CHAPTER 17
Culture: The Underlying Root Cause of Nearly Every Merger's Success or Failure

Table represents the seven sub-playbooks.

The components of the organizational playbook are culture, incentives, leadership, people, and politics. Choose the behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values, and environment that will make up your new culture. Invite people into the new culture, noting who accepts your invitation in what they say, do, and believe.

Given enough time and money, your competitors can duplicate almost everything you've got working for you. They can hire away some of your best people. They can reverse engineer your processes. They can match your service levels. Even innovation, unless embedded in the culture, can be matched. The only thing they can't duplicate is your culture.1

Guy bumps into a competitor's star engineer at a trade event:

“Would you come work for us if we gave you $1 million/year?”

“I would.”

“How about $50,000/year?”

“What do you think I am?”

“We've already established that. Now we're negotiating.”

While not everyone is for sale, enough are to make you vulnerable.

Even if you've got things patented, trademarked, or cloaked in multiple layers of secrecy, your competitors can see what you deliver, what you get done, and the core pieces of how you do it. Even if they can't duplicate what you do exactly, they can get close enough to hurt you—or take it to the next level and render your processes or products and services obsolete.

In many respects, leadership is an exercise in building culture. However you define it, culture is the glue that holds organizations together. Culture is often impacted by pivotal events, such as a new leader joining an organization, a significant external event, or—wait for it—combining organizations post–mergers and acquisitions (M&A). These moments present opportunities to accelerate culture change and deliver better results. Culture change is about bridging the gap between the current state and the desired state, which better enables a team to achieve the organization's mission and goals. The greater the cultural differences, the more difficult the adaptation or change will be. There's real power in understanding the most important cultural differences and then building a plan to bridge those gaps over time.

Jim Donald took the helm of Extended Stay Hotels as it was emerging from bankruptcy, tasked with the mandate to take the company public. He soon realized that while the company was officially out of bankruptcy, the mindset of staff was not. There was still a heads-down, play-it-safe mentality throughout the company.2

Donald knew that this type of behavior was not going to take them where they needed to go. It was now time for bold moves and innovative ideas. His solution was to give each employee a “get out of jail free” card. It guaranteed that as long as they were taking (safe, moral, legal) risks, they would get a free pass if things went wrong. The goal? Empower employees to go out on a limb to try new things.

“Things changed overnight. We began our march to an [intellectual property offering] IPO, and not only did we go public in less than a year, Extended Stay Hotels was just purchased last month for $6B. That's a true testament to the power of encouraging risk-taking,” says Donald.

“It was not magic. It was giving our employees power to make decisions. Encouraging risk taking, with the freedom to fail, is a leadership trait that most leaders are either afraid to do, or don't understand the huge upside and very little downside. Leaders today have to understand that in today's world, in our currency economy, status quo means you're going backward.”

We've seen countless examples of front-line employees going above and beyond to surprise and delight customers, with just the right gesture at the right time. (Think about the legendary guest experience at brands like Southwest Airlines and Disney.) These kinds of experiences are possible only when the front line is empowered to go beyond the checklist and make decisions.

“The right sales team, the right manufacturing team, the right frontline, should have and should demand the ability to make the decisions that could change the trajectory of the company, at the moment that decision needs to be made. Encouraging risk taking and building a culture of risk on your team is vital.”

Some define culture simply as “the way we do things around here.” Others conduct complex analyses to define it more scientifically. Instead, blend both schools of thought into an implementable approach that defines culture as an organization's behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values, and the environment (BRAVE). The BRAVE framework is relatively easy to apply yet offers a relatively robust way to identify, engage, and change a culture. It makes culture real, tangible, identifiable, and easy to talk about.

It's helpful to tackle the BRAVE components from the outside in with five questions, as shown in Table 17.1.

When evaluating each element of culture, think of it on a sliding scale (say 1–5), rather than in absolute terms. The specific dimensions within each cultural component may vary from situation to situation.

Table 17.1 The BRAVE Framework

EnvironmentWhere to play(Context)
ValuesWhat matters and why(Purpose)
AttitudesHow to win(Choices)
RelationshipsHow to connect(Influence)
BehaviorsWhat Impact(Implementation)

Brave Cultures Are Sustainable

All music is made from the same 12 notes. All culture is made from the same five components: behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values, and environment. It's the way those notes or components are put together that makes things sing.

