When my daughter turned six she got a bicycle for her birthday. It was her first big kid bike without training wheels. She was excited to learn how to ride it. She hopped on and promptly lost her balance. We worked with her for an hour, holding the bike and giving guidance, but she couldn’t get the balance right and became so frustrated that she began to cry. We assured her it would take time and practice, but she no longer seemed eager.
We tried to practice with her for the next couple of weekends, but when she didn’t master it right away she got frustrated and lost interest. The bike sat in the garage for another year and became a home for spiders. We tried at times to pull the bike out and invite her to try again, but she went back to riding her scooter, which she had already mastered and felt comfortable on. We didn’t want to push her too hard and make her resent us or the bike, so we gave up and assumed one day she would be interested.
Then we learned that her elementary school had a policy in which every student in second grade is expected to learn to ride a bicycle. The policy is actually part of a greater initiative launched in 2017 by Washington, DC, Public Schools, in partnership with the District’s Department of Transportation, to ensure that all second graders learn to ride a bike.
At first, we were concerned that this would lead to performance anxiety and embarrassment for our daughter. However, we found out that the school district embedded the bike-riding unit into the second-grade curriculum. The program was put in place to support students in learning to ride a bike, regardless of their incoming skill level.
What impressed me most about the school district’s approach was not only had the administration created a policy around a core skill it believed was important for children at that age to learn, but it had also integrated learning and support into the entire semester. The students learn about independence, perseverance, and supporting others who are struggling. Some of the teachers even integrate learning about bicycles into history and science studies. The approach is to instill a collaborative spirit and a collective goal for all second graders to achieve together.
To support this goal, the school district provides bikes and helmets for all children, so students are free to bring their own but there are plenty for those who do not have a helmet or bike at home. The physical education teachers spend class practicing with the students, giving tips and pointers and providing extra support depending on where a student is in their abilities. The culminating event is a bike ride for all second graders on the nearby bike path. Students are encouraged to work together and help one another to prepare for the big event, and they cheer for each other when their peers are able to ride around the school track without tipping over.
During the semester when she was learning to ride, my daughter never seemed anxious or afraid. It still took her a while to get the hang of riding, but she was eager to share what she had learned about the history of the bicycle, how bicycles transfer our energy to kinetic energy to power the bike, and pointed out how the chain connected to the gears. By learning all about the bike, she had developed a curiosity that waylaid her fear of the physical process of riding.
She glowed with happiness when they returned from that final class bike ride. If the school had merely mandated that all children learn to ride bikes in second grade, but left the responsibility solely to families to teach their children, it would have created a disparate and fractured process in which a number of children would not be able to achieve the goal. If the school had only relegated learning to ride a bike to PE class, the students might have learned but would not have been as invested collectively. They would have seen the practice of bike riding in PE as a means to an end. However, the school staff recognized that if they wanted children to not only learn to ride a bike but also appreciate the process of persevering in the face of new challenges, they needed to design the process differently. The fact that bike riding had become a part of my daughter’s daily life and a core component of her interactions with classmates and teachers took the fear out of bike riding and made it a collective journey where everyone supported one another in achieving the communal goal.
How do we make training a part of something sustainable?
Organizations that foster DEI take a holistic and sustained approach to embedding DEI into every thread of the institutional fabric. Standalone, one-off training will not lead to long-lasting change. In fact, in some cases, research indicates it can backfire.
Three big challenges we find are:
Take heart. This does not mean DEI training is ineffective! What it indicates is that DEI knowledge and skills must be reinforced across the learning landscape, systems and policies in the organization need to be DEI focused, and accountability measures must be put in place. This chapter explores ways training professionals can collaborate with diversity, equity, and inclusion leadership in their organization to ensure long-term success. Three worksheets at the end of the chapter focus on integrating DEI into an organizational strategy, conducting a curriculum review, and evaluating learning outcomes.
The three overarching pillars for DEI to lead to successful, sustainable change are:
Regardless of whether your organization has a dedicated DEI leader or office, it is important to team up with the individuals responsible for and committed to DEI. In some organizations, that might be an entire team of people whose full-time jobs are focused on DEI. In others, it might be an informal structure, which requires more commitment from key individuals to build and maintain momentum.
