The term disclosure includes everything in the financial statements. Statement captions, titles, and classifications are all disclosures. In addition, financial statements are not complete without note disclosures. (The auditor’s report covers all disclosures, including those in the notes to the financial statements.) Some elements of disclosure may be either embodied in the principal statements or presented in notes—depending on convenience of space.
Why is disclosure important? Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) require adequate disclosure. Auditors evaluate disclosures before issuing their opinions on the financial statements. Although the need to provide additional disclosures in notes regarding a particular line in the statements may sometimes require judgment, most required disclosures have been promulgated in Sections 45 and 50 of each topic in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification® (ASC). A “Significant Accounting Policies” note is used for the purpose of disclosing specific accounting principles and the methods of applying those principles that are judged by management to be most appropriate to present fairly financial position, cash flows, and results of operations.
FASB Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-13, Disclosure Framework — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, was issued in August 2018. It removes the following disclosure requirements:
It also modifies current requirement by doing the following:
ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.
In addition, if specified disclosure criteria are met, it requires entities to include in their financial statements disclosures about the following:
FASB ASC 958-605-55-70 includes an example of a vulnerability of concentration of risk because of reliance on major donors. FASB ASC 275-10-55 includes other examples of disclosures that may be pertinent for NFPs.
4.02 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) glossary defines cash equivalents as short-term, highly liquid investments that have both of the following characteristics: (a) readily convertible to known amounts of cash [and] (b) so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates. Generally, only investments with original maturities of three months or less qualify under that definition. Original maturity means original maturity to the entity holding the investment. For example, both a three-month U.S. Treasury bill and a three-year Treasury note purchased three months from maturity qualify as cash equivalents. However, a Treasury note purchased three years ago does not become a cash equivalent when its remaining maturity is three months. Examples of items commonly considered to be cash equivalents are Treasury bills, commercial paper, money market funds, and federal funds sold (for an entity with banking operations).
5.103 NFPs may receive communications that are intentions to give, rather than promises to give. For example, communications from individuals indicating that the NFP has been included in the individual’s will as a beneficiary are intentions to give. Such communications are not unconditional promises to give, because individuals retain the ability to modify their wills during their lifetimes. (When the probate court declares the will valid, the NFP should recognize contribution revenue and a receivable at the fair value of its interest in the estate, unless the promise is conditional, in which case a contribution should not be recognized until the conditions are substantially met.) Paragraphs 49–51 of FASB ASC 958-605-55 provide an example of an individual naming an NFP as a beneficiary in her will. NFPs should disclose information about conditional promises in valid wills in conformity with FASB ASC 958-310-50-4. In cases in which the testator has not placed a purpose restriction on the gift, the net asset classification of the contribution revenue from a bequest differs in practice among NFPs. Some have concluded that because the contribution is in receivable form and will be paid at a future date, it is inherently time-restricted and therefore should be recognized as donor-restricted support. Others have concluded that because restrictions can only be placed by donors and the receivable is due and payable on the date the will cleared probate, the contribution revenue is not donor restricted. The latter say that although there may be time delays between clearing probate and payment because of administrative dealings of the courts and attorneys, those delays are not the actions of donors, and the timeline is not a function of a time restriction placed by a donor. NFPs should consider the facts and circumstances in determining the classification of the contribution revenue.
5.104 Per FASB ASC 958-605-25-10, solicitations for donations that clearly include wording such as “information to be used for budget purposes only” or that clearly and explicitly allow resource providers to rescind their indications that they will give are intentions to give rather than promises to give and should not be reported as contributions.
5.105 Recognized contributed services should be reported as contribution revenue and as assets or expenses. Whether such contributions should be recognized is unaffected by whether the NFP could afford to purchase the services at their fair value.
[FASB ASC 958-450-25-1]
[FASB ASC 958-720-50-1]
[FASB ASC 740-10-15-2; FASB ASC 740-10-50]
[FASB ASC 740-10-50-15]
[FASB ASC 740-10-50-15; FASB ASC 740-10-45; Q&A 5250.15]
[“Pending Content” in FASB ASC 958-605-45-3]
[“Pending Content” in FASB ASC 958-220-45-6; “Pending Content” in FASB ASC 958-605-45-4]
[“Pending Content” in FASB ASC 958-605-45-4B]
[“Pending Content” in FASB ASC 958-605-45-5]
[FASB ASC 275-10-50-4]
[FASB ASC 958-720-45-26]
[FASB ASC 958-720-45-26]
Using the excerpts from the 2020 AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Not-for-Profit Entities, the excerpts from the 2019 Checklists and Illustrative Financial Statements Not-for-Profit Entities, and your experience and knowledge of NFP GAAP, verify whether the following selected disclosures meet the minimum requirements per GAAP. If a disclosure (or element of a disclosure) is missing, create a sample disclosure.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Financial statement presentation follows the accounting standard requirements for not-for-profit organizations. Under these standards, an organization is required to report information regarding its financial position and activities according to two classes of net assets depending on the existence and/or nature of any donor restrictions as follows: net assets without donor restrictions and net assets with donor restrictions.
