PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE
Saddle up! We are all pioneers venturing into unmapped territories. “It’s tough to make predictions,” Yogi Berra once said, “especially about the future.” But here’s one prediction I can make with confidence: Local investment opportunities will very soon become easier to find, evaluate, and transact. And some of them will become more lucrative. We are at the beginning of what historians might someday call the Great Local Investment Revolution.
Everything!
By the time this book is published, US citizens probably will have invested nearly a billion dollars locally since 2016 through investment crowdfunding. That’s a tiny sliver of the $85 trillion dollars in financial assets Americans have, but it’s a start.
As more people in your community invest locally, more local businesses will get financed, more municipal infrastructure will be built, more of your neighbors will become homeowners, and more of those struggling with crushing debt will find a way out. As more investors begin to localize their portfolios, they will expand local income, wealth, and jobs, which in turn will enlarge the tax base, gin up public services, and improve the quality of local life. This could be the holy grail of economic development that so many communities have been searching for, far more reliable and cost-effective than giving away billions of dollars of “incentives” to attract and retain global businesses like Amazon.
There also will be losers. As competitive local businesses get more capital, big companies will experience a decapitalization—some dramatically so. What happens when the first trillion dollars moves from Wall Street to Main Street? As demand shifts, the price of Wall Street stocks will drop and the price of Main Street stocks will go up. As more mainstream investors start to notice that the smart money is moving into local business, they too will join in. So will investment advisors. This trend will accelerate until local businesses receive the 60–80 percent of available capital they deserve. And the shift could be stunningly swift.
Among the first major companies to decapitalize may be the “too big to fail” banks, investment houses, brokerages, and other institutions responsible for the crisis of 2008. Were it not for the massive government bailout in the years that followed—not just the $700-billion-dollar relief package that Congress passed in 2008, but the trillions more pumped into the economy by the Federal Reserve through “quantitative easement”—many of these financial behemoths would have gone extinct. If these companies continue to cater exclusively to global finance, their volume of business will steadily shrink. And their competitors at the local level—credit unions, local financial advisors, local investment funds—will multiply. The nation’s financial system will become more diverse, safe, and stable.
There are four pillars of the emerging local investment ecosystem:
What is not widely appreciated, however, is how much each pillar depends on the others. Mutual funds will probably never become seriously interested in local investment until they can see many local investment pools operating with good track records. Local investment funds will never get very far until there are local exchanges or intermediaries where they can sell their securities from time to time. And local exchanges will never be formed until there is a critical mass of local investors looking to use them.
Right now, the local investment ecosystem is filled with a bunch of fragile seedlings. With the JOBS Act and state securities reforms, we have made it easier for local businesses to sell securities—but that’s about it. No state has created its own local stock market, though Michigan passed a symbolic law to explore the idea. About two dozen local investment funds across the country allow grassroots investors to participate. Nearly all of them take advantage of the exemption in the Investment Company Act for nonprofits. To really expand the number of these funds, we need new kinds of funds that take advantage of the more than a dozen other exemptions in the Act.1
The home-run reform, which conservatives would surely rally around, can be summarized in one word: Federalism! We should allow states to experiment with new local investment frameworks and institutions. While federal laws permit states to frame their own laws about issuing local securities, they do not clearly give the states authority to create local stock markets or local investment funds. They should. States should become “laboratories of democracy” when it comes to investing. Congress might consider passing a very short law allowing this, but there’s no reason to wait: The SEC has all the authority it needs to issue a “no action letter” saying that whatever states do regarding their own investors and intrastate securities is their own business—period.
Once this very modest policy declaration occurs, US states will be happily surprised to find plenty of models around the world that they might adopt. In 1999, the Canadian province of Nova Scotia passed a law permitting grassroots groups to set up local investment funds inexpensively, and more than sixty funds have been created since. If the United States had as many funds per capita, we would have 21,000! It shows the importance of getting the law right. In the Canadian province of Alberta, with vast oil resources that make it the Texas of the north, co-ops are given special privileges to become investment funds to stimulate local economic development.