Even if your role is not primarily linked to DEI, it is important to understand the constellation of organizational components that must be linked for DEI to be sustainable and successful.
Global Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Benchmarks: Standards for Organizations Around the World (GDEIB), published in March 2021, is a report based on the expert guidance of almost 100 DEI practitioners from across the globe. The GDEIB offers best practices for organizations to engage in successful systemic change. The GDEIB includes 15 categories broken into four main groups: foundational, internal, bridging, and external.
The three categories in the foundation group—vision, leadership, and structure—represent the critical building blocks upon which any DEI initiative must be developed:
As a training and development professional, you may not be directly involved with every component of the strategic planning and implementation of DEI in your organization, but you must play a critical role in it. This likely will include some sort of professional learning. It’s helpful to have a seat at the table early in the planning process to bring a training and development lens and share best practices for effective learning. It’s also important to determine early in the strategy process how training will be integrated into the organization, who is to be trained, and how success will be measured.
Training and development professionals should also play a key role in determining the specific competencies leaders will need to learn and practice in order to role-model DEI across the organization. Having a coherent plan that clearly outlines leadership competencies and behaviors will help ensure that the training design is successful.
Training and development professionals will need to work directly with members of the DEI leadership and their team to align all learning development activities with DEI organizational goals.
The four categories in the internal group are centered around strengthening the effectiveness of leaders and employees. Often, this is the group under which training professionals reside, as it is most closely aligned with human resources, training, and professional development. However, it is still important for training professionals to understand the connection between their roles and other categories and to collaborate appropriately.
Training and development professionals should be knowledgeable about organizational policies and practices that foster DEI and should make sure all training related to employment (such as employee onboarding, HR, supervisory skills, anti-discrimination and anti-harassment training) is up to date and provides an accurate and consistent message to employees.
The four categories in the bridging group help connect the foundational work with the internal and external focus of DEI.
As a training and development professional, your role in the assessment of DEI will vary depending on what mechanisms are already in place, but generally you will want to be part of or at least privy to assessment data and performance metrics for leaders and employees. To hold people accountable for their performance related to DEI goals, you must provide training to build knowledge and skills.
You can play a key role in terms of ensuring that communications related to training and development (for example, training advertisements, internal or external training and development webpages, and training materials) reflect diversity and are inclusive and equitable.
You also will play a critical role in the development and implementation of all learning activities related to DEI. This is where training professionals can play a role not only in making sure that DEI-specific training is relevant and effective but also ensuring that DEI competencies and practices are integrated into all forms of training in the organization. The most effective approach goes beyond check-the-box, one-off training to provide ongoing opportunities that promote the principles related to DEI as well as learning and practicing skills to foster DEI.
Working toward sustainability, training and development professionals can also equip employees and leaders with the foresight and tools to consider the long-term implications of decisions. A major challenge in many organizations is overcoming inertia when profits and productivity are high. Leaders needs to be constantly mindful of how their decisions today will influence the industry, workforce, and organization of tomorrow.
The four categories in this group represent the organization’s commitment to serving and interacting effectively with diverse communities, customers, and vendors.
The role of training and development professionals in this area may be a bit more limited, but they can definitely be integral to ensuring that external-facing employees have the skills they need to promote DEI in their work, whether it’s customer service, marketing, budgeting and acquisitions, or product development.
In addition to being a core part of the organizational strategy, DEI must become deeply interconnected across the organizational landscape, woven into the very fabric of the way things are done. This means that regardless of department or job function, everyone sees themselves as a key player in DEI efforts. When DEI is relegated to only one division, whether that is Human Resources, EEO, or a dedicated DEI office, its power and reach can be diminished.
All too often, DEI efforts lose momentum because of a lack of ongoing exposure to or reinforcement of DEI concepts. If most employees are only exposed to DEI in one-off training events, it is much less likely they will retain that knowledge or apply the skills learned.
