11
IoT-Enabled Agricultural System Application, Challenges and Security Issues

Himadri Nath Saha1*, Reek Roy2, Monojit Chakraborty3 and Chiranmay Sarkar3

1Department of Computer Science, Surendranath Evening College, Calcutta University, Kolkata, India

2Department of Computer Science, Belda College, Vidyasagar University, Paschim Medinipur, India

3Department of Information Technology, RCC Institute of Information Technology, Kolkata, India

Abstract

The growing demand for food in quantity and quality has increased the need to modernize the agricultural sector. In the present scenario, IoT applications in agriculture include real-time monitoring of crops, croplands, environment, precision farming, smart greenhouse, data analytics, etc. Sensors and smart controllers help to estimate soil moisture or plants’ water needs, detect diseases of the crops, monitor weather conditions, etc. Challenges faced in the IoT-enabled agricultural systems are software simplicity, secure data generation, and transmission, lack of supporting infrastructure. But the biggest obstacle is lack of smooth integration with the agricultural industry at present and lack of optimally skilled human workforce along with the need for sensors to work wirelessly and consume low power, better connectivity, remote management, the rectification of complexity in the software, and security. There is also a high demand for fail-proof systems to mitigate the risk of data loss in any faults during operation. A short description of challenges, limitations, future developments and security issues of IoT-enabled agricultural system are presented in this book chapter along with a small comparison of the existing recent works has been presented to show in which areas the IoT-enabled agricultural system are progressing.

Keywords: IoT-enabled agricultural system, smart agriculture, wireless sensor networks, security, soil parameters, cloud computing, smart farming challenges

11.1 Introduction

The word “Internet of Things” (IoT) was first proposed by Kevin Ashton, a British visionary, in 1999. Internet of Things has been broadly applied in different fields for quite some time like home, industry, and many other applications acquiring attention all over the world. It is very clear from the term itself that the IoT network will provide us with a technological world in which day-to-day tools, sensors, equipment enhanced by computing power and network functionalities, in short, physical objects that can be classified as “Things” will be able to play a role as individual components or as distributed collaborations of interconnected devices [1]. The computer, the Internet and mobile Internet technology have brought a lot of great changes in human society in the last few decades.

In this present technical era, it is quite impossible to think of a single moment in our daily lives without any device and the Internet. IoT has been changing the meaning and dimensions of our lives for quite some time by connecting different parts of our lives. To put simply, IoT is ruling the technical world and hence enables us to connect with anything at anywhere and at any time. The interconnectivity, ubiquitous, heterogenic, dynamic changes, interoperability, sensing and actuation, and enormous scalability characteristics of IoT make it very powerful to integrate everyday objects through the Internet [1]. The present and upcoming technology of IoT have the huge potentiality of connecting machine-to-machine, human-to-human making it a global smart communication through smart technologies like wireless sensor networks, mobile computing, etc. IoT is serving worldwide smart environments in everyday life domains such as the farming system, transport system, agriculture, healthcare system, traffic system, security system, and many more [1].

Agriculture in basic terms is a science of soil cultivation, crop production, animal husbandry, and, ultimately, the marketing of the resulting products [2]. The increasing demand for food in quantitative and qualitative terms can be met by fusing technology with farming practices. The global population has grown dramatically, and so there needs to be such a rise in crop production to satisfy world demand for food and nutrition. With the integration of IoT with agriculture, it will not only be beneficial to the farmers but also the development of the nation. Thus, the development of efficient smart agricultural systems will revolutionize the agricultural industry.

Integrating agriculture along with IoT presumes that the connections will be wireless classified based on energy consumption, the uplink and downlink data rate, and device per success point, topology, packet size, and channel width and frequency bandwidth. IoT-enabled agricultural systems help in finding accurate details about the environmental conditions, soil conditions, etc. to get better productivity. The sensors, when properly installed and maintained, save water while also increasing production output. At the same time, Cloud Computing offers ample tools and solutions for managing, storing, and analyzing the vast amount of data produced by devices that can be used to automate tasks, predict scenarios, and enhance several real-time activities that allow farmers to decide on different factors for crop improvement. For example, diseases of plants are conventionally detected manually by agriculture experts, which can be inaccurate at times and is also very time-consuming. To avoid such inaccurate results and time-consuming processes, automatic and remote identification of crop diseases can be applied through Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and IoT [2]. At the same time, agriculture is accompanied by a lot of other problems like climate changes, environmental changes, increment in urbanization, water scarcity, soil moisture factors, shortage of arable land for growing crops [3, 4]. Given the problems faced in agriculture mentioned above, it can be understood that there is a need for a sufficient range of crop varieties, a proper adaptation of agricultural practices, and sustainability to conserve scarce resources [4]. Such factors affect agricultural growth, such as crop productivity, diseases, and yield generation. Hence, there is a need to incorporate technology with agriculture to increase production.

Modern techniques can be used to grow crops in a controlled environment [5] which can help humans to lead wise and smart agriculture. Since, Cloud Computing also provides sufficient resources and facilities for handling, processing, and evaluating the vast volume of data collected from sensors; so it can be used to optimize operations, forecast scenarios, and improve broad-based real-time activities for smart farming. IoT will be able to help farmers get a timely cultivating guideline related to the parameters like the seasonal plant diseases, pesticide usage, pest control, crop treatment, irrigation management, natural disasters affecting crops and the recovery methods [4, 5]. Other existing technologies along with WSNs that are feasible with IoT are radio frequency identification (RFID), middleware technologies, and cloud computing and end-user applications [6]. Hence, these technologies have a great impact on smart farming or agriculture along with a strong impact on the global economy.

This chapter of the book focuses mainly on the implementation of the IoT-enabled agricultural system, that is, which modern technologies are integrated with the agricultural sector that are benefitting the farmers and increasing the quality of the products, productivity’s volume, and the profitability of a business. The chapter also aims at the challenges and the security issues along with the scopes and trends faced by these systems as many of the current surveys at present focuses on the constraints, pitfalls, and benefits of the agricultural food sector on large scale.

