9
Policies, Schmolicies . . . How to Write and Enforce the Right Rules

The last three chapters of this book focus on implementation and execution. This do-it-yourself part is divided into two sections:

  1. Things you can do to prevent drama from happening in the first place (write policies your employees will actually read and follow, and provide training that will positively impact understanding and behavior).
  2. Innovative but time-tested methods to resolve drama if it does occur (receiving, investigating, and resolving claims of misconduct).

We’ll start with policies. Though policies are universally recognized as useful tools to prevent misconduct, too many organizations pay little attention to writing and enforcing policies that will have that desired effect. Let’s be honest, no one really reads the employee handbook. More precisely, no one reads the typical handbook. (I do know of a few companies who’ve written clear, precise, transparent, and entertaining policies, but they are, unfortunately, the exception rather the rule.)

So how can you take a fresh new approach to writing policies? How can you write policies that become an integral component of your journey to becoming a drama-free workplace?

  • First, as I discussed in detail in the “Freedom” section in Chapter 5,policies that restrict freedom do more harm than good. So write policies that set expectations and communicate your commitment to a healthy workplace.
  • Second, policies have become nothing more than yet another legal CYA tool—an additional element in the company’s quest to “protect” itself from lawsuits, rather than a truly helpful guide. Be bold. Chuck the legalese and instead write policies that employees want to read, with guidelines they understand.

I’ll end the chapter by focusing on sexual harassment policies, summarizing the top 10 mistakes I’ve seen in those policies and providing a roadmap, including sample language, to avoid those pitfalls.

Taken together, these sections will help you authentically state your expectations as you make your journey to the top of the Healthy Workplace Culture Pyramid.

Policies Should Set Expectations, Not Restrict Freedom

Should policies be written to give employees the right to do something, or should they be written to encourage employees to do the right thing? If you’ve been paying attention, you know that I believe the best way to prevent workplace drama is to encourage employees, to promote greater connection and empathy, and to give them a sense of fairness.

So why do so many workplace policies seem to do the opposite? The primary reason is that most companies see their handbook, or individual policies, through the tiny lens of legal compliance. The handbook has become a way to “protect” organizations from employees who are always lurking just around the corner to find a way to bring a claim against you.

But policies have also been rendered all but useless for other reasons.

First, there’s the canned language. Go look at your handbook to see how many times it says “up to and including termination . . .” I’ll bet it says that a lot. Some of my other favorites are: “Discrimination or harassment on the basis of any protected category is prohibited” and “We will not tolerate retaliation.” These are great promises, but they lose their oomph when 10,000 other companies cut-and-paste the exact same language.

Second, too many policies are written to address the misconduct of one employee. Essentially the policy seeks to punish everyone for one person’s mistake or poor judgment. Someone wore clothes you find distasteful, unprofessional, or distracting? Let’s add that to the dress code. Someone is logging onto social media or doing their online shopping at work? Let’s write a policy naming the specific sites that are off limits. What do these situations have in common? The people in charge of enforcing behavioralexpectations are failing to do their job. Rather than taking the direct route —sitting down and talking to the person behaving badly—they take a passive-aggressive approach. Before you know it, you have a 100-plus-page handbook that’s been band-aided over the years. This isn’t helpful to anyone.

Policies also often contain punitive language with no real teeth. Are you really going to enforce your policy that says that someone who eats their lunch at their cubicle will be disciplined? Do you mean it when you say that you’ll fire someone if they fail to report the fact that they went out on a date with a coworker last week?  These policies almost always have one of two results. The first is that employees don’t believe what you’re saying. The policies become nothing more than a source for employee ridicule since they are not enforced (or they’re enforced inconsistently).  The other option is that your employees do believe you and start wondering if this scary workplace is one they want to be a part of.

Finally, too many policies fail to explain the “why” related to the policy, making them sound like nothing more than language taken from an ancient law book.