In sustainable, championship cultures, behaviors (the way we do things here) are inextricably linked to relationships, informed by attitudes, built on a rock-solid base of values, and completely appropriate for the environment in which the organization chooses to operate. As Simon Sinek famously pointed out, most organizations think what–how–why. Great leaders and great organizations start with why (environment and values), then look at how (attitudes and relationships) before getting to what (behaviors).

It's the context that makes it so hard to duplicate a championship culture. Because every organization's environment is different, matching someone else's behaviors, relationships, attitudes, and values will not produce the same culture.

Since you should align your culture, organization, and operations around one of four strategies, it's helpful to flesh out what the four different cultures mean. Let's work through that starting with a culture of independence in support of a design strategy.

Design: Independence

As depicted in Figure 17.1, in a design-focused organization, it's all about unleashing individual creativity and invention.3

An illustration of Core Focus

FIGURE 17.1 Core Focus

The design-focused core has five main components:

  1. Strategy: Design or invent
  2. Culture: Independent (and flexible, with emphasis on learning and enjoyment; Figure 17.2)
  3. Organization: Specialized
  4. Operations: Freeing support
  5. CEO: Enable with principles

In The Culture Factor, Boris Groysberg and coauthors4 suggest eight primary cultural styles (learning, enjoyment, results, authority, order, safety, purpose, and caring) that fall on the two dimensions of flexibility (stability and independence) and interdependence. It's a helpful construct that benefits from a fleshing out across the BRAVE dimensions of behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values, and the environment. (These are different dimensions than we're now using in the base tool. The actual dimensions are flexible.)

An illustration of Design-Focused Culture of Independence

FIGURE 17.2 Design-Focused Culture of Independence

A culture of independence is on the outer edge of every BRAVE dimension. In every case it is more open, diffused, caring, flexible, informal, and casual. Expect people operating in a culture like this to care about learning and enjoyment, to be proactive and driven by their own interpretation of the intended purpose. These people will be hard to control, which is exactly what you want.

Build a culture like this to unleash creativity and invention—the first step in innovation. Innovation is the introduction of something new. You need to be innovative to stay ahead of the curve whether your primary strategy is design, production, delivery, or service. If you choose one of the latter three strategies, you may outsource your design and invention. In any case you can do a better job introducing new things with the five keys to BRAVE innovation:

  1. Environment—where to play: Establish a shared definition of innovation for your organization.
  2. Values—what matters and why: Aim innovation at business concepts and models.
  3. Attitude—how to win: Valuable innovation is born of new, frame-breaking insights that light the way.
  4. Relationships—how to connect: Learn by doing with discipline across your innovation system.
  5. Behaviors—what impact: Drive an end-to-end process through to commercialization.

Independence

In the case of independence, it's not an oversimplification. Certainly, all cultures are blends of many different elements. Certainly, some people in organizations with cultures like this will and must work interdependently. While most people in these organizations will have a bias to flexibility over stability, some things must be stable and reliable. But the overriding, most important dimension is independence because the sparks of invention are inherently individual. Inventing requires freeing individuals.

Not only is each person in a culture of independence going to behave individualistically, but there is also no overall formula for the ideal independent culture. Organizations may vary their cultural preferences on scales like work-focused versus more work–life balance or formal versus informal communication or how they learn.

Purpose

The one thing that probably should not vary is attention to purpose. Chief executive officer (CEO) Tim Cook and all at Apple are clear they are “trying to change the world for the better.” They care about products and people, about inventing products that help people do things they could not have done before, about infusing products with a humanity that others have never done. Their purpose is their ultimate guiding principles.

Cook sees himself as their chief enablement officer. His job is to lead the efforts to provide freeing support to Apple's inventors. As he says over and over again, his job is “to block the noise from the people who are really doing the work”—the designers and inventors.

Produce: Stability

In a culture of stability in support of a production strategy, it's all about ensuring reliability.5

The five core components of stability are:

  1. Strategy: Produce and manufacture
  2. Culture: Stable (and independent, with emphasis on results and authority; Figure 17.3)
  3. Organization: Hierarchy
  4. Operations: Command and control
  5. CEO: Enforce

A culture of stability is at the inner point of every BRAVE dimension. In every case it is more results focused, authority driven, formal, hierarchical, directed, and closed. Expect people operating in a culture like this to care about order and safety, to be reactive, and to follow purpose and rules as written. These people will do what you tell them to do and not much more—which is exactly what you want.