Section 11.2 consists of a literature survey done on various existing systems mentioning the results, pros, and cons of these systems along with a table showing the survey analysis. In Section 11.3, the challenges to implement IoT-enabled systems have been elaborated. Section 11.4 has an explanation of the security issues of IoT systems and measures that can be taken. In Section 11.5 the future research direction of the IoT-enabled systems are explained. Section 11.6 has a short conclusion of this book chapter.

11.2 Background & Related Works

Agriculture is the primary source of food grains and other natural resources, and food is the basis of human life. This area, therefore, plays a very key role in the rate of economic growth of the country. Enhancing the agricultural sector with the implementation of new technology is also one of the major challenges faced by developing countries. Unfortunately, several farmers in developing countries still use conventional farming methods, resulting in low yields of crops and fruit. Some of the characteristics of agriculture that affect the quality and production of the crops and are different for every crop are enormous, dynamics, complexity, and spatiality. IoT-enabled agriculture system application enables the farmers to not only monitor the cultivating crops better but also to scan the soil along with access to the GPS. Access to remote locations can be established to track and manage agricultural fields. Plant disease is a very big threat to cultivation. Conventionally, these diseases are detected manually by experts, which other than being time-consuming are also inaccurate at times. The identification of plant diseases is possible through WSN and IoT. Raspberry Pi3 hardware interfaced with wireless sensors when deployed in the agricultural fields can measure the parameters of the environment and also monitor the agriculture field.

A Random Forest Classifier technique is used to classify the diseases in a system proposed by Devi et al. [2]. Plant images are collected repeatedly and continuously via a camera sensor that is integrated with Raspberry Pi3 hardware and Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) features are extracted to be transmitted to the cloud via Wi-Fi. In this system, plant disease is identified at an early stage so that the spread of such disease can be avoided. The system consists of five phases to detect plant diseases using image processing techniques and IoT-image acquisition (captured using sensor cameras which are interfaced with Raspberry Pi3 hardware model), image pre-processing (resizing captured image to 256 × 256 size and converting color image to gray image to calculate the histogram equalization), image segmentation (segmentation is done on the obtained equalized image using k-means clustering technique), feature extraction (Texture features such as energy, dissimilarity, contrast, correlation are retrieved from the segmented image and the features are determined from the GLCM matrix) and finally image classification (Random Forest Classification (RFC) technique is used to classify and analyze finally). The proposed system is capable of identifying diseases with increased accuracy of 24% compared to the current K-NN classifier.

In some other recent studies have been done on the growth of the monitoring system developed for the crops and the real-world deployments [4], and the main focus has been kept on the leaf area index (LAI) in this study which is a specific crop parameter. Bauer et al. [4] proposed a system that focuses on the LAI, a well-known key parameter that provides details about the performance of the photosynthesis and the plants’ vital conditions. The architecture [4] developed mainly comprises of a WSN based monitoring system which is tailored for in-situ LAI assessment. The key approaches of the architecture are simplicity of the software, redundancy of the hardware, and control of the entire system. A holistic IoT-based agricultural framework to track crops continuously and evaluate the LAI appropriate for the accurate monitoring of crop growth based on an in-situ WSN that is optimized to collect sensor information is presented in Ref. [4]. This sensor network is linked to the central server using an IoT-based MQTT infrastructure and the networking used is the Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN).

Some systems propose that real-time notifications can be delivered to orient smart irrigation based on analyzing information and without the intervention of humans, for example, systems proposed by Balaji et al. [7]. Hartung et al. [8] explained that WSNs have been deployed in the agricultural sector for some time to enhance the remote control of agricultural products and resources. The capability of WSNs to improve efficiency and reduce waste has improved remarkably. More recently, with the increase in the potentiality of WSNs, these deployments have been integrated with IoT successfully as shown by Vasist et al. [9].

Mat et al. [10] presented a system of Green House Management System (GHMS) in which Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have been used. The system will measure soil moisture, the wetness of air, the temperature of air by using a soil moisture sensor, a humidity sensor, and a temperature sensor respectively. The XBee technology [10] has been selected for WSN. A GUI is connected by XBee which can be a computer or a mobile phone. The GreenHouse Management System (GHMS) uses various sensors to collect environmental data like temperature, humidity, and soil moisture. The readings of the sensors will decide which device (fan or water pump) will be switched ON or OFF. Here, the moisture was being used to monitor the input measured in Volumetric Water Content (VWC). The data values decide which device should be ON or OFF. The system uses wireless technology.

Suma et al. [11] proposed a system that uses a microcontroller connected with various sensors (temperature, moisture, and PIR sensor) through RS232. The system receives data and it contains a buzzer and LED light which is set ON and the LED starts to blink if the value received exceeds a threshold value. This system uses sensors, a microcontroller, and RS232 to check incoming sensor values with threshold values. If the sensor value exceeds a certain threshold, the buzzer is switched on and the LED immediately begins to blink. This sends an alarm to the farmer and the power is switched off immediately. The system contains two modes manual and automatic. The system also contains an android application. In the manual mode, the user must manually turn on and off using the built android program. In automatic mode, it is done automatically. In both modes, the implementation is done using a GSM module.

Drought is a major serious problem that limits crop yield productive capacity. Many areas of the world face this problem with varying degrees of severity. To address this problem, remote sensing, especially in very rural areas, is used to acquire frequent soil moisture data that help to assess agricultural drought in remote regions. For this reason, the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite was launched in 2009, which offers global soil moisture maps every one to two days. SMOS L2 was used in the framework proposed by Martínez-Fernández et al. [12] for the measurement of the Soil Water Deficit Index (SWDI) in Spain. They used various methods and compared the data derived from in situ data on soil water metrics with the SWDI. An autonomous, sensor-based, and vision-based robot named Agribot was developed for seed sowing by Santhi et al. [13]. The robot can execute on any crop yields as long as the robot’s self-awareness is verified via the global and local maps created by the Global Positioning System (GPS) and the on-board vision system is equipped with a personal computer.

