Let’s be honest: most of us would have been reluctant to sail with Columbus. “Hey, Chris,” we would have asked, “is there a TripAdvisor review on this so-called New World?” Many are similarly hesitant to embark on the journey to humanocracy. While data and moral courage may get your colleagues to the port, most will hesitate to step aboard until you can paint a picture of the destination. The problem is, conjuring up a plausible image of a super-flat, thoroughly decentralized organization isn’t easy. As human beings, we’re prisoners of the familiar—and there’s little that’s more familiar than bureaucracy.
Luckily, the post-bureaucratic future isn’t entirely terra incognita. A handful of vanguard organizations have been mapping its contours, and there’s much to learn from their endeavors. In this chapter and the one that follows, we’ll delve into two pioneering organizations that have sailed far beyond shores of bureaucratic orthodoxy. Nucor, the world’s most innovative and consistently profitable steelmaker, is a case study in what happens when you invert the pyramid and unleash the capabilities of those on the front lines. Haier, the Qingdao-based home appliance maker, has built a culture that encourages everyone to think and act like an entrepreneur. While their approaches are different, both companies have upended canonical management beliefs. By doing so, they’ve built highly successful organizations that give us confidence in setting sail for humanocracy.
Have you ever been inside a steel mill? If so, you’ll know why the people there are considered the ultimate blue-collar workers. In the furnace, operators clad in heat-resistant jackets and face shields carefully manipulate a forty-foot cauldron of molten metal—what’s left of a few hundred tons of ferrous scrap after a thirty-minute, 175-megawatt electroshock treatment. In the nearby caster—a machine the size of a school bus that pours molten steel into different shapes—crew members gaze intently at the glowing orange stream of liquid metal, periodically adjusting and lubricating the nozzle to ensure a steady flow.
Watching steelworkers tend to these giant machines, you might conclude their work requires more brawn than brain, and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics supports that view. Physical strength and dexterity are considered to be far more important for steelworkers than creative and analytical skills. (See table 4-1.) While that may be true in some steel plants, it’s certainly not the case at Nucor, America’s largest steelmaker.
TABLE 4-1 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Importance of specific skills in select metal-working occupations |
||||
0 = unimportant, 100 = very important |
||||
Caster operators |
Furnace operators |
|||
Handling and moving objects |
86 |
71 |
||
Control precision |
63 |
72 |
||
Manual dexterity |
63 |
72 |
||
Analyzing data or information |
37 |
36 |
||
Developing objectives and strategies |
29 |
26 |
||
Originality |
25 |
25 |
||
Customer service |
19 |
29 |
||
Drafting and specifying technical devices |
16 |
19 |
||
Management of financial resources |
13 |
16 |
||
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; authors’ analysis. |
At Nucor, it’s the expertise and autonomy of frontline workers that drives progress. Consider the team running the furnace at Nucor’s Blytheville, Arkansas, facility, who turned out the giant I-beams that undergird New York’s One World Trade Center. It was crew members—not a finance or engineering executive—who conducted a detailed cost-benefit analysis and decided it was time to replace the aging furnace shell (the colossal bowl where scrap metal is turned into molten steel). Once the decision was made, it was the team—not the purchasing department—that solicited bids from suppliers. Unimpressed by the proposals they received, the crew decided to design the shell themselves. They chose the fabricator and during the build-out provided minute feedback at every step. The result? A highly efficient piece of equipment that cost Nucor $3 million—one-tenth the price of the original bids.
It is this sort of initiative and innovation that has made Nucor America’s steel leader. In 2018, Nucor’s 26,000 employees—called teammates—shipped 27.9 million tons of steel and generated $25 billion in sales. Nucor is also the most diversified steelmaker in North America, supplying beams, sheet, plate, reinforcing bar, and steel grating to a broad range of customers. Nucor runs its plants on scrap steel and is the largest recycler in the western hemisphere.
