Chapter 20
IN THIS CHAPTER
Using documents to track insider trading
Examining insider buying and selling
Understanding corporate buybacks
Breaking down stock splits
Watching Congress closely
Imagine that you’re boarding a cruise ship, ready to enjoy a hard-earned vacation. As you merrily walk up the plank, you notice that the ship’s captain and crew are charging out of the vessel, flailing their arms and screaming at the top of their lungs. Some are even jumping into the water below. Pop quiz: Would you get on that ship? You get double credit if you can also explain why (or why not).
What does this scenario have to do with stock investing? Plenty. The behavior of the people running the boat gives you important clues about the near-term prospects for the boat. Similarly, the actions of company insiders can provide important clues into the near-term prospects for their company.
Company insiders are key managers or investors in the company. Insiders include the president of the company, the treasurer, and other managing officers. An insider can also be someone who owns a large stake in the company or someone on the board of directors. In any case, insiders usually have a bird’s-eye view of what’s going on with the company and a good idea of how well (or how poorly) the company is doing.
In this chapter, I describe different kinds of insider activities, such as insider buying, insider selling, corporate stock buybacks, and stock splits. I also show you how to keep track of these activities with the help of a few resources.
Fortunately, we live in an age of disclosure and the internet. Insiders who buy or sell stock must file reports that document their trading activity with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which makes the documents available to the public. You can view these documents at either a regional SEC office (see www.sec.gov/page/sec-regional-offices
for locations) or on the SEC’s website, which maintains the EDGAR (Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval) database (www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml
). Just click “Search for Company Filings.” Some of the most useful documents you can view there include the following:
For a more comprehensive list of insider forms (among others that are filed by public companies), go to www.sec.gov/info/edgar/forms/edgform.pdf
.
The classic phrase “actions speak louder than words” was probably coined for insider trading. Insiders are in the know, and keeping a watchful eye on their transactions — both buying and selling their company’s stock — can provide you with very useful investing information. But insider buying and insider selling can be as different as day and night; insider buying is simple, while insider selling can be complicated. In the following sections, I present both sides of insider trading.
Insider buying is usually an unambiguous signal about how an insider feels about his company. After all, the primary reason that all investors buy stock is that they expect it to do well. If one insider is buying stock, that’s generally not a monumental event. But if several or more insiders are buying, those purchases should certainly catch your attention.
Insider buying is generally a positive omen and beneficial for the stock’s price. Also, when insiders buy stock, less stock is available to the public. If the investing public meets this decreased supply with increased demand, the stock price rises. Keep these factors in mind when analyzing insider buying:
Identify who’s buying the stock. The CEO is buying 5,000 shares. Is that reason enough for you to jump in? Maybe. After all, the CEO certainly knows how well the company is doing. But what if that CEO is just starting her new position? What if before this purchase she had no stock in the company at all? Maybe the stock is part of her employment package.
The fact that a new company executive is making her first stock purchase isn’t as strong a signal urging you to buy as the fact that a long-time CEO is doubling her holdings. Also, if large numbers of insiders are buying, that sends a stronger signal than if a single insider is buying.
See how much is being bought. In the preceding example, the CEO bought 5,000 shares, which is a lot of stock no matter how you count it. But is it enough for you to base an investment decision on? Maybe, but a closer look may reveal more. If she already owned 1 million shares at the time of the purchase, then buying 5,000 additional shares wouldn’t be such an exciting indicator of a pending stock rise. In this case, 5,000 shares is a small incremental move that doesn’t offer much to get excited about.
However, what if this particular insider has owned only 5,000 shares for the past three years and is now buying 1 million shares? Now that should arouse your interest! Usually, a massive purchase tells you that particular insider has strong feelings about the company’s prospects and that she’s making a huge increase in her share of stock ownership. Still, a purchase of 1 million shares by the CEO isn’t as strong a signal as ten insiders buying 100,000 shares each. Again, if only one person is buying, that may or may not be a strong indication of an impending rise. However, if lots of people are buying, consider it a fantastic indication.
An insider purchase of any kind is a positive sign, but it’s always more significant when a greater number of insiders are making purchases. “The more the merrier!” is a good rule for judging insider buying. All these individuals have their own, unique perspectives on the company and its prospects. Mass buying indicates mass optimism for the company’s future. If the treasurer, the president, the vice president of sales, and several other key players are putting their wealth on the line and investing it in a company they know intimately, that’s a good sign for your stock investment as well.