Training professionals have a unique and critical role to play in providing continuity of DEI efforts, because they typically interface with many departments and functions across the organization. Training and development professionals have the opportunity to regularly connect with everyone in the organization, and they can leverage that connection to develop shared language around DEI, reinforce critical knowledge and skills, and foster behaviors and practices that align with DEI.
In chapter 4 we discussed ways to make any training representative of diversity, and equitable and inclusive in the way it is designed and delivered. Training professionals also have the opportunity and responsibility to embed content that reinforces DEI knowledge and skills into the overall training curriculum for the organization. The five-step process toward that end is detailed here.
Conduct a thorough review of all formal and informal training content in the organization. Identify where and how DEI concepts appear. Consider opportunities to add or revise learning objectives to embed DEI concepts into the training curriculum. Identify ways to weave DEI concepts into the curriculum even if it doesn’t require changing learning objectives. For example, a training on project management may not need a new set of objectives specifically related to DEI, but the content may need to be refreshed or enhanced to present the impact of identity lenses and implicit biases on how we set timelines, assign tasks, and measure success.
When determining ways to embed DEI into all aspects of training and development, assess the existing level of knowledge different learners may bring. Determine the relevant skills needed for that learner group and design the training in a way that will fit their learning needs.
For example, managers and supervisors will most likely need more focused training to prepare them to effectively lead diverse teams, in comparison with budget and acquisition employees who may need to learn practices to promote DEI in terms of vendors and ethical sourcing.
Reinforce the content and skills taught in DEI-specific training. Generally, DEI can and should be woven into all people-focused training. Identity lenses, core values, beliefs, and personal experiences related to one’s societal identity and conditioning all play a powerful role in how we understand and communicate with one another.
For example:
DEI doesn’t just have to live in “people skills” training. In fact, it can play a valuable role in enhancing myriad technical skills.
For example:
Organizations often have significant opportunities for publicizing and reinforcing DEI learning goals. By leveraging these events and resources, you further weave DEI into the organizational language and culture:
In addition to a sound, systemic DEI strategy and continuity of DEI efforts across the organization, there needs to be accountability for achieving DEI goals and contributing to the organization’s DEI vision and mission.
Many organizations wait until their DEI efforts are in motion to address accountability. This can be problematic when there are no clear indicators of success put into place. Not only does this often deter leadership from providing resources for further DEI work; it also can lead to frustration and demoralization if employees do not see progress. Even when progress is made, if it is not measured, documented, and communicated to the organization, it can get lost or diminished.
Accountability should be a part of the DEI work from the beginning. The organization needs to identify and measure progress related to DEI goals. It also needs to determine a plan for holding leaders, employees, and even external stakeholders (such as vendors, contractors, and consumers) accountable for fostering DEI. These steps include determining appropriate metrics to track, creating an evaluation process, and providing regular reporting.
Although there may be common foundational metrics for organizational progress in DEI (for example, recruitment and retention metrics and employee engagement scores), every organization must determine the metrics for success based on its own corporate strategic goals.
Recruitment of underrepresented groups (race, ethnicity, gender, disability)
Promotion of underrepresented groups
Hiring from within versus outside the organization
Representation of underrepresented groups in all job functions and levels
Representation on executive board
Retention of underrepresented groups
Employee engagement or satisfaction surveys
Exit interviews of outgoing employees
EEO complaints and investigations
Non-EEO grievances (bullying, conflict, hostile work environment)
Disciplinary actions for misconduct or unethical behaviors
Employee absences
Employee requests for transfers or new management
Performance evaluations
360-degree feedback
Customer feedback surveys
Customer reviews
Customer service complaints
Quality of products or services increases
Fewer errors, less waste of resources
Increases in revenue
New business lines
New consumer populations
Expenses related to recruitment and talent development
Expenses related to lawsuits or employee turnover
New or refined products or services created
Complex problems solved more quickly
Increase in positive responses from customers on social media
Positive news media coverage
Recognition and awards
Determine the appropriate measures by which you will benchmark progress. This may include both short-term and long-term metrics.