Steelmaking is a tough business. When compared to other industries, return on capital is meager and bankruptcies common. Nucor, though, isn’t an average steel company. Since 1969, it’s suffered only one unprofitable year, following the 2008 financial crisis, and has consistently delivered industry-leading returns. Not only does Nucor outperform its peers on profitability and return on capital, it also leads by a wide margin on growth in market value, revenue, income, and tons shipped per employee (see table 4-2). The company’s ratio of capital per employee is in line with the competition, but its output per capita is almost 50 percent higher than the industry average. These results are the product of a remarkable culture—one that values contribution over rank and innovation over compliance.
TABLE 4-2 |
||||
Nucor performance versus peers, five-year average (2014–2018) |
||||
Profitability and returns metrics |
Nucor |
Peer groupa |
||
Return on capital |
8.3% |
5.7% |
||
Profit margin (EBIT) |
8.4% |
5.2% |
||
Total returns to shareholders (Average trailing, 5-year returns) |
38.7% |
1.4% |
||
Employee productivity metrics (thousands) |
Nucor |
Peer groupa |
||
Market value per employee |
$697 |
$324 |
||
Revenue per employee |
$805 |
$663 |
||
Net income per employee |
$42 |
$14 |
||
Net value of plant, production, and equipment per employee |
$210 |
$233 |
||
Steel tons shipped per employee (2018 only) |
1.06 |
0.67 |
||
a. Simple weighted averages including AK Steel, ArcelorMittal, Commercial Metals Company (CMC), Gerdau, Steel Dynamics, and United States Steel. For employee productivity metrics, CMC and Gerdau were not included due to lack of data. |
||||
Source: Capital IQ; World Steel; company reports; authors’ analysis. |
Nucor produces its steel in mini-mills, which are typically half the size of an integrated, blast furnace mill.1 Mini-mills are more flexible than integrated mills and have lower capital costs. Historically, integrated plants had an advantage in producing thin, high-grade steel. Yet over the past thirty years, Nucor’s relentless innovation has erased much of this advantage. In 1989, Nucor pioneered a new technology that allowed it to produce slabs that were four times thinner than what had previously been possible (1.2 versus 4.8 mm). With thinner sheets, the time required to roll the steel into its final shape was cut from several days to a few hours. (It would be eight years before Nucor’s competitors matched this advance.) In 2002, Nucor introduced ultra-thin cast steel, which reduced thickness to less than a millimeter. Compared to an integrated facility, the ultra-thin cast process consumed 95 percent less energy. Over the past decade, this breakthrough, along with many others, has pushed Nucor’s share of North American crude steel production from 16 percent to nearly 25 percent.2
Nucor’s employees, who live in rural communities across the American Midwest and Southeast, are the soul of the company and share directly in its success. Since the Great Recession, Nucor has increased its payroll by 30 percent, while industrywide employment shrank by 15 percent.3 Not surprisingly, employee turnover is significantly lower than the sector average.
Underpinning Nucor’s performance is a radical, bottom-up organizational model that reflects the convictions of the company’s former chairman and CEO, Ken Iverson. Foundational to Iverson’s worldview was a belief in the capacity of ordinary human beings to do extraordinary things. As he explained in his book, Plain Talk: Lessons from a Business Maverick,
Most of today’s corporations were conceived as command-and-control organizations. The founders of integrated steel mills, for example, clearly assumed that the “genius” of the organization resided almost completely in management … In contrast, we built Nucor under the assumption that most of the “genius” in our organization would be found among the people doing the work. From the outset, we shaped our business to let employees show management the way to goals that once seemed unreachable.4
As you’d expect of a company built to encourage creative problem-solving, Nucor is highly decentralized. In essence, the company is a confederation of seventy-five divisions that operate independently but compete collectively. The average division has $330 million in annual revenues and operates one or two plants. These units make their own decisions on procurement, products and staffing. Each division is also responsible for creating the demand for its products by winning and retaining customers. Unlike other steel companies, Nucor’s plants aren’t mere manufacturing sites, but end-to-end businesses. Accordingly, each division has its own P&L, which is entirely free of corporate cost allocations.
