18.2 Failure Mode and Effect Analysis

As discussed in prior chapters, FMEA is a detailed document that identifies ways in which a process or product can fail to meet critical requirements. It is a living document that lists all the possible causes of failure from which a list of items can be generated to determine types of controls or where changes in the procedures should be made to reduce or mitigate risk. The FMEA also allows procedure developers to prioritize and track procedure changes (1). The process is effective because it provides a very systematic process for evaluating a system or a procedure, in this instance. It provides a means for identifying and documenting

1. potential areas of failure in process, system, component, or procedure;
2. potential effects of the process, system, component, or procedure failing;
3. potential failure causes;
4. methods of reducing the probability of failure;
5. methods of improving the means of detecting the causes of failure;
6. risk ranking of failures, allowing risk informed decisions by those responsible;
7. a starting point from which the control plan can be created.

FMEA can be used to analyze the following:

1. Process. Documents and addresses failure modes associated with the manufacturing and assembly process.
2. Procedure. Documents and addresses failure points and modes in procedures.
3. Software. Documents and addresses failure modes associated with software functions.
4. Design. Documents and addresses failure modes of products and components long before they are manufactured and should always be completed well in advance of prototype build.
5. System. Documents and addresses failure modes for system- and subsystem-level functions early in the product concept stage.
6. Project. Documents and addresses failures that could happen during a major program.

A procedure analysis will be used to demonstrate how an FMEA can be conducted. An FMEA is conducted on a step-by-step basis. Table 18.1 shows an example of an FMEA table. The following constitutes the steps of an FMEA. These steps will be illustrated by use of an example.

Table 18.1 Example of FMEA Table

NumberTable

The first step is to create a flow diagram of the procedure. This is a relatively simple process in which a table or block diagram is constructed that shows the steps in the procedure. Table 18.2 shows the simple steps for checking an engine chip detector. Note that this is a simple example and not an exhaustive analysis. Table 18.3 lists the major, credible failures associated with each step in the process. Table 18.4 shows the effect of the potential failures. Table 18.5 shows the complete FMEA for the task.

Table 18.2 Process Steps for Checking a Chip Detector

Inspecting chip detector
Step number Process steps
1 Cut and remove lock wire from oil drain Plug
2 Remove oil drain plug
3 Drain oil
4 Cut and remove lock wire from chip detector
5 Remove chip detector
6 Examine chip detector
7 Clean chip detector
8 Replace chip detector
9 Lock wire chip detector
10 Replace oil drain plug
11 Lock wire oil drain plug
12 Replace oil

Table 18.3 Failures Associated with Each Step

Inspecting chip detector
Process steps Major failures
Cut and remove lock wire from oil drain plug No major failures that affect process outcome
Remove oil drain plug No major failures that affect process outcome
Drain oil No major failures that affect process outcome
Cut and remove lock wire from chip detector No major failures that affect process outcome
Remove chip detector Improper removal can remove debris from chip detector and cause false reading. Chip detector can be damaged if improperly removed
Examine chip detector Aircraft maintenance technician (AMT) fails to notice debris on chip detector
Clean chip detector AMT fails to properly clean chip detector
Replace chip detector AMT fails to properly install chip detector
Lock wire chip detector AMT fails to properly lock wire chip detector
Replace oil drain plug AMT fails to properly install oil drain plug
Lock wire oil drain plug AMT fails to properly lock oil drain plug
Replace oil AMT fails to properly replace oil

Table 18.4 Effect of Potential Failures

Inspecting chip detector
Process steps Potential failure modes Potential failure effects
Remove chip detector Improper removal can remove debris from chip detector and cause false reading. Chip detector can be damaged if improperly removed Engine could fail if chips are not properly detected. Added cost to replace damaged chip detector
Examine chip detector Aircraft maintenance technician (AMT) fails to notice debris on chip detector Engine could fail if chips are not properly detected
Clean chip detector AMT fails to properly clean chip detector Debris could be placed back into engine
Replace chip detector AMT fails to properly install chip detector Oil could leak past chip detector. Threads of chip detector could be damaged
Lock wire chip detector AMT fails to properly lock wire chip detector Chip detector could become lose and fall out, leading to loss of engine oil
Replace oil drain plug AMT fails to properly install oil drain plug Engine oil could leak out. Oil drain plug could become damaged
Lock wire oil drain plug AMT fails to properly lock oil drain plug Oil drain plug could become loose and fall out Oil drain plug could become damaged
Replace oil AMT fails to properly replace oil Engine could fail

Table 18.5 Complete FMEA for Chip Detector Task

NumberTable NumberTable NumberTable

FMEA is a relatively simple but powerful tool and has a wide range of applicability for analyzing aircraft maintenance tasks.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.21.98.207