To support the Strategic Plan through the development and implementation of an optimized products and services. The portfolio with deliver customer value, optimal performance, and financial goals enabled through sustained Class A capability and performance.
Product and Portfolio Management includes all aspects of planning and managing the company's Products and Services Portfolio: customer and consumer insights, market roadmaps, product and portfolio roadmaps, product and portfolio planning, ideation, management of the innovation funnel, program and project management, resource management, product development and launch, portfolio management, and product life-cycle management.
Process maturity improves over time through education, committed leadership, expert guidance, and a focused effort to attain key business milestones.
After embarking on the path to improvement, accountabilities are assigned, the elements and characteristics of the processes are implemented, and targeted measures drive improvement to enable process transformation.
Done well, a Class A Milestone is achieved at the top of Phase 1 of Business Maturity (see Foundation, Figure I.1). At this stage, the Product and Portfolio Roadmaps drive product portfolio and life-cycle planning to ensure product succession. Product plans are fully integrated and effective to increase launch success. Programs and projects are managed through team-based Project Management, including the early involvement of customers and suppliers.
From this Class A Milestone vantage point, we introduce the next level of maturity in the seventh edition of The Oliver Wight Class A Standard for Business Excellence.
Within this chapter, the term product is used to refer to both products and services.
The leader accountable for managing the Products and Services Portfolio uses the Strategic Plan to develop a Product and Portfolio Roadmap that drives Portfolio Management and optimization.
The Product and Portfolio Roadmap fully aligns with the Value Proposition and Value Discipline focus.
All product and service development is directed by the Market Roadmap and translated by the Product and Portfolio Roadmap into actions.
The Product and Portfolio Roadmap is updated at least annually with the new insights derived from an analysis of the competition and industry standards.
The Technology Roadmap identifies the core technologies and capabilities to fulfill the company strategy and defines the company's research and development and investment programs.
The Product and Portfolio Roadmap deploys the brand strategy through a clearly defined, multi-year timeline.
Products with similar characteristics and requirements are grouped into platforms, and the plan for each is clear and consistent with the aggregate plan.
A process exists to monitor and predict life-cycle trends and, therefore, support planned product introduction and phase-out.
Opportunities for new and available technologies are identified in support of the Product and Portfolio Roadmap, and plans exist to drive maximum return from technology investment across the business.
The linkage between Product and Portfolio Management and the other elements in the integrated planning process is defined and made explicit.
The Product and Portfolio Management process ensures the volume and value projections related to changes to the portfolio are updated at least monthly based on the latest project plans and their business cases. The updated numbers, and supporting assumptions, are provided to Demand, Supply, and Finance and used by each of them as inputs to their plans and projections.
An Assumptions Database is maintained to enable gaps to be analyzed and understood based on the thinking used to establish current plans. Assumptions are used to ensure plans are adjusted only if new information is better than that used initially.
Product and Portfolio Management develops business solutions when its proposed plans identify business gaps or risks that are deemed unacceptable.
Product and Portfolio Management process maps have been converted to Value Stream Maps to ensure the purpose and the value of each step are understood and, hence, a true Lean capability can be exploited.
Processes share real-time information to enable decisions to be made at the optimal time.
Timely adjustments to Assumptions enable performance gaps to be identified for decisions and action.
Modeling and analytics methodologies are developed and deployed to enable ongoing optimization of the portfolio.
There is a process to understand the characteristics of the chosen markets, sectors, segments, and channels to keep product development aligned with market requirements.
The Portfolio Plan is time phased and defines the portfolio of current products, additions to the portfolio through product launches, and removals from the portfolio through product phase-outs.
The number and type of projects at each development stage are balanced and aligned to the Product and Portfolio Roadmap for sustaining the business and meeting growth and margin objectives.
Market position and profitability are understood by markets, sectors, segments, and channels for the current portfolio. Gaps are identified through updates in Assumptions, and actions are taken to ensure planned business goals are achieved.
A segmentation approach has been implemented to optimize customer and consumer service. The portfolio has been structured to support this approach consistent with the Strategic Plan and Roadmaps.
An Insights process gains knowledge of customer and consumer needs as expressed, deduced, or created to keep the product portfolio competitive.
Insights enable Product and Portfolio Management to anticipate customer and consumer needs, including unanticipated needs.
Customer-understood value is embedded in the Supply Chain, enabling a Value Chain to be established.
A process exists to maintain alignment of the portfolio to the Market Roadmap and supply capability.
