[Cohen 2006] Cohen, Jason. 2006. Best Kept Secrets of Peer Code Review. Beverly, MA: SmartBear Software.

[Conradi 2003] ConradiRMohagheghiPArifTHegdeLBundeGPedersenA. 2003. “Object-Oriented Reading Techniques for Inspection of UML Models—An Industrial Experiment”. European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming ECOOP’03: 403–501.

[Dunsmore 2000] DunsmoreARoperMWoodM. 2000. “Object-Oriented Inspection in the Face of Delocalisation”. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) 2000: 467–476.

[Fagan 1976] FaganM 1976“. Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development”. IBM Systems Journal 15(3): 182–211.

[Jazayeri 1997] JazayeriPSchauerH. 1997. “Validating the defect detection performance advantage of group designs for software reviews: report of a laboratory experiment using program code”. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference Held Jointly with the 5th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (Zurich, Switzerland, September 22‒25, 1997): 294–309.

[Kelly et al. 2003] KellyDShepardT. 2003. “An experiment to investigate interacting versus nominal groups in software inspection”. Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, IBM Centre for Advanced Studies Conference: 122–134.

[Votta 1993] VottaL 1993. “Does every inspection need a meeting?” Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, December 8-10: 107–114.