An illustration of Production-Focused Culture of Stability

FIGURE 17.3 Production-Focused Culture of Stability

Build a culture like this to produce things consistently and reliably on an ongoing, regular basis.

Stability

In the culture of stability, don't expect flexibility or innovation. Expect compliance with the rules, with your direction. Expect people to deliver the minimum viable product every time. If you push people in a culture like this to operate more interdependently, to make decisions on their own, to be more proactive, at best they will resist and more likely, you'll break the system.

Coca-Cola is a classic example of a production company with a culture of stability. It operates with a clear hierarchy of command and control, with CEOs who see their primary task as enforcing policies. As a result, every Coca-Cola produced everywhere in the world lives up to the same high standards.

One of Coca-Cola's biggest ever innovations was the introduction of New Coke. A small Skunk Works group worked the project all the way through, leaking nothing until the last minute when the new formula was shipped to every bottler in the world for a coordinated worldwide launch. The product was superior on the dimension of initial mouth appeal, but the brand failed. As a result, the company swallowed its pride and relaunched Classic Coke.

It's an example of why stable production companies should think twice about revolutionary innovations.

Zara is another example of a stable production company. They outsource all their design by relying on copying others' designs. Their magic is that they can go from seeing a design on a fashion catwalk to producing it and getting it into their stores in 15 days.

In some ways, this is the tightest and most easily understood and managed culture. If you're leading a producing company, drive stability, independence, results, and authority. Have a bias to organize hierarchically. Do not shy away from command-and-control operations. Enforce polices for the good of all.

Deliver: Interdependence

In a culture of interdependence in support of a delivery strategy, it's all about enrolling diverse players across the ecosystem.6

The five core components of an interdependence culture are:

Strategy: Delivery, product supply, logistics

Culture: Interdependent (and stable, with emphasis on order and safety; Figure 17.4)

Organization: Matrix

Operations: Shared responsibility

CEO: Enroll

A culture of interdependence is a blended culture. The predominant feature is diverse people working interdependently to deliver things. Thus, individuals have to be open to differences as they deal with a range of suppliers and customers. While there's generally a bias to stability, order, and safety, everything else falls in the middle. Decisions may be hierarchical or diffused. People may be proactive or responsive. They have to balance results and caring and be open to directed or shared learning.

An illustration of Delivery-Focused Culture of Interdependence

FIGURE 17.4 Delivery-Focused Culture of Interdependence

Build a culture like this to manage logistics and product supply chains and deliver things in an orderly and safe way.

Interdependence

The opposite of independence, interdependence is all about people working together in teams. Those teams cross geographic, functional, and organizational bounds as many of the people on core delivery teams may often work for different companies. The lines between employees, contractors, suppliers, allies, partners, customers, and competitors often blur beyond recognition.

The head of one organization bumped into the head of another and told him, “We were going to name you our supplier of the year.”

“Were?”

“You never returned my call when I called to tell you that. So we had to name someone else.”

At the time when Sam Walton told this to Procter & Gamble's (P&G) chief executive officer (CEO) John Smale, P&G did $2 billion per year in business with Walmart. Smale got the message and moved three people to Bentonville to provide Walmart with better service.

Not long thereafter the P&G–Walmart system effectively eliminated all the people placing and receiving product orders. P&G was electronically linked into Walmart's systems, so its systems knew when every individual product left Walmart stores. It was able to ship replenishments to Walmart's distribution centers perfectly timed to go dock-to-dock from P&G's trucks to the trucks going out to stores. If there's nothing in the warehouse, warehouse turns are infinite.

Now there's a whole city of Walmart suppliers based in Bentonville, blurring the lines between organizations in Walmart's superior interdependent delivery system.

Delivery requires a broad, loose matrix organization crossing geographies, functions, products, and organizations. While you'll still want one single point of accountability for each task, project, program, or priority, the key to making this work is going to be a recognition of shared responsibilities.