On the other hand, more data collection functions, such as environmental monitoring, plant health, and pest problems, can be provided by field sensors in every corner of the crop cycle. Approaches such as vehicle precision spraying and automated VRT chemigation was proposed by Oberti et al. [14], which are widely used in smart fertilization, can also be used to treat diseases and other pesticide concerns. Some IoT-based automated traps are advantageous over remote sensing as they can count, track, identify insect types, and export data to the cloud for further evaluation. New approaches are also provided through the advancement of robotic technology. An agricultural robot with multi-spectral sensing systems, under the guidance of a remote IoT disease management system, configured with accurate spray nozzles, can locate and deal with pest challenges more precisely. This type of IoT-based pest management system hence supports the restoration of the natural climate along with reducing the overall expenditures.

Some crops that are grown indoors are less likely to be affected by the climate and the environment. This is called Greenhouse farming in which crops are not limited to receive lights only during day time. Such farming allows crops to grow under suitable conditions in any part of the world and at any time. Greenhouse farming proposed by Akkas et al. [15] has also gained well acknowledgment as it allows the successful production of various crops under a controlled environment like ventilation system, the accuracy of monitoring parameters, covering materials to control the wind, etc. An original routing protocol was developed and integrated into an IoT-based internally accessible agriculture application using MicaZ offthe-shelf wireless nodes [15] programmed in nesC. XServe is the primary gateway for wireless networks and other applications. The data obtained can also be processed on a server and day- and time-based reports are available for analysis. The specific data collected using the adjustable sensor nodes allows the farmers to study intricate trends of the farming process. The long term collected data allows agriculture specialists to make timetables that can grow specific crops in any controlled conditions.

From the literature review above, we can draw the conclusion that certain systems have been developed that identify environmental conditions such as crop temperature and soil conditions. Many systems are designed to keep inspection of the irrigation system. Many existing networks often lack the ability to find out whether any node is being hacked, or whether any cable is being cut by a human knowingly, or by animal scratching. Some systems not only keep a record of soil content but also use sensors to keep track of crop field safety. Many other systems are designed to see field protection.

The book chapter focuses on the challenges and security problems along with the scopes and developments these systems face, as many of the existing studies are currently centered on the large-scale limitations, risks, and benefits of the agricultural food field. The chapter focuses on those aspects of IoT-enabled agricultural systems that need to be considered very keenly while implementing these systems. This chapter of the book also emphasizes how the IoT-enabled agricultural system is applied, that is, what technological innovations are incorporated with the agricultural industry that favors the farmers and increases the quality of the goods, the volume of production and the profitability of a business. Table 11.1 shows the survey analysis of the existing systems in smart agriculture.

Table 11.1 A survey analysis.

Field of work Technology/devices used Outcomes/future scopes
IoT–enabled disease detection system of plants [2] Various sensors—Soil moisture sensor, pH sensor, camera sensor, Temperature sensor, Raspberry Pi 3, Wi-Fi, Image Processing Techniques— Random Forest Classification (RFC), Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM). On average, 24% increased accuracy compared to the current model Accuracy depends on the environmental conditions (image capturing angle, lighting in the field)
A comprehensive IoT-based agricultural monitoring system that focuses on continuous evaluation of the LAI (leaf area index) [4] Wireless Sensor Networks—TelosB1-based platform, Linux-based Raspberry Pi 3, MQTT-based IoT infrastructure, PLMN connectivity.
  • Gives accurate temperature and humidity readings
  • Data in the central server is persistent for analysis
  • The system helps farmers to take decisions
  • Additional environmental sensors can be added
Efficient irrigation in Green House Management System (GHMS) [10] Wireless Sensor Networks-Wireless Moisture Sensor Network (WMSN), temperature sensor, humidity sensor, XBee technology, Irrigation methods— Irrigation by schedule, Feedback based irrigation.
  • More effective automatic irrigation compared to scheduled irrigation
  • Optimizes water, fertilizers and retains soil moisture
  • Average savings of 1,500 ml per tree per day
Smart agriculture irrigation system using sensors deployed in the field [11] Wireless Sensor Networks— moisture sensor, temperature sensor, PIR sensor, PIC16F877A microcontroller, GSM module, RS-232, buzzer.
  • The buzzer is switched ON and LED starts to blink when the threshold value-exceeded in both manual and automatic mode
  • Communication with the farmer through a GSM module
  • The system can be enhanced for large areas of land
Calculation of Soil Water Deficit Index (SWDI) for drought areas [12] Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite, 4 methods used to calculate SWDI— pedotransfer functions (PTF), laboratory analysis (exp), soil moisture series (p5, p95, and gsmm) and linear regression analysis
  • Correlation coefficient high for all 4 methods (R, 0.86)
  • Analysis of results obtained using the Crop Moisture Index (CMI) and Atmospheric Water Deficit (AWD)
  • Good results obtained in both, but AWD was better
  • SMOS found to be a feasible tool for agriculture
  • SWDI of SMOS can be applied to different environmental conditions and spatial scales
  • The issue is the requirement of the parameters FC (field capacity) and WP (wilting point)
Sensor and Vision-based autonomous agricultural robot for sowing seeds [13] Controller (Arduino), Sensors—Ultrasonic sensors, IR sensors, Image Processing Technique, and morphological features, Global Positioning System (GPS)
  • Errors and imprecision removed, calibration completed
  • The suspension mechanism can withstand bumps of up to 3 cm
  • Ultrasonic sensor and IR sensor sow seeds at optimum depth
  • For the future, multi-robot swarming technology can be integrated
Green House Monitoring System using a wireless sensor network (WSN) [15] MicaZ off-the-shelf wireless modules, TinyOS, 802.15.4wireless network, XServe
  • Saves the cost of cabling and overcomes the difficulty of the relocation of nodes if connected by cables
  • Measures greenhouses' temperature, light, humidity, and pressure
  • The one-way flow of information—from the greenhouse to end-user
  • The system can be extended to include actuators

11.3 Challenges to Implement IoT-Enabled Systems

All technologies have their boon and their curse. Though smart farming is very effective and helps in the increase of productivity of the crops for the farmers, IoT-enabled agricultural systems do have their challenges and drawbacks. Some of the challenges in IoT-enabled agricultural system are discussed below.

