[Ackerman and Beier 2006] Ackerman, P.L., and Beier, M.E. 2006. Methods for studying the structure of expertise: Psychometric approaches. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, and R.R. Hoffman, 147–166. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[Acuña et al. 2006] Acuña, S.T., N. Juristo, and M. Moreno. 2006. Emphasizing human capabilities in software development. IEEE Software, 23(2): 94–101.

[Argyris and Schön 1996] Argyris, C., and D.A. Schön. 1996. Organizational Learning II. Theory, Method, and Practice. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

[Arisholm and Sjøberg 2004] Arisholm, E., and D.I.K. Sjøberg. 2004. Evaluating the effect of a delegated versus centralized control style on the maintainability of object-oriented software. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 30: 521–534.

[Arisholm et al. 2007] Arisholm, E., H. Gallis, T. Dybå, and D.I.K. Sjøberg. 2007. Evaluating pair programming with respect to system complexity and programmer expertise. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 33: 65–86.

[Barrick et al. 2001] Barrick, M.B., M.K. Mount, and T.A. Judge. 2001. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9(1/2): 9–30.

[Bell 2007] Bell, S.T. 2007. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(3): 595–615.

[Bergersen 2010a] Bergersen, G.R. 2010. Assessing Programming Skill, to be submitted in 2010. PhD thesis, Simula Research Laboratory/University of Oslo.

[Bergersen 2010b] Bergersen, G.R. 2010. Combining time and correctness in the scoring of performance on items. Presentation at Rasch Conference 2010, Probabilistic models for measurement in education, psychology, social science and health, June 13–16, in Copenhagen, Denmark. https://conference.cbs.dk/index.php/rasch/Rasch2010/paper/view/596.

[Bergersen and Gustafsson 2010] Bergersen, G.R., and J.-E. Gustafsson. Programming skill, knowledge and working memory among software developers from an investment theory perspective. Forthcoming in Journal of Individual Differences.

[Bond 1995] Bond, L., 1995. Unintended consequences of performance assessment: Issues of bias and fairness. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 14(4): 21–24.

[Børte and Nerland 2010] Børte, K., and M. Nerland. Software effort estimation as collective accomplishment: An analysis of estimation practice in a multi-specialist team. To appear in Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems.

[Campbell et al. 1993] Campbell, J.P., R.A. McCloy, S.H. Oppler, and C.E. Sager. 1993. A theory of performance. In Personnel Selection in Organizations, ed. N. Scmitt and W.C. Borman, 35–70. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[Capretz 2003] Capretz, L.F. 2003. Personality types in software engineering. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58: 207–214.

[Capretz and Ahmed 2010] Capretz, L.F., and F. Ahmed. 2010. Making sense of software development and personality types. IT Professional 12(1): 6–13.

[Carroll 1993] Carroll, J.B. 1993. Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[Cegielski and Hall 2006] Cegielski, C.G., and D.J. Hall. 2006. What makes a good programmer? Communications of the ACM 49(10): 73–75.

[Chi 2006] Chi, M.T.H. 2006. “Two approaches to the study of experts’ characteristics.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, and R.R. Hoffman, 21–30. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[Costa and McCrae 1985] Costa, P.T., and R.R. McCrae. 1985. The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

[Covey et al. 1999] Covey, S.R., A. Roger Merill, and R.R. Merill. 1999. First Things First. New York: Simon & Schuster.

[Devito Da Cunha and Greathead 2007] Devito Da Cunha, A., and D. Greathead. 2007. Does personality matter? An analysis of code-review ability. Communications of the ACM 50(5): 109–112.

[Dick and Zarnett 2002] Dick, A.J., and B. Zarnett. 2002. Paired programming and personality traits. Proc. Third Int’l Conf. Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering (XP 2002): 82–85.

[Dickson and Kelly 1985] Dickson, D.H., and I.W. Kelly. 1985. The “Barnum Effect” in personality assessment: A review of the literature. Psychological Reports 57: 367–382.

[Dybå et al. 2007] Dybå, T., E. Arisholm, D.I.K. Sjøberg, J.E. Hannay, and F. Shull. 2007. Are two heads better than one? On the effectiveness of pair programming. IEEE Software 24(6): 12–15.

