References

  1. Adam, M. (2004). Why worry about theory-dependence? Circularity, minimal empiricality and reliability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18(2/3), 117–132.
  2. Agrawal, R. and Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB, 1215, 487–499.
  3. Amossé, T. (2013). La nomenclature socio-professionnelle: une histoire revisitée. Annales. Histoire, Sciences sociales, 4, 1039–1075.
  4. Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. [Online]. Available at: http://archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory [Accessed 11 May 2014].
  5. Andler, D. (2011). Le naturalisme est-il l’horizon scientifique des sciences sociales? In Les sciences humaines sont-elles des sciences?, Martin, T. (ed.). Vuibert, Paris, 15–34.
  6. Andrade, N. (2010). Technology and metaphors: From cyberspace to ambient intelligence. Observatorio (OBS), 4, 121–146.
  7. Anscombe, F.J. (1973). Graphs in statistical analysis. The American Statistician, 27(1), 441–475.
  8. Armatte, M. (2008). Histoire et Préhistoire de l’Analyse des données par J.-P. Benzecri: un cas de généalogie rétrospective. Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics, 4, 1–24.
  9. Armstrong, D.M. (1993). A world of states of affairs. Philosophical Perspectives, 7, 429–440.
  10. Asur, S. and Huberman, B.A. (2010). Predicting the future with social media. [Online]. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1003.5699.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  11. Bachimont, B. (1996). Herméneutique matérielle et artéfacture. Des machines qui pensent aux machines qui donnent à penser. PhD Thesis, École Polytechnique, Palaiseau.
  12. Bachimont, B. (2010a). La présence de l’archive: réinventer et justifier. Intellectica, 54, 281–309.
  13. Bachimont, B. (2010b). Le numérique comme support de la connaissance: entre matérialisation et interprétation. In Ressources vives. Le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques, Gueudet, G. and Trouche, L. (eds). Presses universitaires de Rennes, Rennes, 1–12.
  14. Bachimont, B. (2010c). Le sens de la technique: le numérique et le calcul. Encre Marine, Paris.
  15. Barabási, A.-L. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512.
  16. Barabási, A.-L. (2013). Network science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987), 20120375–20120375.
  17. Barberousse, A. and Imbert, C. (2013). Le tournant computationnel et l’innovation théorique. In Précis de philosophie de la physique, Le Bihan, S. (ed.). Vuibert, Paris, 1–26.
  18. Barberousse, A. and Imbert, C. (2014). Recurring models and sensitivity to computational constraints. Monist, 97(3), 259–279.
  19. Barbin, É. and Lamarche, J.-P. (2004). Histoires de probabilités et de statistiques. Ellipses, Paris.
  20. Barlow, J.P. (1996). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Humanist, 56(3), 18–19.
  21. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., and Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, San Jose, CA, 361–362.
  22. Beaud, J.-P. and Prévost, J.-G. (2000). L’ère du chiffre. Systèmes statistiques et traditions nationales. Presses de l’Université du Québec, Quebec.
  23. Bénel, A. (2013). Quelle interdisciplinarité pour les “humanités numériques”? Les cahiers du numérique, 1, 1–23.
  24. Bénel, A., Lejeune, C., and Zhou, C. (2010). Éloge de l’hétérogénéité des structures d’analyse de textes. Document numérique, 13(2), 41–56.
  25. Berners-Lee, T., Hall, W., Hendler, J.A., O’Hara, K.O., Shadbolt, N., and Weitzner, D.J. (2006). A framework for web science. Foundations and Trends® in Web Science, 1(1), 1–130.
  26. Berry, D.M. (2012). Understanding Digital Humanities. Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  27. Bertin, J. (1970). La graphique. Communications, 15, 169–185.
  28. Bollen, J., Mao, H., and Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1–8.
  29. Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L. (1999). Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  30. Boyer-Kassem, T. (2014). Layers of models in computer simulations. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28(4), 417–436.
  31. Breiman, L., Cox, D., and Breiman, L. (2001). Comment-statistical modeling: The two cultures. Statistical Science, 16(3), 199–231.
  32. Brooks, L.L. and Owen, R. (2008). Answering the Ultimate Question: How Net Promoter Can Transform Your Business. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  33. Brugger, N. (2012). Historical network analysis of the web. Social Science Computer Review, 31(3), 306–321.
