Congratulations! You’re in charge. Or are you?
When you start a new leadership position, you do not have the luxury of a settling-in period. Given the pace of the modern IT environment, pausing to catch your breath would be a deadly mistake.
At the same time, you can’t do everything all at once. Your team may not know you, or at least does not know you as a leader. The team is not yet the well-oiled execution machine that you will build later. The team is still a bunch of people trying to figure out who the new boss is, and what the boss wants. Depending on the history of the group, some of your team members may not have your best interest or even the best interest of the company at heart. You have to lay the groundwork to get the team moving in the right direction.
Start by focusing on a few early wins. This will teach the team how you like to operate, get them used to achieving within that framework, and buy you some breathing room from your own boss.
Identifying early wins depends on what you learn about the environment, what your boss expects of you, and the direction you want to take the team. Select early win tasks that address all three issues. This is not the time to pick a fight.
A change in leadership is a tremendous opportunity for the organization to make needed changes in direction.
But it is also a time when the incoming leader is vulnerable. The new boss has not had time to develop the working relationships or loyalty needed to make the team work effectively.
Be aware of the vulnerability, but don’t be captured by it. Embrace the opportunity.
In your first 90 days, you have to build your team, and learn to make your team work well within the overall organization.
One of the most critical drivers to your team’s success will lie in the decisions you make about how to structure your team. You have to decide on an appropriate structure for the team, and who will fill which roles within it. The earlier you make these decisions, the more you will be able to leverage the changes during your first critical 90 days.
The irony is that you may need to make these decisions after insufficient time to learn about the people in your team, and what their strengths and weaknesses are.
So you will have to gather as much high-quality information as you can, as quickly as you can. Interview team members personally. Speak with key stakeholders in other groups to get insight. But don’t get caught up in the echo chamber of the first person to catch your ear. Sometimes the most insight is held by the members of the team who are least likely to speak up. You have to gather the information quickly, but also filter the bad information from the good.
Besides building your team from within, you also need to be building relationships with other supporting teams. Your team needs to fit into the landscape of the overall organization.
Some of the people you are supervising may be jealous of your new position, especially if you are promoted to supervise people who were once your peers. Expect that your leadership will be challenged. Meet those challenges with firmness, fairness, and decency. If some people in your organization simply will not accept you as the leader, they will need to be moved out of your organization, the sooner the better.
The way you meet these challenges will set the tone for your tenure as the leader of the team. Grasp each challenge as an opportunity to set the tone for your team as it will become.
If you have inherited an existing team, you need to speak with them as early as you can. You need to find out who does what, how each person works, and who is ready to follow directions.
You also need to find out who is willing to give you a chance. Some team members may not be happy about you as their new manager. Try to work it out, but be prepared to shift them out of your team if necessary.
Don’t let problems fester. There is a temptation to ignore problems, but they will get worse rather than better. Try to address issues head-on, usually in one-on-one discussions. Explain your expectations and ask for a commitment. Make it clear that comments are welcome, and plans may be adjusted as the situation evolves, but the plan is the plan. The manager’s job is to define the plan; the team member’s job is to execute it.
Read the evaluations left by your predecessor, but take them with a grain of salt. Not all managers are entirely objective, and you need to be wary of evidence that the previous manager may have played favorites at evaluation time.
Take a look at the group dynamics to see how team members work together. Identify which strengths and weaknesses exist in the communication and interaction between team members.
You will need to identify which team members fall into which of the following categories:
The type of task that you select for an early win depends on the type of environment you have inherited. The strategy you employ needs to match the situation you find yourself in.
Even the definition of a “win” can shift over time. When you make your 90-day plan, present it to your boss. Get buy-in and define what success means, and how it will be measured.
Your boss, your peers, and your partners can also help align your priorities with the organization’s priorities. If you are succeeding at something that is less important to the overall organization, you are failing to reach your potential.
