Dr Nic Peeling
Your work life will be full of things you want to achieve:
The list is endless, and your success will be vital to how successful you are at work. Nothing you want is likely to be handed to you on a plate – you will have to negotiate to get as much as possible of what you want. It is hard to overstate how important it is that you negotiate so that you get what you want and without causing unnecessary upset to the person you are negotiating with. The objective of this module is to equip you to become a great negotiator.
You will learn:
Almost every role you perform as part of your work will involve you in having to persuade others to give you things, or perform actions, that they would prefer not to. You will seldom have the power to make them do what you want them to do – in most cases you need to persuade them. The art of such persuasion is called negotiation.
At the heart of any negotiation is conflict, because you are pitting yourself against someone who doesn’t want to do what you want them to. Most people find conflict difficult – but knowing the rules of the game will take away most of the fear.
Many people think good negotiators are born with the ability. Negotiating is a skill in which many people lack self-confidence. It is, however, a skill that is easy to learn and you will soon find that your negotiating outcomes improve dramatically. You may even end up enjoying the thrill of a good negotiation.
There is a whole range of negotiating strategies and it is obviously important to select an appropriate one for the situation you face. Here is a list of the main strategies to choose from:
Were you aware of all the different strategies? Are there strategies you might have chosen differently in past negotiations? Will you consider the full range of strategies in future situations?
The first two strategies (auction and sticker price) do not involve a negotiations process, but all other strategies need all the different phases of the negotiations process. So, let’s start at the beginning, with preparation.
Probably the most common of all mistakes that negotiators make is skimping on proper preparation for the negotiation, or not realising that there are some issues in the preparation phase that must be addressed.
Success or failure in any venture is dependent on you being properly prepared. For example, a tennis match is heavily influenced by what has happened before either player steps onto the court. The same is most certainly true for a negotiator.
Would you go to buy a new car from a dealership not knowing what you would pay from an internet broker? You may find it considerably harder to answer this question than for a car purchase, but you must come up with an answer. Techniques that can be used include the following:
Leverage is the word used to describe how much power you have in the negotiation process. This has very little to do with how much power your employer has. The main way of assessing your leverage is to consider the walk-away scenarios for both yourself and your opponent. What will you do if you cannot close the deal? What do you think your opponent will do if they cannot agree a deal? The person with the most attractive walk-away scenario has the most leverage.
If you think you have little leverage, the chances are you are being too pessimistic. If you think you have very good leverage, it is easy to lose the deal by not following the rules of the negotiating game properly – for example, many people will walk away from a deal rather than lose face.
The negotiator must take the time to fully understand what is being bought, sold, disputed, etc. This is especially true when an ‘outsider’ is doing the negotiations. For example, it is not uncommon to use someone who is selling something else to a common customer to also negotiate a sale of your offering.
It is surprising how common it is for there to be a misunderstanding as to the precise specification of the subject of the negotiation, whether it be a product, service, dispute, etc.
Negotiations are a great opportunity to ‘up-sell’ – to offer additional features at extra cost. Before your next negotiation situation, prepare, and price, any obvious up-selling opportunities before the negotiation starts.
At the very least, before you start the negotiation you need to talk to any person who can veto your deal. Nobody who thinks they should have a say likes to be presented with a deal that they have been unsighted on. Time and again in Business Express you will see that a cardinal rule is: no surprises.
There are few worse situations than negotiating a deal which is then vetoed by your boss, the finance department, your business development department, your contracts department … the completion of this list is left as an exercise for the reader.
The key technique to avoid the last potential pitfall is to agree with your organisation what is your bottom line, which you will not breach without explicit authority to do so. A related issue is described in the next section.
Arguably, the worst mistake a negotiator can make is to negotiate a deal that subsequently loses their organisation a lot of money, or damages the organisation’s reputation. No negotiator wants to admit failure, but it is better to walk away than do a bad deal.
