Back at the beginning of 2014 I was having a debate (I used air-quotes there people) with some fellow developers about the irrelevance, or not, of worrying about CSS selector speed.
Whenever exchanging theories/evidence about the relative speed of CSS selectors, developers often reference Steve Souders (http://stevesouders.com/) work on CSS selectors from 2009. It's used to validate claims such as attribute selectors are slow or pseudo selectors are slow.
For the last few years, I've felt these kinds of things just weren't worth worrying about. The sound-bite I have been wheeling out for years is:
With CSS, architecture is outside the braces; performance is inside
But besides referencing Nicole Sullivan's later post on Performance Calendar (http://calendar.perfplanet.com/2011/css-selector-performance-has-changed-for-the-better/) to back up my conviction that the selectors used don't really matter, I had never actually tested the theory.
To try and address this, I attempted to produce some tests of my own that would settle the argument. At the least, I believed it would prompt someone with more knowledge/evidence to provide further data.
Steve Souders' aforementioned tests use JavaScript’s new Date()
. However, nowadays, modern browsers (iOS/Safari were a notable exception at the time of testing) support the Navigation Timing API (https://www.w3.org/TR/navigation-timing/) which gives us a more accurate measure we can use. For the tests, I implemented it like this:
<script> ;(function TimeThisMother() { window.onload = function(){ setTimeout(function(){ var t = performance.timing; alert("Speed of selection is: " + (t.loadEventEnd - t.responseEnd) + " milliseconds"); }, 0); }; })(); </script>
This lets us limit the timing of the tests between the point all assets have been received (responseEnd
) and the point the page is rendered (loadEventEnd
).
So, I set up a very simple test. 20 different pages, all with an identical, enormous DOM, made up of 1000 identical chunks of this markup:
<div class="tagDiv wrap1"> <div class="tagDiv layer1" data-div="layer1"> <div class="tagDiv layer2"> <ul class="tagUl"> <li class="tagLi"><b class="tagB"><a href="/" class="tagA link" data-select="link">Select</a></b></li> </ul> </div> </div> </div>
20 different CSS selection methods were tested to colour the inner most nodes red. Each page differed only in the rule applied to select the inner most node within the blocks. Here were the different selectors tested and a link to the the test page for that selector:
:after
): https://benfrain.com/selector-test/06.htmlclass1.class2
): https://benfrain.com/selector-test/07.html[class<sup>ˆ=</sup>“wrap”]
): https://benfrain.com/selector-test/10.html div.wrapper
> div.tagDiv > div.tagDiv.layer2 > ul.tagUL > li.tagLi > b.tagB > a.TagA.link
): https://benfrain.com/selector-test/13.html.tagLi .tagB a.TagA.link
): https://benfrain.com/selector-test/14.htmlThe test was run 5 times on each browser and the result averaged across the 5 results. The browsers tested:
A previous version of Internet Explorer (rather than the latest Internet Explorer available to me) was used to shed some light on how a non evergreen browser performed. All the other browsers tested received regular updates so I wanted to be sure that there wasn't a considerable difference in the way modern regularly updating browsers deal with CSS selectors and how slightly older ones do.
Want to try the same tests out for yourself? Go and grab the files from this GitHub link: https://github.com/benfrain/css-performance-tests. Just open each page in your browser of choice (remember the browser must support the Network Timing API to alert a response). Also be aware that when I performed the test I discarded the first couple of results as they tended to be unusually high in some browsers.
When considering the results, don't consider one browser against another. That is not the purpose of the tests. The purpose is purely to try and evaluate the comparative difference in selection speed between the different selectors employed on each browser. For example, is selector 3 any faster than selector 7 on any browser? Therefore, when looking at the table, it makes more sense to look down the columns than across the rows.
Here are the results. All times in milliseconds:
Test |
Chrome 34 |
Firefox 29 |
Opera 19 |
IE 19 |
Android 4 |
1 |
56.8 |
125.4 |
63.6 |
152.6 |
1455.2 |
2 |
55.4 |
128.4 |
61.4 |
141 |
1404.6 |
3 |
55 |
125.6 |
61.8 |
152.4 |
1363.4 |
4 |
54.8 |
129 |
63.2 |
147.4 |
1421.2 |
5 |
55.4 |
124.4 |
63.2 |
147.4 |
1411.2 |
6 |
60.6 |
138 |
58.4 |
162 |
1500.4 |
7 |
51.2 |
126.6 |
56.8 |
147.8 |
1453.8 |
8 |
48.8 |
127.4 |
56.2 |
150.2 |
1398.8 |
9 |
48.8 |
127.4 |
55.8 |
154.6 |
1348.4 |
10 |
52.2 |
129.4 |
58 |
172 |
1420.2 |
11 |
49 |
127.4 |
56.6 |
148.4 |
1352 |
12 |
50.6 |
127.2 |
58.4 |
146.2 |
1377.6 |
13 |
64.6 |
129.2 |
72.4 |
152.8 |
1461.2 |
14 |
50.2 |
129.8 |
54.8 |
154.6 |
1381.2 |
15 |
50 |
126.2 |
56.8 |
154.8 |
1351.6 |
16 |
49.2 |
127.6 |
56 |
149.2 |
1379.2 |
17 |
50.4 |
132.4 |
55 |
157.6 |
1386 |
18 |
49.2 |
128.8 |
58.6 |
154.2 |
1380.6 |
19 |
48.6 |
132.4 |
54.8 |
148.4 |
1349.6 |
20 |
50.4 |
128 |
55 |
149.8 |
1393.8 |
Biggest Diff. |
16 |
13.6 |
17.6 |
31 |
152 |
Lowest |
13 |
6 |
13 |
10 |
6 |
The Biggest Diff. row shows the difference in milliseconds between the fastest and slowest selector. Of the desktop browsers, IE9 stands out as having the biggest difference between fastest and slowest selectors at 31 ms. The others are all around half of that figure. However, interestingly there .
I was interested to note that the slowest selector type differed from browser to browser. Both Opera and Chrome found the insanity selector (test 13) the hardest to match (the similarity between Opera and Chrome here perhaps not surprising given they share the blink (http://www.chromium.org/blink) engine), while Firefox struggled with a single pseudo selector (test 6 (https://benfrain.com/selector-test/06.html)), as did the Android 4.2 device (a Tesco hudl 7" tablet). Internet Explorer 9's Achilles heel was the partial attribute selector (test 10 (https://benfrain.com/selector-test/10.html)).
3.140.196.244