— 4 —

Nucor

Building People Not Products

Let’s be honest: most of us would have been reluctant to sail with Columbus. “Hey, Chris,” we would have asked, “is there a TripAdvisor review on this so-called New World?” Many are similarly hesitant to embark on the journey to humanocracy. While data and moral courage may get your colleagues to the port, most will hesitate to step aboard until you can paint a picture of the destination. The problem is, conjuring up a plausible image of a super-flat, thoroughly decentralized organization isn’t easy. As human beings, we’re prisoners of the familiar—and there’s little that’s more familiar than bureaucracy.

Luckily, the post-bureaucratic future isn’t entirely terra incognita. A handful of vanguard organizations have been mapping its contours, and there’s much to learn from their endeavors. In this chapter and the one that follows, we’ll delve into two pioneering organizations that have sailed far beyond shores of bureaucratic orthodoxy. Nucor, the world’s most innovative and consistently profitable steelmaker, is a case study in what happens when you invert the pyramid and unleash the capabilities of those on the front lines. Haier, the Qingdao-based home appliance maker, has built a culture that encourages everyone to think and act like an entrepreneur. While their approaches are different, both companies have upended canonical management beliefs. By doing so, they’ve built highly successful organizations that give us confidence in setting sail for humanocracy.

Meet Nucor

Have you ever been inside a steel mill? If so, you’ll know why the people there are considered the ultimate blue-collar workers. In the furnace, operators clad in heat-resistant jackets and face shields carefully manipulate a forty-foot cauldron of molten metal—what’s left of a few hundred tons of ferrous scrap after a thirty-minute, 175-megawatt electroshock treatment. In the nearby caster—a machine the size of a school bus that pours molten steel into different shapes—crew members gaze intently at the glowing orange stream of liquid metal, periodically adjusting and lubricating the nozzle to ensure a steady flow.

Watching steelworkers tend to these giant machines, you might conclude their work requires more brawn than brain, and data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics supports that view. Physical strength and dexterity are considered to be far more important for steelworkers than creative and analytical skills. (See table 4-1.) While that may be true in some steel plants, it’s certainly not the case at Nucor, America’s largest steelmaker.

TABLE 4-1

Importance of specific skills in select metal-working occupations

0 = unimportant, 100 = very important

Caster operators

Furnace operators

Handling and moving objects

86

71

Control precision

63

72

Manual dexterity

63

72

Analyzing data or information

37

36

Developing objectives and strategies

29

26

Originality

25

25

Customer service

19

29

Drafting and specifying technical devices

16

19

Management of financial resources

13

16

Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; authors’ analysis.

At Nucor, it’s the expertise and autonomy of frontline workers that drives progress. Consider the team running the furnace at Nucor’s Blytheville, Arkansas, facility, who turned out the giant I-beams that undergird New York’s One World Trade Center. It was crew members—not a finance or engineering executive—who conducted a detailed cost-benefit analysis and decided it was time to replace the aging furnace shell (the colossal bowl where scrap metal is turned into molten steel). Once the decision was made, it was the team—not the purchasing department—that solicited bids from suppliers. Unimpressed by the proposals they received, the crew decided to design the shell themselves. They chose the fabricator and during the build-out provided minute feedback at every step. The result? A highly efficient piece of equipment that cost Nucor $3 million—one-tenth the price of the original bids.

It is this sort of initiative and innovation that has made Nucor America’s steel leader. In 2018, Nucor’s 26,000 employees—called teammates—shipped 27.9 million tons of steel and generated $25 billion in sales. Nucor is also the most diversified steelmaker in North America, supplying beams, sheet, plate, reinforcing bar, and steel grating to a broad range of customers. Nucor runs its plants on scrap steel and is the largest recycler in the western hemisphere.

