So, we have three big challenges:
I do not want to be too dogmatic about process – situations vary from company to company and situation to situation. However, what follows shows how to set about and refine the thinking on the creation of a strategy and the way to become more adept at making decisions that are strategically informed.
What follows comprises 15 or so tips that offer practical help in making you much better at being a strategic decision maker.
The nightmare scenario for most of us is, when flapping our hands in anguish, we wail, ‘I don’t know what to do’.
This is most common when we do not have enough information, we do not understand where we are going and we do not know what we want to achieve. Management consultants typically will ask their client, ‘What do you want to achieve?’
Once you can answer that, decision making is easier (did I say easy? It is never that). The real key is to ask about every decision you make: ‘Is this decision consistent with the strategy and does it make the strategy more likely to happen successfully?’
It is human nature to want to take the A–B quickest route and have only one option strategically. It seems to me, that having a plan B, plan C and even plan D in your back pocket is sensible. Our minds thrive on choice. It is with choice that our mettle as decision makers is tested.
Never be locked into having only one plan. Create choice. You may favour one option, but allow stakeholders to perceive that you are open-minded.
Most designers offer a small range of proposals to their clients so they do not feel they are being railroaded. Psychology says, when offered a choice of three, the client will be drawn to one, so the beginning of a sale is achieved.
Having more than one option allows you to explore the way different strategic options play out. It encourages what a boss of mine called ‘supple thinking’. Me? I am with Mark Twain: ‘There’s nothing more dangerous than an idea if it’s the only one you have.’
We make decisions the whole time: ‘Shall I finish this section or go and have a glass of wine?’ Wine wins after careful thought, but it is not a strategic decision. A strategic decision might be, ‘I have half of this book to write and the deadline looms. What do I do?’ Answer: cancel all appointments I can, get up at 5.30 am. Put that wine away. Lubricate my mind instead with some Nassim Nicholas Taleb (author of The Black Swan and Antifragile – both great books; British journalist and author Bryan Appleyard called him ‘the hottest thinker in the world’ and he sure makes you think about uncertainty and risk). Now that recipe is strategic.
Beware of short-termism. Think very hard about what you want to achieve and precisely where you want to go. Strategic thinkers look at all the options. It is more tiring that way, but the biggest pitfall is to opt for the easy way out.
There are other things about strategic thinking:
Beware the tailor or couturier who seizes something from the rail, saying, ‘You’ll look wonderful in this’ because one size does not fit all. But, experience shows that focus on these three issues will help you construct strategic parameters around any business.
Where are you now? Where do you need to be? What are the strengths and weaknesses of your team? Do you have a winning or a laissez-faire culture? Look at your business as though you were an outsider. Does it feel innovative, energetic and open-minded? When I first went into the Google HQ in Zurich, I was struck by how small and hands-on a business it felt. In reception, it could have been a smallish advertising agency. Strategies that are not underpinned by a brilliant team will not work. Any strategic decision must recognise the limitations of those who will execute it.
Assess your people, their attitudes and how they get on with each other. Keep on assessing their talent, their potential and their performance. Making sure you are ahead of the competition is critical.
How does your product stack up in the marketplace in terms of pricing, presentation and promotion? Are you sufficiently innovative? Is it positioned clearly and strongly? Are you proud of it? Strategic decisions need to be made in the context of how strong you are. At RHM Foods, years ago, a new CEO was appointed who said at his first major meeting, ‘We can be market leader in all our key areas’. His subordinates, recognising the power of Mars, Kellogg’s and Heinz, revolted and he was gone in a month. You have to be honest about what you have. As the Rolling Stones sang, ‘You can’t always get what you want.’ But you must always know what you have got and could get.
And here is a brilliantly optimistic view of that sort of life from Gary Comer, founder of Land’s End: ‘Worry about being better; bigger will take care of itself. Think one customer at a time and take care of each one the best way you can.’
Focus on getting better. Whatever skills you have, be obsessed about improving them and about being faster, cheaper and better. No one can succeed by standing still.
This is about the market and all the factors outside your control – pricing, distribution structures, technology, global structures (for example, how does your market work in areas in which you are not operating?).