Insider stock buying is rarely negative — it either bodes well for the stock or is a neutral event at worst. But how about insider selling? When an insider sells his stock, the event can be either neutral or negative. Insider selling is usually a little tougher to figure out than insider buying because insiders may have many different motivations to sell stock that have nothing to do with the company’s future prospects. Just because the president of the company is selling 5,000 shares from his personal portfolio doesn’t necessarily mean you should sell, too.
Insiders may sell their stock for a couple of reasons: They may think that the company won’t be doing well in the near future — a negative sign for you — or they may simply need the money for a variety of personal reasons that have nothing to do with the company’s potential. Some typical reasons why insiders may sell stock include the following:
www.marketwatch.com
, www.sec.gov
, and finance.yahoo.com
(along with other sources in Appendix A).Do outside events or analyst reports seem coincidental with the sale of the stock? Sometimes, an influential analyst may issue a report warning about a company’s prospects. If the company’s management pooh-poohs the report but most of them are bailing out anyway (selling their stock), you may want to do the same. Frequently, when insiders know that damaging information is forthcoming, they sell the stock before it takes a dip.
Similarly, if the company’s management issues positive public statements or reports that contradict their own behavior (they’re selling their stock holdings), the SEC may investigate to see whether the company is doing anything that may require a penalty (the SEC regularly tracks insider sales).
When you read the financial pages or watch the financial shows on TV, you sometimes hear that a company is buying its own stock. The announcement may be something like, “SuperBucks Corp. has announced that it will spend $2 billion to buy back its own stock.” Why would a company do that, and what does that mean to you if you own the stock or are considering buying it?
When companies buy back their own stock, they’re generally indicating that they believe their stock is undervalued and that it has the potential to rise. If a company shows strong fundamentals (for example, good financial condition and increasing sales and earnings; see Chapters 8 and 11 for details) and it’s buying more of its own stock, it’s worth investigating — it may make a great addition to your portfolio.
The following sections present some common reasons a company may buy back its shares from investors, as well as some ideas on the negative effects of stock buybacks.
You bought this book because you’re looking at buying stocks, but individuals aren’t alone in the stock-buying universe. No, I don’t just mean that mutual funds, pensions, and other entities are buyers; I mean the companies behind the stocks are buyers (and sellers), too. Why would a public company buy stock — especially its own?
By simply buying back its own shares from stockholders, a company can increase its earnings per share without actually earning extra money (see Chapters 8 and 11 as well as Appendix B for more on earnings per share). Sound like a magician’s trick? Well, it is, kind of. A corporate stock buyback is a financial sleight of hand that investors should be aware of.
Here’s how it works: Noware Earnings, Inc. (NEI), has 10 million shares outstanding, and it’s expected to net earnings of $10 million for the fourth quarter. NEI’s earnings per share (EPS) would be $1 per share. So far so good. But what happens if NEI buys 2 million of its own shares? Total shares outstanding shrink to 8 million. The new EPS becomes $1.25 — the stock buyback artificially boosts the earnings per share by 25 percent!
If you watch a company’s price-to-earnings ratio (see Chapter 8, Chapter 11, and Appendix B), you know that increased earnings usually mean an eventual increase in the stock price. Additionally, a stock buyback affects supply and demand. With less available stock in the market, demand necessarily sends the stock price upward.
Suppose you read in the financial pages that Company X is doing a hostile takeover of Company Z. A hostile takeover doesn’t mean that Company X sends storm troopers armed with mace to Company Z’s headquarters to trounce its management. All a hostile takeover means is that X wants to buy enough shares of Z’s stock to effectively control Z (and Z is unhappy about being owned or controlled by X). Because buying and selling stock happens in a public market or exchange, companies can buy each other’s stock. Sometimes, the target company prefers not to be acquired, in which case it may buy back shares of its own stock to give it a measure of protection against unwanted moves by interested companies.
In some cases, the company attempting the takeover already owns some of the target company’s stock. In this case, the targeted company may offer to buy those shares back from the aggressor at a premium to thwart the takeover bid. This type of offer is often referred to as greenmail.
As beneficial as stock buybacks can be, they have to be paid for, and this expense has consequences. When a company uses funds from operations for the stock buyback, less money is available for other activities, such as upgrading technology, making improvements, or doing research and development. A company faces even greater dangers when it uses debt to finance a stock buyback. If the company uses borrowed funds, not only does it have less borrowing power for other uses, but it also has to pay back the borrowed funds with interest, thus lowering earnings figures.