Here are some examples and ways you can improve your policies:

  • Timekeeping policies shouldn’t just be a way to keep tabs on employees. Let employees know that in addition to legal requirements, you have timekeeping mandates because you are committed to making sure everyone gets paid for all the work they do.
  • Also in the world of timekeeping, rather than just telling employees that they “must” take rest and meal breaks and that failure to do so could result in discipline (“up to and including termination”), tell them that the intent of this policy is to make sure employees don’t get burned out. A well-written policy tells your employees that you value their physical and mental health and want them to work hard when they’re working, but to take time to decompress, too.
  • Disability policies should cover more than legal obligations.  Yes, your organization is required to provide an accommodation request if, after a good faith interactive process, you find an accommodation that is reasonable and will be effective in allowing the employee to do her job. But a great employer does more than comply with this requirement. Stating the “why” gives you a chance to tell employees that your goal is to make the process a win-win proposition. Explain that while it’s not always possible to find an accommodation that works, you’re committed to approaching the process with a can-do mindset.  This reminds employees that yours is a company that complies not only with the letter of the law, but also with the spirit of the law.
  • Bullying policies are often vague and fail to define what is meant by “respectful” or “professional.” Does this mean that saying one curse word after stubbing your toe is wrong? Or does it mean that a boss who throws things at employees is behaving acceptably because he’s “high spirited?” (I’ve investigated both these claims.) First, if you think it’s necessary to have a policy on abusive or demeaning behavior, give specific examples and be realistic. Follow up by discussing this more during training. And finally, if you opt to have a policy emphasizing your commitment to a respectful workplace, enforce it. Consistently.  Too often I see companies who say “we want a respectful workplace” on paper but the reality is that bullies run rampant and people are too scared to do anything, especially if the bully is in a position of power.
  • Policies about evaluations and salary reviews could help create a more seamless process, but unfortunately many policies make the process more bureaucratic. Inauthentic, canned language sends the message that you only see the evaluation process as a necessary evil and don’t really do much analysis when deciding about salary increases. Add language that sets expectations for managers and employees. This might include your organization’s commitment to continuous feedback (along with training on what that means), helpful supplements with answers to FAQs, and an offer to help if someone is struggling with how to give feedback. For employees, you can provide similar resources to let them know that the evaluation process isn’t something you do because your lawyers force you to; it’s a process you view as a vital employee development tool.

Take a look at your current handbook with these suggestions in mind to start the process of setting expectations that will help free your organization of needless drama.

And one final note: Be creative and innovative. Speak to your employees in the format and language that will most resonate with them. Here are a few ideas:

  • Videotape some of your policies. That doesn’t mean you don’t put them in writing, but having a short introduction or a series of videos to present your expectations might help your employees pay attention.
  • Host periodic town hall meetings. Make sure top-level leaders are there to speak and to answer questions. Make it fun and engaging and make sure what you cover corresponds with the other efforts you’re taking to create a healthy culture. Make it into a game show to see who can talk about your policies most accurately and enthusiastically.
  • Share success stories. HR is often viewed as the equivalent of the vice principal’s office in high school—it’s where you are sent when you’re in trouble. Change the narrative and make the HR department (or whatever you call your department) a place that is actually human, and provides resources. If someone successfully used your leave policy and expressed appreciation for the guidance you provided during that difficult and emotional process, celebrate that. Ask the employee to tell his/her story—again, perhaps via video or some other engaging avenue (without disclosing any personal information, and assuming the employee is comfortable doing so).
  • And if you’re really bold and playful, do something that’s completely outside the box. Develop a contest related to your handbook. Include stories that help illustrate your points. One company slipped in nonsensical policies to see if anyone actually read the handbook. And the HR director awarded prizes to employees who spotted the fakes. One of the pretend policies said, “If you quit within three months of hire, you have to wash the HR director’s car for six months after your departure.”1 This type of playfulness may not work with all companies, but if you think it won’t fly at your workplace, maybe the answer is that you need to inject more fun into your organization!

Top 10 Mistakes in a Typical Sexual Harassment Prevention Policy

An employee handbook contains dozens of policies, but in today’s post-#MeToo world, many organizations are focusing most of their attention on their harassment prevention policy. I’ve reviewed thousands of policies in my work as an attorney, investigator, and expert witness. I can probably recite your policy without ever having seen it because there is very little difference between policies, regardless of company or industry.