  34. Bruno, I. and Didier, E. (2013). Benchmarking: l’État sous pression statistique. Zones, Paris.
  35. Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T., and Schnapp, J. (2012). Digital Humanities. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  36. Cailliau, F. and Poudat, C. (2008). Caractérisation lexicale des contributions clients agents dans un corpus de conversations téléphoniques retranscrites. JADT 2008: 9e Journées internationales d’Analyse statistique des données textuelles, Lyon, 267–275.
  37. Calude, C.S. and Longo, G. (2015). The deluge of spurious correlations in big data. [Online]. Report. Available at: https://www.di.ens.fr/users/longo/files/BigData-Calude-LongoAug21.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  38. Cardon, D. (2013). Dans l’esprit du PageRank. Réseaux, 177(1), 63.
  39. Casilli, A. (2012). Comment les usages numériques transforment-ils les sciences sociales? In Read/Write Book 2. Une introduction aux humanités numériques, Mounier, P. (ed.). OpenEdition Press, Marseille, 1–9.
  40. Caveng, R. (2012). La production des enquêtes quantitatives. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 6(1), 65.
  41. Chalmers, A. (2003). The theory-dependence of the use of instruments in science. Philosophy of Science, 70(3), 493–509.
  42. Champin, P.-A., Mille, A., and Prié, Y. (2013). Vers des traces numériques comme objets informatiques de premier niveau: une approche par les traces modélisées. Intellectica, 59(1), 1–33.
  43. Chateauraynaud, F. (2003). Prospéro: une technologie littéraire pour les sciences humaines. CNRS, Paris.
  44. Chaumartin, F.-R. (2012). Antelope, une plate-forme de TAL permettant d’extraire les sens du texte. PhD Thesis, Paris Diderot University, Paris.
  45. Cibois, P. (1990). Éclairer le vocabulaire des questions ouvertes par les questions fermées: le tableau lexical des questions. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology, 26(1), 12–21.
  46. Cioffi-Revilla, C. (2014). Introduction to Computational Social Science. Springer, Berlin.
  47. Cleveland, W.S. and McGill, R. (1985). Graphical perception and graphical methods for analyzing scientific data.  Science, 229(4716), 828–833.
  48. Couper, M.P. (2000). Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4), 464–494.
  49. D’Aubigny, G. (2001). Le traitement des questions ouvertes dans les enquêtes et sondages: Introduction. Journal de la société statistique de Paris, 142(4), 1–5.
  50. Dacos, M. and Mounier, P. (2014). Humanités numériques: état des lieux et positionnement de la recherche française dans le contexte international. Report, Institut français, Paris.
  51. Daston, L.J. and Galison, P.L. (2007). Objectivity. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  52. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., and Harshman, R. (1990). Indexing by latent semantic analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391–407.
  53. Desrosières, A. (2010). La politique des grands nombres. Histoire de la raison statistique. La Découverte, Paris.
  54. Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Algorithmic accountability. Digital Journalism, February 1–18.
  55. Diogo, M.P. (2017). “To be or not to be” la construction d’une identité civile pour les ingénieurs militaires portugais. Quaderns d’Història de l’Enginyeria, 15, 243–256.
  56. Dodds, P.S., Clark, E.M., Desu, S., Frank, M.R., Reagan, A.J., Williams, J.R., Mitchell, L., Harris, K.D., Kloumann, I.M., Bagrow, J.P., Megerdoomian, K., McMahon, M.T., Tivnan, B.F., and Danforth, C.M. (2015). Human language reveals a universal positivity bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2389–2394.
  57. Domingos, P. (2015). The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World. Basic Books, New York.
  58. Doueihi, M. (2008). La grande conversion numérique. Le Seuil, Paris.
  59. Duhem, P. (1906). La théorie physique. Son objet et sa structure. Chevalier et Rivière, Paris.
  60. Dupré, J. (2002). Human Nature and the Limits of Science. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  61. Fauré-Fremiet, E. (2017). Les origines de l’Académie des sciences de Paris (1840–1945). Quaderns d’Història de l’Enginyeria, 15, 20–31.
  62. Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Smyth, P. (1996). From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases. AI magazine, 17(3), 37–54.
  63. Few, S. (2007). Save the pies for dessert. Visual Business Intelligence Newsletter, August.
  64. Fielding, N.G. and Lee, R.M. (1997). Applications of computer software in the sociological analysis of qualitative data. Bulletin de Méthodologie sociologique, 57(1), 3–24.