Matrix organizations succeed when people work together interdependently to deliver shared objectives. They collapse when people put their own personal or functional objectives ahead of the common good. Thus, the leader's main role in an interdependent, matrix organization is to enroll people through the use of formal or informal team charters.

Service: Flexibility

In a culture of flexibility in support of a service strategy, it's all about doing whatever is required to provide the best experience for customers or guests or whatever you call them.

The five main components of flexibility in support of service are:

Strategy: Service and customer experience

Culture: Flexible (and interdependent, with emphasis on purpose and caring; Figure 17.5)

Organization: Decentralized

Operations: Guided accountability

CEO: Champion experience

An illustration of Service-Focused Culture of Flexibility

FIGURE 17.5 Service-Focused Culture of Flexibility

A culture of flexibility is—wait for it—flexible. Its people are going to be all over the map. When you focus people on service or customer or guest experience as a higher purpose, when you ask them to care more about customer impact than about short-term results, when you push decisions out to them, don't be surprised when your managerial authority is diminished. Customer first by definition means everything else second.

Cultures like this help you win with service strategies. They are counterproductive for producing and delivering and are also probably distractions for designing.

Flexibility

This culture is the opposite of stability, which suggests either outsourcing production and delivery or at least setting those functions up as separate groups with their own subcultures. There is an unavoidable conflict between people wanting to do whatever it takes to enhance customers' experience and people trying to make or deliver things in a stable, orderly, safe way.

Ritz-Carlton hotels are filled with ladies and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen. If you ask any bellboy to fix your broken TV, that bellboy owns that problem until it is fixed and has full authority to do whatever it takes to make you happy. To be clear, that bellboy does not have to fix the TV himself. But he does have to make sure it gets fixed and that everything that happens from that moment on enhances your experience.

Wonderful examples of retail service happen in high-end bridal boutiques. Their staffs' attitudes are all about making their customers feel like princesses for the day. Expect champagne and fawning service with wonderful gowns brought to you. These people don't design the gowns, make them, or even deliver them. Their job is to make you feel wonderful.

Leading Flexibility

Leading a culture like this is akin to steering a galloping horse. You're not really in control—and you don't want to be. You're going to have a decentralized organization. You're going to give those decentralized leaders accountability. But you're going to use things like the Ritz-Carlton's gold standards to guide that accountability. Polices are like holding the reins too tight. But letting go of the reins completely is a recipe for chaos. Deploying guiding principles is a middle way that guides your decentralized decision-makers without tripping them up.

This is why these organizations' ultimate leaders must think of themselves as chief experience officers. As such, they are keepers of purpose, the most caring people in belief, word, and deed. This is how to get people in a flexible culture to follow you and provide the service required to deliver superior customer or guest experience.

Making It Real

Whether your society is a company, family, tribe, or country, its culture is the combination of the characters of its members. While some members have more influence, all have some. So manage positive and negative deviation from true fit—especially when hiring and onboarding in general or after a merger.7

There are three steps to directing the culture of an organization:

  1. Understand the true culture and character.
  2. Focus on the most important differences.
  3. Figure out the potential impact of those differences and act accordingly.

Understand the True Culture of the Society and the True Character of the New Member

The BRAVE framework allows a relatively easy, robust assessment of culture and character by looking at behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values, and the environment. Cross this with be–do–say. Although words matter, people's actions often don't match their words. And even if their actions do match their words but not their fundamental, underlying beliefs, they will eventually trip up and get caught. As former Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein told the New York Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin, “The character thing in the long run always came out at the worst possible time.”8

Look beyond the behaviors, relationships, attitudes, values, and environment an individual or society presents as its public face to what's really going on—the individual's true character and society's true culture. Some define character or culture as what you believe, think, say, and do when no one is listening or watching.

Focus on the Most Important Differences

The most important differences between what individuals and other members of the society believe, think, say, and do are the ones that are most different and will have the greatest impact.

An individual's preference for yellow shirts while everyone else wears white shirts is probably not an important difference. Someone's refusal to wear any clothes at all may disqualify them for an arctic exploration team.

Figure Out the Potential Impact of Those Differences and Act Accordingly

Darwin taught us that “it is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.” He's talking about species, not individuals. Species evolve over time as their stronger deviants do better and their weaker members perish.

Diversity is not a high-minded selfless act. You must bring different strengths and perspectives into your society for it to survive. The question is how much and how fast the society must and can change.