Steelmaking is a tough business. When compared to other industries, return on capital is meager and bankruptcies common. Nucor, though, isn’t an average steel company. Since 1969, it’s suffered only one unprofitable year, following the 2008 financial crisis, and has consistently delivered industry-leading returns. Not only does Nucor outperform its peers on profitability and return on capital, it also leads by a wide margin on growth in market value, revenue, income, and tons shipped per employee (see table 4-2). The company’s ratio of capital per employee is in line with the competition, but its output per capita is almost 50 percent higher than the industry average. These results are the product of a remarkable culture—one that values contribution over rank and innovation over compliance.

TABLE 4-2

Nucor performance versus peers, five-year average (2014–2018)

Profitability and returns metrics

Nucor

Peer groupa

Return on capital

8.3%

5.7%

Profit margin (EBIT)

8.4%

5.2%

Total returns to shareholders (Average trailing, 5-year returns)

38.7%

1.4%

Employee productivity metrics (thousands)

Nucor

Peer groupa

Market value per employee

$697

$324

Revenue per employee

$805

$663

Net income per employee

$42

$14

Net value of plant, production, and equipment per employee

$210

$233

Steel tons shipped per employee (2018 only)

1.06

0.67

a. Simple weighted averages including AK Steel, ArcelorMittal, Commercial Metals Company (CMC), Gerdau, Steel Dynamics, and United States Steel. For employee productivity metrics, CMC and Gerdau were not included due to lack of data.

Source: Capital IQ; World Steel; company reports; authors’ analysis.

Nucor produces its steel in mini-mills, which are typically half the size of an integrated, blast furnace mill.1 Mini-mills are more flexible than integrated mills and have lower capital costs. Historically, integrated plants had an advantage in producing thin, high-grade steel. Yet over the past thirty years, Nucor’s relentless innovation has erased much of this advantage. In 1989, Nucor pioneered a new technology that allowed it to produce slabs that were four times thinner than what had previously been possible (1.2 versus 4.8 mm). With thinner sheets, the time required to roll the steel into its final shape was cut from several days to a few hours. (It would be eight years before Nucor’s competitors matched this advance.) In 2002, Nucor introduced ultra-thin cast steel, which reduced thickness to less than a millimeter. Compared to an integrated facility, the ultra-thin cast process consumed 95 percent less energy. Over the past decade, this breakthrough, along with many others, has pushed Nucor’s share of North American crude steel production from 16 percent to nearly 25 percent.2

Nucor’s employees, who live in rural communities across the American Midwest and Southeast, are the soul of the company and share directly in its success. Since the Great Recession, Nucor has increased its payroll by 30 percent, while industrywide employment shrank by 15 percent.3 Not surprisingly, employee turnover is significantly lower than the sector average.

Underpinning Nucor’s performance is a radical, bottom-up organizational model that reflects the convictions of the company’s former chairman and CEO, Ken Iverson. Foundational to Iverson’s worldview was a belief in the capacity of ordinary human beings to do extraordinary things. As he explained in his book, Plain Talk: Lessons from a Business Maverick,

Most of today’s corporations were conceived as command-and-control organizations. The founders of integrated steel mills, for example, clearly assumed that the “genius” of the organization resided almost completely in management In contrast, we built Nucor under the assumption that most of the “genius” in our organization would be found among the people doing the work. From the outset, we shaped our business to let employees show management the way to goals that once seemed unreachable.4

Built on Freedom and Responsibility

As you’d expect of a company built to encourage creative problem-solving, Nucor is highly decentralized. In essence, the company is a confederation of seventy-five divisions that operate independently but compete collectively. The average division has $330 million in annual revenues and operates one or two plants. These units make their own decisions on procurement, products and staffing. Each division is also responsible for creating the demand for its products by winning and retaining customers. Unlike other steel companies, Nucor’s plants aren’t mere manufacturing sites, but end-to-end businesses. Accordingly, each division has its own P&L, which is entirely free of corporate cost allocations.

