Enterprise Security Management Practices ◾  61
© 2011 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Monitoring and Controlling Process Group: Regularly measures and monitors
progress to identify variances from the project management plan so that cor-
rective actions can be taken when necessary to meet project objectives
Closing Process Group: Formalizes acceptance of the product, service, or result
and brings the project or a project phase to an orderly end
Note that the above groups are similar to the other security cycles using dier-
ent names but very similar functions (see Figure1.15).
As can be seen from Figure1.14, the nine knowledge areas have processes that
are about managing specic key functional elements, some of which were identied
in previous security cycles. Scope, quality, and risk management are areas that are
very similar. Others related to managing costs, time, personnel, procurement, and
communications between groups are areas in which successful management skills
could very much support the various actions that need to be managed in any of the
development and security cycles previously discussed.
e success of ISSMPs can depend on how well they understand the above 45
processes, because this knowledge will allow them to manage projects and work with
project managers more eectively. ISSMPs looking to move to senior management posi-
tions should seriously look at becoming a certied Project Management Professional.
SECURITY PROFESSIONAL’S GOALS ARE TO:
Provide risk-based system security.
Recommend cost-eective security.
Deploy practical and acceptable security.
PM Processes
Initiating
Planning
Controlling and
Monitoring
Executing
Closing
Project Procurement Management
Project Risk Management
Project Communications Management
Project Human Resource Management
Project Quality Management
Project Cost Management
Project Time Management
Project Scope Management
Project Integration Management
Knowledge Areas
Figure 1.14 PMI Body of Knowledge.
62 ◾  Official (ISC)
2
® Guide to the ISSMP® CBK®
© 2011 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Inuencing resources is a required skill for every ISSMP, because all security
programs must have funding to operate. Understanding the process for obtaining
the necessary funding to support existing security needs (i.e., personnel, infrastruc-
ture, services, specialists, supplies, training and education, etc.), initiatives, and
emergencies is very important. Seeming very complex at rst, the processes are easy
to learn, and this learning process can provide an advantage for the ISSMP if han-
dled correctly. Of all the individuals in an organization, the people who control or
contribute to the organizations budget process are most important to the ISSMP,
because they have a large say as to what gets funded and what does not.
It is recommended that the ISSMP contact the budget personnel and request
a tutorial on how the budgeting and execution of funds are accomplished in the
organization. is initiative serves two purposes: it provides an understanding of
the process and schedule and establishes a cooperative relationship with these inu-
ential individuals. is is very important, because these individuals will provide
formats and information that will make the ISSMP successful.
SECURITY PROFESSIONAL’S GOALS ARE NOT TO:
Assume risk.
Build a 100% secure system.
Have the largest budget or sta possible.
Deploy the most technical solutions.
PM, Development, and Security Cycles
PM Processes SDLC RMF Generic
Initiating Initiation Categorize System Initiation
Planning
Development
Acquisition
Select Controls
Verification
Implement Controls
Executing Implementation
Assess Controls
Approval
Authorize System
Controlling and
Monitoring
Operation
Maintenance
Monitor Controls
Maintenance
Closing
Disposition
Disposal
Disposal
Figure 1.15 Cycle comparison.
Enterprise Security Management Practices ◾  63
© 2011 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Basically, the funding process has four phases: Planning, Programming, Budgeting,
and Execution. e following provides an overview of each of these phases:
Planning Phase: During this phase, senior management identies the organi-
zations strategies, goals, and objectives for the future. Depending on the
organi zation, this projection can be anywhere from 2 to 10 years out. ese
projections are the results of changes in laws and regulations, business trends,
market analysis, growth and nancial projections, and so forth. Using these,
senior man agement issues guidance (including future goals, objectives, priori-
ties, strategies, etc.) to the organization’s managers, so they can identify what
they need to do in the future to support the successful accomplishment of the
future goals and objectives.
Programming Phase: In the programming phase, functional managers review
alternatives to expand or reduce existing projects and programs or develop
new initiatives to support senior managements guidance. Senior manage-
ment will review these alternatives and determine which have the best poten-
tial of success and which are the most cost eective. e outcome of this
phase is some type of a program decision from senior management.
Budgeting Phase: e budgeting phase is where the functional managers
develop detailed budget estimates for the changes approved in the decision
memorandum. e budget personnel will review these budget estimates for
accuracy, completeness, and compliance with the decision memorandum.
Senior management resolves any issues and promulgates a budget decision.
Execution Phase: With the budget decision, senior management allocates fund-
ing to the functional managers to fund the approved programs. Typically the
funding allocations support one year’s eorts, but sometimes the funding
supports a specic phase of a project. e budget includes funding for person-
nel, utilities, facilities, services, materials, advertising, infrastructure, and so
forth, for both direct and indirect costs.
