In the new business development discipline, megatrends and subtrends are of crucial importance because of their potential effects on business strategy and the success of projects. Even though one has no control over them, how a business gets ahead of and adapts to them makes a difference. Hence, analysis of megatrends and their implications are a vital element of a sponsor company's strategic, financing, and business plans. What is more important than knowing which ones impact a business is what one does with that information to take advantage or avoid megatrends. Once their impacts are well understood by all stakeholders, they are used in decision making across all sponsor company organizations and in enhancing stakeholder cooperation.
Figure 15.1 shows trend components and illustrates that the assessment of trends first involves identification, then analysis of megatrends, subtrends, and PESTLED trend effects. To be of value, it also involves trend response planning. The term megatrend was popularized by John Naisbitt (1982), defined megatrends as global, broad impact, sustained forces of change that affect industries, economies, societies and cultures, and peoples' lives. The effects of megatrends are permanent and shape the business environment, competition, and the future of the world. Subtends on the other hand, are prevailing tendencies, movements, or progressions within or outside megatrends that persist over a period of time. Trends are different than fads in that trends are bottom–up determining actions, whereas fads are top–down phenomena of limited lifespan. Trends are also different than predictions, which are forecasts, opinions, projections, or extrapolations from trends and the two should not be confused.
Like project risks, the determination and evaluation of relevant global‐trend impacts on a project are done properly in the early development stage of new projects and investment opportunities. An extension of this effort is the assessment of subtrends impacting the prospective investment country and the industry of the contemplated investment. For project financing purposes, however, it is as important to understand how trends and subtrends affect the project company and different project stakeholders as well. Namely, the sponsors and potential investors involved, the participating host government authority involved, the infrastructure construction industry, and the project finance industry participants. This understanding is important because trends:
Our discussion of megatrends and subtrends is of a cursory nature and it is partly based on discussions with clients, project consultants and advisors, and benchmarking study participants. Section 15.1 presents relevant trends to project finance, while Section 15.2 discusses the nature and origin of trends affecting project stakeholders and characteristics of trends impacting projects. Section 15.3 enumerates the demographic trends expected to continue into the future, while Section 15.4 highlights trends impacting technology and the infrastructure industry.
Trends that impact governments and their reaction to them are presented in Section 15.5, while trends that impact sponsors and debt and equity investors are discussed in Section 15.6. Trends impacting funding sources and financing of infrastructure projects and financial engineering are addressed in Section 15.7. Lastly, Section15.8 addresses the process and resources used to identify and analyze relevant trends and assess potential impacts. It also sketches out how one may take advantage of trends.
The megatrends considered here are twenty years out, generally applicable to all types of infrastructure projects, well accepted and known, have global effects across infrastructure and project finance industries. They include the following:
The US National Intelligence Council (NIC) is an expert, reliable, and accurate source of global megatrend identification. In its 2010 assessment, which is still operating today, it considered the following megatrends as most impactful:
Megatrends originate from good ideas, basic necessity factors, and innovation. In order to be sustainable, they also have reinforcement from the subtrends they generate and from the impact they have. Trends are developed from dynamic interactions with political, economic, societal, technological, legal, educational, and demographic factors. Changes in political and military power can trigger the development of trends that can be localized or broad and so can changes in economic systems. Legal and regulatory changes can set in motion trends affecting national economies, industries, and business models. Also, education and demographic changes can start the creation of trends that could impact the entire economy of a country for years to come.
Besides technological disruptions, the causes of megatrends and subtrends are associated with the following elements that underlie their development. In summary form, they are:
Megatrends are universal in nature; that is, they affect people's lives around the globe in varying degrees but have similar characteristics, the most important being:
The effects of megatrends and subtrends on infrastructure projects can vary significantly across countries, industries, sectors and projects. However, their impact is evident in the following areas:
Given these trend characteristics, some basic questions that governments and sponsors need to answer in order to meet the challenges of and benefit by them include the following:
There is general agreement that demographic trends are a determining factor of the demand for infrastructure projects around the world. The National Intelligence Council (2012) studied the source of trends and their implications. These trends, which have been operative for a number of years, are expected to continue into the future:
The demographic trend impacts come primarily from three sources: The increased needs for basic needs of water and food; medical facilities and services; and public elder‐care facilities and nursing homes. These trends, in turn, exert increased pressures on emerging and developing country government budgets to shift priorities away from other infrastructure projects. To support economic growth, however, governments are required to increase spending on educational facilities and urbanization project needs. The impacts of demographic trends are fairly easily forecasted and translated into needs governments consider in long‐range planning. This will increase investment in social infrastructure projects and funding, primarily through the use of PPP models. However, the impact of trends on development infrastructure cannot be as easily assessed and investments in this area are primarily driven by economic growth needs.