Some of your early wins may be organizational. Not all of these may be reportable to your boss, but you need to accomplish them to get your team off to a good start. Track these on your 90-day plan, and don’t let yourself get sidetracked from taking care of them:
If you haven’t gathered this information, it will be impossible for you to work on your first early win: Structure the team for success.
Structure the Team for Success
It may be the case that the team is already well structured. In that case, reinforce the parts of the structure that work. Assure the leaders that you like the work they have been doing, and encourage the staff members to continue.
It is more likely that there are some adjustments that need to be made. There may be someone on the team who is hoarding knowledge or interesting work. There may be someone who is more interested in exercising authority than performing with excellence. Or there may be someone on the team with potential that has not been realized yet.
As an outsider, you have an advantage. People within a team see the work that they have always done, divided up the way they have always divided it. Based on your conversations with your peers and your boss, you have a view into the work that needs to be done, and what the priorities are.
When you restructure the team, you do not have to divide up the same work the same way and just reshuffle the names. You can take what you know about what needs to be done, add some tasks, de-emphasize some other tasks, and divide up the work in a way that matches up with the people best able to execute it.
Spread learning experiences and interesting work around as far as possible. Design and evaluation tasks should be spread among several people, not just always assigned to the same person. Teach your team to work together on these plum tasks, and those same work habits will carry over to the less fun work.
You will probably make some mistakes, so make it clear that responsibilities will rotate over time, as appropriate. Set an expectation that things are not set in stone.
Also make it clear that you expect success as a team, and that you value and reward teamwork. Just as your power comes from leveraging your team, your employees’ power comes from being part of a well-functioning team.
Defect Rates and Tracking Success
It is easy to claim early wins. Lots of people skate through their careers, claiming successes that they have not earned. You should be different: document your progress and track your successes.
Documenting and tracking progress needs to become second nature to your team. Set up a method for people to identify the work they are doing and to measure their success.
If you have a ticketing system, that is a good place to start. Work should be reflected on tickets, and the success of that work should be reported there. If you don’t have a ticketing or work tracking system, implement one. That can be one of your early wins.
Whatever your team does, the key thing to measure is the defect rate. Defects are what trigger rework. Defects are counted differently for different disciplines, and you will need to define defects in a way that works for your team.
If you are gathering requirements, a defect would be having to circle back and redefine the requirement. If you are coding, a defect would be a bug (i.e., a failure to meet a requirement). If you are building a server, a defect would be having to go back and reconfigure something on the server.
What you want to see is the defect rate dropping over time. That doesn’t happen by itself. The way to lower the defect rate is to analyze the defects and implement processes and procedures to avoid them. A better template for collecting requirements, a different type of code review process, or a more defined building process would be ways to correct the three types of defects we discussed earlier.
So, how do you track the defect rate?
It would be really cool if your team just collected and reported the defect rate, but that seems unlikely. Once you can convince your team of the power of tracking defects, you might be able to get them to do that.
One way of getting the team into the habit of tracking defects is to select work items (e.g., tickets) and ask your team members detailed questions about them. What were the time-intensive parts of that task? Which parts were frustrating? What mistakes were made? What rework was needed? How could the process have been changed to avoid those problems in the future? This sort of questioning is sometimes called a postmortem.
This is a habit your team should get into, and one that they should be able to execute without you. But you may need to jumpstart the habit by interviewing your team members individually or in groups about what they are working on. Take the time to listen and ask questions. You have an advantage that most managers don’t—you know the technology, or at least you know technology well enough to ask penetrating questions.
Take notes about the defects in the process and the suggestions that are raised to help avoid them in the future. Circulate the suggestions in the group, and get suggestions from other group members. Foster the conversation, and then stand back and let it happen. Assign someone to rank the suggestions, and assign the best ones to team members for implementation.
This is not magic. Postmortems are a common enough discipline, in the context of major undertakings. But if you look at your team’s work, most of it is done on a much smaller scale. Postmortems on a selected sample of common work items can result in a large overall improvement in your team’s efficiency, and in your team’s morale. Nobody likes rework.