Thanks to this decentralization, the entrepreneurial spirit runs deep at Nucor. Attend a plant meeting, and you’ll undoubtedly hear teammates discussing new commercial opportunities. Consider, for example, the experience of the Hickman, Arkansas, sheet division. For years, the bulk of its revenue came from selling steel tubes to oil and gas companies. Riding the fracking boom of the early 2010s, Hickman became one of Nucor’s most profitable units. But in late 2014, oil prices collapsed and, with it, demand for Hickman’s tubes. In a matter of weeks, the division went from being maxed out to losing money. This triggered an urgent search for solutions. How can we diversify our product range and industry exposure? What can we produce that’s differentiated from competitors and other Nucor plants? A small ad hoc team fanned out to capture ideas from colleagues and customers. The brainstorming surfaced two promising opportunities: specialized steel for electric motors and high-strength steel for auto parts. Team members were soon on airplanes, traveling the world to locate the technology and equipment needed to make the new products. In parallel, other team members worked up a proposal for a $230 million mill expansion that would add 650,000 tons of capacity. MaryEmily Slate, who at the time was Hickman’s general manager, pitched the proposal to Nucor’s executive group in February 2016 and, within a few months, had secured the necessary funding.

Reflecting later on how her team had mobilized to right the ship, Slate said, “The greatest thing is you get it done without somebody from the top saying, ‘This is what you’re going to do.’ The idea came from the ground floor, based on a shared assessment of what we needed. We’re all responsible for the financial performance of our facility.”5

An oft-repeated mantra at Nucor is that decisions should be “pushed down to the lowest level.” It’s no surprise, then, that the company has a miniscule corporate center—about a hundred people occupying two floors of a nondescript office building on the outskirts of Charlotte, North Carolina. Head office acts as the corporate bank, reviewing major capital requests, and also sets a few basic rules such as base salary levels and minimum performance standards for the divisions.

Unlike most industrial companies, Nucor has chosen not to centralize functions like R&D, sales, marketing, strategy, safety, engineering, compliance, and purchasing. Beyond the CEO, Nucor’s executive ranks include only one other functional head, the CFO. Similarly sized U.S. Steel, based in Pittsburgh, has at least eight central functions—including performance analytics, strategic planning, compliance, supply chain, manufacturing excellence, IT, HR, and finance—which are supported by a head-office staff group of about a thousand individuals.

Nucor’s lean management philosophy also applies at the divisional level. The thousand-strong Blytheville beam division, for example, has a scant seven full-time managers—including the plant manager. Across the company, full-time managers and executives, a population that doesn’t include team supervisors, account for only 2 percent of employment—four times less than the percentage in the overall economy. As a percentage of revenue, Nucor’s general and administrative expenses hover around 3 percent, or roughly half that of its competitors.

Nucor’s Post-bureaucratic Recipe

Nucor’s faith in its people has produced a management model that breaks the bureaucratic mold in five important ways.

1. Creativity: Paying for Breakout Thinking

Through its compensation system, Nucor focuses everyone’s attention on innovating in ways that maximize asset productivity and growth. While competitors may assume that investment is the fastest way to raise output, Nucor bets on the imagination of its people. Here’s how it works.

REWARDING PRODUCTIVITY.  At Nucor, a team’s earning power is linked to its productivity. Base pay for frontline teammates is about 75 percent of the industry average, but once a team’s output exceeds a threshold, typically 80 percent of the plant’s rated capacity, a bonus plan kicks in. The bonus threshold is fixed and gets adjusted only when capital investments increase the rated output of a particular piece of machinery or the entire plant. Knowing this, team members have a powerful incentive to “sweat the assets,” since the only way to increase their bonus is to produce more steel for a given amount of capital. In practice, this means using their ingenuity to shrink costs and speed up workflows. When a new piece of equipment is installed, it’s not unusual for a team to blow through the rated capacity level in a matter of months.