Strategic decisions that are informed by a deep knowledge of what other people have tried and are doing will always be more convincing. Market paradigms are breaking. Fail to understand the nature and speed of change and you are disadvantaged massively. For example, successively, the mobile phone market has been dominated by Motorola, then Nokia and now Apple and Samsung are both currently vying for control. As Bobby Rao of Hermes Growth Partners put it when talking about technology market chaos like this, ‘No one knows where the ball is any more.’
I sympathise with modern executives, I really do. There is an electric speed of change, jostling crowds of competitors, awkward employees. In the giddy whirligig of the 21st century, knowing where you are and where you are heading is not easy. So, whoa! Slow down. Stop. Think. Like Terry Pratchett wrote in I Shall Wear Midnight: ‘If you do not know where you come from, then you don’t know where you are and, if you don’t know where you are, then you don’t know where you’re going. And if you don’t know where you’re going, you’re probably going wrong.’
Assess where you were, where you are and where you want to get. But doesn’t Terry say it more appealingly? ‘Do you know where you are going?’ is the key question.
At a conference recently, I heard an inspirational speaker berating his large corporate audience (from an organisation with very big brand leaders in a mature static market) for talking about only 5 per cent growth. ‘Why not 500 per cent growth?’ he shouted. ‘Oops! There goes another pig in airman’s googles looping the loop,’ I thought. Be ambitious, yes, but stay real.
When I talk about the trajectory of strategy development and the decision-making framework, I hear cries of ‘jargon and gobbledegook’. Good rebuke. I will try again.
We need to make strategic decisions and develop our strategies with our feet squarely on the ground but our plans need be bold and radical not timorous and safe. And I like the word trajectory because it is about taking off and going higher.
To get everyone around you in the right frame of mind, you need an occasional discussion forum about any changes you have noticed anywhere (not just your own market) that might make you all think a bit and reflect on underlying reasons for such changes. The aim is to become change-aware.
Are you deeply curious about change? Looking around you, do you see change, new shops, new people, new fashions, what is in and what is out? If you are not change-sensitive and aware, you are missing out.
At school, I had a History master who used to intone gravely, ‘The pendulum always swings back.’ So, good kings become bad kings, are then revived as good kings and are then vilified again by academics. What comes up goes down. A while back, in a knee- (or rather tummy-) jerk reaction to an excess of low-carb-evangelism, pies made a return. Baking is in for now (or it might be in the past tense by the time you read this). Gin is back. And here is the one I like best of all – the return of the hacking-immune electric typewriter. There are cycles, trends and swings everywhere.
But change is a norm. And it always was, even in 450 BC when the Greek philosopher Heraclitus said: ‘The only thing that is constant is change.’
The key drivers are always:
Beware just following trends. Trends reverse. Fashions change. Be ahead of the next movement. Keep asking what might happen next. Your biggest threat is being out of date. And stopping wondering and thinking.
Become a student of change in the way you think and look at things every day, not just when you have embarked on strategic thinking. That is what marks out a leader.
Change happens erratically, not in straight lines, and, as we have said, pendulums swing back. Your job is to know how to be ahead of the curve. Reading, watching and asking, ‘Are you sure about that?’ will help you do this. There is a bit of the rebel in us all, so never say, ‘People will never do x again’, just because the trends suggest they will not.
I recall a long time ago the toy industry had a somewhat arcane structure of trade discounts. No one really liked them and they seemed to belong to history rather than common sense. A new MD was appointed to a company called Palitoy. He was a bright and opinionated man, who decided to take on the industry, saying ‘I’m going to change this market’. Predictably, the market gobbled him up and spat him out. It was not a battle worth fighting. A good news story is the one about Greggs and the real food movement evoked by the smell of fresh baking. Their slogan is ‘always fresh, always tasty’ – not bad. It started in 1951 with a shop in Newcastle and now has over 1,500, it employs over 19,000 and it turns over in excess of £800 million. The levers they have controlled brilliantly are freshness, taste, price and a shrewd insight into their consumers.
Like Greggs, identify what you can control and start tweaking the levers until you find a mix that works. Just do not try and take on your industry; worry about your consumers instead.