One of the main reasons for talking to your stakeholders is to identify your deal breakers, which you must never breach. As an example, government bodies will seldom agree to unlimited indemnities, so government negotiators will always have to agree limits on indemnities as part of any negotiation. Another example might be that your boss insists that you never agree a delivery time that you aren’t sure the organisation can safely meet.
This section finishes with a few useful practical tips:
We will now move on to face-to-face negotiations. However, before you start haggling or bargaining you need to build a relationship with your opponent and agree issues such as how the negotiations will proceed, how decisions will be recorded, who will prepare a contract or written agreement (if needed), and the like.
Think back to a few of your last negotiations: did you prepare properly for them? Were you aware of all the issues that needed to be part of your preparation? Can you see the value of good preparation? Will you prepare better in future negotiations?
Business Express modules are divided into 30-minute learning chunks, so there are obviously areas where learning material has to be abbreviated. This section on The Sharing has been reduced to headline issues to allow more time on other, more crucial, aspects that a good negotiator needs to know.
Before you start making offers and receiving counter-offers it is important to agree various issues, exchange relevant information, ask important questions, which will all serve to build a relationship with your opponent. The Sharing can last anywhere from minutes to days, depending on the importance of the deal being negotiated.
Some key issues to be raised in The Sharing include:
Try to reduce your opponent’s expectations of the deal they can achieve. Examples might be ‘The quality of product and after-sales service we offer will obviously mean we are not the cheapest option’ or ‘We have a limited budget and we are evaluating a number of ways to achieve the best value for money from our investment’.
Another key theme in Business Express is the need to listen at least as much as you talk. You cannot pick up information if you don’t listen. Ask lots of open questions (questions that cannot be answered by a simple yes or no) – for example, ‘Are there any things that you would want us to offer you in the negotiation?’
Don’t try to make friends with your opponent – you seldom get the best deals from your friends. You want a polite, positive business relationship, where you are the stronger partner.
If you are a buyer, never reveal your budget up front because a skilled negotiator will make sure that is the least they get out of you.
Were you aware that a sharing phase is useful? Have you used The Sharing in past negotiations? Do you see the value in The Sharing? Will you use The Sharing in future?
Let the offers and counter-offers begin!
To save the reader’s time we will deal with haggling and bargaining in a single section. The difference between haggling and bargaining can be best illustrated by what I call the myth of the ‘win–win’ negotiation. In a haggling situation you want to win big and if your opponent has to lose – then tough! In a bargaining situation you want to win as big as possible, but without making your opponent unhappy.
This leads on to the golden rule of negotiations: set yourself a challenging target. There is ample research that the more ambitious your target, the better the deal you will get. You need to be bold, brave and tough. Remember that if someone says about you ‘they are a really tough negotiator’, they will be complimenting, not criticising, you. The world admires tough negotiators.
You may be thinking that a tough negotiator has to be aggressive. This is 100% wrong. You need to be tough but polite, courteous and, if possible, charming. It is much easier to give in to someone who asks for things nicely. This is equally true for haggling as it is for bargaining. There is never a need to be aggressive or impolite.
The importance of getting a good deal is often underestimated. If you are bargaining over price, every pound extra you win goes straight on the bottom line. Many organisations work on a profit margin of 10%, so an extra £1,000 is the equivalent of winning £10,000 of new business.
Do you think you have set yourself sufficiently ambitious targets in previous negotiations?
Should you make the opening offer? A lot of people agonise over this particular issue. In practice it makes little difference. If you make the opening offer correctly (see below), you have set the tone for the negotiation. If your opponent opens, they may make a mistake you can exploit.
If you do not know the value of the object being negotiated I would recommend trying to persuade your opponent to make the opening offer.
If you make the opening offer, what should it be?
When you are buying, I have recommended never disclosing your budget. However, when selling, the reverse is true. Try to find out during The Sharing what your opponent’s budget is. Make sure that your opening offer uses up their entire budget.
If you are selling, ask for the highest credible price; when buying, offer the lowest credible price. Don’t be afraid of pushing credibility to the absolute limit.
