References

  1. Adams, J., and Duncan Grand, D. (2019). New Tech Network: Driving systems change and equity through project‐based learning. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
  2. Aguilar, J., Nayfack, M., and Bush‐Mecenas, S. (2017). Exploring Improvement Science in Education: Promoting College Access in Fresno Unified School District. Policy Analysis for California Education, PACE. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED574814.pdf
  3. Alliance for Resource Equity. (n.d.). Ten dimensions: Resource equity diagnostic for districts. https://www.educationresourceequity.org/documents/diagnostic.pdf
  4. American Institutes for Research (AIR). (2018). Strategies for equitable family engagement. https://oese.ed.gov/files/2020/10/equitable_family_engag_508.pdf
  5. Arnaiz‐Sánchez, P., de Haro, R., Alcaraz, S., and Mirete Ruiz, A. B. (2020). Schools That Promote the Improvement of Academic Performance and the Success of All Students. Front. Psychol. 10:2920.
  6. Bleacher Report. (2010). 1992 dream team: The greatest team ever assembled. https://bleacherreport.com/articles/435593-the-greatest-team-ever-assembled
  7. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Easton, J. Q., and Luppescu, S. (2010). Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
  8. Boudett, K. P., City, E. A., and Murnane, R. J. (Eds.). (2013). Data Wise: A step‐by‐step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning, Revised and expanded edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  9. CASEL. (2019). SEL 3 signature practices playbook: A tool that supports systemic SEL. https://casel.org/casel_sel-3-signature-practices-playbook-v3/
  10. CAST (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2 [graphic organizer]. Wakefield, MA: Author.
  11. California Department of Education. (2021). Definition of MTSS. (2021). https://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/cr/ri/mtsscomprti2.asp
  12. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2019). The Six Core Principles of Improvement. https://www.carnegiefoundation.org/our-ideas/six-core-principles-improvement/
  13. Center for Universal Design. (1997). Principles of universal design. https://projects.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_ud/udprinciplestext.htm
  14. Chardin, M., and Novak, K. (2020). Equity by design: Delivering on the power and promise of UDL. Corwin Press.
  15. Choi, J. H., McCart, A. B., Hicks, T. A., and Sailor, W. (2018). An analysis of mediating effects of school leadership on MTSS implementation. The Journal of Special Education 53(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918804815
  16. Choi, J. H., McCart, A. B., and Sailor, W. (2020). Reshaping educational systems to realize the promise of inclusive education. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education 6(1), 8–23.
  17. Choudhury, S. (2021). Differentiating between UDL and differentiated instruction. Novak Educational Consulting. https://www.novakeducation.com/blog/udl-vs-differentiated-instruction-a-new-perspective
  18. Council of Great City Schools. (2012). Common Core State Standards and Diverse Urban Students: Using Multi‐Tiered Systems of Support. https://www.cgcs.org/cms/lib/DC00001581/Centricity/Domain/87/77—Achievement%20Task%20Force—RTI%20White%20Paper-Final.pdf
  19. Crane, K., and Mooney, M. (2005). Essential tools: Community resource mapping. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Institute on Community Integration, National Center on Secondary Education and Transition.
  20. Curtis, R. E., and City, E. A. (2009). Strategy in action: How school systems can support powerful learning and teaching. Harvard Education Press.
  21. Dane, A. V., and Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control? Clinical Psychology Review 18, 23–45
  22. Dulaney, S. K., Hallam, P. R., and Wall, G. (2013). Superintendent perceptions of multi‐tiered systems of support (MTSS): Obstacles and opportunities for school system reform. AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice 10(2), 30–45.
  23. Durisic, M., and Bunijevac, M. (2017). Parental involvement as an important factor for successful education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal 7(3), 137–153.
  24. Eagle, J. W., Dowd‐Eagle, S. E., Snyder, A., and Holtzman, E. G. (2015). Implementing a Multi‐Tiered System of Support (MTSS): Collaboration Between School Psychologists and Administrators to Promote Systems‐Level Change. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation 25(2/3), 160–177.
