SENSE OF URGENCY VERSUS REALISTIC PATIENCE
One of the most critical responsibilities of a transition leader involves maintaining energy, momentum, and productivity in the face of change. Having a sense of urgency or a need to “get on with it” is an important element of the revitalization process for the leaders and for other members of the group. In addition, leaders are likely to receive pressure from above to hurry up and get people moving toward the desired outcomes. The skills associated with a sense of urgency allow leaders to be action oriented and keep things rolling. Leaders who have a strong sense of urgency move on issues quickly and motivate others to work at a rapid pace, stay focused, and get results. They value action and know how to get things done.
Equally important but rarely addressed in times of change is the importance of having enough patience with the transition process. Realistic patience involves knowing when and how to slow the pace to allow time and space for people to cope and adapt. This means recognizing that people need differing amounts of time and effort to understand and adapt to change. As in any grief or loss experience, there is a natural cycle to the process of letting go of the old and connecting with the new. Leaders must learn how to honor this cycle in others if the transition effort is to be successful in the long term. Failure to have patience with people can actually increase their resistance, and thereby hinder their process of adapting.
Leaders who overdo sense of urgency and downplay realistic patience are too insistent, too quick to announce changes, and too eager to take action. They fail to prioritize, making everything equally urgent. This fosters resistance and even fear. Often, in a rush to make their marks, these leaders instead erode their credibility and stymie the energy, motivation, and creativity of the very people they need on board to make their initiatives successful.
When managers do the opposite—when they overdo realistic patience and downplay sense of urgency—everything is a work in progress, deadlines are extended, and employees wonder whether the planned changes will ever take place. In an attempt to protect themselves or others, these leaders seem to hold off the change. But rather than appreciating the “protection,” people are more likely to feel that such leaders are causing more stress by putting off the inevitable and not making firm decisions. This indecisive and uninspiring leadership also frustrates those who are ready to move on.
So what does it look like when a leader addresses both sense of urgency and realistic patience? How does managing this pair of competencies help establish a team that is committed, trustworthy, and loyal? Leaders who balance sense of urgency and realistic patience focus on four key actions:
1. They articulate expectations. Clearly explaining why, how, and when things need to happen sets up expectations and creates a healthy level of stress and pressure. It also establishes a mechanism for monitoring and addressing performance.
2. They accurately gauge pace. When such leaders say something is urgent, it really is. They don’t panic, overreact, or make everything equally urgent or important. They are able to prioritize. They recognize when to slow down in order to speed up later.
3. They give support through the struggle. Helping the team get on with it without driving them past the point of productivity gives people a chance to keep up when they are struggling. These leaders make a conscious effort to provide extra support and guidance when appropriate. They give people feedback so they know whether they’re getting it or not. They foster credibility by achieving a balance between urgency and compassion.
4. They demonstrate flexible control. Leaders who set the right tone between control and flexibility are respected and viewed as competent—as well as caring and in touch with employees.
We worked recently with a company in an intense turnaround mode. They brought in Tom, an executive known for his decisive style, for an important “fix-it” assignment. Right away he dismissed a lot of the staff that he had inherited, quickly making the decision that they were much of the problem. Priding himself on his ability to be decisive, he pushed action and made swift change. Unfortunately, his decisions were not sufficiently thought out, and he gained a reputation for making quick but unwise decisions. His shoot-from-the-hip style cut out a lot of good people, alienated others, and led to mistakes that could have been prevented.
Ironically, those looking down from above initially thought Tom was just what the doctor ordered. His approach was applauded and rewarded by top management. He was characterized as a take-charge executive who was willing to make the tough calls on both issues and people. It was only when things began to unravel in a morass of tactical errors and deflated morale that his transition leadership skills were called into question and he was reassigned.
Leaders who demonstrate a healthy sense of urgency
create clear expectations and timelines
explain why the urgency
provide data to support the urgency
set and adjust priorities
provide resources and clear obstacles
remind about deadlines
encourage more than berate
articulate the “now” and the vision
walk the talk
make timely decisions
create healthy level of stress and pressure
monitor the team’s ability to deliver
Leaders who exhibit realistic patience
explain the why and how of what needs to be done
coach people who are struggling
are patient with the emotional realities—their own and those of their followers
understand that performance may initially lag
set interim targets for people
put things into different words or contexts to help bring people along
don’t stay patient forever—but give people space and time to learn and cope
set a range of outcomes so people have a chance to be successful
What steps can you take to strike the right chord when it comes to demonstrating both a sense of urgency and realistic patience? Here are some guidelines:
Meet them where they are. If you want to lead people somewhere new, you need to understand where they are. What have they experienced in the past? What have they been told before? What is completely new? What do they value? What do they fear they are losing? What do they have personally at stake? Remember that your role in the leadership process probably puts you in a position of having more input, more control, more information, and earlier warnings than those who are looking to you for guidance. In those moments when you are frustrated by the hesitancy and reluctance of people to change, remember that, unlike you, they are probably just learning about some of the changes for the first time. It will require patience on your part to allow people the time and space to go through the natural stages of letting go before they will be ready to catch up with you. Try as you might, you can’t shake people hard enough to put them on your timetable for acceptance and recovery.
Prioritize and pace. Be sure to set and honor priorities. Arrange activities and events in a way that will build to the new reality in stages. While there is always much to do, every event cannot be urgent and every task cannot be a number one priority. Change and transition are demanding experiences that can exhaust the most committed of employees. Set stretch targets that are achievable. Whenever possible, create interim milestones that will allow people to achieve success along the way.
Take time to listen. Allow people to air their gripes and complaints. Some of what you will hear grows out of the pain of having to learn new methods and strategies. On the other hand, some of it may reflect valid evaluations of the gaps and discontinuities in the evolving design. In either case, it is important to allow people the time and space to vent their concerns and voice their alternative strategies—even if nothing can be done to alter the overall plans.
Avoid swift judgment. Don’t dismiss, write off, or label employees too easily or too quickly. People differ in ways that can affect their degree of readiness and rate of response to transition. These may include personality, experience, situations outside work, and organizational expectations. Remember that the initial stages of the normal transition response pattern include denial, withdrawal, and frustration. Even a more evolved reaction will often include various forms of resistance, anger, and rejection. Displaying the patience that encourages people to work their way to a healthier commitment can pay huge dividends in the end.
Don’t squash resistance. Establish a climate that processes resistance rather than attempting to squash it. Generally there is useful information in the way people resist change and transition. All change involves loss. The nature of resistance can inform you about what people value and what they are afraid of losing. At a minimum, that sense of loss needs to be acknowledged. Perhaps more important, there may be embedded information about aspects of the environment that should not be swept aside or lost in the course of change. There may be wisdom in maintaining some things as they were.
Coach, teach, and model. Spend some of your time and energy in coaching, teaching, and modeling the adaptive process for others. If you can honor the past and model the present and future, you will encourage others by your example.
Underdone |
||
Sense of Urgency |
• Insists, pressures • Runs ahead of plan • Makes everything a priority • Is impersonal • Blocks resistance • Pushes too hard |
• Doesn’t commit to change • Yields to resistance • Is reluctant to push others • Is indecisive and uninspiring • Conflicts with culture • Moves too slowly |
Realistic Patience |
• Can be manipulated • Fails to implement • Doesn’t inspire others • Frustrates those who are ready to move on • Is soft on people issues |
• Doesn’t listen well • Won’t acknowledge loss • Hides own feelings • Gives up on people • Generates fear • Fosters resistance |
18.117.91.187