  65. Fouetillou, G. (2007). Le Web et le traité constitutionnel européen. Réseaux, 144(5), 279–304.
  66. Franklin, A. (1994). How to avoid the experimenters’ regress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 25(3), 463–491.
  67. Frawley, W.J., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., and Matheus, C.J. (1992). Knowledge discovery in databases: An overview. AI Magazine, 13(3), 57–70.
  68. Frippiat, D. and Marquis, N. (2010). Les enquêtes par Internet en sciences sociales: un état des lieux. Population, 65(2), 309–338.
  69. Fukushima, K. (1980). Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics, 36(4), 193–202.
  70. Gelman, A. and Shalizi, C.R. (2013). Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(1), 8–38.
  71. Georges, F. (2009). Représentation de soi et identité numérique. Réseaux, 154(2), 165.
  72. Ginzburg, C. (1980). Signes, traces, pistes. Le Débat, 6, 3–44.
  73. Golumbia, D. (2009). The Cultural Logic of Computation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  74. Gomez-Uribe, C.A. and Hunt, N. (2015). The Netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 6(4), 1–19.
  75. Goody, J. (1979). La raison graphique: la domestication de la pensée sauvage. Éditions de Minuit, Paris.
  76. Graham, M. (2013). Geography/Internet: Ethereal alternate dimensions of cyberspace or grounded augmented realities? Geographical Journal, 179(2), 177–182.
  77. Grefenstette, G. (1994). Corpus-derived first, second, and third-order word affinities. [Online]. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.3712&rep=rep1&type=pdf [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  78. Grossberg, S. (1988). Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, and architectures. Neural Networks, 1(1), 17–61.
  79. Guérin-Pace, F. (1997). La statistique textuelle. Un outil exploratoire en sciences sociales. Population, 52(4), 865–887.
  80. Guichard, É. (2013). L’internet et les épistémologies des SHS. Sciences/Lettres, 2 [Online]. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/rsl/389 [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  81. Hacking, I. (1981). Est-ce qu’on voit à travers un microscope? In Philosophie des sciences – Tome 2: Naturalismes et réalismes, Laugier, S., Wagner, P. (eds). Vrin, Paris, 305–322.
  82. Hacking, I. (2002). L’émergence de la probabilité. Le Seuil, Paris.
  83. Heidelberger, M. (2003). Theory-ladenness and scientific instruments in experimentation. In The Philosophy of Scientific Experimentation, Radder, H. (ed.). University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 138–151.
  84. Hey, T., Tansley, S., and Tolle, K. (2009). The Fourth Paradigm. Microsoft Research, Redmond.
  85. Hookway, C. (2013). Pragmatism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2016 Edition), Zalta, E.N. (ed.). Stanford University, Palo Alto [Online]. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/ [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  86. Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H. (1989). Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 2(5), 359–366.
  87. Humphreys, P. (2004). Extending Ourselves. Computational Science, Empiricism and Scientific Method. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  88. Israel-Jost, V. (2016). Computer image processing: An epistemological aid in scientific investigation. Perspectives on Science, 24(6), 669–965.
  89. Jebeile, J. (2013). Explication et compréhension dans les sciences empiriques. PhD Thesis, Pantheon-Sorbonne University, Paris.
  90. Jebeile, J. (2016). Les simulations sont-elles des expériences numériques? Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review, 55(1), 59–86.
  91. Jouison-Laffitte, E. (2009). La recherche action: oubliée de la recherche dans le domaine de l’entrepreneuriat. Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat, 8(1), 1.
  92. Jurgenson, N. (2012). When atoms meet bits: Social media, the mobile web and augmented revolution. Future Internet, 4(1), 83–91.
  93. Kant, E. (1995). Critique de la faculté de juger. Aubier, Paris.
  94. Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. [Online]. Available at: http://www.uk.sagepub.com/books/Book242780?subject=F00&fs=1 [Accessed 19 August 2014].
  95. Kitchin, R. and McArdle, G. (2016). What makes big data, big data? Exploring the ontological characteristics of 26 datasets. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1–10.
  96. Krämer, S. (2012). Qu’est-ce donc qu’une trace, et quelle est sa fonction épistémologique? État des lieux. Trivium. Revue franco-allemande de sciences humaines et sociales, 10 [Online]. https://journals.openedition.org/trivium/4171 [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  97. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., and Moon S. (2010). What is Twitter: A Social Network or a News Media?  ACM Press, New York.