  25. Education Law Clinic of Harvard Law School and the Trauma and Learning Policy Initiative of Massachusetts Advocates for Children. (2019). Students' Voices: Their Perspectives on How Schools Are and Should Be. https://students-speak.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Focus-Group-Report-July_2019-Final.pdf
  26. Ellery, T. (2020). Belonging as a pathway to inclusive: An inquiry into supporting inclusive practice in secondary schools. Kairaranga 20(2), 52–60.
  27. Escudero, B. (2019). How to practice culturally relevant pedagogy. Teach For America. https://www.teachforamerica.org/stories/how-to-engage-culturally-relevant-pedagogy
  28. Evans, R. (2005). Reframing the achievement gap. Phi Delta Kappan 86, 582–589.
  29. Farmer, J., Hauk, S., and Neumann, A. M. (2005). Negotiating Reform: Implementing Process Standards in Culturally Responsive Professional Development. High School Journal 88(4), 59–71.
  30. Fixsen, D., Blase, K., Metz, A., and Van Dyke, M. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence‐based programs. Exceptional Children 79, 213–230. Doi:10.1177/001440291307900206
  31. Fixsen, D., Naoom, S., Blase, K., Friedman, R., and Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network.
  32. Gabriel, J. G., and Farmer, P. C. (2009). How to help your school thrive without breaking the bank. ASCD.
  33. Graham, P., Kennedy, S.,and Lynch, J. (2016). Dare to dialogue: Engaging parents in system change. Odyssey: New Directions in Deaf Education 17, 68–71.
  34. Gresham, F. M., MacMillan, D. L., Beebe‐Frankenberger, M. E., and Bocian, K. M. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 15(4), 198–205.
  35. Hall, G. E., Wallace, R. C., and Dossett, W. A. (1973). A developmental conceptualization of the adoption process within educational institutions (Report No. 3006). Austin: University of Texas at Austin.
  36. Hanover Research. (2014). Optimal scheduling for secondary school students. https://www.mansfieldisd.org/uploaded/main/departments/CIA/assets/MasterScheduleStudy/Research-OptimalScheduling_Secondary.pdf
  37. Harlacher, J. E., Sakelaris, T. L., and Kattelman, N. M. (2014). Practitioner's guide to curriculum‐based evaluation in reading. New York: Springer.
  38. Hartmann, E. (2015). Universal design for learning (UDL) and learners with severe support needs. International Journal of Whole Schooling 11(1), 54–67.
  39. Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., and Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.
  40. Hernández, L. E., and Darling‐Hammond, L. (2019). Deeper learning networks: Taking student‐centered learning and equity to scale. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED603414.pdf
  41. Hirsh, S., Delehant, A., and Sparks, S. (1994). Keys to successful meetings. National Staff Development Council.
  42. Hoy, A. W. (2000). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Session 43: 22.
  43. Institute of Education Sciences. (2017). Introduction to improvement science. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/west/Blogs/Details/2
  44. International Disability Alliance (IDA). (2021). Universal design for learning and its role in ensuring access to inclusive education for all: A technical paper by the international disability alliance. https://www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/sites/default/files/universal_design_for_learning_final_8.09.2021.pdf
  45. Javius, E. (2020). Coaching up at every level: Inside the system of support to improve Tier I. Leadership 49(4), 24–27.
  46. Khazan, O. (2018). Are “learning styles” real? Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/the-myth-of-learning-styles/557687
  47. Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., and Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teaching coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta‐analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research 88(4), 547–588.
  48. Ladson‐Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal 32(3), 465–491.
  49. Learning for Justice. (n.d.). Social justice equity audits. https://www.learningforjustice.org/professional-development/social-justice-equity-audits
  50. Lever, N., Castle, M., Cammack, N., Bohnenkamp, J., Stephan, S., Bernstein, L., Chang, P., Lee, P., and Sharma, R. (2014). Resource mapping in schools and school districts: A resource guide. Baltimore, Maryland: Center for School Mental Health.
  51. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; equilibrium and social change. Human Relations 1(1): 5–41.
