As I mentioned in the introduction, there are lots of reasons to write and make a short film. Perhaps the most obvious reason is to gain access to audiences. It’s much easier to get lots of people to see your short—particularly if you post it online in open forums like Vimeo or YouTube. We’ll talk more about venues later.
A short film is a great calling card that can showcase your talent to lots of people who don’t have long attention spans, and sadly, that’s most of us. We’re all movement junkies. As a culture we have trouble keeping still. We’re always looking for the next thing—for newer sights and sounds. We’re always looking for stimulation, and this search for constant jolts drives us to do “unnatural things,” like checking our smart phones every few minutes and gorging on YouTube videos.
Canadian columnist McLen Greaves writing in Zoomer Magazine, July 2015 tells us that according to Statistic Brin Research Institute, our average attention span has dropped from 12 seconds in 2000 to an anorexic 8 seconds in 2013. The average attention span of a goldfish in comparison is 9 seconds.
He reported that college age kids now own an average of 6.9 devices and have subconsciously responded to information overload with speed. Facebook research shows that updates are getting shorter (Twitter has a 140-character limit) and sending email has been leapfrogged by messaging apps like WhatsApp, KIK, Messenger, and Line. And young Internet users are often foregoing words for pictures, fueling the rise of photo-sharing messaging apps like Instagram, Snapchat, and the Twitter-owned Vine where videos are limited to six seconds!
The bad news is that this creates some major problems in the way we all think, particularly in those with what I call “jolt addiction.” Greaves (2014; p. 30) writes that
a China-based research team ran MRI scans on 18 college age students who fit the description of Internet addicts. Results showed several parts of the addicts’ brains had shrunk up to 20 per cent including parts of the brain tied into Executive Function Disorder—a kind of new ADHD diagnosis flagged by teachers, parents and counselors as an inability to create and finish a plan.
Pretty daunting!
Those of us interested in reaching vast audiences to relay our messages are forced to vie for attention in this jolt-seeking world—a vast and glowing market that demands continuous entertainment. But given the speed at which people tend to like moving, that entertainment has got to be short, quick, and easy. As I already mentioned, a variety of platforms have been designed specifically to satisfy that addiction. Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, Tumblr, etc., all deal with the explosion of images and fast facts, the sharing of media jolts, that document lives and ideas.
Years ago, Marshall McLuhan defined and predicted “Blip Culture.” He was talking about the way people like to get their news. He predicted the obsolescence of print and the dependence on electronic media and described how we’ll all increasingly get our information in sound bites. But wait—what about an art form like film?
Unfortunately those who have been raised on film as a traditional art form are discovering that film has taken on a new meaning and direction. Film is more disposable and quick. Certainly, it’s more efficient, and it’s not even “film” any more but a series of pixels—pointillism gone wild—entirely digital and extraordinarily popular.
Independent filmmakers are realizing they no longer need be bound by the idea that movies must be long and expensive. In fact, the current marketplace eschews long and yearns for short.
Even in the industry, people aren’t wild about reading 120 pages. Spec scripts aren’t selling well and have to go through an intense vetting gauntlet just to get the “right” people to read them. And even then, they’re often not read. If you want someone to get a glimpse of your work, there’s no better way than to send that person a 5- to 7-minute short that demonstrates what you can do with story. That short can also demonstrate your sensibility and how you approach dialogue. That means you’ll have to make sure that the short you write is produced well with great actors and good production quality.
In my interview with Marshall Nord of Shorts HD, he said he’d
had meetings lately with some other companies like Ron Howard and Brian Grazer. They started this digital incubator company with Discovery and they are saying oh we’re going to make digital short form movies. They are doing 10 short form films. What they are doing is what I was doing when I was an executive at Dreamworks. They are going out and pitching their projects and it used to be show me a pilot or some tape and now what it has turned into is “show me the short form.”
Nord goes on to say that he
used to think that a good short film had a twist to it … like a Hitchcockian thing but that’s too formula. I would say a clear concise idea told and executed well and what short film allows you to do is not be constrained to any formulaic structure. They say television and film is a collaborative medium and everyone puts their scent on it but in short film if you are an auteur. It really is your project whereas if you get paid or if you’re writing for a particular purpose you have to craft it in a certain way.