  98. Lagoze, C. (2014). Big data, data integrity, and the fracturing of the control zone. Big Data & Society, 1(2) [Online]. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053951714558281 [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  99. Lallich-Boidin, G. (2001). Données linguistiques et traitement des questions ouvertes. Journal de la Société française de statistique, 4, 29–36.
  100. Lanciani, A.A. (2011). Analyse phénoménologique du concept de probabilité. Hermann, Paris.
  101. Landauer, T.K. and Dumais, S.T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 1(2), 211–240.
  102. Lassègue, J. (1996). La méthode expérimentale, la modélisation informatique et l’intelligence artificielle. Intellectica, 22(1), 21–65.
  103. Lebart, L. and Salem, A. (1994). Statistique textuelle. Dunod, Paris.
  104. LeCun, Y. (2014). Deep learning. Week 1: Intro to deep learning. [Online]. Available at: http://cilvr.cs.nyu.edu/lib/exe/fetch.php?media=deeplearning:dlintro.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  105. Leonelli, S. (2014). What difference does quantity make? On the epistemology of big data in biology. Big Data & Society, 1(1) [Online]. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2053951714534395 [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  106. Leonelli, S. (2016). Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  107. Lewin, K. (1952). Field Theory in Social Science. Harper & Row, New York.
  108. Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Challenge of Scientometrics. The Development, Measurement and Self-organization of Scientific Communications. DSWO Press, Leiden.
  109. Loeve, S. (2009). Le concept de technologie à l’échelle des molécules-machines. PhD Thesis, Paris Nanterre University, Paris.
  110. Loosveldt, G. and Sonck, N. (2008). An evaluation of the weighting procedures for an online access panel survey. Survey Research Methods, 2(2), 93–105.
  111. MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1(233), 281–297.
  112. Mäki, U. (2013). Scientific imperialism: Difficulties in definition, identification, and assessment. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27(3), 325–339.
  113. Manovich, L. (2007). Cultural analytics: Analysis and visualization of large cultural data sets. [Online]. Available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Cultural+analytics:#2 [Accessed 24 December 2012].
  114. Marc, X. (2001). Les modalités de recueil des réponses libres en institut de sondage: le rôle de l’enquêteur, les consignes et les procédures de contrôle, les perspectives d’amélioration. Journal de la Société française de statistique, 142(4), 21–28.
  115. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into The Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  116. Mayer-Schönberger, V. and Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Eamon Dolan/Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York.
  117. Mayo, D.G. and Cox, D. (2009). New perspectives on (some old) problems of frequentist statistics. Error and Inference, 49, 247–330.
  118. McCosker, A. and Wilken, R. (2014). Rethinking “big data” as visual knowledge: The sublime and the diagrammatic in data visualisation. Visual Studies, 29(2), 155–164.
  119. McCulloch, W.S. and Pitts, W. (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4), 115–133.
  120. Merzeau, L. (2013a). L’intelligence des traces. Intellectica, 59(1), 1–22.
  121. Merzeau, L. (2013b). Traces numériques et recrutement: du symptôme au cheminement. In Traces numériques: de la production à l’interprétation, Galinon-Mélénec, B., Zlitni, S. (eds). CNRS, Paris, 35–53.
  122. Metaxas, P.T. (2012). Why is the shape of the web a bowtie? WWW 2012, WebScience Track, April.
  123. Metropolis, N. and Ulam, S. (1949). The Monte Carlo method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44(247), 335–341.
  124. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., and Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, Burges, C.J.C., Bottou, L., Welling, M., Ghahramani, Z., Weinberger, K.Q. (eds). Curran Associates, New York, 3111–3119.
  125. Monnin, A. (2012). Les ressources, ces ombres récalcitrantes. [Online].  SociologieS. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/sociologies/4334.
  126. Moretti, F. (2000). Conjectures on world literature. New Left Review, 1, 54–68.
  127. Mounier, P. (2015). Une “utopie politique” pour les humanités numériques? Socio, 4, 97–112.
  128. Musso, P. (2010). Le Web: nouveau territoire et vieux concepts. Annales des Mines – Réalités industrielles, 4, 75–83.
  129. Mussou, C. (2012). Et le Web devint archive: enjeux et défis. Le Temps des médias, 19(2), 259–266.
  130. O’Hara, K. and Hall, W. (2012). Web science. In The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies, Dutton, W. (ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  131. Pak, A and Paroubek, P. (2010). Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. LREC, 10, 1320–1326.