It’s harder to find examples around the world of local stock exchanges, except in our own history. In the late 1800s and early 1900s dozens of small stock exchanges scattered across the United States facilitated the buying and selling of shares of local companies. They were indispensable tools for regional economic development. We need to bring these exchanges back. Every state should have at least one virtual exchange where residents can find local companies. If I live in Montana, I should be able to sign up for the Big Sky Exchange, search for “organic food” companies, and quickly find fifty interesting places to park my money. Unlike today’s two principal exchanges operating in the United States, the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ, these local exchanges might maintain higher standards of social responsibility and favor slower transactions that discourage speculation.
All this will take time. If you’re like me, however, you may be impatient. The gap between rich and poor is yawning. The legions of homeless on our streets are expanding. Traditional jobs are under threat from cheap labor abroad and robots at home. The climate is getting hotter, and water supplies are dwindling. We have got to act now.
The faster law and policy change, the more local investment options you will have, and the more likely it is that you will find the right ones that fit with your needs for return, risk, and liquidity. We can accelerate this process by bringing down the costs of local investing. While there are a zillion things the federal government can do, I’m going to focus on where we have more influence—state and local governments.
The spread of Self-Directed IRAs and Solo 401ks can greatly increase the number of local investors and the amount of money they move from Wall Street to Main Street. DIY Accounts cost something—not a lot, but something—and like speed bumps, their fees slow down the local investment revolution. Suppose we could bring down those costs. Automation and competition are likely to do this anyway, and I predict that the cost of a Self-Directed IRA and Solo 401k will ultimately shrink to about $100–200 per year, maybe even less. But let’s go further and get rid of these costs altogether.
One way to do this effectively might be through a local investment tax credit. For every dollar you put into local investment, you might get some amount off on your taxes. Suppose you had a 5 percent state tax credit. If you reinvested $10,000 of your DIY Account into local business, you would get a $500 credit on your state income or property taxes—more than enough to cover your fees for a year. Better still, let’s apply the credit to the total amount of local investments you hold, so you can apply it year after year.
Tax credits exist in many states for a variety of purposes, but none are designed to facilitate local investing by unaccredited investors. A great example can be found just above the US border. The province of New Brunswick, which abuts the state of Maine, recently passed a tax credit to promote local investment. Residents there get fifty cents off every dollar they pay in provincial taxes. There’s no reason US states couldn’t pass a tax credit like New Brunswick’s. In fact, several state legislators are already drafting pieces of legislation to do this. How about yours?
What else should we ask policymakers to do? Let’s start with your city council. You might kindly request they consider the following:
Please don’t stop there. Get busy at your statehouse too. After your state legislators pass a local investment tax credit, you might ask them to try these ideas:
Advocating for policy change may be more than you signed up for. I know, I know, you just want to put your money in your life. But there’s a practical point here: The more you and others in your community can change the system—locally, statewide, and ultimately nationally—the better your returns will be. You can shape the system to make it easier for you to find, evaluate, and profit from local investments. Become your community’s expert on local investing, engage in modest advocacy, and all kinds of new possibilities may open up.
I began the book by noting that the local investment revolution, while grounded in well-founded public distrust of Wall Street, also provides the most visionary leaders in the financial industry with tremendous new business opportunities. To expand the services of local banks and credit unions with DIY Accounts. To deploy new investment funds and stock exchanges in your states. To provide grassroots investors with better tools to evaluate local securities. To integrate local securities into mutual funds. To bundle local securities in new ways, including local futures and derivatives (hopefully with greater transparency than their predecessors). To design new ways of diversifying portfolios with interesting combinations of large and small companies.
The most creative among you might see ways of improving economies of scale in the local investment industry. You might put together a national fund of local funds. Or design one platform for local stock exchanges and replicate it in all fifty states. Or create a network of local banks that share certain administrative functions, like a producer cooperative. Or launch a national consulting firm in the area of local finance. Or open a business school that specializes in teaching the skills required for cutting-edge financial institutions.
Some of your colleagues will dismiss local investing as a carnival sideshow irrelevant to the real economy of global businesses. That’s great news! It means that you are likely to come to this cutting-edge industry faster than your peers. And by the time they realize their mistake, you will be comfortably and profitably building the next century’s financial system.
Here’s a checklist I hope you will consider:
As you embark on this adventure, remember the immortal words of Sir Francis Bacon: “It would be an unsound fancy and self-contradictory to expect that things which have never yet been done can be done except by means which have never yet been tried.”
3.144.238.20