11.3.1 Secured Data Generation and Transmission and Privacy

IoT-based agriculture systems have a lot of security issues while implementing. It is very important to keep in mind that there can be data loss while implementation. With the Internet being accessed more and more nowadays, access to raw information, on-field information can be easily hacked without proper security. The sensor nodes can lead to destruction without adequate security [16]. The security challenge is one of the main factors that affect the success of IoT. With the up-gradation of the technology, the environment of IoT is becoming way more complex making privacy issues more complicated. The transition of data to the interconnected internet of smart things should ensure that the security, privacy, and authenticity of the data involved in the network are preserved.

11.3.2 Lack of Supporting Infrastructure

The lack of sufficient infrastructure does not allow farmers to take advantage of the IoT technology even if they implement it. Many farms are concentrated in remote areas and far from the Internet. A farmer needs to be able to access crop data securely from any position at any time, so issues with networking will make an advanced monitoring system ineffective. Also, a lot of remote locations in India do not have proper electricity supply and since electricity is the engine for IoTenabled smart agricultural systems this is one of the greatest obstacles in integrating IoT technology with the existing agricultural industry. Developing countries face major challenges in the availability and connectivity of the internet and hence the adoption of IoT becomes quite difficult for farmers [17]. There is a shortage of IoT services, such as smart grid and smart metering, in the agriculture sector. In addition to this, the cost of infrastructure modernization and maintenance will be a major obstacle for farmers who are already suffering from high costs and low incomes. Lack of knowledge on IoT infrastructure in agriculture would be detrimental to productivity. It can therefore be recognized that rural agricultural areas are not developed in terms of overall infrastructure. The capacity of the user to incorporate new core-related functionality is diminished by the unanticipated development tool. Many of the infrastructures that are far from ready for use in Indian agriculture are smart water supply, smart power grid, smart drainage, a system of sanitation, etc.

11.3.3 Technical Skill Requirement

For years, agriculture was completely based on manual labor. Farmers, hence have abundant knowledge when it comes to doing farming manually, but integrating technology with farming is not something that they are familiar with. For smart farming to be successful, data analytics should be at the core of every smart agriculture solution. One of the essential keys to the survival of agricultural extension is the capacity building [17].

Adequate knowledge of know-how is required for agriculture, and the lack of operational skills affects the overall agricultural output. The capacity building focuses on solving challenges and resolving the need for development [17] to increase the capacity of an institution so that the functions of agriculture can be carried out. Technological development has also developed to increase the demand for high skilled labor across various working environments. Motor skills, cognitive skills, and communication skills are the three stages of skills needed by the operator in the agriculture industry. The educational gap is one of the primary problems for the farmers in the path of adopting new practices and effective technologies. Technical manpower is expected to be needed in a high number. It will tend to be inadequate with time over the horizon.

The technical, skilled manpower in the agricultural sector has played a crucial role in achieving self-sufficiency in the growth of food grains. Studies have shown that technical manpower shortage is present at various levels especially related to IoT. There is a shortage of manpower, resources, technology-related skills, and access to the latest technologies to improve infrastructure in most of the rising economies. Interoperability, ensuring data protection and sourcing the skills needed are some of the main concerns that are growing in emerging economies. Also in the developed world, the spectrum of IoT problems has not been specific and has faced a range of challenges. Some of the challenges related to the IoT in many sectors are the incentives of market and investments, resources of policy, infrastructure readiness, and technical skill requirements [17]. Interoperability has produced a huge effect on the IoT with an economic impact beyond technological aspects.

11.3.4 Complexity in Software and Hardware

The complexity of software and the interpretation of data are identified as one of the main critical problems of the IoT-based agricultural framework. Some other problems associated with the IoT-based agricultural system are scalability, self-configuration, interoperability, energy-optimized solutions storage capacity, and fault tolerance [17]. Adequate software infrastructure is needed to support the network. Software running in smart sensors should be able to operate with minimal resources, as in traditional embedded systems, and the server should be able to support the network of these smart devices in the background. Software performance, complexity, design, and dynamics are some of the variables that have a significant effect on the quality and production of the crop. At the same time software should be such that it is easily operable by the user to perform various functions involved in agriculture. User-friendly applications have paved the way for big data to be implemented on the various data acquired by the smart devices to understand the growth and behavior of plants in customized environments, effectively implement precision farming techniques, and increase production output. But even so, a lot of problems persist and much detailed analysis is needed to cope with these problems in a better way.

Devices used for smart farming must be robust so that they can protect them from temperature fluctuations, heavy rainfall, humidity, heavy winds, solar radiation, and extreme cold, and also from other dangerous issues that can destroy these devices. To run for longer periods, these IoT devices must be battery powered. Solar panels and turbines are power harvesting modules that can help in the implementation of IoT. Data for IoT–enabled agriculture systems are usually in bulk and so they must be compatible with lower-power capabilities powering tools and small-scale infrastructure servers. The costly equipment must be provided with physical protection in different climates to ensure the efficiency of the transmission of data. The current gateways and protocols and networks may not handle a wide variety of IoT devices or nodes deployed on the agricultural platform. With the IoT devices deployed, scalability and localization of the devices must be considered so that good communication with other IoT devices is possible.

The fault tolerance is also a major challenge and it requires redundancy on several levels depending on various conditions. Hence better systems need to be developed which can tackle hardware and systemic faults while also decreasing the risk of data loss such that the maximum amount of data can be retrieved even in worst-case scenarios.

