Generally, differential equations are the backbone of various physical systems occurring in a wide variety of disciplines viz. physics, chemistry, biology, economics, and engineering [1,2]. These physical systems are modeled either by ordinary or partial differential equations. Generally, in differential equations, the involved coefficients and variables are considered as deterministic or exact values. In that case, one may handle such differential equations (with deterministic coefficients or variables) by known analytic or numerical methods [3–5].
In actual practice, due to errors in experimental observation or due to truncation of the parametric values, etc. we may have only imprecise, insufficient, or incomplete information about the involved parameters of the differential equations. So, the parametric values involved in such differential equations are uncertain in nature. As such, there is a need of modeling different physical problems with uncertain parameters. In general, these uncertainties may be modeled through probabilistic, interval, or fuzzy approach [4, 5 ]. Probabilistic methods may not be able to deliver reliable results at the required condition without sufficient data. Therefore, in the recent years, interval analysis and fuzzy set theory have become powerful tools for uncertainty modeling.
In this chapter, we present different approaches to handle differential equations with interval uncertainty.
Moore [6] first introduced the concept of interval analysis and computations in 1966. Thereafter, this concept has been successfully applied by various researchers for uncertainty analysis. Several books [ 6 –8] have also been written by different authors representing the scope and various aspects of interval analysis. These books give an extensive review of interval computations which may help the readers to understand the basic concepts of interval analysis. Various mathematical techniques have been developed by different authors to handle the differential equations with interval analysis. As such, differential calculus is studied by Chalco‐Cano et al. [9] for interval‐valued functions using generalized Hukuhara differentiability [10], which is often referred as the most general concept of differentiability for interval‐valued functions. Also, the Hukuhara concept has been utilized by Stefanini and Bede [ 10 ,11] in a more generalized way for interval‐valued functions and interval differential equations (IDEs). Differential transformation method (DTM) is applied by Ghazanfaria and Ebrahimia [12]. Recently, Chakraverty et al. developed new techniques and approaches to handle differential equations with uncertain parameters [13–15].
The next section presents the preliminary concepts of interval arithmetic and parametric form of interval numbers.
An interval is denoted as , where
and
represent the lower and upper bounds of interval
, respectively. Any two intervals
and
are considered to be equal if their corresponding bounds are equal. The basic interval arithmetic operations are as follows [ 6
,7]:
One of the known definitions of difference and derivatives for interval‐valued functions was given by Hukuhara [16]. Further, the new concepts named as generalized Hukuhara differences have been examined in Refs. [ 11 , 12 ].
Let us consider two intervals and
. Then, the Hukuhara difference [11]
is defined as
where and
.
Let us consider a linear interval‐valued differential equation 11, 12 ] as
where
After applying integration to Eq. (19.1) the equivalent integral equation 10, 11 ] is obtained as
where δ is a small positive quantity.
Using the Hukuhara difference
Now, according to Eq. (19.2), one may obtain
By using the differential form [ 12 , 13 ] to Eq. ( 19.1 ), we obtain
with respect to the initial conditions ,
.
We obtain two situations from Eq. (19.4) as
Figure 19.1 Comparison of trivial solution with lower and upper bounds obtained using (a) case (i) and (b) case (ii).
As mentioned in the introduction, several numerical and analytical methods [14,17] are available to solve IDEs. Generally, analytical solutions have a significant role in proper understanding of various science and engineering problems [18]. Accordingly, below we present one of the new approaches to handle IDEs [ 14 , 15 , 17 ].
Let us consider nth‐order IDE in general form given in Refs. [ 14 , 17 ] as
subject to the initial conditions
where ci's are real constants and 's are interval values for 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1.
Here, is the solution to be determined.
Now, Eq. (19.10) may be represented in terms of lower and upper bounds as
subject to interval initial conditions
From Eq. (19.11), three possible cases arise with respect to the sign of the involved coefficients. The possible three cases are given as [ 17 , 18 ]:
The analytical methods to handle IDE ( 19.10 ) in all three possible cases mentioned above are presented in the next section.
In this section, we present the solution procedure based on addition and subtraction of intervals [18] to handle all the three possible cases of considered IDE given by Eq. ( 19.10 ).
Case (i): When all the coefficients cn − 1, cn − 2, …, c1, c0 involved in Eq. ( 19.10 ) are positive. Then, one may obtain the following equations in terms of lower and upper bound as
and
By adding Eqs. (19.12) and (19.13), one may obtain
subject to the initial conditions
For simplification, Eq. (19.14) is represented as
with respect to the initial conditions
where ,
,
, and
.
Similarly, subtracting Eqs. ( 19.12 ) and ( 19.13 ), one may obtain
Further, Eq. (19.16) is represented as
with respect to the initial conditions
where ,
, and
It may be noted that both Eqs. (19.15) and (19.17) are in crisp forms. So, one may easily obtain solutions
Then, by applying standard methods, the lower‐bound solution is obtained by adding u(x) and v(x) whereas the upper‐bound solution is obtained by subtracting u(x) and v(x).
Case (ii): When some of the coefficients cn − 1,…, cn − m are positive and cn − m − 1, cn − m − 2,…, c1, c0 are negative [ 14 , 18 ] in Eq. ( 19.10 ), one may obtain the lower‐ and upper‐bound equations as
and
subject to the initial conditions
Now, by using the same procedure as in case (i) one may also obtain the required lower‐ and upper‐bound solutions for this case.
Case (iii): When all the coefficients cn − 1, cn − 2,…, c1, c0 involved in Eq. ( 19.10 ) are negative. Then, one may obtain the following lower‐ and upper‐bound equations 18,19] as
and
subject to the initial conditions
Similarly, as in case (i), one may obtain the required lower‐ and upper‐bound solutions for case (iii). For more detailed understanding of various analytical methods to handle IDEs, one may refer Refs. [ 14 , 15 , 17 , 19 ,20].
Figure 19.2 Lower‐, center‐, and upper‐bound solutions of Example 19.2.
18.188.166.246