Original Pronouncement | Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) 10, Attestation Standards: Revision and Recodification. |
Effective Date | This statement currently is effective. |
Applicability | When a practitioner is engaged by a public entity that prepares Management’s Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) in accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (or a nonpublic entity following the same requirements) to either perform an examination or review of MD&A. A practitioner engaged to perform agreed-upon procedures on MD&A should follow the guidance in Section 201. |
MD&A. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations adopted by the SEC and found in Item 303 of Regulation S-K, as interpreted by Financial Reporting Release (FRR) 36.
The SEC adopted requirements for MD&A in 1974 to have management provide a narrative explanation of the financial statements. The idea was to allow the user to see the company’s financial position and operating results through management’s eyes.
Two levels of service are possible—an examination or a review. A review report is restricted as to use and is not intended to be filed with the SEC. An examination report is intended for general use, but at this stage, whether there will be a significant demand for this service is unknown. The SEC does not require a practitioner’s report on MD&A—the narrative presentation is management’s responsibility and not a part of the audited financial statements.
According to AT 701.05, the practitioner’s objective in an examination of MD&A is to express an opinion on the presentation taken as a whole by reporting whether:
The objective of a review of MD&A is to provide negative assurance on these three items.
An examination of MD&A would generally be expected to relate to the MD&A for annual periods, but a review might relate to the MD&A for annual or interim periods or some combination.
In an examination, the practitioner seeks to obtain reasonable assurance by accumulating sufficient evidence to support the disclosures and assumptions, thus limiting attestation risk to an appropriately low level. A review consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries and does not provide assurance that a practitioner would become aware of all significant matters that would be disclosed in an examination.
In 2001 the Auditing Standards Board issued SSAE 10, Attestation Standards: Revision and Recodification. SSAE 10 superseded SSAEs 1 through 9 and renumbered the AT sections in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ (AICPA’s) Codification. SSAE 10 made only minor changes to this section, including modifying the reports in this section to conform to changes made by Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) 93, Omnibus Statement on Auditing Standards—2000.
To accept an engagement to examine MD&A, the practitioner should audit the financial statements for at least the latest period to which the MD&A presentation relates and the financial statements for the other periods covered by the MD&A presentation should have been audited by the practitioner or a predecessor auditor.
According to AT 701.41, the practitioner should do the following:
The financial statements for the periods covered by the MD&A presentation and the related auditors’ report should accompany the presentation or be incorporated by reference to information filed with a regulatory agency.
The report should include the elements as found in the example in Illustration 1.
A practitioner may accept an engagement to review an MD&A presentation for an annual period under the same circumstances as an examination.
To accept an engagement to review the MD&A presentation for an interim period, both of the following points should occur:
According to AT 701.76, the practitioner should do the following:
The financial statements for the periods covered by the MD&A presentation and the related auditors’ or accountants’ reports should accompany the presentation or be incorporated by reference to information filed with a regulatory agency.
The report should include the elements as found in the examples in Illustrations 2 and 3.
There are no interpretations for this section.
The following reports are adapted from SSAE 10:3
1 The SSAE on examination or review of MD&A is essentially a detailed manual on how to perform examinations and reviews, and only the highlights are summarized here. A practitioner seeking to provide these services should refer to SSAE 10 and the SEC’s rules and regulations on MD&A. Only the considerations for a public entity are covered here. The considerations for a nonpublic entity are very similar because only the SEC has, at this point, issued rules and regulations that provide guidance on the presentation of MD&A.
2 Practitioners should be aware that, on April 15, 2002, the SEC issued “Commission Statement about Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The release sets forth certain views of the SEC regarding disclosures that should be considered by registrants. Disclosure matters covered in the release are liquidity and capital resources, including off-balance-sheet arrangements; certain trading activities that include nonexchange traded contracts accounted for at fair value; and the effects of transactions with related and certain other parties. The release can be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
3 If the entity is a nonissuer and complies with GAAS rather than the standards of the PCAOB, the references in the report to the PCAOB’s standards should be changed to refer to “auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America” and “attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.”
4 If prior financial statements were audited by other auditors, this sentence would be replaced by the following:
We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the financial statements of Widget Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 20X2, and in our report dated Month XX, 20X3, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. The financial statements of Widget Company as of December 31, 20X1, and for each of the years in the two-year period then ended were audited by other auditors, whose report dated Month XX, 20X2, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
If the practitioner’s opinion on the financial statements is based on the report of other auditors, this sentence would be replaced by the following:
We have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the financial statements of Widget Company as of December 31, 20X2 and 20X1, and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 20X2, and in our report dated Month XX, 20X3, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements based on our audits and the report of other auditors.
5 The following sentence should be added to the beginning of the explanatory paragraph if the entity is a nonpublic entity:
Although Widget Company is not subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis is intended to be a presentation in accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
6 The following sentence should be added to the beginning of the explanatory paragraph if the entity is a nonpublic entity:
Although Widget Company is not subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis is intended to be a presentation in accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
7 The following sentence should be added to the beginning of the explanatory paragraph if the entity is a nonpublic entity:
Although Widget Company is not subject to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the accompanying Management’s Discussion and Analysis is intended to be a presentation in accordance with the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
3.139.83.96