  • Level zero is no change at all. Those societies are going to perish, so it doesn't matter how they bring new people in.
  • Level one is evolutionary change. These societies need to add people over time whose characters differ in slight ways on just a few core dimensions from the current culture. Onboarding and nurturing them have only low levels of fit risk.
  • Level two is moderate change. These societies need to add people who believe, think, communicate, and act differently in some important ways from the current culture in ways that enable them to influence others relatively soon. Onboarding and nurturing them have moderate fit risk. They will need help with their onboarding and support over time.
  • Level three is dramatic change. These societies are on the path to extinction and need to add change agents who can change their cultures meaningfully and fast.

The trouble is that most change agents don't survive their own changes. Some should not. If, as Peter Drucker allegedly said, “Culture eats strategy for breakfast,” it devours change agents as amuse-bouchées. The only way these stronger change agent deviants can succeed is for weaker members to perish.

Level one culture changes are relatively painless. Level two changes are uncomfortable. Level three changes are disruptive by design. Don't bring in or tolerate a level three deviant unless you're really seeking and committed to the change and prepared to work through and support the disruption. If you find yourself with a level three deviant who's having a negative impact, expel them quickly. The number one regret experienced leaders have looking back on their careers is not moving fast enough on people.

Don't join as a level three deviant unless you're sure you're going to get the support you need and can stomach the impact you will have on weaker members.

Attitude Is the Pivot Point

As you work to evolve your culture, focus on attitudes. There's a strong case to be made that IBM's near-death experience was a result of a bad attitude. It thought it was the best. It thought its customers needed it more than it needed its customers. It stopped being flexible. The big thing Lou Gerstner did was reversing that attitude. Behaviors and relationships followed.

More recently, we saw the same thing at Facebook. It has started believing its own myths and is losing the congruence between strategy and posture.

Of course, this oversimplifies things. Few things are as simple as we hope they are. Of course, you have to be in touch with your environment. Of course, you have to make sure your values are current. Of course, people and communication matter. Of course, it's all theoretical gibberish until someone actually does something that impacts someone else. Attitude is not the only lever. But it's generally the lever to pull first, using that choice or change to influence the others.

There are three steps to achieve the results you want:

  1. Look back at the cultural assessments you did in due diligence for each organization.
  2. Map out your aspirational culture.
  3. Invite people into the new culture.

Evolving Aspirations

A recent survey of global executives suggests a need to evolve most organizations' culture by dialing up speed, more open communication, and broadening the definition of doing good for others.9

Let's start with the logic of evolving cultures: Culture is the only sustainable competitive advantage. You have to evolve to survive. It follows that you must evolve your culture to keep it a sustainable competitive advantage as opposed to a sustainable competitive disadvantage. Add to that the conclusions from executive search firm Cornerstone International Group's survey:

  1. Speed: The speed and ubiquity of digitalization is forcing major change in business organizations:

    Decision-making is moving closer to customers

    Organizations are reforming smaller, more agile work groups.

    Talent acquisition is more specialized in order to deliver niche knowledge on Day One.

  2. More open communication: Technology is re-writing boundaries:

    Globalization is enabled by technology advances across the spectrum

    Competition is no longer likely to come solely from within the core business.

    Information is now unfiltered and shared instantly across the organization.

  3. Broadening the definition of doing good for others: Corporate social responsibility is driving culture change:

    The new generation of talent will only work where social expectations are being met.

    Social awareness requires evaluation of values and mission goals.

    Boards of Directors and CEOs must understand and embrace social responsibility.

As a whole, the Cornerstone Survey indicates the need to evolve cultures to dial up:

  1. Intuitive, exploratory behaviors aimed at getting it right vaguely right fast and iterating (speed)
  2. More informal, verbal, personalized, open communication (boundarylessness)
  3. Broader definition of doing good for others that includes the entire human race (corporate social responsibility)

Post-Pandemic Changes

There are things people were in the habit of doing before the Covid pandemic that they're not doing now. Like a computer shut down prompts us to rethink previously open applications, the pandemic disrupted the inertia behind our habits, heightened our sensibilities, and gave us the opportunity to rethink our choices. This is why you must align the way you're leading with your followers' post-pandemic work–life balance, health and well-being, relationships, and sense of place in the world.10

Work–Life Balance and Health and Well-Being

Pandemic-driven office closures disrupted the lives of people used to commuting to and from work 5 days a week. At first it was jarring, uncomfortable, and stressful. Then people figured out the technology and how to work productively at home.