Say that Noware Earnings, Inc. (NEI), typically pays an annual dividend of 25 cents per share of stock and wants to buy back shares, which are currently at $10 each, with borrowed money with a 9 percent interest rate. If NEI buys back 2 million shares, it won’t have to pay out $500,000 in dividends (2 million multiplied by 25 cents). That’s money saved. However, NEI has to pay interest on the $20 million it borrowed ($10 per share multiplied by 2 million shares) to buy back the shares. The interest totals $1.8 million (9 percent of $20 million), and the net result from this rudimentary example is that NEI sees an outflow of $1.3 million (the difference between the interest paid out and the dividends savings).
Using debt to finance a stock buyback needs to make economic sense — it needs to strengthen the company’s financial position. Perhaps NEI could have used the stock buyback money toward a better purpose, such as modernizing equipment or paying for a new marketing campaign. Because debt interest ultimately decreases earnings, companies must be careful when using debt to buy back their stock.
Frequently, management teams decide to do a stock split. A stock split is the exchange of existing shares of stock for new shares from the same company. Stock splits don’t increase or decrease the company’s capitalization; they just change the number of shares available in the market and the per-share price.
Typically, a company may announce that it’s doing a 2-for-1 stock split. For example, a company may have 10 million shares outstanding, with a market price of $40 each. In a 2-for-1 split, the company then has 20 million shares (the share total doubles), but the market price is adjusted to $20 (the share price is halved). Companies do other splits, such as a 3-for-2 or 4-for-1, but 2-for-1 is the most common split.
The following sections present the two basic types of splits: ordinary stock splits and reverse stock splits.
An ordinary stock split — when the number of stock shares increases — is the kind investors usually hear about. If you own 100 shares of Dublin, Inc., stock (at $60 per share) and the company announces a stock split, what happens? If you own the stock in certificate form (which is very rare now), you receive in the mail a stock certificate for 100 more shares. Now, before you cheer over how your money just doubled, check the stock’s new price. Each share is adjusted to a $30 value.
A reverse stock split usually occurs when a company’s management wants to raise the price of its stock. Just as ordinary splits can occur when management believes the price is too expensive, a reverse stock split means the company feels that the stock’s price is too cheap. If a stock’s price looks too low, that may discourage interest by individual or institutional investors (such as mutual funds). Management wants to drum up more interest in the stock for the benefit of shareholders (some of whom are probably insiders).
The company may also do a reverse split to decrease costs. When you have to send an annual report and other correspondence regularly to all the stockholders, the mailings can get a little pricey, especially if you have lots of investors who own only a few shares each. A reverse split helps consolidate shares and lower overall management costs.
A reverse split can best be explained with an example. TuCheep, Inc. (TCI), is selling at $2 per share on the Nasdaq. At that rock-bottom price, the investing public may ignore it. So TCI announces a 10-for-1 reverse stock split. Now what? If a stockholder had 100 shares at $2 (the old shares), the stockholder now owns 10 shares at $20.
The latest sensation in the world of insider trading has been how congresspeople of both parties have reaped fortunes by doing something that’s illegal for you and me — but was legal for them! For those folks who’ve wondered how someone can spend millions to get a “public service” job and then retire a multimillionaire, now you have a clue: congressional insider trading.
Congressmen and women, as you know, pass laws for a variety of matters. They know which companies stand to lose or benefit as a result. They can then invest in the winners and/or avoid (or go short) the losers. (When you go short on a stock, you make money by selling high and then buying low; to get a good idea about how short selling works, see Chapter 17.) Many were able to easily reap million-dollar gains because of this privileged perch they stood on.
Some folks in Congress made outrageous profits from shorting strategies during the 2008 crash when they learned of pending financial developments behind closed doors before the public (and most investors) found out. It’s maddening that these politicians profited (legally!) from activities that you and I would have ended up in jail for doing.
From the furor in late 2011 over this incredible corruption came a new law passed in early 2012: the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act (Public Law 112-105). This law was a great start, but it was quietly amended in 2013, and important enforcement provisions were watered down (ugh!). To find out more, you can go to the site for the Office of Government Ethics (www.oge.gov
) and discover other sources through your favorite search engine.
35.170.81.33