[Ericsson 2006] Ericsson, K.A. 2006. “An introduction to The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: Its development, organization, and content.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, and R.R. Hoffman, 3–20. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[Fallaw and Solomonsen 2010] Fallaw, S.S., and A.L. Solomonsen. 2010. Global assessment trends report. Technical report, PreVisor Talent Measurement.

[Forer 1949] Forer, B.R. 1949. The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 44: 118–123.

[Furnham 1996] Furnham, A. 1996. The big five versus the big four: The relationship between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences 21(2): 303–307.

[Gigerenzer 2007] Gigerenzer, G. 2007. Gut Feelings: The Intelligence of the Unconscious. New York: Viking.

[Gigerenzer and Todd 1999] Gigerenzer, G., and P.M. Todd, editors. 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.

[Glass 2002] Glass, R.L. 2002. Facts and Fallacies of Software Engineering. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.

[Goldberg 1990] Goldberg, L.R. 1990. An alternative description of personality: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 1216–1229.

[Goldberg 1993] Goldberg, L.R. 1993. The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist 48: 26–34.

[Goldberg et al. 2006] Goldberg, L.R., J.A. Johnson, H.W. Eber, R. Hogan, M.C. Ashton, C.R. Cloninger, and H.C. Gough. 2006. The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality 40: 84–96.

[Grimstad and Jørgensen 2007] Grimstad, S., and M. Jørgensen. 2007. Inconsistency in expert judgment-based estimates of software development effort. Journal of Systems and Software 80(11): 1770–1777.

[Gruschke and Jørgensen 2005] Gruschke, T.M., and M. Jørgensen. 2005. Assessing uncertainty of software development effort estimates: Learning from outcome feedback. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium: 4.

[Hærem 2002] Hærem, T. 2002. Task Complexity and Expertise as Determinants of Task Perceptions and Performance: Why Technology-Structure Research has been Unreliable and Inconclusive. PhD thesis, Norwegian School of Management BI.

[Halkjelsvik et al. 2010] Halkjelsvik, T., M. Jørgensen, and K.H. Teigen. 2010. To read two pages, I need 5 minutes, but give me 5 minutes and I will read four: How to change productivity estimates by inverting the question. Forthcoming in Applied Cognitive Psychology.

[Hannay et al. 2007] Hannay, J.E., D.I.K. Sjøberg, and T. Dybå. 2007. A systematic review of theory use in software engineering experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 33: 87–107.

[Hannay et al. 2009] Hannay, J.E., T. Dybå, E. Arisholm, and D.I.K. Sjøberg. 2009. The effectiveness of pair programming: A meta-analysis. Information & Software Technology 55(7):1110–1122.

[Hannay et al. 2010] Hannay, J.E., E. Arisholm, H. Engvik, and D.I.K. Sjøberg. 2010. Personality and pair programming. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 36(1): 61–80.

[Hanson and Claiborn 2006] Hanson, W.E., and C.D. Claiborn. 2006. Effects of test interpretation style and favorability in the counseling process. Journal of Counseling and Development 84(3): 349–358.

[Hertwig et al. 1999] Hertwig, R., U. Hoffrage, and L. Martignon. 1999. Quick estimation: Letting the environment do the work. In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, ed. G. Gigerenzer and P.M. Todd, 75–95. New York: Oxford University Press.

[Hogan et al. 2000] Hogan, K., B.K. Nastasi, and M. Pressley. 2000. Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4): 379–432.

[Horn and Masunaga 2006] Horn, J., and H. Masunaga. 2006. A merging theory of expertise and intelligence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, ed. K.A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P.J. Feltovich, and R.R. Hoffman, 587–612. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[Jarvis 1999] Jarvis, P. 1999. The Practitioner-Researcher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[Jørgensen 2004] Jørgensen, M. 2004. Top-down and bottom-up expert estimation of software development effort. Information and Software Technology 46(1): 3–16.