  132. Pégny, M. (2012). Les deux formes de la thèse de Church-Turing et l’épistémologie du calcul. Philosophia Scientiæ, 1(3), 39–67.
  133. Pégny, M. (2013). Sur les limites empiriques du calcul. Calculabilité, complexité et physique. PhD Thesis, Pantheon-Sorbonne University, Paris.
  134. Peirce, C.S. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302.
  135. Perini, L. (2012). Truth-bearers or Truth-makers? Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 6(1), 142–147.
  136. Petit, V. (2017). Perspectives sur le design. Métier, enseignement, recherche. Cahiers COSTECH, 1 [Online]. http://www.costech.utc.fr/CahiersCOSTECH/spip.php?article26.
  137. Petit, V. and Deldicque, T. (2017).  La recherche en design avant la “recherche en design”. Cahiers COSTECH, 1(1) [Online]. http://www.costech.utc.fr/CahiersCOSTECH/spip.php?article25 [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  138. Pincemin, B. (2012). Sémantique interprétative et textométrie. Texto! Textes et Cultures, 17( 3), 1–21.
  139. Popper, K.R. (1963). Conjuctures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Routledge and Kegan Paul, Abingdon-on-Thames.
  140. Porter, T.M. (1995). Trust in Numbers. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  141. Porter, T.M. (2003). Statistics and statistical methods. In The Cambridge History of Science, Porter, T.M., Ross, D. (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 238–250.
  142. Provost, F. and Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science and its relationship to big data and data driven decision making. Big Data, 1(1), 51–59.
  143. Rajaraman, A., Ullman, J., David, J.D., Leskovec, J., and Rajaraman, A. (2011). Mining of Massive Datasets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  144. Rastier, F. (2001). Arts et sciences du texte. PUF, Paris.
  145. Rastier, F. (2015). Sémantique de corpus – Questions d’épistémologie et de méthodologie. Texto ! Textes et Cultures, 20(1), 1–11.
  146. Ratinaud, P. and Déjean, S. (2009). IRaMuTeQ: implémentation de la méthode ALCESTE d’analyse de texte dans un logiciel libre. MASHS, June.
  147. Reichfeld, F. and Markey, R. (2011). The Ultimate Question 2.0 (Revised and Expanded Edition): How Net Promoter Companies Thrive in a Customer-Driven World. Harvard Business Review Press, Cambridge.
  148. Reinert, M. (1990).  ALCESTE – Une méthodologie d’analyse des données textuelles et une application: Aurélia de Gérard de Nerval. Bulletin de Méthodologie sociologique, 26(1), 24–54.
  149. Rickert, H. (1997). Science de la culture et science de la nature suivi de Théorie de la définition. Gallimard, Paris.
  150. Ricœur, P. (1983). Temps et récit 1. Le Seuil, Paris.
  151. Ries, E. (2011). The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. Currency, New South Wales.
  152. Robinson, V.M.J. (1993). Current controversies in action research. Public Administration Quarterly, 17( 3), 263–290.
  153. Rodrigues, M. (De Lurdes) (2017). La profession d’ingénieur au Portugal. Quaderns d’Història de l’Enginyeria, 15, 271–286.
  154. Rogers, R. (2008). Post-demographic machines. In Walled Garden, Dekker, A., Wolfsberger, A. (eds). Virtueel Platform, Amsterdam, 29–39.
  155. Rogers, R. (2009). The end of the virtual: Digital methods. Inaugural Speech, Chair of New Media & Digital Culture. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
  156. Rogers, R. (2010). Internet research: The question of method – A keynote address from the YouTube and the 2008 election cycle in the United States conference. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(2/3), 241–260.
  157. Rogers, R. (2013). Digital Methods. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  158. Rosenblatt, F. (1958). The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological review, 65(6), 386–408.
  159. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., and Williams, R.J. (1985). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Vol. 1: Foundation, Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L. (eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  160. Sahlgren, M. (2008). The distributional hypothesis. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 20(1), 33–54.
  161. Savage, M. and Burrows, R. (2007). The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41(5), 885–899.
  162. Schindler, S. (2013). Theory-laden experimentation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(1), 89.
  163. Schmitt, É. (2015). La structuration disciplinaire et thématique des humanités numériques. 10e colloque ISKO France 2015. European Doctoral College, Strasbourg, November.