Thanks to this decentralization, the entrepreneurial spirit runs deep at Nucor. Attend a plant meeting, and you’ll undoubtedly hear teammates discussing new commercial opportunities. Consider, for example, the experience of the Hickman, Arkansas, sheet division. For years, the bulk of its revenue came from selling steel tubes to oil and gas companies. Riding the fracking boom of the early 2010s, Hickman became one of Nucor’s most profitable units. But in late 2014, oil prices collapsed and, with it, demand for Hickman’s tubes. In a matter of weeks, the division went from being maxed out to losing money. This triggered an urgent search for solutions. How can we diversify our product range and industry exposure? What can we produce that’s differentiated from competitors and other Nucor plants? A small ad hoc team fanned out to capture ideas from colleagues and customers. The brainstorming surfaced two promising opportunities: specialized steel for electric motors and high-strength steel for auto parts. Team members were soon on airplanes, traveling the world to locate the technology and equipment needed to make the new products. In parallel, other team members worked up a proposal for a $230 million mill expansion that would add 650,000 tons of capacity. MaryEmily Slate, who at the time was Hickman’s general manager, pitched the proposal to Nucor’s executive group in February 2016 and, within a few months, had secured the necessary funding.
Reflecting later on how her team had mobilized to right the ship, Slate said, “The greatest thing is you get it done without somebody from the top saying, ‘This is what you’re going to do.’ The idea came from the ground floor, based on a shared assessment of what we needed. We’re all responsible for the financial performance of our facility.”5
An oft-repeated mantra at Nucor is that decisions should be “pushed down to the lowest level.” It’s no surprise, then, that the company has a miniscule corporate center—about a hundred people occupying two floors of a nondescript office building on the outskirts of Charlotte, North Carolina. Head office acts as the corporate bank, reviewing major capital requests, and also sets a few basic rules such as base salary levels and minimum performance standards for the divisions.
Unlike most industrial companies, Nucor has chosen not to centralize functions like R&D, sales, marketing, strategy, safety, engineering, compliance, and purchasing. Beyond the CEO, Nucor’s executive ranks include only one other functional head, the CFO. Similarly sized U.S. Steel, based in Pittsburgh, has at least eight central functions—including performance analytics, strategic planning, compliance, supply chain, manufacturing excellence, IT, HR, and finance—which are supported by a head-office staff group of about a thousand individuals.
Nucor’s lean management philosophy also applies at the divisional level. The thousand-strong Blytheville beam division, for example, has a scant seven full-time managers—including the plant manager. Across the company, full-time managers and executives, a population that doesn’t include team supervisors, account for only 2 percent of employment—four times less than the percentage in the overall economy. As a percentage of revenue, Nucor’s general and administrative expenses hover around 3 percent, or roughly half that of its competitors.
Nucor’s faith in its people has produced a management model that breaks the bureaucratic mold in five important ways.
Through its compensation system, Nucor focuses everyone’s attention on innovating in ways that maximize asset productivity and growth. While competitors may assume that investment is the fastest way to raise output, Nucor bets on the imagination of its people. Here’s how it works.
Critically, bonuses are paid to teams, not individuals. A typical team comprises twenty to thirty operators who work across multiple shifts and have joint accountability for a particular process. Team rewards encourage collaborative problem solving, which is essential in a process industry where tasks are highly interdependent. (See figure 4-1.) The furnace, caster, and maintenance teams, for example, are all part of a continuous process, so they have a common production target. One caster crew member in the Hickman plant remarked, “If one area goes down, we all go down with it. My problem is their problem, and everyone will jump in to solve it.”
Within each plant, teams have access to real-time information on their performance and, hence, their compensation. The expectation is that a well-performing team will exceed its target and generate a substantial weekly bonus—which in most cases is exactly what happens. As you might expect, team members have little patience with slackers. A furnace operator in the Blytheville plant noted, “Peer pressure is a wonderful motivator.”
Highly variable compensation is unusual for frontline workers, but Nucor’s success demonstrates the value of giving everyone an incentive to innovate. With bonuses included, Nucor’s factory workers make about 25 percent more than their industry peers.