For example, if a key challenge that was identified in the assessment phase is that the organization does not have adequate representation of racial and ethnic diversity, especially in leadership and management positions, then a DEI strategic goal for the organization should be to increase diversity in the employee population across all levels. The organization will need to determine the appropriate metrics for achieving this goal.
Possible metrics may be quantifiable and directly related to the goal:
Metrics may also be supportive of the goal even if they are not directly correlated:
You may not be directly involved in determining all the DEI strategic goals and metrics. However, you can play a critical role in developing measurements related to training and development.
Following Kirkpatrick’s model of training evaluation, let’s examine the four levels of evaluation that you may use to gauge the effectiveness of DEI-related training:
When designing training that includes DEI, always begin by considering the desired learning outcomes and how you will measure success. Make the learning objectives and competencies specific and measurable and consider the mechanisms you will use to evaluate the training.
The most common evaluation tools for Level 1 are surveys provided to participants immediately upon completion of the training. Typically, these surveys measure Level 1 (reaction) and to some extent Level 2 (learning). The surveys give valuable data on what participants liked or disliked about the training, and how effective and relevant they believe it was.
Administering a knowledge test prior to and immediately following training can measure participants’ learning directly related to the training program. The knowledge test should be directly tied to the training program’s learning objectives. The knowledge test can directly measure existing competencies by quizzing the participants on the content that will be covered.
Example:
What percentage of Fortune 500 CEOs are White males?
a. 80%
b. 75%
c. 90%
d. 50%
The knowledge test can also be more of a self-reporting assessment to gauge how well learners believe they understand the content. These can take the form of Likert scales measuring agreement, satisfaction with existing knowledge, or frequency of practice.
Example:
I am aware of how my implicit biases impact my decisions and behaviors at work.
1 = Never 2 = Rarely 3 = Sometimes 4 = Frequently 5 = Always
You can also measure participants’ confidence or attitudes toward DEI content.
Example:
I am comfortable engaging in dialogues with colleagues about diversity issues.
1 = Very uncomfortable 2 = Slightly uncomfortable 3 = Comfortable 4 = Very comfortable
Evaluating individual behavior changes can be a little trickier, but it’s important to ensure the effectiveness of the training program in bringing about positive change. There are a few methods to consider, ranging from high touch to low touch. All these have the potential for bias. To mitigate biased evaluations (by yourself or others), be as specific as possible with the behavioral indicators to be observed and reported.
It is challenging to directly link training outcomes with organizational results, especially with DEI. However, it is not impossible. When designing training, clarify the organization’s expectations of the training. Map the training objectives to the organization’s DEI strategic goals. Think about how the training outcomes can be represented as business outcomes.
When measuring results, look for patterns and organizational results that correlate to the training content. For example, if a DEI training program for HR professionals and hiring managers focused on examining and mitigating bias in the hiring and promotion process, then look at changes in the number of underrepresented populations who are interviewed, hired, or promoted in the six to 12 months following the training.
Provide frequent updates to leadership on the progress toward DEI strategic goals and the contributions of training and development. Regularly report to the organization and your own department or team on the priority of DEI strategic goals and how training supports those goals. Reporting can also pinpoint barriers or challenges and provide insight to determine when the solutions you have in place need to be adapted or discontinued.
For example, if a DEI training program for leaders and managers has been in place for a year, but there has not been an increase in positive ratings on performance evaluations for DEI-related competencies, then it may be time to review and revise the training content or approach.
Although training and development professionals are not necessarily driving DEI strategy for their organization, they play a crucial role in supporting overall organizational change. It is important to understand how your work fits within the larger constellation of DEI work, so that you can design, implement, and evaluate training programs in a meaningful way.
Training and development professionals play an important role in both supporting strategic change and providing continuity of content across the organization to embed DEI into the organizational culture.
It is also important to foster accountability by establishing observable metrics to gauge process. Focus not only on individual behavior change but also on overall organizational results.
In the next chapter, we will explore DEI training and development from a global perspective and identify how to adapt training to globally diverse audiences.
3.147.54.108