That, of course, doesn’t mean that shorts have no structure to them. They very much do, but the structure is simple and doesn’t have the very particular structure confines of a feature. The short film mirrors the structure of a feature without the subplot and the spikes that propel plot points. We’ll see how this works in a later chapter when we break down a feature and reimagine it into a new-entity short film. But for now, know that as long as your short film has a beginning, middle, and end (three acts essentially), it can be as loose or as “experimental” as you choose to make it.
Keep in mind though that if your goal is to eventually make commercial features (and by that I mean films that can be distributed for larger audiences), your short films shouldn’t be so freeform experimental as to turn audiences, distributors, and investors off. You want to make people believe in your vision and your story-telling ability in a marketplace that is highly demanding on all levels. And there are lots of opportunities to make money and showcase your talents at the same time by making short films for that marketplace. For example, on April 10, 2015, The Los Angeles Times featured a front page Business Section story describing how JW Marriott hopes its short movies will draw younger travelers.
Marriott not only starred in the film (the first of several it plans to make) but also took the unusual step of producing “Two Bellmen” (a 17 minute film about two bellhops who thwart an art heist) at a cost of about $200,000. Since the film was distributed on YouTube May, 2014 it has attracted more than 5 million views (to April, 2015).
It’s the first of several short films the world’s largest hotel chain is producing to help promote its brand to a younger generation of travelers. Marriott “has launched its own studio to make short films showcasing its diverse properties which span 4, 100 hotel properties representing 19 brands in 76 countries. Driving Marriott’s foray into entertainment are fundamental shifts in the advertising market. As millennials shun traditional ads and spend more time on YouTube and other digital platforms, hotels are having to rethink the ways they market their brands to younger travelers.
(Los Angeles Times, 2015, p. 1C)
Other companies and institutions are jumping on this very lucrative (for filmmakers) bandwagon broadening the possibilities for new filmmakers to get their work seen and earn some money doing that. Because of the explosion of new platforms, it’s possible to actually get a job making films that doesn’t involve beating down the doors of impregnable studios or production companies. That means having a short film as a sample of what you can do is a powerful tool that trumps any resume.
This kind of magic happened to one of my students, Gregory Hansen, back in 1993. He wrote and directed a short called 7 Souls, and it was so good it got snapped up and made into a feature called Heart and Souls starring Robert Downey, Jr. Greg got to write the script, and this launched him on a screenwriting career. Many now famous directors started their careers making short film or industrials or music videos.
Noah Pisner (July 2015), writing on the site Arts.Mic, put forward 16 short films that launched the careers of famous directors. Here’s some of what he had to say about several of them.
If you go to the Art.Mic site you can see these films and the others that Posner names. These are only a few in the vast pantheon of shorts that launched careers and even Oscars. (Think Whiplash, the short made in 2013 that two years later ended up as an Academy Award–nominated feature!)
So now that you’ve seen how short films can help you move your career along and even make you money, you’re ready to think about how to craft your story to make it into a powerful short.
Bottle Rocket. Dir. Wes Anderson. 1994. Short film.
Cigarettes & Coffee. Dir. Thomas Anderson. 1993. Short film.
Frankenweenie. Dir. Tim Burton. 1984. Short film.
Glory at Sea. Dir. Benh Zeitlin. 2008. Short film.
Greaves, McLen. 10 Reasons Why Almost All Internet Articles Are Lists. Zoomer Magazine, September 2014, p. 30.
Human Behavior. Dir. Michel Gondry. 1993. Short film.
It Was a Good Day. Dir. Gary Gray. 1993. Short film.
Lick the Star. Dir. Sophia Coppola. 1998. Short film.
Marriott, J. W. Room for Films. Los Angeles Times, Friday, April 10, 2015, p. 1 C.
Peluca. Dir. Jared Hess. 2003. Short film.
Pisner, Noah. 16 Short Films that Launched the Careers of Famous Directors, Arts.mic, July 15, 2014, https://mic.com/articles/92951/16-short-films-that-launched-the-careers-of-famous-directors#.xD1jOJBUK. Accessed 18 November 2016.
3.142.173.40