Critically, bonuses are paid to teams, not individuals. A typical team comprises twenty to thirty operators who work across multiple shifts and have joint accountability for a particular process. Team rewards encourage collaborative problem solving, which is essential in a process industry where tasks are highly interdependent. (See figure 4-1.) The furnace, caster, and maintenance teams, for example, are all part of a continuous process, so they have a common production target. One caster crew member in the Hickman plant remarked, “If one area goes down, we all go down with it. My problem is their problem, and everyone will jump in to solve it.”

FIGURE 4-1

The steelmaking process at a mini-mill

Steel is produced through an interdependent and continuous process with integrated teams working toward a shared production target.

Within each plant, teams have access to real-time information on their performance and, hence, their compensation. The expectation is that a well-performing team will exceed its target and generate a substantial weekly bonus—which in most cases is exactly what happens. As you might expect, team members have little patience with slackers. A furnace operator in the Blytheville plant noted, “Peer pressure is a wonderful motivator.”

Highly variable compensation is unusual for frontline workers, but Nucor’s success demonstrates the value of giving everyone an incentive to innovate. With bonuses included, Nucor’s factory workers make about 25 percent more than their industry peers.

Nucor’s compensation model yields other benefits as well.

SHARED RESPONSIBILITY FOR GROWTH.  When demand is slack, paychecks reflect the idle capacity, so teams use the slowdown to visit customers and pitch new product ideas. Within the plant, crew members test those ideas by experimenting with changes to the production process. When, for example, demand softened at Nucor’s plate mill in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, teammates experimented with ways to make armored plate—a product that was new to the plant. An underutilized mill also turns up the heat on managers. Team members will grill their leaders: “What are you doing to help us innovate and find new customers?”

No one at Nucor is looking to the center for direction. Instead, strategy typically emerges from below, as dozens of teams and divisions scan the horizon for opportunities and take the initiative in courting customers, hiring teammates, and experimenting with new products and methods.

LESS POLITICKING.  Nucor’s top team understands that when executives have the power to monkey with targets, the result is favoritism, sandbagging, and an erosion of trust. Nucor’s clear, consistent goals are designed to minimize gamesmanship. Simple, understandable goals also reduce the need for the sort of detailed team-level KPIs that can lead to suboptimization when employees chase piecemeal targets rather than focusing on the health of the overall business.

FINANCIAL FLEXIBILITY.  Nucor’s output-based compensation model allows the company to rapidly trim its labor costs when demand softens. This flexibility eliminates the need for layoffs and gives Nucor a head start in ramping up when the business cycle turns around.

Taken together, the elements of Nucor’s compensation model send a strong message: everybody is essential to building a better business and will be rewarded for doing so.

2. Competence: Cultivating Expertise

It’s no accident that Nucor’s employees are more skilled—technically and commercially—than their industry peers. Team members understand that to become ever more efficient, and generate ever more demand, they have to solve ever tougher problems—which in turn means getting progressively smarter, both individually and collectively. Nucor’s people practices, not surprisingly, are attuned to building deep knowledge.

SELECTIVE HIRING.  Nucor hires people for a career, not a short-term gig. The expectation is that teammates will grow their skills over the arc of their career. Accordingly, Nucor’s hiring process is aimed at finding individuals who are eager to learn. The process includes a two-hour, standardized test to gauge quantitative and verbal problem-solving skills, followed by a behavioral interview with a psychologist. The final hiring decision is made by teammates who take part in an hour-long panel interview. Typical questions include:

  • What is something you are passionate about that helps to motivate you at work?
  • Have you ever fixed something?
  • Describe learning a new skill—how did you go about it?
  • Tell us about a time when you made a mistake at work. How did you correct it?
  • If a coworker really can’t stand you, what would you do?

As these questions imply, the focus is less on specific skills (which can be learned on the job) and more on the candidate’s resourcefulness and capacity to self-manage. Nucor’s highly selective approach also carries symbolic value: new hires understand they’re joining an exclusive organization that sets a high bar for performance and cares for its members.