Nucor’s compensation model yields other benefits as well.
No one at Nucor is looking to the center for direction. Instead, strategy typically emerges from below, as dozens of teams and divisions scan the horizon for opportunities and take the initiative in courting customers, hiring teammates, and experimenting with new products and methods.
Taken together, the elements of Nucor’s compensation model send a strong message: everybody is essential to building a better business and will be rewarded for doing so.
It’s no accident that Nucor’s employees are more skilled—technically and commercially—than their industry peers. Team members understand that to become ever more efficient, and generate ever more demand, they have to solve ever tougher problems—which in turn means getting progressively smarter, both individually and collectively. Nucor’s people practices, not surprisingly, are attuned to building deep knowledge.
As these questions imply, the focus is less on specific skills (which can be learned on the job) and more on the candidate’s resourcefulness and capacity to self-manage. Nucor’s highly selective approach also carries symbolic value: new hires understand they’re joining an exclusive organization that sets a high bar for performance and cares for its members.
The best way to advance your career at Nucor is to move across departments and even plants. It’s common to find former salespeople working in shipping, or furnace operators working in maintenance. At the Blytheville beam mill, more than half the teammates with five or more years of tenure have made at least one departmental rotation. Rotations are facilitated by Nucor’s internal job market, which gives teammates visibility into every open position across the company.
Exposing people to multiple skills and functions is a win-win. For individuals, the change in pace, activity, and colleagues makes work more interesting. In return, Nucor gets a workforce that’s able to solve complex, multidisciplinary problems.
By bolstering business thinking deep in the organization, Nucor maximizes the quality of decision making at all levels and reduces the perceived status gap between frontline employees and commercially savvy managers.
In most organizations, cross-unit coordination is the job of corporate staffers. They’re responsible for spotting opportunities to standardize practices, share resources, and jointly pursue new initiatives. At Nucor, coordination, like everything else, happens bottom-up. A dense network of lateral connections helps stitch together far-flung divisions with little or no top-down direction.
Nucor also hosts regular cross-plant events. Plant managers get together every month, and department managers every six months. In addition, there are annual gatherings of frontline teams. This represents a substantial investment in time and travel, but Nucor believes it’s the best way to transfer expertise and tackle new problems. A member of the Hickman caster team described the benefits: “You’re engaging and investing in people, building relationships, and generating opportunities to improve. During a visit, the ideas pile up. By the time you get back, you have a ton of energy to try something new. It’s never a question about whether it’s worth the time. You always bring something back.”
In each mill, cross-functional teams mapped out the skills and technologies that they would need to acquire. The teams hired metallurgists and partnered with local universities to explore new production methods. Through regular cross-team meetings and frequent best-marking visits, the automotive initiative took shape. The informal team of teams solved technical problems, developed marketing strategies, and divvied up product responsibilities. Today, Nucor ships more than 1.5 million tons of steel to carmakers each year—an amazing testament to the power of grass roots coordination!
Nucor’s profligate transparency creates a healthy competition between divisions, prompting friendly contests to see which plant will be first to achieve a particular goal around safety or efficiency. It also makes it easy to spot plants and practices that deserve to be best-marked.
Commitment flourishes in an environment of trust. To go all in, team members need to feel they work in an organization that values fairness, honesty, and loyalty. Sadly, trust is often a scarce commodity in large companies. In a 2016 Ernst & Young global survey, fewer than half of the ten thousand employees surveyed said they had a “great deal of trust” in their colleagues or the company overall.6
By contrast, Nucor teammates speak of the company as a “community” or “family.” According to John Ferriola, the company’s CEO from 2013 to 2019, “Nucor doesn’t have a chain of command; it has a chain of trust.”
Many of the practices we’ve described boost trust: the compensation process ensures that the fruits of innovation are equitably shared; investment in personal development creates reciprocal loyalty; and radical transparency brings people together around shared goals. Beyond this, there are other pillars that strengthen trust.