Before we start thinking about all the different bargaining tactics at your disposal, it is worth a practical tip for those who just don’t feel they can ever be good negotiators. Try treating the negotiation as a game, where you are pitting your wits against your opponent. Try not to think about how important the negotiation is or you will freeze. You can see this problem when people buy and sell houses – there is so much money involved they frequently panic and lose the deal for silly reasons. If you really cannot handle the pressure then bring in a professional negotiator, or a friend/colleague, to do it for you. Being blunt, if you cannot play the game you will pay a terrible price (literally and metaphorically).
Try practising in your home life. When buying something of value, ask, ‘What is your best price?’, then say, ‘We are not far apart, can you do a little better?’ This will work for almost anything with a non-trivial ticket price – at an antiques market/shop, or a jeweller, or when buying a kitchen or bathroom, a car, etc. Just try it and see what you can save by politely asking for a better deal.
Starting at the very beginning, never offer something without getting anything in return. The basic form of an offer should be: ‘If you give me X, I would consider offering you Y.’ Obviously the skilled negotiator will offer something they value less than what they are getting in return.
In a later section we will discuss how to close a deal. It is important to prepare for closing a deal by making smaller and smaller concessions as the negotiation progresses.
A classic example of this tactic might be when you are buying from a small or relatively new supplier. They will almost certainly value customer references and you can offer such references – if they do a good job (and it virtually ensures they will do a good job).
Another example is that if your opponent has cash flow problems, you can offer some money up front, staged payments, and prompt settlement of the final bill.
Try to get things you value highly, but that cost your opponent little, as cheaply as possible.
Exploit time issues to your advantage. At the end of an organisation’s financial year they tend to be very busy, but at the start of the next year, work is often hard to find. Negotiating for work at the start of their financial year often puts you in a strong position. Some organisations have cycles when they get bonuses for business they have won – you can take advantage of these. If an organisation has a slack period, you can often get a good deal and force a quick closure of the deal on terms that are very advantageous to you.
Negotiations must be one of the only aspects of business life where lying is regarded by everyone as ‘part of the game’. Bluffs that cannot be detected are obviously the safest, but if you ever get caught out, just look totally unembarrassed and say something like, ‘I think I may have embellished the facts.’
Never lie about something that could get you sued. For example, never overstate the capabilities of a product or service, or lie about its performance in past situations.
Never be so keen to do a deal that you get your organisation into a position where it loses money or reputation. A classic example of this would be to offer a delivery time your organisation cannot meet, or to offer a change to the standard specification without checking that this is both feasible and cost effective.
A useful bluffing tactic is the ‘third-party mandate’.
It can be useful to call upon a, possibly mythical, third party as the reason why you cannot do something, or why you must do something else:
A clever way to put your opponent under pressure is to let a silence build. It is amazing how often your opponent will end the silence with a concession.
Overusing any tactic, such as the power of silence, will irritate your opponent.
I cannot illustrate the importance of listening for cues from your opponent better than by quoting an example from the TV series The Apprentice. The teams were tasked to approach celebrities to get offers from them for a charity auction. One team had prepared a list of offers they wished to get from each of their celebrities. In one negotiation the celebrity said: ‘I want to be the celebrity that raises the most for the charity.’ Did the budding apprentice who led the negotiation deviate from his plan? No!
I will give just one further example of a cue. Your opponent says: ‘Our previous supplier let us down badly.’ This probably means that your opponent is more interested in the quality of your service than the lowest price.
Listening for cues does of course imply that you need to shut up long enough for your opponent to chat about their issues. It also means that after The Sharing you need to continue asking open questions.
Do you have a tendency to talk too much? Did you know about the power of silence? Are you good at asking open questions?
Experienced negotiators sometimes get frustrated because they know quite quickly how the deal will turn out. You just have to let the negotiation run its natural course – if you try to cut too quickly to the end point you will pay for it.
It is important to not let the pace of the negotiation drag. Always push for follow-up meetings and insist that your opponent responds to issues quickly.
Email is an excellent way to maintain momentum. It is also very good for maintaining a written record of issues that have already been agreed. It can also be used to continue making offers and counter-offers.