Net assets with donor restrictions include restricted contributions received. When donor restrictions expire (that is, when a stipulated time restriction ends or purpose restriction is met), net assets with donor restrictions are reclassified to net assets without donor restrictions and reported in the statement of activities as net assets released from restrictions. However, if a restriction is fulfilled in the same time period in which the contribution is received, the Foundation reports that support as net assets without donor restrictions.
Contributions of cash and other assets received are recorded as increases in net assets with or without donor restrictions depending on the existence and nature of any donor restrictions.
All net assets with donor restrictions are reported as increases in net assets with donor restrictions. When a restriction expires (that is, when a stipulated time restriction ends or purpose restriction is met), net assets with donor restrictions are reclassified to net assets without donor restrictions and reported in the statement of activities as net assets released from donor restrictions.
A number of people have contributed significant amounts of time to the activities of the Foundation. The financial statements do not reflect the value of these contributed services because they do not meet the criteria for recognition.
The Foundation is a controlled affiliate of the ABC NFP. ABC NFP provides administrative support and fundraising services for which it did not charge the Foundation. The Foundation recognized revenue and related expenses for contributed services from the Association based on the estimated fair value of those services.
The Foundation is organized as a not-for-profit organization exempt from federal income tax under Section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Foundation also meets the requirements of Section 509(a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code and is therefore not a private foundation.
The Foundation has no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2019. As of June 30, 2019, the Foundation did not recognize any interest and penalties associated with tax matters.
The framework for measuring fair value provides a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described as follows:
Level 1: | Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Foundation has the ability to access. |
Level 2: | Inputs to the valuation methodology include:
If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, the level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. |
Level 3: | Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. |
The asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the Foundation’s assets at fair value as of June 30, 2019:
Assets at Fair Value as of June 30, 2019 | ||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
Mutual Funds | $ 4,000,000 | $ - | $ - | $ 4,000,000 |
Exchange Traded Funds | $ 1,500,000 | $ - | $ - | $ 1,500,000 |
Preferred Stock | $ - | $ - | $ 1,000,000 | $ 1,000,000 |
Total Assets in FV Hierarchy | $ 5,500,000 | $ - | $ 1,000,000 | $ 6,500,000 |
Investments measured at NAV | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ 750,000 |
Total investments at fair value | $ 5,500,000 | $ - | $ 1,000,000 | $ 7,250,000 |
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in fair value of the Foundation’s level 3 assets for the year ended June 30, 2019:
Balance, July 1, 2019 | $ 200,000 |
Unrealized gain | 800,000 |
Balance, June 30, 2019 | $ 1,000,000 |
These investments were classified as level 3 assets because the Foundation used unobservable inputs to value them, reflecting the Foundation’s assessment of the assumptions market participants would use in pricing these investments due to the absence of quoted market prices and inherent lack of liquidity.
The preceding methods described may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although the Foundation believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.
Net assets as of June 30, 2019:
Without donor restrictions | |
Board designated - scholarships | $ 750,000 |
Unrestricted | $ 10,000,000 |
$ 10,750,000 | |
With donor restrictions | |
Scholarships | $ 3,000,000 |
Community Outreach | $ 500,000 |
Diversity & Inclusion Initiative | $ 375,000 |
$ 3,875,000 | |
Total net assets | $ 14,625,000 |
Net assets were released from donor restrictions by incurring expenses satisfying the following purpose restrictions:
Diversity and inclusion initiative | $ 50,000.00 |
Community Outreach | 500,000.00 |
Release of net assets with donor restrictions | $ 550,000.00 |
Unconditional promises to give that are expected to be collected within one year are recorded at net realizable value. Unconditional promises to give that are expected to be collected in future years are recorded at the present value of their estimated future cash flows. The discounts on those amounts are computed using risk-adjusted rates. Amortization of the discounts is included in contributions revenue. An allowance for doubtful accounts is based on specific identification of possible uncollectible accounts and the Foundation’s historical collection experience.
3.145.77.114