Since the financial crisis of 2008, a tendency is observed towards increased importance and emphasis on rehabilitation of existing infrastructure as opposed to greenfield projects in countries with constrained government budgets and growth of the construction industry in emerging markets. The focus shifts to cities and urban area infrastructure needs and from the ability to fund projects to cost reduction of investment needs. At the same time, there is process innovation taking place in the preparation of project sites, logistics, and the use of new technologies, such as sophisticated logistics and project management software and applications of 3D printing that enhance the efficiency of the infrastructure‐construction industry.
Organizational and contractual innovations are taking place and expected to continue, such as computerized inventory control, along with increased use of advanced equipment, tools, and materials, and development of super‐supply chains. Further, there is increased attention paid to life‐cycle infrastructure risk management that reduces project failures. Also, an important trend that is becoming apparent is one that links procurement, contracting, and project management models with asset operations.
Technology trends are probably the most impactful on the infrastructure industry and include new approaches to solving urbanization problems, and providing improved services and quality of life for people. In addition to the well‐known trends in innovation and introduction of new information technology services, futurists like Thomas Fray (2015), talk about trends that will dramatically affect the development of infrastructure projects and construction, such as:
Government budget constraints and higher sponsor project‐development costs are forcing innovation and the introduction of new technologies to make projects and the infrastructure industry more efficient. Governments and the infrastructure industry are using new technologies and innovations in organizations, contracts and procurement, risk management, and project management. However, solutions to major urbanization‐infrastructure needs involve additional new and futuristic technology introductions, costs, and challenges. Along with these solutions to infrastructure needs, come increased physical and cybersecurity challenges that create opportunities to address them effectively.
Infrastructure project financing is impacted by trends observed in the public sector due to responses by governments and their attempt to get value for money invested. The following are trends observed in this area, but note that these trends may be more country specific and not of uniform impacts in every country:
The impact of demographic trends causes a shift to social infrastructure projects that is counterbalanced by the effect of government emphasizing projects supporting development and economic growth. Overall, the positive impacts of government impacting trends are balanced in favor of economic growth projects. Budgetary constraints are also causing governments to introduce reforms to attract infrastructure investments that promote needed economic growth and a shift from public to PPP projects that yield value for money spent. A positive impact of budgetary constraints is that governments are becoming more experienced in project finance techniques and shifting infrastructure costs from taxpayers to users.
All trends mentioned so far are affecting sponsors and investors directly or indirectly, but the following are trends generated by factors within these agents that have a direct impact on their mode of operations:
One of the helpful impacts of trends on sponsors and other investors in infrastructure projects is the transfer of project finance knowledge to governments and the restructuring of legal and regulatory regimes. The latter is also influenced by the intervention of official funding sources that require changes in order to reduce project risks and make them financeable. These effects make project development and financing easier to achieve effectively. Because governments look for effective and flexible contracts, the role of the due diligence is expanded to ensure more effective risk management. While investors look for low‐risk projects, infrastructure projects are becoming more complex and costly to develop which, in turn, give incentives to sponsors to introduce innovations to make projects economically viable and they do.