The mix of products that are existing, new, and under development is reviewed to ensure the right balance of projects to maintain a competitive portfolio aligned to business goals. Considerations include innovation, risk, and timing.
Life-cycle maps identify when product phase-out should be initiated. Product phase-out is actively managed.
A defined Prioritization process exists for the ranking of all active projects and projects waiting for authorization.
The Prioritization process criteria include a number of business drivers, such as strategy, return on investment, feasibility, risk, and profitability and are not based solely on financial measures.
A Business Filtering process uses the prioritization mechanism to ensure optimal use of resources for authorized and pending projects.
Pass/fail rates are monitored along the funnel to regularly challenge and update filter criteria and the Prioritization process.
All Programs and Projects are planned and managed through a formal process to ensure the best use of resources and competencies and to achieve business goals.
The program and project control process includes formal decision checkpoints to determine the progression of Programs and Projects to the next stage.
A formal cost control process is used to ensure that Programs and Projects are developed and launched within their approved budget.
The decision to launch is supported by a formal prelaunch checklist that is used to minimize launch execution risk.
Launch plans and timing are defined based on the latest insights gained from the market, customers, and competition.
Formal post-launch reviews are conducted following market reaction, when learnings and benefits can be maximized, to ensure future programs and projects take advantage of these experiences for future development and introductions.
The number of ideas that begin as projects, but fail to pass decision checkpoints, is monitored to establish the attrition rate of the funnel. This rate is used to ensure that there is sufficient flow of ideas to ensure there are no funnel gaps.
Program and project handovers have been clearly defined to ensure the effective transfer of accountability.
The Product and Portfolio Roadmap is supported by a company-wide commitment to continuously improve the product development and delivery process.
The concept of Program Management is well understood and applied to situations that require the integration of multiple interdependent projects.
There is an agreed plan among the program partners (internal and external) regarding achievement of the program goals that are aligned to the Product and Portfolio Roadmap.
Program Management deploys appropriate tools to synchronize all projects that are integrated into the program.
Formal Service Level Agreements are used to define deliverables for the program, and Key Performance Indicators validate they are being followed.
An unconstrained view for programs and projects is used to ensure the Master Product Development Plan (MPDP). When this plan does not satisfy the Strategic Plan, gap-closing opportunities are identified and modeled.
The MPDP communicates the order and priority of approved projects and includes anticipated future activity to resolve resource conflicts.
The MPDP provides all the information required to effectively integrate with Demand, Supply, and Finance to support their planning and decision making.
At a minimum, the MPDP provides visibility of activities within the current Integrated Business Planning horizon.
The Program and Project vulnerability and opportunity database is used to determine parameters to support scenario planning for modeling and decision making.
Decision making has been empowered throughout the organization, and there is a formal decision escalation process to obtain the required authority.
Team-Based Project Management is used to facilitate sharing of knowledge and activities, enabling execution of work elements in parallel to accelerate time-to-market. Self-managed team capabilities are developing.
Project teams are extended as necessary and may include customers, consumers, suppliers, external technology owners, and regulatory experts.
A concurrent approach is used to optimize time-to-market. This is demonstrated through team-based execution of activities in parallel.
Supply activities are introduced concurrently and as early as possible so that products are developed considering ease of supply.
The environment enables natural sharing of information and data across all areas of the business and extended project teams. This ensures decision making is optimized to sustain Class A performance.
The organization design has removed traditional functional and departmental barriers to support a team- or process-based structure.
The Aggregate Resource Plan captures all critical resource needs. It uses established templates based on historical profiling. The plan is built on assumptions informed by past performance to model the future mix requirements.
At a minimum, the plan covers the horizon of the MPDP and must reflect the lead times to secure additional critical resources. Resource planning decisions are routinely made well in advance of requirements.
Multi-functional resources are managed to satisfy the requirements of the plan.
Where there is a conflict between multi-functional resource allocations, issues that cannot be resolved are modeled to enable decisions for optimal allocation.
Sufficient flexibility is available in the plan to support business opportunities that were not anticipated in roadmaps.
Changes in headcount and critical skills are identified in the plan, and decisions are made to acquire the required resource mix.
The company understands and is investing in its technologies that underpin the business.
The concept of the critical mass is established. Where new technology is important to the business but the required capability is not in place, decisions are made to secure the capability.
The Supply Chain is a potential source of technology and competency. Partnerships are sought to enhance skill and competency to satisfy business requirements, and they are used to drive the technology development process.
Sources of ideation extend beyond the boundaries of the organization, drawing from customers, consumers, suppliers, competition, and the marketplace in general. Ideation is a formal and thought-lead process.