When that happened, they discovered they didn't have to worry about getting home in time for dinner with their kids. They could spend more time with their family, more time exercising, more time relaxing, and still get all their work done.

Many liked it. All formed new habits.

Now inertia is on the side of those habits. Many are not sure they want to go back to the rat race, give up time with their families, or sacrifice their newly renewed health and well-being.

Relationships

The pandemic disrupted relationships in two ways: throwing people together or keeping them apart.

Some found themselves quarantined with people they were used to spending less time with on a regular basis. In some cases, their time together strengthened those relationships. In some cases, it made people discover things about each other they didn't like so much. Some of them will go in different directions.

Others found themselves unable to spend time with some people. As restrictions relax, they will not necessarily restart those relationships and their old habits. Instead, they'll spend time with the people they care about and let the other relationships stay dormant. It's not so much that there was anything wrong with the relationships before. It's more that the pandemic changed all of us and created new shared experiences, replacing old shared experiences.

Our Place in the World

Some things in the world at large have become harder to ignore.

The United Nations declared “Code Red for humanity” on climate change. “It's just guaranteed that it's going to get worse. Nowhere to run, nowhere to hide.” This is making ever more people rethink their unsustainable habits and base more and more of their decisions on climate impact.

Social media–fueled sharing of racial, gender, LGBTQ, religious, and other injustices have made more and more aware of them across the globe. This has led many to rethink their habitual choices and biases with regard to diversity and inclusion in those lights.

The disruption in the supply chain all the way from sourcing to retail has led to many rethinking their habitual brand choices. Now many are looking at product or brands' provenance, ethics, and how they impact the environment and treat those vulnerable to unjust treatment with new sensibilities. Customers are looking for brands to be–do–say with integrity, matching what they say with what they do with their underlying values and behaviors.

Implications for You as a Leader

Those you lead are not going to return to a pre-pandemic normal. They are going to rethink their choices either consciously or subconsciously. Fighting that is like fighting the tide. You'll lose—especially with the new generation. Instead, invest in inspiring, enabling, and empowering those you lead to do their absolute best together to realize a meaningful and rewarding shared purpose that is in line with their choices about work–life balance, health and wellness, relationship, and place in the world.

Identify the Dimensions to Evolve and Choose the Order

Part of why culture is your most sustainable advantage is that it's so hard to build and hard to change. The prescription for evolution is to move only a few dimensions at a time. Create a gap between where you want to be and where you are.

Change the Stories

Evolving culture is an exercise in changing unwritten rules. Jeff Leitner suggests the best way to do that is to encourage deviant behavior that can subvert the social norms—in the direction you want to head.

Your team needs disrupters, rebels, challengers, and deviants to help it evolve and survive.11

The highest-performing teams function with a minimum of disruption. They do well. But they are resistant to the changes required to evolve and survive over time. This is why you need a meaningful level of disruption, challenge, rebellion, and deviation on a team. The trouble with being at the peak is that the only way to go from there is down. Root out complacency and keep your team striving for a new peak.12

By the end of 2017, only 60 of the 1955 Fortune 500 still existed. And it continues. Witness GE's continued free fall and quarterly losses and breakup. Some members of the Fortune 500 like IBM survived near-death experiences on the way. Even Apple almost disappeared until Steve Jobs came back to reinvent the company.

At a HATCH Summit at Moonlight Basin, Montana, a recurring theme was the importance of diversity.

Darwinian Evolution

Astrobiologist Luke McKay explained how even if the odds are one in a million that one of a gazillion planets in the universe has life, the mathematical probability is that there are aliens. NASA's definition of life: “Self-sustaining chemical system capable of Darwinian evolution.”

Note that Darwinian populations evolve through their mutations, which are, by definition, different from the norm. And note that the environment determines which mutations survive as opposed to the mutations picking their environment.

Differential Strengths

Kristian Ribberstrom, the Medici Group's chief experience officer, asked whether it's better to hire someone with seven critical strengths or three. If the seven strengths overlap strengths already on the team and the three are new to the team, the three are more valuable than the seven.