Figure1.16 illustrates the timing, organizations interactions, and outcomes of
each phase. e specic time required to accomplish each phase is totally dependent
on the organization. In some organizations a phase may take a year, and in others,
weeks or days. e size of the organization, geographic diversity of management,
complexity of the business environment, level of competitive demands, uidity of
the marketplace, and so forth, can have major impacts on how long and how fast
the process moves. is is why ISSMPs must gain awareness of their specic orga-
nizations funding process from the individuals who control the budget process.
Once the process is understood, the ISSMP can anticipate budget requests in
support of the process and become very responsive to related management actions.
It is recommended that the ISSMP request the budget individual review and com-
ment on inputs prior to the inputs being requested to ensure that the inputs are
correct and demonstrate awareness of the process. Additionally, determine when
funding reviews occur during the Execution Phase, because this is an opportunity to
64 ◾  Official (ISC)
2
® Guide to the ISSMP® CBK®
© 2011 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
identify the need for additional funding or highlight savings initiated by the ISSMP.
An example of this is in the government, whose goal is to spend all allocated fund-
ing within the scal year (1 October to 30 September), so government organizations
conduct a mid-year review in the spring and expedited contract funding at the end
of the summer. ISSMPs should take advantage of these times to gain resources for
unfunded improvements. In the commercial sector, ISSMPs should look for times
of large cash inputs to the company, for example, at the end of every quarter when a
large contract renewal check is received from clients. Each organization is dierent.
However, the information can be gained from the budget or nancial personnel.
One nal comment on gaining resources: funding is almost always available for
proposals that have a major impact on reducing risk or increasing prots, but the
ISSMP must be credible and have a strong justication to gain them.
Selling senior management on approving a solution for a security issue is one of
the hardest jobs that an ISSMP will have to do. For many people, selling is not easy
for many reasons: they are asking for money; they have to give a presentation; they
nd it dicult to write a justication or determine the ROI; the audience will ask
questions; and many others.
Building on the concepts presented in the Hierarchy of Needs and the Laws
of Organizations, ISSMPs will need to build a strategy for selling to their specic
senior management. A key rule in selling is that one must sell on the buyer’s needs,
not the seller’s needs. Just like organizations, the individuals in the organization are
dierent, so the ISSMP will have to understand the needs of the boss, the boss’s
boss, the Board, and anyone else who inuences purchasing decisions. Justications
and presentations need to follow the 0–5 approach to selling, based on the selling
techniques presented in the book KNOW Cyber Risk: By Managing Your IT Security
Planning Phase
Programming Phase
Budgeting Phase
Executing Phase
Guidance
Program
Decision
Funding
Allocation
Budget
Decision
Senior
Management
Functional
Managers
Timeline
Goals, Objectives, Strategies….
Review, Questions, Decisions….
Changes, Alternatives,
Cost Estimates….
Hire, Procure, Contract….
Justifications….
Review, Questions, Decisions….
Oversight, Modifications….
Trends, Suggestions, Projections
Figure 1.16 Planning, programming, budget, and execution cycle.
Enterprise Security Management Practices ◾  65
© 2011 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
(James P. Litchko, Al Payne. KNOW Book Publishing; Kensington, MD © 2004).
Table1.6 provides the details of this approach.
e approach is just like security: simple, practical, and ecient. Note how the
approach uses the Laws of the Organization:
Senior managers are decision makers, so give them options and recommendations.
Senior managers have limited time, so give them one-page and ve-minute
presentations.
e higher up in the organization the more resources; therefore, also know the
boss’s boss.
Typically, new ISSMPs have diculties with implementing the 0–5 approach
because of the following concerns:
How can I present everything in ve minutes? e majority of senior man-
agers are not technical and they are all about making decisions. ey will
appreciate the fact that you understand and respect the time that they have
given you. Give them the basics, and if they have questions they will ask. e
presenter wants them to ask questions, because it gets them involved with the
problem and the solution, giving them the feeling of owning the solution.
How can I present everything on one page? Justications for additional
resources should be no longer than one page, again because senior managers
do not have lots of time. Whenever possible base the justication on mission
or business needs.
Where do I get the format for the one-pager? Get the format from the nan-
cial or budget personnel. Remember, they are the ones who will be getting
the approval for changing the allocation of the funds, so why not use their
format and save everyone time?
How do I know what the audience’s needs and goals are? e best way is to talk
to the executive assistant to know who will be in the meeting and what their
backgrounds and roles are. Do a Web search and read articles about them, pre-
sentations and papers from them, and so forth. Also, ask the nance or budget
personnel and your mentor for advice. Many people think that the way to sell
to senior management is to present a solid return on investment (ROI), but
remember Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Some people are more driven by needs
other than ROI; sometimes being successful and being recognized by their
peers at a conference or in an article is what drives them—Esteem. Or know-
ing that they will not get into trouble with their evaluators, the Board, or
their boss is their goal—Safety. Remember, everyone is dierent, present to
the whole audience, and not all problems need to have an ROI component.
How do I nd a mentor? It is recommended that when you are picking a men-
tor always pick someone who is positive and successful in the organization
and does not always agree with you, because you want someone who will
challenge you and give an honest opinion.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.119.136.84