Anger and unreasonable behaviour are very likely to generate an emotional response from your opponent, and this is seldom productive.
Don’t let this section’s advice encourage you to become an appeaser. If your opponent gets angry, makes accusations, is unreasonable, or issues frequent ultimatums, do not give in – you must unemotionally oppose such tactics.
Don’t do anything to make your opponent lose face – you want to get the better end of the deal, but you do not want to leave your opponent feeling unhappy.
During haggling especially you do not have to be rational, but in both haggling and bargaining, rational arguments are often very powerful. As an example, if your opponent is putting you under pressure to shorten a delivery time, you can explain that this may lead to mistakes being made, or to increased expense, which ultimately your opponent must pay for.
During your preparation phase you need to have researched facts that you can use during the negotiation. For example, if you make it clear you know the features and prices of competitive products or services then your opponent will know they must make an attractive offer to you.
In many cases, if your opponent demands something, you can demand a reciprocal offer from them. As an example, if your opponent demands penalty clauses for late delivery, you can demand reciprocal clauses if your opponent’s organisation changes the specification of what is to be delivered. There are many areas where reciprocity isn’t reasonable, however, so use it when it favours you and reject it when it is not applicable and puts you at a disadvantage.
It is worth highlighting alternatives as a particularly useful form of open questions. They can help expose your opponent’s priorities and also make them face conflicting choices. An example would be:
‘Are you willing to change your current processes to use an off-the-shelf solution, or do you prefer to pay to have our product customised to suit your current way of working?’
Everyone makes mistakes and so it is likely you will upset your opponent at some stage. A clear, unambiguous apology can quickly clear the air.
Everyone is familiar with the approach where two negotiators work together, with one playing it hard and the other being far friendlier. The main problem with this approach is that two negotiators are one too many. A better tactic is to make the bad cop an absent third party (see ‘the third-party mandate’).
In the section on preparation, I advised that you prepare up-selling opportunities. During the negotiation you may also get the opportunity to cross-sell other offerings from your organisation. The best way in such cases is to say: ‘Is it alright if I get one of our people to call you tomorrow?’ Don’t just provide contact details to your opponent.
Some examples might be:
Have you learned a number of new tactics to use in negotiations? Will you use some of them in future?
There is a double benefit from knowing all the common negotiating tactics – not only can you use them, you can also spot when they are being used on you. Not reacting as your opponent expects can be both effective and great fun.
When a negotiation deadlocks it can be pretty scary. There are, however, many techniques to break the deadlock:
If you have been making smaller and smaller concessions throughout the negotiation, then closing the deal may be as simple as saying, ‘I have reached my limit, are you also ready to do the deal?’ A variant of the simple approach is to say, ‘If I make this last concession, will you do the deal?’
If you cannot close the deal, then you have a deadlock, so all the options to break the deadlock, outlined above, are available to you.
You can issue a threat, such as ‘Unless you can knock £10,000 off your price then I will try your competitor’, or ‘Surely you don’t want to lose the deal for £5,000?’
The classic closing techniques are to ration some commodity – usually time:
If I had a pound for every closed deal that never got executed, I would be a rich man. You need a commitment to the deal, such as:
You must assess yourself after each negotiation. What worked? What didn’t work? What could you have done better? How near did you get to your negotiating target?
Once the object of the deal is finished, review whether your organisation benefited from the deal you negotiated. What are the chances of follow-on relationships with your opponent’s organisation?
If you had a second in the negotiation, ask them for constructive criticism.
There are a number of ways to start your journey to becoming a great negotiator:
You should see that you are setting yourself tougher targets and keep track of how much your deals improve with time.
Prepare a list of things you intend to do in your next negotiation that you haven’t done previously. Review the first negotiation after reading this document, and review whether your negotiation went better as a result.
Try selecting some of the tactics you haven’t used before and see if they work for you in your next negotiation.
During your next negotiation, can you spot the tactics your opponent is using on you?
18.218.89.173