How do you track the defect rate over time? There are a couple of ways to approach it. If you can get to where defects are self-reported consistently, you can track the defect rate directly. You can also sample a certain number of tickets of a certain type each month and look at them for defects, then track the defect rate and report it. Try to focus on work that is common and visible first. Those are the low-hanging fruit where your efforts will be most visible and have the best feedback effect by reducing the amount of time and effort your team spends executing them.
Once your team sees the power of postmortems, you will start to see team members executing them on their own. When you see that happening, you know that you have accomplished something.
Leveraging your team will not be possible without communication. Your team should become used to communicating in a few standard ways. There is a balance between execution and communication. If people spend all their time on inefficient communication, they will have less time for executing the work.
It is most effective to standardize on a few ways of communicating. These should have different purposes and should be used appropriately.
From the beginning, set up expectations about how people should communicate. The expectations you set in the beginning will set the tone for the time you manage the group.
Challenging Environments
When senior executives were asked about the most influential positions they held in their careers, they typically pointed at positions that had involved major challenges.1 These included turnarounds, positions with significant new responsibilities, start-ups, or relocations overseas. The fact is that we learn more from challenging assignments than easy ones. If you are coming into a challenging position, all the more reason to treat the transition seriously.
For a lot of technical managers, we tend to be stronger at technical challenges than at political or cultural challenges. Our impulse may be to focus on what we are strongest at, and ignore challenges in the other domains. It is counterproductive to ignore these challenges. There are some strategies for dealing with challenges that make us uncomfortable:
You face expectations from several stakeholders. Your boss, your direct reports, and your internal customers all have needs and expectations. Your former boss may not be willing to let you go.
All of these expectations have to be managed, or they will eat you alive. If your former boss needs you to transition, set explicit expectations and deadlines. Your priority is your new job, not your old one.
With your new boss, sit down to develop a 90-day plan of action. Identify some specific milestones that your team will meet within that time frame, and specify what qualifies as success for each one.
Be aware that some people may not have your best interests at heart. People may be jealous, or may be looking to dump responsibilities that they don’t want to carry any more. Some may be looking for a fall guy for a long-festering wound.
Keep an eye out, and concentrate on the areas that you have actually been assigned. Make sure that expectations are documented and clear. And then keep your boss up to date about progress on those tasks as well as any challenges you are working through.
And when you set expectations, always err on the side of under promising and over delivering. Allow yourself a margin of error, whether it be in terms of money or time. Something will always go wrong, so you need to allow for that in your plans.
Managing Your Boss
Part of managing is managing up, not just down. You have to develop a good working relationship with your boss. Your boss is ultimately the person who will give you the resources to succeed. Fighting with your boss is almost never a good idea.
There are some key pitfalls to keep in mind as your relationship with your boss develops:
“Managing up” is one of the critical skills you will have to learn as a new manager. Observe how other managers interact with their manager. Tap into your network of mentors and friends for advice. Do whatever it takes to get this relationship right, or nothing else is going to work.
Drinking from the Fire Hose
Every new job brings new challenges, but new management jobs more than most. Not only do you have to learn a vast amount of information in a short amount of time; you are the one responsible for identifying and prioritizing what you need to learn so that you learn the most important things first.
Identify the most critical pieces of information you need, and then develop a plan for finding and verifying that information. If you just try to drink from the fire hose without structuring your learning efforts, you are not going to learn what you need to know in time to be able to use the information.
One key question that has to be answered is how things got to be the way they are. If you don’t learn the history of the group, you are likely to make the same mistakes that were already made. The people who work for you are not stupid; they have probably tried a lot of different things. Maybe some of the things that look strange at first glance are just creative ways to work around an issue you may not realize that you have yet.
Admitting that you have to learn new information can be difficult. For some technical people, it can feel like an admission of weakness to admit that we don’t know everything yet.