Complexity, spatial–temporal variation, and complexity are some of the characteristics of agriculture that need to be addressed when designing the right types of services. In addition to these, the actuators, cameras sensors, software, and positioning technology (GPS), wireless communication, and radio frequency identification (RFID) technology are some of the technologies which have been used for the development of IoT-enabled smart agricultural systems. Due to all these factors, the complexity of the system increases in certain sectors of agriculture. With time the system complexity will increase even further as agricultural systems will be needed to be developed more which means considering and monitoring more parameters and operating more number of functions. Thus, a proper in-depth understanding of the software and operating it is needed.

11.3.5 Bulk Data

A secure IoT system or service relies not only on the efficiency of the entire system and on each layer of the network but also on cooperation between layers in terms of protection, privacy, and other assets linked to trust [17]. The trustiness of the entire system has to be achieved. New issues continue to emerge in the area of IoT due to their specific characteristics. Data collection, usually in bulk, is a key problem in IoT. The overwhelming amount of data obtained from the physical perception layer must be accurate. In the event of harm to the data collected or malicious feedback of any sensors, the output of the IoT sensors would be significantly affected [17]. The collection of data needs to be assured. Data mining and merging involve accurate, stable, confidential, and reliable data processing and analysis. On the one hand, IoT systems are focused on data mining, processing, and analysis and, at the same time, users need to reveal their data or privacy to benefit from advanced services. Intelligently delivering context-aware and customized services while preserving consumer privacy at the expected stage, is a significant obstacle in current IoT research and practice [17]. Many small scale farmers who are not aware of the system are thus skeptical to disclose such huge bulk of data about their farming.

11.3.6 Disrupted Connectivity to the Cloud

In most locations, poor third or fourth-generation (3G/4G) connectivity coverage is present [18] practically, 5G is not implemented at most of the remote places. SIGFOX, LoRa are low power wide area 9LPWA technologies which provide an opportunity to overcome the poor connectivity issue [18]; but they do not handle bulk datasets. So, internet connectivity in farmhouses is still not efficient enough to send Big Data to the cloud for review. There may also be examples of field interference that may have damaging effects on cloud connections. These disruptions in connections between the smart devices in the farm and the cloud can be overcome in several ways. These include offline capabilities, the presence of specific IoT gateways, enhanced deep learning through cloud services, and system migration. These technologies provide end-to-end IoT connectivity that enables systems to provide a variety of agricultural services, such as precision farming methods, pH monitoring, productivity forecasting, and microclimate prediction, even when the cloud computing system is not continuously interconnected.

To reduce operational costs, ensure environmental sustainability, and improve yields, farmers need to implement technologies that promote data-driven operations. These and other features are still under development and are slowly empowering farmers to take advantage of precision farming techniques to operate a more productive and profitable enterprise. Thus, there is a high demand for much better technologies; systems, and connectivity which would make farmers recognize all the benefits of farming using data analytics.

11.3.7 Better Connectivity

In general, most farms are located in different areas where Internet access might not be good enough to allow rapid data communication. Rural areas face a lot of problems in the domains of connectivity, communication infrastructure, environmental management, etc. For all the rural and remote areas, the barriers that are to be addressed by broadband information and communication technologies (ICTs) are economic, social barriers, and most importantly distance barriers [19]. Also, communication lines in remote areas can be disrupted by trees, canopies, and other physical obstacles. These factors drive up the cost of data transmission and have been responsible for the sluggish implementation of highly precise technology in agriculture. Such costs will increase exponentially after the advent of Big Data.

These problems can be overcome by the use of vacant TV frequencies. Vacant TV frequencies can be used to transfer information. It is especially helpful in remote areas, as poor reception of TV also contributes to the presence of White Spaces in TV broadcast frequencies, which are then available for use. Ultra-High Frequency (UHF) and Very High Frequency (VHF) broadcast bands are both capable of multiplying the power of Wi-Fi signals, rendering them stronger. Such advantages would reduce expenses and increase networking, thus expanding the adoption of precision agricultural techniques.

11.3.8 Interoperability Issue

Interoperability is a crucial concern for the application of IoT technology. Millions of devices are linked in IoT and need to communicate with each other in which interoperability plays an important role. Technical interoperability, syntactic interoperability, and organizational interoperability are various types of interoperability problems that need to be addressed in IoT. Technical interoperability aims to provide seamless information exchange between the systems, associated with the software and hardware [20]. Data formats such as the syntax of messages exchanged in systems, high-level languages (HTML, XML, etc.) or table formats are subject to syntactical interoperability. Semantic Interoperability deals with the human interpretation, experience, and understanding of IoT applications and hence has special importance for end-users. For IoT scalability, organizational interoperability is of very great importance for the success of distributed IoT infrastructures; so that data can be transferred effectively and there is meaningful communication in different geographical regions and varying systems [20].

11.3.9 Crop Management Issues

Along with monitoring the climatic conditions like hail, flood, extreme cold, drought, snowfall, storms, crop management issue is also a challenge. Weather parameters keep on changing like the rain, wind, temperature, barometric pressure, global warming, which in turn affects the crops. Also, the change in soil should be paid heed to so that managing the crops and sowing the seeds at the proper time can be done. Macronutrients like the potassium, nitrogen, phosphorus of the soil need to be monitored. Keeping track of these manually involves human intervention which is very time consuming and a very tedious process. As we know, temperature, humidity, wind are parameters of the environment which affect types of soil, change in topology, weather change and vegetation, so, having IoT-based agricultural system will help in identifying the soil requirements and can also help in suggesting the amount and type of fertilizers which are to be used. Diseases in the crop can be detected earlier and suitable fertilizer and pesticide can be organized as a collection of data, along with soil parameters, of the particular crop to be planted so that the correct pesticide can be sprayed to the field to save the crop in advance.