Ferriola says the company could have avoided its one and only loss-making year, 2008, by laying off a small number of people, but he and other executives never considered it. That was a good call. Nucor’s local teams have made the company a leader in process automation because nobody’s worried about being replaced by a smart machine.
Some benefits, such as Nucor’s profit-sharing scheme, scholarship program, employee stock purchase plan, and service awards program, are off-limits to senior officers. With few status differentiators, communication tends to be candid and forthright. At Nucor, executives don’t sit on pedestals.
Team members are directly involved in the selection of supervisors and managers. There’s also a formal process for giving upward feedback. A supervisor in Hickman said, “You get a bad score on the survey and you’re toast.” Head-office managers make frequent plant visits and host local town halls. During these dinner meetings, teammates can raise any issue that comes to mind. Said one plant manager, “These dinners aren’t done until the teammates are ready to call it a night. I often feel like I’m getting grilled, and I can’t BS my way out of their questions.”
When compared to its competitors, Nucor’s production crews are ridiculously empowered. Shift teams are supported by a supervisor who’s more coach than boss, but it’s frontline team members who take the lead in setting production targets, allocating tasks, meeting safety and quality standards, and solving production snags. The financial impact of these decisions can run to tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Beyond controlling the production process, teams are also responsible for:
The team takes the lead in professional development. Teammates give each other feedback through an annual survey that focuses on performance, safety, reliability, and leadership skills. While the peer review process doesn’t have a direct bearing on compensation, it gives every employee a clear sense of his or her standing within the team, and informs decisions on rotation, advancement, and special assignments. Being accountable to peers inspires individuals to give their best. As one teammate working in the Blytheville furnace put it, “Every day is an interview.”
The $230 million expansion at the Hickman division mentioned earlier was meant to give the mill access to rolling machines that could switch between different product specs in minutes rather than hours. The project team, led by Jay Wheeler, a former maintenance engineer, included both operators and managers. After visiting equipment suppliers in Europe and Asia, they arrived in Vienna for talks with a local vendor. During the meeting, engineers from the supplier probed the Nucor team members to better understand their needs and constraints. Wheeler recalls the Austrian engineers were confused when their questions were answered not by Nucor managers but by frontline team members.
The logic of relying on operators to source and deploy technology seems obvious to people at Nucor. After all, it’s the people at the sharp end of the business who have the best perspective on what they need to succeed.
Though it’s widely regarded as one of the world’s most innovative steelmakers, Nucor doesn’t have a central R&D function, nor does it boast a chief technology officer. Yet as Ferriola notes, “It’s not quite right to say that Nucor lacks an R&D department. We do have one, and it’s 26,000-people strong.”
With empowerment comes a degree of personal risk—what happens to you if you screw up? In a rule-worshipping culture, that risk may not be worth taking, but at Nucor, the tolerance for “smart” failures runs deep. Said Ferriola: “We encourage our people not to fear failure. You cannot stretch the limits of your knowledge, your imagination, or your skills, if you’re afraid to fail. It’s very typical to hear a manager or a supervisor coach a new teammate by saying something like: ‘If you’re not failing, you’re not pushing the limits of your abilities.’ ”
Nucor’s management model has been built to maximize creativity, competence, collaboration, commitment, and courage. Not coincidentally, it is these human attributes and behaviors that are most critical to producing extraordinary results. True to the spirit of humanocracy, Nucor’s model isn’t about pushing employees to do more, but giving them the opportunity to be more—more than blue-collar workers, more than order takers, more than mere operators, more than employees. Nucor’s frontline team members are experts, innovators, risk takers, and owners. Nucor proves unequivocally that every job can be a good job, whatever the industry.
In chapter 2, we laid bare the foundations of bureaucracy: stratification, standardization, specialization, and formalization. Nucor’s model challenges management orthodoxy in each of these areas.
In the end, no single system or practice explains Nucor’s success, but if you’re looking for an overarching lesson, it’s this: whatever your organization makes or sells, its real business is growing human beings. As they say at Nucor, “We don’t build steel, we build people.”
18.216.143.65