But we have to deal with reality as it exists. And reality is that we don’t know everything, and we have a lot to learn in a short amount of time. Pride is just going to get in the way.
On top of that, the denial that comes with pride can cause us to start to blame our team members for our own failings. Once that dynamic gets started, nothing good will come of it.
Accept that you have a lot to learn. You are going to have to ask for help. It is not weakness; it is reality. Prioritize what you need to learn, make a plan, and get on with it.
There are several types of questions you need answered. Michael Watkins suggests several topics that you should explore when generating your list.2 Here are some of the questions I ask; you will need to create a list for your environment.
These are the questions you need to answer for yourself. You can’t reasonably put these questions to everyone in the environment. But you can schedule the time to speak to individuals and ask them open-ended questions to get the information you need.
One problem to avoid is a bias toward the responses of the first people you interview. One technique for avoiding this problem is to start with the same script for everyone you interview. For example, the answers to the following open-ended questions will get you a lot of the information you need. They will need to be customized for your environment:
What challenges do you see, either now or in the near future?
Where are these challenges coming from? Are the causes internal or external?
What opportunities do you see that are not being exploited? What barriers are preventing them from being exploited? What do you see as the most important thing for me to focus on?
Keep notes, use the same script, and look for similarities and differences between the responses. This technique can be used (with different scripts, of course) to look at responses from your customers and peers as well as your team members. Compare responses from people at the same level as well as looking at responses within the same vertical within the organization.
Some information may also be available from things such as employee or customer satisfaction surveys. If it is not, find a way to take the temperature of both your team and its customer base.
If a root cause analysis has been run on areas where the team has failed, you will also need that information. If it has not, you may need to convene a group to investigate the failure and suggest responses. In Chapter 9, we discuss techniques to run a group troubleshooting session.
One of your key constituents is your boss. You have to find out how your boss sees the situation to identify the early wins, align with the overall organization, and negotiate expectations.
Some key information that you need from your boss:
Not all of these questions should be addressed the first day. In fact, some of them require that you gather information beforehand or at least develop a level of trust between you and the boss.
In particular, the personal development conversation will need to wait until you have developed some trust with your boss, and hopefully after you have achieved some of your early wins.
These conversations will go better if you prepare beforehand. Your boss also needs to prepare, so agree to an agenda beforehand.
At different stages in your 90-day plan, you need to include activities to learn the environment so that you can steer your team in the right direction. Include your learning plan in your overall 90-day plan. Here are some suggestions of the types of learning activities you can include for different stages of the 90-day plan.
Read external comments and articles by people who know your organization. Google is your friend. Look at write-ups in the annual report as well as news items and blog postings.
Speak with your group’s suppliers or customers, if possible. Draft a script and look for commonalities and differences across these interviews.
If possible, speak with your predecessor. Depending on the situation, this may or may not be possible. Listen without being captured by the previous leader’s world view. You will bring your own perspectives and talents into the environment, so you may or may not end up agreeing with what the former leader has to say.
Speak with your new boss. Try to understand both the environment as well as the boss’s expectations for your team.
Generate hypotheses (discussed in Chapter 9). Then identify ways that you can confirm or refute these hypotheses. These should make their way into the next phase of your 90-day plan.
Review detailed internal information that was not available to you before starting. This may include items such as satisfaction surveys, the files of the people who work for you, and root cause analyses of problems.
Meet with each of your direct reports individually, and ask the questions from the script you developed in the last phase. Compare and contrast the responses, and use the information to adjust your hypotheses, and to develop the next round of scripts.
Talk to sales, customer service, and purchasing to see how they perceive your group. See if they can help you identify problems or opportunities to be exploited in your 90-day plan.
Ask people at different levels within the organization about the vision and strategy of the organization. Are the responses similar, or at least consistent? If your team is going to be successful, you need to be pulling in the same direction as the overall strategy, and the teams around you also need to be aligned.