CROSS-TRAINING.  Instead of specializing in a single task, Nucor teammates are trained for a variety of roles. In the Blytheville division, new members in the melt shop department rotate through multiple crews, like the furnace and caster. This gives them an overview of the entire production cycle and enhances their ability to solve cross-boundary problems. In many divisions, teammates can come in on their off days and get paid to train for a different role. In a typical year, more than 20 percent of teammates will receive some form of cross-training; for entry-level positions, the percentage is even greater.

The best way to advance your career at Nucor is to move across departments and even plants. It’s common to find former salespeople working in shipping, or furnace operators working in maintenance. At the Blytheville beam mill, more than half the teammates with five or more years of tenure have made at least one departmental rotation. Rotations are facilitated by Nucor’s internal job market, which gives teammates visibility into every open position across the company.

Exposing people to multiple skills and functions is a win-win. For individuals, the change in pace, activity, and colleagues makes work more interesting. In return, Nucor gets a workforce that’s able to solve complex, multidisciplinary problems.

BUILDING BUSINESS ACUMEN.  While most companies focus blue-collar training on narrow technical topics, Nucor invests in developing teammates’ commercial skills. The company believes people need to understand the business if they’re going to improve it. As part of their training, Nucor teammates participate in a daylong, Monopoly-like game called “Dollars and Tons,” where five-person teams run a fictional Nucor division. Teams make decisions on how much scrap to buy at what price, on how many people to hire, and when to invest in new equipment to expand capacity. At the end of the simulation, teams are assessed on profitability, return on assets, working capital management, and balance sheet strength—all drivers of a plant’s performance.

By bolstering business thinking deep in the organization, Nucor maximizes the quality of decision making at all levels and reduces the perceived status gap between frontline employees and commercially savvy managers.

ENCOURAGING PERSONAL GROWTH.  Many companies treat frontline employees like expendable resources, but not Nucor. Every team member has a personal development plan outlining five- to ten-year career goals. One department manager said, “We’re always trying to find something that a teammate wants to get better at. Some want to grow fast and some don’t, but we work to put people in the best position to succeed.”

3. Collaboration: Building Social Networks

In most organizations, cross-unit coordination is the job of corporate staffers. They’re responsible for spotting opportunities to standardize practices, share resources, and jointly pursue new initiatives. At Nucor, coordination, like everything else, happens bottom-up. A dense network of lateral connections helps stitch together far-flung divisions with little or no top-down direction.

LEARNING EXCHANGES.  Every year, Nucor’s team members make thousands of “best-marking” trips to sister plants. During these visits, colleagues share operational expertise and tackle common problems. When the Hickman division set out to reduce the thickness of its sheet steel, a caster crew flew in from Nucor’s plant in Ghent, Kentucky, to share what it had learned when it engineered a similar change. Most visits last a few days, but when the technical challenge is significant, a best-marking trip may extend to several weeks.

Nucor also hosts regular cross-plant events. Plant managers get together every month, and department managers every six months. In addition, there are annual gatherings of frontline teams. This represents a substantial investment in time and travel, but Nucor believes it’s the best way to transfer expertise and tackle new problems. A member of the Hickman caster team described the benefits: “You’re engaging and investing in people, building relationships, and generating opportunities to improve. During a visit, the ideas pile up. By the time you get back, you have a ton of energy to try something new. It’s never a question about whether it’s worth the time. You always bring something back.”

SPONTANEOUS NETWORKS.  When divisions identify a need for sustained coordination, they assemble a team. In a typical case, sales managers from thirteen bar mills developed a national pricing schedule to provide a consistent offering for their largest customers. Some teams are ad hoc, while others are long-lasting. There’s a network of frontline team members, for example, that coordinates procurement of raw materials and parts. Most networks begin informally. Those that add value become quasi-permanent.