Here are the top 10 mistakes I’ve seen in the typical harassment prevention policy. These aren’t listed in the order of importance but are instead listed in the order that most policies follow:

Overall Tone

  1. The focus is singularly on the law. If the emphasis is exclusively on the law, the message is that all you care about is minimal compliance.
    • It may seem like minutiae, but words are powerful. Does the title of your policy make it clear that you expect respect, collaboration, and inclusion, or does it sound like a scary legal document?
    • Is your harassment prevention policy 10 pages long? If so, that’s too long. There is no magic formula, but if your policy is that long then my guess is that you’ve put little thought into it. (The one exception is for employers in the State of New York, who must use the language in the state’s long “model” policy.)
    • Make sure the definitions you provide are precise. Be meticulous with language. That means you make a distinction between lawful and unlawful behavior. I often use “Harassment” (with a capital “H”) and “harassment” to make that distinction. Or you can use the phrase “unlawful harassment” or “illegal harassment” versus behavior that is inappropriate, bothersome, demeaning, demoralizing, exclusionary, or belittling.
    • Make sure your definition of “unlawful harassment” is precise and complete. Some policies provide a definition that is underinclusive. For example, leaving out a necessary element and giving the misimpression that certain behavior is unlawful when it isn’t. Other policies are overinclusive and provide more information about both the definition of Harassment and the examples of unlawful behavior.
    • Now that you’ve got the legal issues out of the way, add language that makes it clear that your goals are much loftier than only legal compliance. (See sample language below.)
  2. Vague zero-tolerance language. While the use of the term zero tolerance started with good intentions, the term has lost its purpose and effectiveness. If you feel the need to use the term, then define it precisely. What exactly will you “not tolerate?” If the answer is “we won’t tolerate unlawful harassment,” then that implies you will tolerate really bad behavior, so long as it doesn’t rise to the level of illegality. If you don’t specifically define what you will or won’t tolerate, then the implication is that anything that is perceived as inappropriate, unprofessional, or bothersome will be “dealt with swiftly.” But that’s not true since in many instances this type of behavior is technically “tolerated,” meaning it’s not cause for firing someone. I’d encourage you to stop using this language and use language that better defines expectations and corresponding consequences.
  3. Harsh language regarding supervisor responsibility. Supervisors, especially middle managers, are your company’s lifeline. They straddle that difficult space of dual responsibility—they have bosses to answer to, but they’re in daily contact with employees. Often they’re in contact with unhappy or dissatisfied employees. They’re in the best position to observe behavior—good and bad—and to be your organization’s eyes and ears to address smoke before it becomes fire. Supervisors are also expected to lead by example. This is a lot to ask, but it’s what comes with the territory. Make your supervisor’s jobs easier, not harder. Provide them with a roadmap to help them understand the critical role they play in making yours a fantastic workplace culture. Sure, they have to know legal parameters, but more important, they need to understand how they can contribute to a drama-free workplace. This means enough with the punitive language—“you must report all harassment . . . failure to do so will result in discipline” (“up to and including termination”). Of course you need to make it clear that you’re relying on them to observe behavior and to either resolve or report bad conduct. But rather than focusing on their legal obligation (or, at the very least, in addition to stating this legal obligation), tell them what you expect. (See sample language below.)

Reporting Misconduct

  1. The policy says “tell us if you’ve been harassed.” If you’re telling your employees to wait until the conduct is this severe, you’re missing the boat. From a legal standpoint, courts have repeatedly stated that an organization can defend itself against a harassment lawsuit if it can show that it took reasonable steps to prevent harassment. (See Chapter 1 for a discussion on using legal requirements to shield you from legal liability.) You can only prevent behavior from escalating to the point of illegal conduct if you set up a reliable and effective way to address conduct when it’s mild, so that it will never reach the crisis point of illegality. But this brings us to the point that is much more important than legal obligations or legal defenses to harassment lawsuits: It is impossible to achieve a drama-free workplace if your message is, “We will leave you unprotected up until the very last minute, when the behavior is persistent and intolerable.”

Organizations must do better than this. Here’s a better approach.