11.3.10 Power Consumption

The concept of IoT is to connect numerous smart devices via the Internet and transfer and exchange information in bulk which as a result leads to very high power consumption and high bandwidth. So, there is a need to minimize the consumption of power as well as the bandwidth [21] as in many rural areas abundant power supplies are not available and internet connectivity does not provide high bandwidth.

11.3.11 Environmental Challenges

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) have been deployed in the agriculture domain for quite some time. While many improvements have been made in the last decade, the maintenance and deployment of WSNs in the physical world still face some difficulties. Keeping aside the general challenges of WSN, that is, their power consumption, the hardware limitations of small sensor devices, and sometimes low power communication, WSNs face additional challenges when deployed for the long term outdoors. The natural environment has a very strong effect on the WSN’s operability. Sensor nodes are usually exposed to severe weather conditions during extreme temperature variations and heavy rainfall. Humidity, moisture content, dust during dry seasons, short circuits, corrosion, mud has a major impact on WSNs if they are deployed directly in the field.

11.3.12 High Cost

The equipment required to incorporate IoT in agriculture is extremely expensive. Bigger and capital intensive farms are usually much more receptive to the concept of IoT-based agriculture systems and interested to invest continuously in new equipment. The main challenge remains is to attract small scale farmers who have limited resources for newer technology and are scared of misuse of data. Nonetheless, sensors are the least expensive part, but it would cost more than a thousand dollars to equip all farmers’ fields with them.

Automated machinery expenses are more than manually controlled machinery, as it requires the cost of the farm management software and cloud access to record data. Added to these are cloud service costs and other technology costs like regular monitoring, data analysis, and prediction, and of course, material cost directly associated with agriculture like crop seeds, fertilizers, and other utility costs. Even though agricultural processes are automated in the proposed system but human labors are needed for certain functions like manually checking plant health and detecting any faults or anomalies or maintenance purposes all of which come at a cost. On top of these are the electricity costs, since the whole system will be powered by electricity. Hence cost is a major hiccup in IoTenabled smart agricultural systems.

Farmers are currently relying on a sparsely distributed network of sensors to gather farm conditions data. Apart from the physical constraints of these sensors, they are costly. As a result, farmers tend to rely on less sophisticated farming technologies that reduce their yield and productivity. To reduce these costs, the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) increases spatial coverage and helps to enhance control. Tethered Eye helium balloons may also be used in places where there are limitations on the use of drones, including government controls, poor battery life, and high costs. Such aerial sensors produce a stream of uninterrupted images of farm situations that are used to refine the data obtained by sensors on the ground. As a result, this strategy helps to minimize hardware costs while promoting more accurate data collection. Also if this is not possible then cameras can be implemented to monitor the crops from time to time. But again initial installation cost for all these may be too expensive for farmers. To make higher profits, the farmers must invest in these technologies, but it would be difficult for them to make an initial investment to set up IoT technology in their farms. Added to these will be extra charges in case the system needs some repair. A solution to this problem is quite complex. The technological firms should be able to offer these technologies and equipment to the farmers at a lower price and the government should also have lucrative financial schemes for farmers which encourage them to embrace IoT-enabled smart agricultural systems.

11.4 Security Issues and Measures

Security has always been an essential component and a challenge in the implementation of IoT solutions. Improper access and privacy are the main issues on the list. With the advent of new technology, the IoT world has become more challenging and complex, making problems of privacy and protection more complicated.

Some of the security threats in IoT are the modification of data, data leakage, device modification, protocol hijacking, software vulnerabilities data gathering, and many more. Other factors affecting the security measures of IoT are network structure, terminal equipment, etc. The implementation of mobile nodes and wireless sensor networks enhances the role of wireless infrastructure in IoT applications. Wireless sensor networks become vulnerable to hackers from all over the world if they are left open to internet connectivity. Several reports have shown that IoT systems and users are seriously impacted by various security threats. Many of the major security concerns in IoT include an unsafe mobile interface, unprotected web interface, unsafe network infrastructure, inadequate authorization and authentication, insecure cloud interface, lack of security specifications, etc.

The security threats listed above are as general in the field of smart farming as in other IoT fields. Therefore, as with any other sector, farmers need to think about safety and security to use technology in the right way. The agricultural sector involves the challenges of hacking and theft of data brought about by the concept of precision farming. Organized crime or cyber terrorism can cause huge damage to the system, infrastructure, and business. Malware attacks may cause huge data loss. Less expensive machines in compromised locations are much more susceptible to cyber-attacks. Also, other modern and complex higher-level security threats are triggered by middleware integration, several software layers, APIs, machine-to-machine communication, etc.

Front-end sensors and devices, network, and back-end IT services are referred to as security threats of IoT. A few of the aspects associated with the back end of IT systems are the replacement of an operator and management of the safety of code resources. Since data is the brain of IoTbased smart agricultural systems, they are extremely valuable. Somebody might have unauthorized entry to the IoT provider database and can hence steal and manipulate the information. If anyone alters the data then even the smallest alterations may have disastrous consequences like if someone alters the data about the precise use of fertilizers or pesticides on plants then a huge amount of crops will be damaged and the farmer may incur huge losses. If the plants survive, excess amounts of fertilizers, pesticides, or chemicals may be consumed by humans and animals leading to more fatal outcomes. Thus data security is a top priority in IoT-based agricultural systems. There has been a lack of information significantly about data protection in IoT-enabled agricultural systems additionally. To make farming more efficient, IoT devices and data analysis practices are used by farm equipment providers.