OPPORTUNITY MASH-UPS.  Plants often share leads and collaborate on new business development. One of the most significant efforts involved a coordinated assault on the automotive market. A decade ago, Nucor lacked the ability to produce the high-grade, flexible steel that carmakers use for engine components and body stampings. Several divisions had flagged the auto industry as an attractive segment, but individually they lacked the skills to make much headway. Recognizing this, they joined forces to crack the market.

In each mill, cross-functional teams mapped out the skills and technologies that they would need to acquire. The teams hired metallurgists and partnered with local universities to explore new production methods. Through regular cross-team meetings and frequent best-marking visits, the automotive initiative took shape. The informal team of teams solved technical problems, developed marketing strategies, and divvied up product responsibilities. Today, Nucor ships more than 1.5 million tons of steel to carmakers each year—an amazing testament to the power of grass roots coordination!

TRANSPARENCY.  Nucor’s capacity for collaboration rests on a foundation of transparency. Company policy encourages teammates to “share everything.” Every employee has access to detailed performance metrics including tons produced, cost per ton, tons lost to defects, and much more. Commercial data is similarly open. This includes bids, orders, inventory, shipments, return on assets—anything that’s potentially relevant to running the business. Most of this information is available in real time, but in each facility, performance data also gets posted weekly near the plant entrance or in the cafeteria.

Nucor’s profligate transparency creates a healthy competition between divisions, prompting friendly contests to see which plant will be first to achieve a particular goal around safety or efficiency. It also makes it easy to spot plants and practices that deserve to be best-marked.

4. Commitment: Creating an Environment of Trust

Commitment flourishes in an environment of trust. To go all in, team members need to feel they work in an organization that values fairness, honesty, and loyalty. Sadly, trust is often a scarce commodity in large companies. In a 2016 Ernst & Young global survey, fewer than half of the ten thousand employees surveyed said they had a “great deal of trust” in their colleagues or the company overall.6

By contrast, Nucor teammates speak of the company as a “community” or “family.” According to John Ferriola, the company’s CEO from 2013 to 2019, “Nucor doesn’t have a chain of command; it has a chain of trust.”

Many of the practices we’ve described boost trust: the compensation process ensures that the fruits of innovation are equitably shared; investment in personal development creates reciprocal loyalty; and radical transparency brings people together around shared goals. Beyond this, there are other pillars that strengthen trust.

JOB SECURITY.  Nucor has never laid off employees at its steel mills, a remarkable feat in an industry that shed 40 percent of its employees between 2000 and 2018.7 Nucor could have followed suit, but that would have violated the company’s long-standing promise to employees: “Do your job well today, have it tomorrow.” When orders plummet, the company reduces the workweek, not the workforce. This reduces the odds of making the weekly bonus, but for most employees, that’s better than being laid off. In the rare instances when Nucor closes or scales back a plant, people are offered positions in other mills.

Ferriola says the company could have avoided its one and only loss-making year, 2008, by laying off a small number of people, but he and other executives never considered it. That was a good call. Nucor’s local teams have made the company a leader in process automation because nobody’s worried about being replaced by a smart machine.

FEW STATUS SYMBOLS.  In contrast to its competitors, where managers often wear uniquely colored hard hats (in one company, the CEO’s helmet is gold-plated), there are few status symbols at Nucor. Executives forgo the sort of perks often doled out in other large companies. There are no company cars, country club memberships, or personal trips on corporate aircraft.

Some benefits, such as Nucor’s profit-sharing scheme, scholarship program, employee stock purchase plan, and service awards program, are off-limits to senior officers. With few status differentiators, communication tends to be candid and forthright. At Nucor, executives don’t sit on pedestals.