  • First, make it clear that you want to address unacceptable behavior early. That means teaching employees and managers how to intervene in the moment if appropriate. It also means providing safe and open spaces for complaints to be heard and taken seriously (in the event employees are not comfortable intervening, or if the intervention doesn’t stop the objectionable conduct).
  • Next, once employees know that you welcome complaints since you see them as opportunities rather than burdens, teach them how to report. Rather than giving them instructions to tell you about the “harassing conduct,” ask them to tell you: (1) what happened; (2) how the behavior affected them; and (3) how you can work together to find solutions and move forward.
  • In many instances, you’ll have to then conduct a formal investigation. However, by using this language you eliminate the need to open a formal inquiry into every report made, since often a complaint requires action rather than an investigation. If, however, you do determine that you need to launch an impartial workplace investigation, you’re starting out ahead of the game by having a clear understanding about the nature of the complaint. And you’re sending a strong and important message to your employees about your commitment to staying drama free.
  1. The policy makes reporting difficult or scary. Many employers write and distribute policies that essentially state “Take care of this on your own” or “We can’t be bothered with your complaints.” In many instances, this message is inadvertent. In their zeal to “comply,” many organizations turned to language that has been used forever without realizing the damage that language might have. This includes:
    • If your policy says employees are “required” to report (or worse, required to submit a form or otherwise put their complaint in writing), the unintended consequence is that employees feel like they have to jump through procedural hurdles before they’ll be heard (much less believed). What you really mean is that you can’t fix what you don’t know. Your policy should therefore emphasize your true commitment to creating an environment in which employees feel comfortable expressing concerns. And preferably that’s done before the conduct is severe, so that you can partner with the employee to resolve issues early. But by using words like “require” and “in writing” that overall message gets lost.
    • Although not as common, some policies “require” that the employee confront the person engaging in misconduct. Again, while we want to educate and encourage employees to use their voices—whether they are the targets or witnesses to bad behavior—this sends a message that the responsibility for bad behavior falls on the recipient, rather than on the person who is actually engaging in misconduct.
    • Also beware of providing insufficient avenues to raise concerns. If an employee only has the option to go to their immediate supervisor and maybe one person in HR, they may opt not to say anything. The number and types of complaint mechanisms will vary depending on your company size (and resources) but make sure you provide options so that employees understand that you’re serious when you say you want to hear their concerns.
  2. The policy creates a chilling effect by referring to “malicious” or “frivolous” claims. Another mistake I see regarding reports of misconduct is this stark warning: “If we find that you’ve lodged a frivolous complaint, there will be consequences.” Talk about creating a chilling effect! This implies that if a person’s claims are not fully substantiated (which happens often), then they might be subject to some disciplinary action. What most employers mean to say is that they expect all their employees to act in good faith and with integrity, and that includes lodging complaints. Either use more precise and less punitive language like “good faith” to achieve your intended result, or scrap this language altogether. If you’ve written other policies well, and if you have a workplace that is rooted in integrity and values, this is implied. And, in my experience, this is another example of a policy with no teeth. Unless you can conclusively prove that the complainant lied and did so with malicious intent (a high bar), are you really going to discipline or fire that person? (See more on the investigation and resolution of claims of misconduct in Chapter 11.)

Investigations of Misconduct

  1. The policy only promises to investigate claims of “harassment.” See the discussion above related to only allowing employees to complain about harassing conduct (mistake #4).  The legal obligation, and the smart decision, if you want to have a healthy workplace, is to look into claims of misconduct. You can certainly further define what you will and won’t investigate, but replacing “harassment” with “misconduct” (or a similar word/phrase) is a good place to start.
  2. You make promises about investigations that you can’t keep. The investigation process is detailed. While you can and should include general information about investigations, there is no need to go into great detail. And don’t overpromise.
    • Promise “limited confidentiality” rather than a promise that you’ll conduct a “confidential investigation.” In fact, you might consider replacing “confidential” with a word like “discreet” so that the message is clear: “We will do everything in our power to keep private information private, but a promise of complete secrecy means we can’t conduct a fair and thorough investigation.”
    • Also look out for promises related to communicating with the parties after the investigation, or promises that you’ll share your entire investigation file with them. While you want to have a transparent process and you should absolutely report back with the main parties when you’re done investigating, this doesn’t mean you share everything. (See Chapter 11 for more on this topic.)

Fixing Problems

  1. The policy says you’ll take action only if the behavior is unlawful or violates the policy. If after your investigation you find any level of misconduct, you need to take action. Period. The severity of the consequence will depend on numerous factors, but if you find misconduct and do nothing, then you are emboldening the bad actor to continue with the objectionable behavior.  You’re also sending a message that rules apply only to certain people. That’s a recipe for disaster for any organization that wants to remain drama free. (For more on the topic of instituting appropriate remedial measures, see Chapter 11.)
  2. You use canned language related to discipline. While there is nothing wrong with having a progressive discipline policy, it’s not necessary. Most employees understand that actions have consequences. They also understand that different actions have different consequences. Go back and look at your language on discipline to make sure it’s achieving its desired effect and not causing confusion or setting unrealistic expectations (“it says in the policy that a first violation would only get me a written warning . . .”).