  164. Schonlau, M., Zapert, K., Simon, L.P., Sanstad, K.H., Marcus, S.M., Adams, J., Spranca, M., Kan, H., Turner, R., and Berry, S.H. (2004). A comparison between responses from a propensity-weighted web survey and an identical RDD survey. Social Science Computer Review, 22(1), 128–138.
  165. Schurmans, M.-N. (2011). Expliquer, interpréter, comprendre: le paysage épistémologique des sciences sociales. Carnets des sciences de l’éducation, Geneva.
  166. Schutt, R. and O’Neil, C. (2014). Doing Data Science. O’Reilly, Sebastopol.
  167. Serres, A. (2002). Quelle(s) problématique(s) de la trace? [Online]. Available at: https://archivesic.ccsd.cnrs.fr/sic_00001397/document [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  168. Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., Hendler, J.A., and Dutton, W.H. (2013). Web science: A new frontier. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987) [Online]. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rsta.2012.0512 [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  169. Shinn, T. and Ragouet, P. (2000). Formes de division du travail scientifique et convergence intellectuelle. La recherche technico-instrumentale. Revue française de sociologie, 41(3), 447–473.
  170. Simondon, G. (2017). On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Univocal, Minneapolis.
  171. Simondon, G. (2005). L’invention dans les techniques. Cours et conférences. Le Seuil, Paris.
  172. Snow, C.P. (1959). Two Cultures. Science, 130(3373), 419–419.
  173. Spanos, A. and Mayo, D.G. (2015). Error statistical modeling and inference: Where methodology meets ontology. Synthese, 192(11), 3533–3555.
  174. Stevens, K.A. (1981). The visual interpretation of surface contours. Artificial Intelligence, 17(1-3), 47–73.
  175. Su, Y.-S. (2008). It’s easy to produce chartjunk using Microsoft® Excel 2007 but hard to make good graphs. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52(10), 4594–4601.
  176. Tiercelin, C. (1993). C.S. Peirce et le Pragmatisme. PUF, Paris.
  177. Tufte, E.R. (1997). Visual Explanations. Graphics Press, Cheshire.
  178. Tufte, E.R. (2008). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire.
  179. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading.
  180. Turing, A.M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460.
  181. Vandendorpe, C. (1999). Du papyrus à l’hypertexte. La Découverte, Paris.
  182. Vapnik, V.N. (1998). Statistical Learning Theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  183. Varenne, F. (2007). Du modèle à la simulation informatique. Vrin, Paris.
  184. Varenne, F. and Silberstein, M. (2013). Épistémologies et pratiques de la modélisation et de la simulation. Éditions matériologiques, Paris.
  185. Vial, S. (2016). Le tournant design des humanités numériques. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication, 8 [Online]. https://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/1828 [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  186. Wang, Y. and Kosinski, M. (2017). Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (JPSP), 114(2), 1–47.
  187. Wigner, E.P. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13(1), 1–14.
  188. Windelband, W. (2000). Histoire et sciences de la nature. Discours prononcé au Rectorat de Strasbourg. Les Études philosophiques, 1, 1–16.
  189. Wing, J.M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33.
  190. Witte, J.C. (2009). Introduction to the special issue on web surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 37(3), 283–290.
  191. Wu, X. and Zhang, X. (2016). Responses to critiques on machine learning of criminality perceptions. [Online]. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/1611.04135 [Accessed 29 March 2020].
  192. Wu, X., Kumar, V., Ross, Q.J., Ghosh, J., Yang, Q., Motoda, H., McLachlan, G.J., Ng, A., Liu, B., Yu, P.S., Zhou, Z.-H., Steinbach, M., Hand, D.J., and Steinberg, D. (2008). Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowledge and Information Systems, 14(1), 1–37.
  193. Yakout, M., Berti-Équille, L., and Elmagarmid, A.K. (2013). Don’t be SCAREd: Use SCalable Automatic REpairing with maximal likelihood and bounded changes. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Management of data – SIGMOD’13. 553, 553–564.
  194. Yeung, K. (2017). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation and Governance, 1–39 12(4), 505–523.
  195. Zhao, Y. (2012). R and data mining: Examples and case studies. [Online]. Available at: http://www.rdatamining.com [Accessed 29 March 2020].
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
13.59.61.119