  52. Loucks, S. F., and Hall, G. E. (1979). Implementing innovations in schools: A concerns‐based approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  53. Mace, R. (1998). Designing for the 21st Century: An International Conference on Universal Design. Speech, June 19, 1998, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY. https://projects.ncsu.edu/ncsu/design/cud/about_us/usronmacespeech.htm
  54. Mason, E. N., and Smith, R. A. (2020). Tracking intervention dosage to inform instructional decision making. Intervention in School and Clinic 56(2), 92–98.
  55. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2019). Guidebook for Inclusive Practice. https://www.doe.mass.edu/edeval/guidebook/
  56. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2022). Massachusetts district reviews. https://www.doe.mass.edu/accountability/district-review/targeted.docx
  57. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, (2023a). Center for School and District Partnership (CSDP) coherence guidebook. https://www.doe.mass.edu/csdp/guidebook/coherence-guidebook.pdf
  58. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2023b). Deeper learning tasks. https://www.doe.mass.edu/kaleidoscope/tasks.html
  59. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Commonwealth Consulting, and Novak Educational Consulting (2019). Multi-tiered system of support blueprint. https://www.doe.mass.edu/sfss/mtss/blueprint.pdf
  60. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Commonwealth Consulting, and Novak Educational Consulting (2022). Coherence guidebook. https://www.doe.mass.edu/csdp/guidebook/coherence-guidebook.pdf
  61. McColskey‐Leary, C., and Garman‐McClaine, B. (2021). Integrating Improvement and Implementation Sciences to Enhance Educational Outcomes. National implementation Research Network, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
  62. McGlynn, K., and Kelly, J. (2017). Using formative assessments to differentiate instruction. Science Scope 41(4), 22–25.
  63. Mehta, J., and Fine, S. (2019). In search of deeper learning: Inside the effort to remake the American high school. Harvard University Press.
  64. Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., and Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.
  65. Mid‐Atantic Equity Consortium (MAEC). (n.d.). An Equity Audit: Is it in your future? https://maec.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Equity-Audit-Considerations-1.pdf
  66. Minnesota Department of Education. (2021). Minnesota Multi‐tiered System of Support Roadmap. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED618754.pdf
  67. Nancekivell, S. E., Shah, P., and Gelman, S. A. (2019). Maybe they're born with it, or maybe it's experience: Toward a deeper understanding of the learning style myth. Journal of Educational Psychology 112(2), 221–235.
  68. National Center for Learning Disabilities (2021). Research‐based approaches to accelerating learning. https://ncld.org/reports-studies/promising-practices-to-accelerate-learning-for-students-with-disabilities-during-covid-19-and-beyond/part-1-research-based-approaches-to-accelerate-learning/
  69. National Center on Time and Learning. (2014). School resources. https://www.timeandlearning.org/school-resources/tools
  70. National Equity Project. (2022). Equity messaging guidance for districts. https://www.nationalequityproject.org/resources/tools/equity-messaging-guidance-school-districts
  71. National Implementation Research Network. (n.d.). Definitions and fidelity. https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/module-1/usable-innovations/definitions-fidelity
  72. National School Board Association (NSBA). (n.d.). About us. Equity statement. https://www.nsba.org/About
  73. Noguera, P. (2017) Taking deeper learning to scale. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/deeper-learning-to-scale-report
  74. Novak, K. (2022). UDL now! A teacher's guide to applying Universal Design for Learning, 3rd ed. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.
  75. Novak, K. (2021). If equity is a priority, UDL is a must. Cult of Pedagogy. https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/udl-equity/
  76. Novak, K., and Rodriguez, K. (2016). Universally designed leadership: Applying UDL to systems and schools. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.
  77. Novak, K., and Woodlock, M. (2021). UDL playbook for school and district leaders. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.
  78. Pak, K., Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., and Saldívar García, E. (2020). The adaptive challenges of curriculum implementation: Insights for educational leaders driving standards‐based reform. AERA Open, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420932828
  79. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.
  80. Posey, A., and Novak, K. (2020). Unlearning: Changing your beliefs and your classroom with UDL. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.
  81. Rantung, R. C., and Sarmita, R. N. (2020). Business students' perspectives: What makes successful group performance? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) 9(4), 896.