[Jørgensen 2005] Jørgensen, M. 2005. Practical guidelines for expert-judgment-based software effort estimation. IEEE Software 22(3): 57–63.

[Jørgensen 2010] Jørgensen, M. 2010. Selection of strategies in judgment-based effort estimation. Journal of Systems and Software 83(6): 1039–1050.

[Jørgensen and Carelius 2004] Jørgensen, M., and G.J. Carelius. 2004. An empirical study of software project bidding. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(12): 953–969.

[Jørgensen and Grimstad 2008] ] Jørgensen, M., and S. Grimstad. 2008. Avoiding irrelevant and misleading information when estimating development effort. IEEE Software 25(3): 78–83.

[Jørgensen and Grimstad 2010] Jørgensen, M., and S. Grimstad. 2010. The impact of irrelevant and misleading information on software development effort estimates: A randomized controlled field experiment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Preprint(99).

[Jørgensen and Halkjelsvik 2010] Jørgensen, M. and T. Halkjelsvik. 2010. The effects of request formats on judgment-based effort estimation. Journal of Systems and Software 83(1): 29–36.

[Jørgensen and Sjøberg 2001] Jørgensen, M., and D.I.K. Sjøberg. 2001. Impact of effort estimates on software project work. Information and Software Technology 43(15): 939–948.

[Jørgensen and Sjøberg 2004] Jørgensen, M., and D.I.K. Sjøberg. 2004. The impact of customer expectation on software development effort estimates. Journal of Project Management 22(4): 317–325.

[Jørgensen et al. 2004] Jørgensen, M., K.H. Teigen, and K.J. Moløkken-Østvold. 2004. Better sure than safe? Over-confidence in judgment based software development effort prediction intervals. Journal of Systems and Software 70(1-2): 79–93.

[Kahneman and Frederick 2004] Kahneman, D., and S. Frederick. 2004. “A Model of Heuristic Judgment” in The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, eds. K.J. Holyoak and R.G. Morrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 267–294.

[Karn and Cowling 2005] Karn, J.S., and A.J. Cowling. 2005. A study of the effect of personality on the performance of software engineering teams. Proc. Fourth International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE’05): 417–427.

[Karn and Cowling 2006] Karn, J.S., and A.J. Cowling. 2006. A follow up study of the effect of personality on the performance of software engineering teams. Proc. Fifth International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE’06): 232–241.

[LeBoeuf and Shafir 2004] LeBoeuf, R.A., and E.B. Shafir. 2004. “Decision Making” in The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, eds. K.J. Holyoak and R.G. Morrison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 243–266.

[Li et al. 2007] Li, J., G. Ruhe, A. Al-Emran, and M.M. Richter. 2007. A flexible method for software effort estimation by analogy. Empirical Software Engineering 12(1): 1382–3256.

[Meehl 1956] Meehl, P.E. 1956. Wanted—A good cookbook. American Psychologist 11(3): 263–272.

[Moløkken-Østvold and Jørgensen 2003] Moløkken-Østvold, K.J., and M. Jørgensen. 2003. A review of surveys on software effort estimation. Proc. Int’l Symp. Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2003): 223–230.

[Moløken-Østvold and Jørgensen 2005] Moløkken-Østvold, K.J., and M. Jørgensen. 2005. A comparison of software project overruns—flexible vs. sequential development models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(9): 754–766.

[Moore 1991] Moore, J.E. 1991. Personality characteristics of information systems professionals. Proc. 1991 Special Interest Group on Computer Personnel Research (SIGCPR) Annual Conference: 140–155.

[Paul 2005] Paul, A.M. 2005. The Cult of Personality Testing: How Personality Tests Are Leading Us to Miseducate Our Children, Mismanage Our Companies, and Misunderstand Ourselves. New York: Free Press.

[Peeters et al. 2006] Peeters, M.A.G., H.F.J.M. van Tuijl, C.G. Rutte, and I.M.M.J. Reymen. Personality and team performance: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Personality 20: 377–396.