Different Perspectives

Creative partner Aithan Shapira discussed the need to change perspectives to give people permission to be who they are and permission to change. Most first look at only the middle 7 percent of a painting, whereas experts take in 70 percent of the same painting. He took us through the 1949 radical change in Jackson Pollock's painting style from recognizable to revolutionary and how that gave permission to other artists to change their perspective.

Deviation

Jeff Leitner and Andrew Benedict-Nelson solve problems others run away from. Their book, See Think Solve,13 is an ode to deviation—an existing or new behavior so powerful that it can subvert the informal, unspoken social norm keeping problems unsolved. Teams functioning without deviation can't overcome their social norms to solve new problems.

Full Spectrum Creativity

Chris Wink, Phil Stanton, and Matt Goldman started the Blue Man Group by wandering around—literally. They dressed as the Blue Man character and wandered around to see how people reacted. Some didn't see them. Some couldn't see them. Some actively ignored them. Some thought they were cool.

They learned the character was not one but three. It's not Blue Man; it's the Blue Man Group. As Wink said, “Three is one.” Their magic is in the collaboration as they put on different capes to see the world with fresh eyes, overcoming their “disabilities” of being blue men with holes in their chests and reacting to everyday situations in new ways. As depicted in Figure 17.6, their different capes include:

  • The scientist who likes to test things and builds instruments
  • The artist or shaman who feels things and brings them to life
  • Sometimes they embrace the system as group members
  • Sometimes they rebel as “tricksters”
  • Some play the role of hero, pushing them toward a goal
  • Some act as the innocent, bringing humanity to what they do
An illustration of Blue Men

FIGURE 17.6 Blue Men

Implications

Diversity is not a goal. It's the key to survival over time. Find and nurture people with differential strengths that complement those already existing on your team, not reinforcing them. Do not push for perfect alignment of peoples' behaviors, relationships, and attitude with your existing culture. Do not bring in a complete cultural misfit like NBC did with Megyn Kelly, but do push for some evolutionary deviation on one or more dimensions.

With all that in mind, don't wiggle on purpose. Require rock-solid commitment to that. Let's explore how to get more positive deviation, drawing from Andrew Benedict-Nelson and Leitner's book See Think Solve on how to solve tough societal problems.

In his talks, Leitner describes culture as the unwritten rules and group expectations about what we should and shouldn't do. This is close to Seth Godin's “People like us do things like this.” Leitner then goes on to suggest that unwritten rules are:

  • Reinforced by social cues
  • More powerful than written rules
  • Virtually invisible
  • Insurmountable obstacles to change

He describes four ways to deal with unwritten rules and social norms. The wrong way is to try to change them with new written rules. The easy way is not to try to change them at all and just walk away. The intermediate way is to go around them with other changes. The advanced way is to prompt and reward positive deviation.

Benedict-Nelson and Leitner's main premises are:

  1. Deviant behavior can subvert the social norms—informal, unspoken rules—preventing you from solving problems.
  2. Every tough problem is held in place by one or more problematic social norms.
  3. See the actors, history, limits, future, configuration, and parthood and then think about norms and deviance before deviating from the norm to solve the problem.

Some definitions:

  • Actors are the people involved in problems—directly, influencing or not.
  • History is the stories people tell—true, false, or nonsense.
  • Limits are explicit rules and laws that influence how people behave.
  • Future is the set of beliefs people have about what is likely, possible, or impossible.
  • Configuration is labels or categories people use—whether or not they actually make sense.
  • Parthood is how your problems relate to other problems through shared actors, settings, or resources.
  • Norms are the informal, unspoken rules that really explain what's going on.
  • Deviance is an existing or new behavior outside the norms.

Deviance can be positive or negative, evolutionary or revolutionary, unintentional or deliberate. Positive deviations move you in desired directions where negative deviations do the opposite. Evolutionary deviations are incremental, where revolutionary deviations are major step changes. Unintentional deviations happen without foresight or planning as opposed to planned, deliberate deviations. You want positive deviations whether they are evolutionary, revolutionary, unintentional, or deliberate.

How to Get More Positive Deviance

Recall the ABCs of behavior modification: antecedents, behaviors, consequences. People do things because antecedents prompt them. They do them again because of the balance of consequences: rewarding or punishing desirable or undesirable behavior.