  82. Rhode Island Department of Education. (n.d.). School Reform Planning Worksheet #2: Theory of Action. https://www.ride.ri.gov/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/Information-and-Accountability-User-Friendly-Data/Transformation/Theory-Action-One-Pager.pdf
  83. Riley, K. A. (2018). Place, belonging and school leadership: Researching to make the difference. Bloomsbury Academy.
  84. Roc, M., Ross, P., and Hernández, L. E. (2019). International network for public schools: A deeper learning approach to supporting English learners. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED603420.pdf
  85. Rowland C., Feygin, A., Sebastian, F.L., and Gomez, C. (2018). Beyond accountability: Improving the use of information to support teaching and learning through continuous improvement cycles. American Institutes for Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED592098.pdf
  86. SWIFT Education Center. (2017). SWIFT MTSS starter kit. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56b90cb101dbae64ff707585/t/5cc1ed15fa0d6061c22f6a75/1556213016911/MTSS_Starter_Kit_2017.pdf
  87. Saldana, L., and Chamberlain, P. (2012). Supporting implementation: The role of community development teams to build infrastructure. American Journal of Community Psychology 50(3–4), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9503-0
  88. Sanetti, L. M. H., and Kratochwill, T. R. (2009). Analysis of treatment integrity in school‐based prevention programming: Contextual considerations and the good behavior game. PsycEXTRA Dataset.
  89. Schiller, E., Chow, K., Thayer, S., Nakamura, J., Wilkerson, S. B., and Puma, M. (2020). What tools have states developed or adapted to assess schools' implementation of a multi‐tiered system of supports/response to intervention framework? (REL 2020–017). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory, Appalachia.
  90. Scott, L. A. (2018). Barriers with implementing a Universal Design for Learning framework. Inclusion 6(4), 274–286.
  91. Smith, K. L. Finney, S. J., and Fulcher, K. H. (2017). Actionable steps for engaging assessment practitioners and faculty in implementation fidelity research. Research and Practice in Assessment 12, 71–86.
  92. Smith, O. L., and Robinson, R. (2020). Teacher Perceptions and Implementation of a Content Area Literacy Professional Development Program. Journal of Educational Research and Practice 10(1), 55–69.
  93. Thirunarayanan, M. O. (2004). The “significantly worse” phenomenon: A study of student achievement in different content areas by school location. Education and Urban Society 36, 467–481.
  94. Thurlow, M. L., Ghere, G., Lazarus, S. S., and Liu, K. K. (2020). MTSS for all: Including students with the most significant cognitive disabilities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes/TIES Center.
  95. TNTP. (2018). The Opportunity Myth. https://opportunitymyth.tntp.org/
  96. Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., and Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating Instruction in Response to Student Readiness, Interest, and Learning Profile in Academically Diverse Classrooms: A Review of Literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203
  97. Turse, K. A., and Albrecht, S. F. (2015). The ABCs of RTI: An introduction to the building blocks of response to intervention. Preventing School Failure 59(2), 83–89.
  98. United Nations. (2020). Universal, inclusive education “non‐negotiable.” UN News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/06/1066942
  99. UNICEF. (2013). The state of the world's children. https://www.unicef.org/sowc/
  100. US Department of Education. (2016). Using evidence to strengthen education investments. https://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/essa/guidanceuseseinvestment.pdf
  101. Venning, J., and Buisman‐Pijlman, F. (2013). Integrating assessment matrices in feedback loops to promote research skill development in postgraduate research projects. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38(5), 567–579.
  102. Waitoller, F., and Kozleski, E. (2013). Working in Boundary Practices: Identity Development and Learning in Partnerships for Inclusive Education. Teaching and Teacher Education 31: 35–45.
  103. Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. (2020). Washington's Multi‐Tiered System of Supports Framework. https://www.k12.wa.us/sites/default/files/public/cisl/iss/pubdocs/WA%20MTSS%20Framework%20Publication_final.pdf
  104. WIDA. (n.d.). Understanding multilingual learners. https://wida.wisc.edu/teach/learners
  105. W.K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic model development guide. https://www.naccho.org/uploads/downloadable-resources/Programs/Public-Health-Infrastructure/KelloggLogicModelGuide_161122_162808.pdf
  106. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.‐Y., Scarloss, B., and Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues and Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 033). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.135.219.166