Active programs are in place to convert prioritized ideas into applications that secure a competitive advantage.
A culture exists to motivate the free flow of ideas and innovations through the organization as individual and team knowledge are accepted as ways to drive competitive advantage. This is enabled through a formal set of Knowledge Management practices.
A team-based culture has been established, enabling both individual and team activities to be recognized and rewarded to communicate successes.
Employees have a clear understanding and ownership of the Strategic Plan, which enables them to establish teams when deviations from the plan are detected. The use of self-managed teams is encouraged by leadership, who hold the teams accountable through the allocation of required resources.
The communication of information and data is technology enabled and has significantly reduced the need for meetings. Employees and teams naturally share their progress to accelerate learning.
The environment enables sharing of information and data, in real time, which are then used by employees and teams to take action.
Leaders foster an environment that systematically provides the required resources and skills to support the Product and Portfolio Roadmap. Empowered individuals and teams are a natural consequence, providing the knowledge and expertise to achieve business goals.
Predominant management style has evolved to Leadership increasing the use of delegation and empowerment and enabling different styles of management/leadership to be used. This has eliminated traditional organizational barriers, enabling the successful use of multi-functional teams and concurrency.
Knowledge captured in the processes makes them intuitive and self-sustaining.
Team and Process-Based thinking has become a natural way of life; self-directed teams are developing. Teams hold themselves accountable to deliver results on time. This capability enables programs and projects to be successfully managed and delivered.
The inclusive environment and empowerment at all levels ensure shared knowledge, understanding, and application. Decisions are moving more to a consensus basis. Trust has been earned up and down the organization.
The talent, skills, and competencies required to undertake current and future needs of Product and Portfolio Management are understood. This includes competency in optimization of Program Management, Project Management, and Regulatory compliance.
Collaboration has become the basis to ensure new knowledge is embedded in process designs and that learnings are shared.
Development plans are in place for the talent, skills, and competencies required for new technology to be implemented.
Product Portfolios are managed through internal knowledge of product capabilities, applications, and performance as well as external evaluation of information from the market, competition, and customers.
There is a passion for customers' success based on an understanding of their requirements. The organizational structure enables collaboration.
The organization has evolved into a broader, flatter structure, which provides a responsive and agile capability with greatly simplified communication through fewer layers.
The organization values and recognizes gaining skills and taking initiative to increase responsibilities.
Roles and responsibilities and associated decision rights are regularly redefined to align their scope in response to organization changes.
The organization has developed a capability to manage a virtual organization to better respond to new challenges and collaboration.
A balanced suite of measures has been defined, and targets are based on external benchmarking where possible and support achievement of the Product and Portfolio Roadmap. The measures have been communicated to all stakeholders.
The key measures are reviewed to align improvement projects to the Product and Portfolio Roadmap and achievement of Critical Success Factors. Key Performance Indicators and targets are changed to maintain visibility and prioritize improvement.
There is a clear hierarchical link between the suite of key measures for each business process and the Business Scorecard. Once process proficiency has been established, the measures are delegated or redefined, or the targets revised.
Key measures and associated Key Performance Indicators are a competitive advantage rather than a goal and drive individual and team-based behaviors.
A reasonable balance of measures exists among process areas. Leading indicators are increasingly used.
It is recognized that when percentile performance is insufficient to determine improvements, a migration to Six Sigma methodology/statistical performance is required.
There is a suite of measures for ideation, program and project effectiveness, Resource Management, and product development covering the full scope of Product and Portfolio Management.
Perfect Project Delivery is viewed as a vital measure for Product and Portfolio Management performance. Percentage of projects delivered completely to cost, specification, launch date, and initial volumes, as compared to the business case at the go-to-development gate, is measured and is improving.
Measures in place recognize the importance of key skills to be developed in support of the Strategic Plan. These measures should capture, for example, the positioning of skill sets versus plan, percentage utilization of critical resources, retention of critical resources, and percentage of the project resourced appropriately for success.
Strategic Plan alignment is confirmed through the Critical Success Factors Roadmap.
Financial success is confirmed through plan attainment and is monitored through Integrated Business Planning.
Variance to plan is understood in both financial and operational performance terms.
Performance of product and services in the marketplace and with customers is routinely measured and managed.
The importance of Velocity to deliver a real competitive advantage is understood. There is a focus on improving responsiveness to market competitive expectations, demonstrated by an improving trend in time-to-market, time-to-volume, and time-to-profit.
3.144.36.141