To get more positive deviation, start by prompting it. Hire for differential strengths to get people on your team who can do different things better than can your existing team members. Hire for differential preferences to nudge your culture in a new direction. Then explicitly invite people to challenge existing norms. It's all for naught if you don't change the balance of consequences as well.

Imagine I'm standing next to you and ask you to shake my hand. You do. I look you in the eye, smile, and say thank you. If I then ask you to shake my hand again, you likely will. You shake my hand both times because I ask you as an antecedent. You shake my hand the second time partly because the consequences of the first handshake are positive. But if I take your hand and then punch you in the face, you are less inclined to shake my hand again.

If you want positive change, you must dial up the positive consequences and dial down the negative consequences of desired behaviors and do the opposite for undesired behavior. Stop punching people in the face for doing things you want them to do—especially when it comes to positive changes that violate existing norms. And make sure others don't punish your deviants for doing things differently.

Boss comes by subordinate's desk holding a memo. “Did I ask you to write this?” “No.” Boss puts the memo in the subordinate's trash bin, effectively punching him in the face for thinking on his own.

Too many people get shunned for working harder or smarter or going an extra mile for an internal or external customer by others thinking they are being made to look bad or feeling threatened in some way. Be explicit about the need for deviance and apply the ABCs to behaviors supporting or hindering that deviance as well as to the deviance itself.

At a high level, this involves:

  • Understanding who's doing what: the actors, their history, limits, future beliefs, frameworks, and context
  • Digging out the unwritten rules that explain the inexplicable: the norms, social situations, and actions unexplained by laws or formal, explicit rules and who keeps the actors in line
  • Helping them migrate to a better way: with a deviant behavior turned into new stories

You should have mapped your current culture and the culture of the organization you're merging with or acquiring as part of your due diligence with Us for us and Ts for them in Tool 11.1. Now add an X to each line, identifying your aspirational culture. In some cases, it will be closer to your own or their existing culture. In other case, it will be something completely different.

In either case, invite everyone in both organizations to move towards your aspirational culture. Some will accept—at least with their words. Some will decline. Those declining are the easier case. Help them find other cultures, in other organizations better suited to their preferences.

Those that accept are trickier. Some of them will believe in the new culture, have the required strengths, and end up as valuable, contributing members of the new organization. Great. Some of them will say they accept, but never really sign up. Find those people as soon as practical and help them find other cultures, in other organizations better suited to their preferences.

Figure out where you're heading, and invite others to join the journey.

Notes

  1. 1   Bradt, George, 2012, “Corporate Culture: The Only Truly Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” Forbes (February 8).
  2. 2   Axonify, 2021, “‘The Turnaround King' on Why Frontline Employee Engagement Is a Business Imperative” (June 4).
  3. 3   Bradt, George, 2018, “What It Means to Have a Culture of Independence,” Forbes (July 3).
  4. 4   Groysberg, Boris, et al., 2018, “The Culture Factor,” Harvard Business Review (January).
  5. 5   Bradt, George, 2018, “What It Means to Have a Culture of Stability,” Forbes (July 10).
  6. 6   Bradt, “Culture of Interdependence.”
  7. 7   Bradt, George, 2021, “Culture Is the Collective Character of a Society. Manage It or Perish,” Forbes (January 12).
  8. 8   Sorkin, Andrew Ross, and Livni, Ephtrat, 2021, “When Business and Politics Mix, ‘Character Really Counts,'” New York Times (January 9).
  9. 9   Bradt, George, 2019, “The Next Three Cultural Dimensions Almost Every Organization Should Evolve,” Forbes (July 21).
  10. 10 Bradt, George, 2021, “How to Lead Through Post-Pandemic Changes in Sensibilities,” Forbes (October 6).
  11. 11 Bradt, George, 2018, “In Praise of Deviants,” Forbes (November 6).
  12. 12 Bradt, George, 2018, “Why the Highest-Performing Teams Always Fail over Time,” Forbes (October 30).
  13. 13 Benedict-Nelson, Andrew, and Leitner, Jeff, 2018, See Think Solve: A Simple Way to Tackle Tough Problems, Chicago: Leitner Insights LLC.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.128.202.92