REVERSE ACCOUNTABILITY.  While Nucor does have a formal hierarchy, there’s a commitment to reverse accountability that’s seldom seen in large companies. This reflects Iverson’s belief that power should trickle up, not down: “A manager’s authority comes from employees. We have seen general managers fail to effectively lead people to the ambitious goals we set at Nucor. When that happens, we say, ‘the employees fired the general manager.’ It’s similar to when a football team loses faith in the coach. Who are you going to fire, the coach or the whole team?”8

Team members are directly involved in the selection of supervisors and managers. There’s also a formal process for giving upward feedback. A supervisor in Hickman said, “You get a bad score on the survey and you’re toast.” Head-office managers make frequent plant visits and host local town halls. During these dinner meetings, teammates can raise any issue that comes to mind. Said one plant manager, “These dinners aren’t done until the teammates are ready to call it a night. I often feel like I’m getting grilled, and I can’t BS my way out of their questions.”

PROFIT SHARING FOR ALL.  Nucor’s profit-sharing plan is another mechanism for building commitment. Each year, the company contributes at least 10 percent of its pretax earnings to the plan. In 2018, Nucor paid in $308 million, which worked out to about $12,000 per employee. Teammates receive a small portion in cash and the remainder goes into a retirement account, which, for many employees, constitutes their largest financial asset.

5. Courage: The Confidence to Act

When compared to its competitors, Nucor’s production crews are ridiculously empowered. Shift teams are supported by a supervisor who’s more coach than boss, but it’s frontline team members who take the lead in setting production targets, allocating tasks, meeting safety and quality standards, and solving production snags. The financial impact of these decisions can run to tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Beyond controlling the production process, teams are also responsible for:

PEOPLE PLANNING AND PEER SUPPORT.  Production teams manage attendance and shift planning. When, for example, teams in the Blytheville division decided to change from five-day eight-hour shifts to four-day twelve-hour shifts, they didn’t ask management for permission.9 Teammates are also the first to intervene when colleagues underperform. They’ll work to identify the underlying issue and typically resolve things without the help of a supervisor.

The team takes the lead in professional development. Teammates give each other feedback through an annual survey that focuses on performance, safety, reliability, and leadership skills. While the peer review process doesn’t have a direct bearing on compensation, it gives every employee a clear sense of his or her standing within the team, and informs decisions on rotation, advancement, and special assignments. Being accountable to peers inspires individuals to give their best. As one teammate working in the Blytheville furnace put it, “Every day is an interview.”

CAPITAL SPENDING.  Nucor’s production teams have a degree of financial autonomy that’s unprecedented within the steel industry. Team members regularly issue purchase orders in the tens of thousands of dollars without consulting plant management. Before pulling the trigger, they’ll consult with colleagues, but the goal is to get input, not approval.

DEPLOYING NEW TECHNOLOGY.  Nucor’s teams are constantly on the hunt for technology that will give their business a competitive edge. Here, as elsewhere, frontline operators are deeply involved in the decision-making process.

The $230 million expansion at the Hickman division mentioned earlier was meant to give the mill access to rolling machines that could switch between different product specs in minutes rather than hours. The project team, led by Jay Wheeler, a former maintenance engineer, included both operators and managers. After visiting equipment suppliers in Europe and Asia, they arrived in Vienna for talks with a local vendor. During the meeting, engineers from the supplier probed the Nucor team members to better understand their needs and constraints. Wheeler recalls the Austrian engineers were confused when their questions were answered not by Nucor managers but by frontline team members.

The logic of relying on operators to source and deploy technology seems obvious to people at Nucor. After all, it’s the people at the sharp end of the business who have the best perspective on what they need to succeed.

INTERACTING WITH CUSTOMERS.  In large industrial companies, it’s rare for frontline employees to interact directly with customers, unless they’re in a sales or tech support role. Not so at Nucor. From the crane operator to the forklift driver, everyone knows the customer. Production teams make regular customer visits, known as “line-to-line” meetings. A mill team, for example, will spend a day at an automotive plant talking to the manufacturing teams who turn steel sheets into car parts. The visitors will pepper their hosts with questions: How does the machine handle our steel? How do results compare with our competitors’ products? Where can we improve? These conversations generate a myriad of ideas and create personal relationships that ensure future issues are speedily resolved.

