64 4. PROBLEMS IN ELECTROSTATICS AND ELECTRODYNAMICS
expressing energy density scaled by the squared mass-to-energy ratio for the field. e energy
flux—the standard Poynting 3-vector—is
T
0i
ˆ
! T
0
ˆ
D
k
k
0
T
00
ˆ
expressing the energy density T
00
ˆ
flowing uniformly in the direction of the momentum nor-
malized to energy. Comparing the proportionality factor to that for a free particle
k
k
0
!
p
E=c
D
1
c
M d x=d
M dt =d
D
v
c
which will not generally be a unit vector unless D 0, as it must be for Maxwell plane waves.
e mass flux vector—a second Poynting 3-vector—can be written
T
5i
ˆ
! T
5
ˆ
D
k
T
55
ˆ
expressing the mass density T
55
ˆ
flowing uniformly in the direction of the momentum normal-
ized to mass. Finally,
T
50
ˆ
D
k
0
T
55
ˆ
D
k
0
T
00
ˆ
so that T
5
ˆ
can be written as
T
5
ˆ
D
k
T
55
ˆ
D
k
k
2
0
T
00
ˆ
expressing the mass density T
55
ˆ
flowing in the direction of the 4-momentum. In this sense, T
50
ˆ
represents the flow of mass into the time direction. We notice that when ! 0, as is the case
for Maxwell plane waves, k=k
0
becomes a unit vector and T
5˛
ˆ
D 0, so that mass density and
flow vanish. e interpretation of plane waves carrying energy and momentum (energy flux)
uniformly to infinity is thus seen to generalize to mass flow, where mass is best understood
through (4.21) as the non-identity of energy and momentum.
Suppose that a plane wave of this type impinges on a test particle in its rest frame, de-
scribed by x
˛
./ D
.
c; 0; c
5
/
. Since Px D 0, the wave will interact with the event through the
Lorentz force (3.6) and (3.7) as
M Rx
.
/
D
e
c
f
0
.x; / Px
0
.
/
C c
5
f
5
.x; /
d
d
.
1
2
M Px
2
/ D
ec
5
c
55
0
Px
0
which for
k
¤ 0 ) k
k
¤ 0 becomes
R
t D
55
e
c
5
Mc
2
1
k
0
k
k
Rx D
e
M
h
e
?
1 C
c
5
c
k
0
C
k
c
5
c
C
55
k
0
i