Official, government, and private sources of funding are affected directly by megatrends and trends in the areas discussed earlier. Gaps in funding for urgently needed economic development and social infrastructure projects are causing innovations in order to close those gaps. So, in addition to new players coming into the infrastructure financing market, new models of financing are introduced, such as regulated asset finance, project output‐based aid, social impact bonds, and tax increment finance. The trends impacting funding sources and project financing include:
Creation of the New Development Bank and the Contingency Reserve Arrangement by the BRICS countries, the establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, the China Africa Development Fund, and the Silk Road Fund are ample evidence of trends to more infrastructure funding sources sponsored or led by Chinese institutions. These changes are creating trends that have global impacts, and other financing trends that affect sponsors and governments include:
In summary, trends impacting funding sources and project financing show that the role of China will lead development of infrastructure projects not only in underdeveloped countries, but around the world. After China, Islamic financing will expand its influence in funding projects and this creates conditions for other sources of funding to increase their cooperation and pooling of funds. Because of the impacts of trends on project financing and other areas, projects are becoming more complex, take longer to complete, and involve higher costs. At the same time, project finance is increasingly being used to fund projects beyond infrastructure, such as in real estate, pharmaceuticals, and other industries. Also, Islamic financing and pension and sovereign wealth funds will play a significant role in the globalization of the infrastructure fund market.
The purpose of identifying and assessing trends is to evaluate their impacts on the business and to plan to take advantage of them or minimize adverse impacts. The different elements and the process of identifying trends and their impacts affecting the project company's operations are illustrated in Figure 15.8.1. The process begins with identifying megatrends, subtrends, and PESTLED trends and determining which ones and to what extent they are relevant for a particular country and industry. At this junction, it is important to ensure that fads are separated from trends and determining how the relevant trends are likely to impact the industry the project company is in. This step is helpful in assessing trend effects on the industry structure and likely changes in the operating environment's competitive forces.
Once the effects of trends affecting the industry are well understood, the process examines how industry‐relevant trends will affect the project company's future and determine the magnitude of impacts on its financial performance over its lifetime. The evaluation of trends impacting the project company specifically includes an assessment of trend effects on future technology; host country legal and regulatory changes; unmet customer/user needs and changes in preferences; and potential threats to the project company's success. While the process of identifying relevant trends is fairly straightforward, the quantification of their impacts requires a thorough analysis of analogs from competitors and other industries, and the evaluation and input of industry experts.
The identification of trends and their impacts on project finance deals is crucial because of project characteristics, sizable investment requirements, and required quality of financial projections to make projects financeable. The quantification of trend impacts requires building up strong competitive analysis competencies that support the sponsor organization's strategic planning, business development, and PFO efforts. This involves activities such as:
A variant of Figure 15.8.1 is a sketch summary of the progression of identifying relevant trends and quantifying their impact on a project is shown in Figure 15.8.2, with assessment of trend impacts focused on:
The first order in the assessment process starts with selecting the most relevant megatrends followed by a thorough host country environmental analysis and, having the benefit of the insights of futurists, determine how different trends are likely to affect the project company. Once the identification of country, industry, and company impacting trends is complete, trend impacts affecting the nature of a product or service and delivery are evaluated. How? By leveraging knowledge of industry experts, building plausible scenarios for forecasting models, and analyzing the effects of trends on pricing, demand, and the supply of the project company's output.
The evaluation of scenario outputs and sensitivity analysis facilitates a reasonably good assessment of the project company's SWOT analysis under the impact of trends. It also helps in the development of sponsor strategy and plans to deal with adverse trend impacts or prepare to take advantage of the opportunities presented by them. However, trend analysis and impact quantification are far more valuable when taking into account the impact of trends on all project stakeholders. This is needed because, for example, what impacts sponsors one way may affect equipment suppliers, host governments, contractors, and funding sources differently and/or with different lags. Note that ordinarily the evaluation of other trend impacts on stakeholders is of lesser rigor than that of on sponsors and the project company. However, differential impacts need to be considered and may require reconciling to satisfy adversely impacted parties.
What is also important in overall trend assessment is that trend impacts need to be evaluated for specific areas of a given project. Namely, impact evaluation on the following project areas:
Once trends are identified, analyzed, and their impacts quantified, planning and preparation to take advantage of trends or avoid adverse effects take place. Here, the value added of experts in competitive analysis and strategic‐decision forecasting are crucial in the development of response and expectation realization planning. Why? Because the various trend impacts need to be integrated into an overall project value impact. This requires extensive industry knowledge, skills, and experience, and seasoned judgment to make the integration by assigning appropriate weights to different trends.
3.133.149.180