[Pervin and John 1997] Pervin, L.A., and O.P. John. 1997. Personality: Theory and Research, Seventh Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

[Read et al. 2010] Read, J.S., B.M. Monroe, A.L. Brownstein, Y. Yang, G. Chopra, and L.C. Miller. 2010. A Neural Network Model of the Structure and Dynamics of Human Personality. Psychological Review 117(1): 61–92.

[Royce 1970] Royce, W.W. 1970. Managing the development of large software systems. Proc. IEEE WESCON: 1–9.

[Saggio and Kline 1996] Saggio, A., and P. Kline. 1996. The location of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator in personality factor space. Personality and Individual Differences 21(4): 591–597.

[Saggio et al. 2001] Saggio, A., C. Cooper, and P. Kline. 2001. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Personality and Individual Differences 30: 3–9.

[Saleh et al. 2010] Saleh, N., E. Mendes, J. Grundy, and G. St. J. Burch. 2010. An empirical study of the effects of conscientiousness in pair programming using the five-factor personality model. Proc. of the 32nd ACM/IEEE Int’l Conf. Software Engineering 1: 577–586.

[Schmidt and Hunter 1998] Schmidt, F.L., and J.E. Hunter. 1998. The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 124(2): 262–274.

[Schmidt et al. 1986] Schmidt, F.L., J.E. Hunter, and A.N. Outerbridge. 1986. Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 71(3): 432–439.

[Schmidt et al. 1988] Schmidt, F.L., J.E. Hunter, A.N. Outerbridge, and S. Goff. 1988. Joint relation of experience and ability with job performance: Test of three hypotheses. J. Applied Psychology 73(1): 46–57.

[Schweizer 2005] Schweizer, K. 2005. An overview of research into the cognitive basis of intelligence. Journal of Individual Differences 26(1): 43–51.

[Shaft and Vessey 1998] Shaft, T.M., and I. Vessey. 1998. The relevance of application domain knowledge. Journal of Management Information Systems 15(1): 51–78.

[Shneiderman 1980] Shneiderman, B. 1980. Software Psychology: Human Factors in Computer and Information Systems. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.

[Smith 1989] Smith, D.C. 1989. The personality of the systems analyst: An investigation. SIGCPR Computer Personnel 12(2): 12–14.

[Sonnentag 1998] Sonnentag, S. 1998. Expertise in professional software design. Journal of Applied Psychology 83(5): 703–715.

[Spangler 1992] ] Spangler, W.D. 1992. Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin 112(1): 140–154.

[Spearman 1923] Spearman, C. The Nature of “Intelligence” and the Principles of Cognition, Second Edition. New York: Macmillan.

[Spolsky 2007] Spolsky, J. 2007. Smart and Gets Things Done. New York: Apress.

[Sternberg 2003] Sternberg, R.J. 2003. A broad view of intelligence: The theory of successful intelligence. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 55(3): 139–154.

[Sternberg 2005] Sternberg, R.J. 2005. Intelligence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, ed. K.J. Holyoak and R.G. Morrison, pp. 751-774. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[Turley and Bieman 1995] Turley, R.T., and J.M. Bieman. 1995. Competencies of exceptional and non-exceptional software engineers. Journal of Systems and Software 28(1): 19–38.

[Valentin Kvist and Gustafsson 2008] Valentin Kvist, A., and J.-E. Gustafsson. 2008. The relation between fluid intelligence and the general factor as a function of cultural background: A test of Cattell’s investment theory. Intelligence 36: 422–436.

[Walle and Hannay 2009] Walle, T., and J.E. Hannay. Personality and the nature of collaboration in pair programming. Proc. 3rd Int’l Symp. Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM): 203–213.

[Weinberg 1971] Weinberg, G.M. 1971. The Psychology of Computer Programming. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

[Weinberg 1998] Weinberg, G.M. 1998. The Psychology of Computer Programming. New York: Dorset House Publishing.

[Williams et al. 2006] Williams, L., L. Layman, J. Osborne, and N. Katira. 2006. Examining the compatibility of student pair programmers. Proc. AGILE 2006: 411–420.

[Woodruff 1979] Woodruff, C.K. 1979. Personality profiles of male and female data processing personnel. Proc. 17th Annual Southeast Regional Conference: 124–128.