This is a long list, I know. But unfortunately most organizations have spent years, maybe even decades, writing and distributing the same old same old. It’s time to pay close attention to the true purpose of policies and handbooks. Although they’ve too often morphed into yet another compliance tool, taking a fresh approach and seeing policies as a key to achieving no drama at work will put you at the top of the Healthy Workplace Culture Pyramid in no time!

Say Goodbye to Legal Jargon and Hello to Clarity and Positivity

Some policy language is legally required, but that doesn’t mean you have to stop there. Ideally, policies should focus more on the promise of a healthy, productive, and respectful workplace culture.

My suggestion? Reinvent the workplace policy. Take the opportunity to craft policies that showcase your company’s commitment to making respectful treatment a mutual responsibility, a two-way street where respect and inclusion are core values that the organization expects everyone to adhere to.

Here is some sample language. Feel free to use this language, or, better yet, use this and other parts of this book as inspiration to draft your own language.

  1. Instead of “We promise a harassment-free workplace,” consider stating:

    We’ve covered the legal issues separately but we want to take this opportunity to address something that is more important to us than legal compliance. Don’t misunderstand, we are deeply and genuinely committed to a workplace with no unlawful sexual harassment. But we want to make a much bolder promise than “We vow to comply with our minimum legal requirements.” The promise we make is that rather than focusing exclusively on compliance, we will do all we can to create, maintain, and promote a culture that values respect, fairness, and inclusion. We invite you to be a part of our quest.

     and/or

     Our mission is ___. We understand we can’t live up to that mission, or serve our customer base without providing you, our most important resource, a safe, comfortable, positive, and productive work environment. To that end, we give you our word that we are committed to providing a healthy work environment where you can effectively perform your job and where you can thrive – as an individual and as a valuable member of a supportive team.

     and/or

     Whereas some companies promise a “harassment-free workplace,” our goals are much loftier than that. This isn’t simply a guarantee that we won’t violate the law. Our word to you is that we will not only do our part to prevent and resolve unlawful harassment, but that we are committed to creating and maintaining a diverse, inclusive, and professional environment.

  2. Let employees and managers know the resources you’ll provide to help them distinguish between severity of conduct (unlawful versus objectionable/offensive but not illegal), and guidance on how to make and receive reports of workplace concerns.

     We are steadfast in our commitment to:

    • Provide relevant, practical, and continuous education about our behavioral expectations to all employees—behavior we find acceptable or unacceptable, regardless of whether it rises to the level of illegal harassment. We understand that conduct that might start out as minor or infrequent can, if left unaddressed, quickly turn into more serious misconduct.
    • Provide employees, supervisors, and company leaders with resources, including helpful communication tools—including tools to object to inappropriate behavior as it occurs as well as tools to learn to report behavior to supervisors, HR, or through our company hotline.
    • Create a safe and comfortable environment where employees and managers share concerns so that we have an opportunity to look into them and resolve them.
    • Fairly and honestly investigate any reports of misconduct, allowing all parties to have a say.
    • Implement appropriate and meaningful corrective measures in the event our investigation uncovers misconduct (in English, we promise to fix any problems we identify).
    • Implement appropriate and meaningful consequences in an even-handed way and through the use of discipline that is commensurate with the wrongdoing uncovered by an independent investigation.
  3. Close your policy with uplifting language (or send similar language in an email distributing the policy, or put language like this in a preamble to an employee handbook):

    What is most important to us is to start an honest dialogue about these issues. Though these topics (bias, harassment, racial strife, gender issues) might be difficult and sensitive, we want all our employees to feel comfortable asking questions and giving suggestions on how we can foster an atmosphere of trust and of mutual respect.

     We want to reiterate that we are not simply reciting corporate speak when we say that you, our valued employees, are truly our most valuable resource. We mean it, and we know that we cannot succeed on any level if we don’t have a workforce who trusts us, who views their role at the company (and their actual work) as meaningful, and who we can deploy as true-believing brand ambassadors. We hope this policy answers any questions you have about where we stand when it comes to these issues, but if you have any additional comments, please do not hesitate to contact any of us.