CONTINUOUS EXPERIMENTATION.  At Nucor, teammates have both the incentives and the freedom to experiment with new production techniques. The result: a company where everyone innovates. In one case, an employee in the Blytheville melt shop worked for several years to redesign the ladle—the giant container that feeds the caster with molten steel. Through a series of experiments, he reworked the cauldron’s liner using materials that were more resistant to decomposition. The new design doubled the reliability of the ladle and yielded reductions in downtime and maintenance expenses. Experiments like this happen across the company, and are core to Nucor’s competitive advantage.

Though it’s widely regarded as one of the world’s most innovative steelmakers, Nucor doesn’t have a central R&D function, nor does it boast a chief technology officer. Yet as Ferriola notes, “It’s not quite right to say that Nucor lacks an R&D department. We do have one, and it’s 26,000-people strong.”

With empowerment comes a degree of personal risk—what happens to you if you screw up? In a rule-worshipping culture, that risk may not be worth taking, but at Nucor, the tolerance for “smart” failures runs deep. Said Ferriola: “We encourage our people not to fear failure. You cannot stretch the limits of your knowledge, your imagination, or your skills, if you’re afraid to fail. It’s very typical to hear a manager or a supervisor coach a new teammate by saying something like: ‘If you’re not failing, you’re not pushing the limits of your abilities.’ ”

The Spirit of Humanocracy

Nucor’s management model has been built to maximize creativity, competence, collaboration, commitment, and courage. Not coincidentally, it is these human attributes and behaviors that are most critical to producing extraordinary results. True to the spirit of humanocracy, Nucor’s model isn’t about pushing employees to do more, but giving them the opportunity to be more—more than blue-collar workers, more than order takers, more than mere operators, more than employees. Nucor’s frontline team members are experts, innovators, risk takers, and owners. Nucor proves unequivocally that every job can be a good job, whatever the industry.

In chapter 2, we laid bare the foundations of bureaucracy: stratification, standardization, specialization, and formalization. Nucor’s model challenges management orthodoxy in each of these areas.

STRATIFICATION.  Nucor has a formal hierarchy, but the company is far less stratified—fewer levels, fewer managers, and fewer top-down commands—than most organizations of its size. Nucor has distributed the work of managing to frontline team members by giving them expansive decision rights and a substantial voice in choosing their own leaders. At Nucor, there’s no caste system, no distinction between thinkers and doers.

STANDARDIZATION.  Forced standardization chokes off innovation and turns employees into automatons. That’s why Nucor resists the temptation to dictate operating standards top-down. Every plant is free to develop its own procedures and protocols. There are no attempts to impose uniformity merely for the sake of orderliness, and no rigid policies designed to make the company more homogenous and thus more easily managed from the top. Instead, transparent performance data and a shared passion for getting better facilitate the spread of bleeding-edge practices. At Nucor, production processes converge naturally when it makes sense, but not when it doesn’t.

FORMALIZATION.  Every organization needs a certain amount of structure—boundaries that delineate teams, functions, and operating units. Yet despite having nearly a hundred divisions, Nucor isn’t balkanized. Rather than using corporate staff groups—planning, marketing, sales, and R&D—to harvest synergies, Nucor relies on social networks. As with standardization, coordination happens organically, when teams identify a common interest. Coordination is the product of collaboration, not centralization.

SPECIALIZATION.  Nucor’s team members are deeply skilled, but they’re also multiskilled. Shared targets, cross-training, and malleable roles help them tackle the sort of tough, boundary-spanning problems that yield big productivity gains. There are no “slots” at Nucor and, thus, no artificial limits on where and how team members can contribute.

In the end, no single system or practice explains Nucor’s success, but if you’re looking for an overarching lesson, it’s this: whatever your organization makes or sells, its real business is growing human beings. As they say at Nucor, “We don’t build steel, we build people.”

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.216.143.65