Test your hypotheses about challenges and opportunities by checking first with lower-level people, and then use the same script at progressively higher levels within the organization. This will give you a feeling for how well information is filtering up.
At the end of your first week, discuss what you have found with your boss. Present your current hypotheses about challenges and opportunities, as well as your adjusted plan for the next phase.
Continue to follow up to confirm or refute the hypotheses you have developed. This will mean circling back to some of the people you have already spoken with, and it will mean requesting data to confirm or refute what you suspect is the situation.
Look at how people on the outside of your organization perceive you. When you ask questions to gather this information, start from the outside in. This will include people such as sales reps who are completely outside of the company, as well as your team’s internal customers.
Examine some of the key processes that your team is responsible for. How are requests received, how are requirements specified and determined, and how are requests executed? Look for process improvements that will benefit both your customers and your team. Process improvements are usually fertile ground for early wins. Document these early wins for your boss; these will help you lock in the credibility you will need for harder changes you will need to make.
Find the old-timers and integrators within the organization. From them, you can learn organization history and why things are done the way they are. Maybe the processes are outmoded, but maybe there is a real reason for the way things are.
As you gather this information, update your hypotheses and your 90-day plan. Your 90-day plan cannot be viewed as a static document. Don’t let yourself get locked in to your original hypotheses.
When you meet with your boss, present the changes you have made to your plan and explain why you made them. By this point, you should have identified some early wins, and hopefully even implemented some of them. Highlight these, and negotiate with your boss to identify the success criteria for each of these wins.
The second month needs to be where you start putting some of your changes into place, and measuring the results. Ideally, you should have some early wins during the second month.
This is where metrics come into play. If you can’t measure and list your accomplishments, everyone will assume you are just mouthing words. For each of the changes you are putting into place, identify a way to verify and measure the effect of the changes.
At the 60-day mark, review your progress toward the overall 90-day plan, and make adjustments for the coming 30 days.
Don’t be too proud to change the parts of your plan that aren’t working the way you expected. Plans need to evolve to reflect the changing face of reality.
Matching the Strategy to the Situation
Broadly speaking, Michael Watkins identifies four major types of situations you may encounter as a new leader.3
Each of these situations has unique characteristics. For example, start-ups and turnarounds require that the leader make difficult and critical decisions right away, possibly on the basis of inadequate information. That same strategy would be wrong for a sustaining success or realignment situation, where the existing team has significant strengths that should be leveraged to meet new challenges.
Start-ups pose several paired challenges and opportunities. While you will not be encumbered by old, broken structures, you will have to build structures and documentation from scratch. You can recruit your own team, but you will not have an experienced team to back you up. Your team will have to be mentored and fostered to develop the relationships, procedures, and lines of communication that will make it effective.
In a turnaround situation, it is likely that you are dealing with compressed time scales, limited resources, and a demoralized team. On the other hand, there will be a recognition that changes are necessary, and it is likely that you will be given the necessary support to implement those changes.
As your changes start to bear fruit, you will be able to build momentum and support quickly. People want to be part of successful teams. On the other hand, the pressure for early wins is higher in a turnaround situation than in the others. If you can’t start making measurable progress right away, the organization will bring someone in to clean up the turnaround situation you will be leaving behind.
In a realignment situation, you face a team that has been strong, but is no longer contributing to the organization’s overall strategy. This type of situation can be tricky. On the one hand, there are strengths within the organization that can be used as a foundation for growth. But there are also engrained ways of thinking and acting that are no longer as productive as they once were. Your job will be to convince your team, your peers, your customers, and your boss that the team needs to move in a different direction.
Start-up and turnaround situations require immediate decisions and action, but realignments need some careful thought. You don’t want to break what is working well. You also can’t have your team wasting energy bucking against the organization’s strategic direction.