This is a lot. Perhaps you’ll opt to put only some of this language in your formal policy. Or maybe you’ll decide that you’ll have a policy spelling out the legal issues, and have a separate policy or a separate handbook that has these messages. Regardless of which option you select, the important thing is that you’re now on a clear path that will allow you to use policies to set expectations and to use as a vehicle to communicate with your employees. More important, you’re on your way to making your policies a key aspect on your trip to the top of the Healthy Workplace Culture Pyramid.

Harassment Prevention Policy Checklist2

This checklist will help you avoid the top 10 mistakes in harassment prevention policies. These suggestions will help you create an effective policy.

  1. Policy addresses the law, but focuses on more than the law.
    • image Policy contains required legal language:
      • Definition of unlawful behavior (stated precisely, clearly, and succinctly)
      • Examples of unlawful behavior
      • Retaliation – all are protected by it, all are bound to follow it
      • How to report, details on how reports will be handled
    • image Policy goes beyond legal definitions, says all misconduct is unacceptable, especially if it has the effect of making employees feel excluded, demeaned, or disrespected.
    • image Policy lists core values and these are woven into the entire policy—respect, inclusion, accountability, integrity, ethics.
    • image Is the name of the policy clear or does it sound legal?
    • image Is the policy too long?
  2. Zero-tolerance policy?
    • image Decide if want/need to include.
    • image Consider renaming or rewriting policy to precisely define which behavior is intolerable and the consequence for engaging in that behavior.
  3. Provide supervisors with encouraging guidance to report misconduct.
    • image Policy should not be threatening or punitive.
    • image Policy written to honor supervisor role as company eyes and ears.
    • image Policy written to encourage reporting, and explain why that’s so important.
    • image Policy written to set expectations, not written in legalese.
  4. Reporting – encourage early reports.
    • image Policy welcomes complaints of misconduct, that is, conduct that excludes, belittles, or demeans; does not limit complaints to only those about unlawful conduct.
    • image Policy encourages speaking with a manager or HR if there is a concern that can be addressed and resolved early (even if no formal investigation is needed).
    • image Policy states the company’s commitment to teach early conflict resolution skills so that drama can be nipped in the bud.
  5. Reporting – make it easy and safe.
    • image Policy says employees are “invited to” or “encouraged” to report concerns, not “required to.”
    • image Policy language makes it clear that company sees reports as an opportunity to make workplace better; to make culture healthier.
    • image Policy refers to company’s commitment to educate employees and managers on how to address conflict early, but does not “require” that employee “confront” person engaged in misconduct before filing a complaint.
    • image Policy provides numerous avenues to lodge complaints; message to employees is “we welcome hearing from you.”
  6. Reporting – do not cause a chilling effect.
    • image Policy says company will investigate concerns brought in “good faith,” not that company will discipline or fire employee if concerns are “malicious” or “frivolous.”
    • image Concept of “good faith” is further explored in other policies that address ethics, expected professional conduct, integrity, and values.
  7. Investigations – include broad language for what you will investigate.
    • image Policy language is broad, making it clear that the company will investigate concerns of misconduct.
    • image Policy includes commitment to a healthy culture, which means concerns are identified, investigated, and resolved early, long before they reach the level of unlawful harassment.
  8. Investigations – don’t overpromise.
    • image Policy refers to “limited confidentiality” or “discretion,” not to a “confidential investigation.”
    • image Policy indicates that the company will communicate with the main parties (complainant and accused) after the investigation to provide them conclusions and next steps, but does not guarantee that specific information or documents will be shared (policy explains that the company will be transparent but needs to exercise judgment and discretion).
  9. Conflict resolution – promise more than “We will fix problems only if harassment is found.”
    • image Policy clearly indicates that appropriate remedies will be taken if the investigation uncovers misconduct, not that action will only be taken if the conduct violates a policy or is found to be unlawful.
    • image Policy provides general statement indicating that remedial action taken after the investigation will vary and will be guided primarily by the severity of the misconduct.
    • image Policy emphasizes company’s commitment to not only discipline when necessary, but to also learn from each investigation since goal is to make culture healthier.
  10. Make sure your discipline policy is precise and clear.
    • image Policy on progressive discipline is clear, precise, and customized; it is not canned.
    • image Language on discipline makes it clear that investigations that uncover misconduct will include a step to determine the best remedial measure—one that aims to correct behavior and prevent it from happening again.
    • image Policy emphasizes the company’s commitment to even-handedness when it comes to discipline.

Notes

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
13.58.110.152