Reconciling yourself to going in the opposite direction to others requires real strength of will. There has been a lot written about the dangers of being part of the herd. Read Michael Lewis’ book Big Short about the US property boom that, in the end, was not a boom at all and the corrupt collateralised debt options that were sold on the back of it. A small group of contrarians escaped the herd disease.
Andy Weiss, writing for Digital Pivot, produced this little gem:
Client: ‘We want a Facebook program.’
Agency: ‘Why?’
Client: ‘Because there are a lot of people on Facebook and all our competitors are there.’
‘In which case,’ Andy howls, ‘do something different.’
You know about momentum? It is when people say, ‘We’re on a roll.’ Well, I do not know. No real idea. No one does. Money to throw at it helps, but less than it did. A popular cause helps – polar bears did a lot for climate change activists. Coca-Cola making loyalists angry with ‘new Coke’ did it. We are learning more as we watch things go viral that seem trivial (Fenton, the deer-chasing dog, for instance: www.google.co.uk/?gws_rd=cr&ei=lZoUU-_QM4mShgf-u4GACg#q=youtube fenton) but it is hard to predict.
What is clear is that, in a social media, if you want momentum, be different, be angry, be funny, be attractive, be outrageous, be astonishing or use pets, children or people in embarrassing situations. Make people laugh, cry or gasp. Get an emotional reaction and your strategy may become a cause.
Are you as good as you should be at creating a different, interesting and emotional story? Do you really get the idea of being on a roll? Check out how many things you did last week that created waves.
In a changing world, one in which health and safety and political correctness are prominent features of our lives, our strategic behaviour will be modified by these. Environmental issues, gender equality, multiculturalism, whistleblowing as a mandatory requirement (which is somewhat counter to centuries of concepts like tribal loyalty) and, finally, transparency in decision making, all these inform and transform the way strategic decisions are made. The world is a better place, but some of these factors, unfamiliar to some leaders, need to be better understood. The last, in particular – transparency of process – is tough for those more used to fixing things in private, behind closed doors. Today, following the example of Master Chef on TV, everything needs to happen in open view.
One of the merits of transparency is our behaviour in reaching a strategic decision and our identification of drivers of change will have to contain more discipline. We shall need to create a decision trail in which the various factors leading to our decision are clearly expressed and transparently debated. Had this discipline always existed in the businesses subjected to the inquisitions of the Public Accounts Committee at Westminster, they might, from time to time, have suffered from less severe a roasting. As a start, ensure a new, transparent, properly recorded process is used. Explain that there is no off-the-record stuff allowed.
The most frustrating thing that happens in business life is to have a roomful of bright, expensive people operating below their potential, being cautious and uncreative.
Avoid this by having a clear agenda, all participants well briefed and prepared, a short meeting – never more than three hours, except in exceptional situations – well and good humouredly chaired and with, the next day, clear, simple and comprehensive minutes. And make sure everyone has a say and that no one dominates and no one is silent.
The keys to good work are clarity, brevity, preparation, good humour and lots of energy. Tattoo this on your hand… No, do not, just remember it!
The key is to make your strategy and any activity in which you are involved simple, clear and radical. Steve Jobs, on being asked what drove his thinking, replied: ‘That’s been one of my mantras – focus and simplicity. Simple can be harder than complex: you have to work hard to get your thinking clean to make it simple. But it’s worth it in the end because, once you get there, you can move mountains.’
Successful results, not extensive debates, are what we need in business and the acid test is this: are you making decisions that are sensibly (that is, strategically) linked to each other, all driving in the same direction towards the fulfilment of a grand strategic plan? Meanwhile – of course – you have to recognise the changes in your world. But if (in the end) you are making decisions that are not directed at making the key strategy work, I have to ask, what on earth are you up to?
How will you know if you are becoming a better strategic decision maker?
Here are simple questions that can help you:
Making decisions carries risks. It exposes you. This book shows you how to limit your exposure to risk whilst maximising your chances of applause when it all goes well.
There are three key attitudes you need to make the difference:
Have you cracked the art of making decisions, all of which align with the key mission of the business? Are you adept at understanding drivers of change?
18.119.106.237