This type of situation is both the easiest and the hardest type of environment to walk into. On the one hand, there is a strong culture in place that is accustomed to contributing to the health of the overall organization. On the other hand, it is very difficult to get the credibility to make the changes that will need to be made as the organization evolves. Complacency is a tough foe to vanquish.
Identifying Problems
As you build your team, keep an eye out for some common types of management failure. Be honest with yourself; if you have any of these problems, they will not go away on their own. It will require concentrated effort to overcome them. It will be easier to resolve these issues in your first 90 days than later. Spend the time and energy to resolve them now.
Selecting Your Early Wins
When you are planning out your early wins, it is important to recognize that they are stepping stones into the future. You have to pick early wins that will be templates for what you want to accomplish and how you want to accomplish it in the future.
You can’t improve everything at once. Focus is important, so you will need to pick wins that matter, either in isolation or as part of a larger win that is coming later. If you spread your attention across too many areas of focus, you are not focusing on anything.
Wins should be something that matters both to your plans and to the overall organization. Emphasize to your team that business alignment is a key part of measuring success.
If your boss or the organization culture does not recognize your wins as important, they will not garner you the credibility you need. That is why it is critical that you sell your proposed wins to your boss as part of your 90-day plan, and that you are selecting things that will be seen as legitimate wins within your team and throughout the organization.
The process is important too. If you accomplish the goal, but you don’t use it to set up the processes you want, you have wasted an opportunity. Early wins are important for building momentum, team morale, and credibility, but they are most important for setting up future changes in processes, strategy, skills, and structure in future waves of change. Early wins have to be selected and executed with the bigger picture in mind. Early wins are most valuable as learning opportunities. The tasks leading up to the wins are your opportunity to get the team working together the way you need them to work together going forward.
As you are selecting items for early wins, look for structural, strategic items that can be put in place to make your team work more effectively. If you can implement something to replace or optimize manual processes that will pay off in spades later on.
Your direct reports will need to work with you in your new role. Help them to make the same transition you are making with your own boss.
The steps are basically the same as what you need to carry out with your boss, but in reverse. Make things easier for them. Reach out, schedule time, and make yourself available. Structural items such as regular planning meetings in small groups can help create the team identity you are trying to create.
Get to know your team members, and let them know that they are valued. Identify their strongest characteristics, compliment them on those characteristics, and think of ways that you can assign work to take advantage of their strengths.
Everyone likes to be valued; value your employees. Make them look good, and they will make you look good.
Communicate your expectations clearly. Be fair. Be available. Be the kind of boss you would like to have.
Helping your people get used to you involves a lot of the same things that we listed earlier on how you should learn to work with your new boss:
Your 90-day plan will be a living document. Include your early wins, as well as the steps you are taking toward the longer-term changes you will put into place. Include your learning plan, and report the results to your boss.
Throughout your first 90 days, update your plan and review it with your boss. Make sure your boss understands what wins you have logged, what challenges you have overcome, and what plans you have for facing other challenges within the organization.
The exact format for your 90-day plan depends on what you and your boss decide is a good way to capture your observations and goals. It could be a spreadsheet, or a project plan, or a text document. The key is that it captures and documents your priorities for your critical first 90 days.
You will probably want to have a few different versions of your 90-day plan. These can be maintained by using a filtering function on a spreadsheet or a project plan, or they can be separate documents. You may want to keep versions of your 90-day plan for different audiences.
The 90-day plan can provide a focus and agenda for your regular discussions with your boss. It will help keep you aligned with what the boss wants, the organization needs, and what you want to accomplish as the leader of your team.
Summary
Here are a few ideas of questions you should think about when drawing up your 90-day plan:
Discussion Questions
Further Reading
Harvard Business Essentials. Manager’s Toolkit. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
Watkins, Michael. The First 90 Days. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
1 Helen Handfield-Jones, “How Executives Grow,” McKinsey Quarterly, February 2000.
2 Michael Watkins, The First 90 Days (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2003).
3 Michael Watkins, The First 90 Days (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2003).
18.119.106.135