This section describes how to choose the best hardware configuration based on our firewall requirements.

It's easiest to choose a form factor if we've already decided on the rest of our prerequisites:

• Deployment scenario
• Throughput requirements
• Interface requirements
• Image platform

Before choosing a form factor, we first need to evaluate the different types of form factors:

• Small form: Energy-efficient, quiet (often silent), small footprint form factor.
• Desktop: Standard desktop hardware. Easily upgradable and most people will have an older machine lying around that's perfectly suited for running pfSense.
• Server: Larger or more complex environment may require server-class hardware.

Consider whether any of our requirements require special hardware. In our case, we need moderate throughput and aren't using any packages that require special hardware. Low power consumption and silent operation are important to our small office/home office, so we're opting for small form factor.

The choice of a form factor has more to do with our environment than our pfSense installation. Every environment will vary and form factors will differ. Thanks to the vast variety of computer hardware on the market, any deployment of pfSense is possible on any type of form factor, with the exception of Netgate ADI. While most standard platforms are installed on desktops, and most embedded platforms on appliances, there's no reason they can't be swapped if we've equipped our hardware properly.

There's no reason we can't use a laptop. If we have an old laptop lying around, it would probably make a great, albeit unusual, pfSense machine. The biggest obstacle we'd likely face is adding NICs. Typical laptop NICs that fit into laptop expansion slots  (such as ExpressCard) might not be compatible with pfSense, and USB Ethernet adapters are often unreliable. One possibility is an all-VLAN setup with both WAN and LAN and any other network on the same interface as a VLAN, but this would mean having WAN and LAN traffic on the same physical interface, which clearly is a security concern.