Traditional agriculture with old technologies still prevails which often does not include a robust data backup along with a proper security concept. Let us take an example, farms equipment is connected via some field monitoring drones which are often linked to the internet and general channels. However, these types of equipment do not include basic security mechanisms such as employee logins monitoring or two-factor verification or authentication for remote access sessions. Nevertheless, these types of equipment do not have specific security features, such as employee logins monitoring or two-factor remote access session authentication. Major security standards must therefore be developed, such as network access control, identity authentication, 2-way verification, the confidentiality of data to improve protection. One of such systems developed to secure agricultural data from hackers uses AES 128 cryptography method [22]. The data obtained by the sensors is stored safely in the cloud in this system. The device which gathers the sensor data from the cloud gets the information framed into the JSON format at the encryption side in the device system. An extension of the AES 128 cryptography method has been proposed which gets the data encrypted. The reverse order is followed at the decryption side. The JSON parser is used to obtain the raw data at the decryption side of the server system. Other systems that define precision agriculture technologies, uncover security threats, devises lightweight encryption, and decryption method to facilitate a robust authentication solution in P2P communications of smart farming have also been proposed. A system that constructs the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) score has also been predicted which calculates the score based on the technologies that are used in the farm for smart farming. Such a system can be used to focus on assessing the cyber-attack vulnerabilities in the technologies along with the smart farming environment.

The security issue is not only confined to the resources but also the agricultural products. For example, crops are often damaged due to rodents or insects as mentioned before. To detect the motion of insects, pests, or rodents, an Infrared (IR) Sensor can be used which can calculate the distance of the pests or insects and capture their images. These data can be stored in the websites so that the farmers can retrieve them and can get an idea as to how to protect the crops. Such systems can use web cameras to take the images, hence reducing manpower and usage of pesticides.

Drones or UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) with equipped cameras, integrating modules, and sensors can be deployed in various sections of the field which can capture real-time images and contribute towards precision agriculture and also towards security issues of the fields. Some proposed solutions [23] which can be incorporated into Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) or drones have been discussed such as hyperspectral imaging is much better than multispectral imaging. RGB-D camera can be installed in drones to obtain real-time images that can be processed further using Support Vector Machine (SVM). These systems can have Global Positioning System (GPS) [24] built in it so that it can carry the right instruction by the operator across any location. The use of thermal or heat-seeking cameras can aid agriculture in a significant way by tracking the thermal properties of plants and crops and also by identifying the presence of harmful wildlife in agricultural fields. Thermal imaging also allows us to track plant pests, lack of water, and other physiological processes.

11.5 Future Research Direction

The future of IoT-based agricultural farming is the interconnected farm known as smart farming. Precision agriculture applications are usually targeted at large and conventional farming, but in the future, there will also be new levers to enhance the changing trends in agricultural investments, such as organic farming, family farming, etc. The coming years of agriculture lie in linking, gathering, and analyzing the vast majority of data to maximize efficiency and productivity. Licensed low-power wireless access (LPWA) is believed to be the new era of sustainable agriculture because of its good geographical coverage and also because it is cost-effective.

The use of drones can help to keep track of rainfall and environmental information, as well as the crop species that can be harvested in a particular environment. The historical information can be found out about an area and sent to agricultural experts to make better decisions as to which crop suits which environment. The identification of the type of fertilizers which is suitable for a specific crop is an important challenge that can be overcome if a device can say the change in soil type or weather change through intelligent systems.

Protection of the deployed devices from environmental damages and wildlife damages is a big challenge. Along with the sensor networks, the connectivity of the entire network is affected by adverse weather effects. Ground-level sensors when deployed in rural areas get moved sometimes due to wildlife, sometimes the cables get nibbles or even bit marks on sensors are seen. Sensors on higher levels are sometimes disturbed by birds. These challenges could be mitigated by the usage of solar energy equipment, more robust and shielded cables, and professional uninterrupted power supply (UPS) systems or by electric fences.

As data security is one of the critical problems in this field, local networks should be protected from interference by other networks. If the server is infected once, it will be very difficult to debug it. Reinstalling the software or shutting down a compromised system is not a feasible option and takes a major toll on the entire process. The devices can be authorized and authenticated if the middleware of IoT can manage a trust relationship with these devices. Middleware helps in promoting data interoperability (technical interoperability) and becomes the bridge between the heterogeneous applications in the cloud and the things.

Autonomous systems will always be more efficient according to the market situation, minimizing the cost and maximizing the profits. But in some cases, many small individual users can use the same IoT integrated agriculture process. In such cases, the technologies and the specifications of the sensors used by the different users may be different. So we need local network security along with making difference in the interoperability, the semantic annotation, and filtering of data coming from each user. Security, command over access rights to information, anonymity is hence important and should be maintained in such a system as many of these data stored by these users can be related to commercial enterprise, strategic thinking and are not to be disclosed to non-authorized entities.

11.6 Conclusion

In today’s world, every aspect of human life is connected by IoT devices such as automotive and logistics, remote monitoring of health and fitness, smart homes, industrial IoT, smart cities, alarm systems, etc. [25]. In the last decades, there has been a major technological transformation in the domain of agriculture and farming and this field has become more industrialized and technology-driven. IoT-enabled agricultural system applications have made farmers gain better control over growing crops by saving scarce resources like water, increasing scale efficiencies, decreasing production risks, and cutting down costs. The weather patterns, crop production, soil conditions, and all other data can be managed using smart sensors from remote locations, i.e. without the presence of humans. Climate-based controllers alter climatic factors to facilitate plant growth. This critical data collected can be recorded and stored in the cloud and later retrieved to monitor equipment output and staff results. Automation is an important IoT approach to achieve greater control over the production cycle while retaining higher growth potential and higher crop quality standards.

Hence we see that crop management devices make farming more precise by tracking factors like precipitation, temperature, leaf water capacity, and overall crop safety, which as a result makes it possible to avoid diseases or infestations that could adversely affect crop yields. In this book chapter, we see that there are quite a several challenges that are faced to implement such IoT-based agricultural systems. With the future moving towards and farming being the major source of survival in this world, a continuous study and research are going on to make the IoT-based agricultural system more and more feasible to all sectors of the farmers.

References

1. Chakraborty, S., Das, P., Pal, S., IoT Foundations and Its Application, in: IoT and Analytics for Agriculture, Springer, Singapore, pp. 51–68, 2020.

2. Devi, R.D., Nandhini, S.A., Hemalatha, R., Radha, S., IoT Enabled Efficient Detection and Classification of Plant Diseases for Agricultural Applications, in: 2019 International Conference on Wireless Communications Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET), Chennai, India, pp. 447–451, IEEE, 2019.

3. Masih, J. and Rajasekaran, R., Integrating Big Data Practices in Agriculture, in: IoT and Analytics for Agriculture, pp. 1–26, Springer, Singapore, 2020.

4. Bauer, J. and Aschenbruck, N., Design and implementation of an agricultural monitoring system for smart farming, in: 2018 IoT Vertical and Topical Summit on Agriculture-Tuscany (IOT Tuscany), Tuscany, Italy, pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2018.

5. Sowmiya, M. and Prabavathi, S., Smart Agriculture Using IoT and Cloud Computing. IJRTE, vol. 7, issue 6S3, 2019.

6. Nayak, P., Kavitha, K., Rao, C.M., IoT-Enabled Agricultural System Applications, Challenges, and Security Issues, in: IoT and Analytics for Agriculture, pp. 139–163, Springer, Singapore, 2020.

7. Balaji, V.R. and Prakash, N., IoT-Based Smart Security and Monitoring Devices for Agriculture. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., 116, 11, 121–129, 2017.

8. Hartung, R., Kulau, U., Gernert, B., Rottmann, S., Wolf, L., On the experiences with testbeds and applications in precision farming, in: Proceedings of the First ACM International Workshop on the Engineering of Reliable, Robust, and Secure Embedded Wireless Sensing Systems, pp. 54–61, 2017.

9. Vasisht, D., Kapetanovic, Z., Won, J., Jin, X., Chandra, R., Sinha, S., Stratman, S. et al., Farmbeats: An IoT platform for data-driven agriculture, in: 14th {USENIX} Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation ({NSDI} 17, pp. 515–529, 2017.

10. Mat, I., Kassim, M.R.M., Harun, A.N., Yusoff, I.M., IoT in precision agriculture applications using wireless moisture sensor network, in: 2016 IEEE Conference on Open Systems (ICOS), Langkawi, Malaysia, pp. 24–29, IEEE, 2016.

11. Suma, N., Samson, S.R., Saranya, S., Shanmugapriya, G., Subhashri, R., IoT based smart agriculture monitoring system. Int. J. Recent Innovation Trends Comput. Commun., 5, 2, 177–181, 2017.

12. Martínez-Fernández, J., González-Zamora, A., Sánchez, N., Gumuzzio, A., Herrero-Jiménez, C.M., Satellite soil moisture for agricultural drought monitoring: Assessment of the SMOS derived Soil Water Deficit Index. Remote Sens. Environ., 177, 277–286, 2016.

13. Santhi, P.V., Kapileswar, N., Chenchela, V.K., Prasad, C.V.S., Sensor and vision based autonomous AGRIBOT for sowing seeds, in: 2017 International Conference on Energy, Communication, Data Analytics and Soft Computing (ICECDS), Chennai, India, pp. 242–245, IEEE, 2017.

14. Oberti, R., Marchi, M., Tirelli, P., Calcante, A., Iriti, M., Tona, E., Ulbrich, H. et al., Selective spraying of grapevines for disease control using a modular agricultural robot. Biosyst. Eng., 146, 203–215, 2016.

15. Akkaş, M.A. and Sokullu, R., An IoT-based greenhouse monitoring system with Micaz motes. Procedia Comput. Sci., 113, 603–608, 2017.

16. Thirukkumaran, R., Survey: Security and trust management in internet of things, in: 2018 IEEE Global Conference on Wireless Computing and Networking (GCWCN), Lonavala, India, pp. 131–134, IEEE, 2018.

17. Khan, S.F. and Ismail, M.Y., An Investigation into the Challenges and Opportunities Associated with the Application of Internet of Things (IoT) in the Agricultural Sector—A Review. JCS, 14, 2, 132–143, 2018.

18. Gupta, K. and Shukla, S., Internet of Things: Security challenges for next generation networks, in: 2016 International Conference on Innovation and Challenges in Cyber Security (ICICCS-INBUSH), Noida, India, pp. 315–318, IEEE, 2016.

19. Dlodlo, N. and Kalezhi, J., The internet of things in agriculture for sustainable rural development, in: 2015 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Networks and Computer Communications (ETNCC), Windhoek, Namibia, pp. 13–18, IEEE, 2015.

20. Tzounis, A., Katsoulas, N., Bartzanas, T., Kittas, C., Internet of Things in agriculture, recent advances and future challenges. Biosyst. Eng., 164, 31–48, 2017.

21. Talwana, J.C. and Hua, H.J., Smart world of Internet of Things (IoT) and its security concerns, in: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData), Chengdu, China, pp. 240–245, IEEE, 2016.

22. Vidyashree, L. and Suresha, B.M., Methodology to secure agricultural data in IoT, in: Emerging Technologies in Data Mining and Information Security, pp. 129–139, Springer, Singapore, 2019.

23. Saha, A.K., Saha, J., Ray, R., Sircar, S., Dutta, S., Chattopadhyay, S.P., Saha, H.N., IOT-based drone for improvement of crop quality in agricultural field, in: 2018 IEEE 8th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 612–615, IEEE, 2018.

24. Saha, H., Basu, S., Auddy, S., Dey, R., Nandy, A., Pal, D., Maity, T. et al., A low cost fully autonomous GPS (Global Positioning System) based quad copter for disaster management, in: 2018 IEEE 8th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 654–660, IEEE, 2018.

25. Saha, J., Saha, A.K., Chatterjee, A., Agrawal, S., Saha, A., Kar, A., Saha, H.N., Advanced IOT based combined remote health monitoring, home automation and alarm system, in: 2018 IEEE 8th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, pp. 602–606, IEEE, 2018.

*Corresponding author: [email protected]

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.145.7.7