How big is the market your firm addresses?
If your business is called Tesco, you will subscribe to a market research organisation. You will feed it data at the end of each appropriate period and receive results promptly on the overall size of the UK grocery market, its growth since the previous period and whether your market share has gone up or down from around 27%.
And so it is with most large companies.
Yet, many medium-sized companies enjoy a similar relationship with a niche market research house or industry association. I have worked in some obscure niches over the years and it never ceases to amaze me how companies with a turnover of just a few million pounds, dollars or euros still receive good, regular, informative market data from some enterprising independent research house serving that company and most of its competitors.
But, for small companies, this data may be punitively expensive to acquire, may not be directly relevant or may not exist.
Tough. Your backer needs an estimate of market size.
They want to know whether you are a big fish in a small pond, or vice versa. Suppose you are a mega fish in a tiny pond, but one that can be protected from other waters. Your backer would love to hear that.
You’ll have to have a go, and make an estimate of market size yourself.
It is not that difficult. Many years ago, I developed a bottom-up process for market sizing, which I termed marketcrafting, and have used it frequently with entrepreneurs or managers of smaller businesses over the years. Used with care, it works.
Marketcrafting is a doubly useful process. Not only does it give you the base data needed for market demand sizing and growth (Chapter 3 of your business plan) but for industry supply too (Chapter 4).
It is, however, terribly approximate. Appreciate that, live with it and do it anyway – and you’ll find that your backer will appreciate your diligence.
There are seven main steps in marketcrafting:
Marketcrafting is hardly an accurate process, nor can it be guaranteed that the final number will not be some way off. But it is better than nothing, much better, because you can use the results to get indicative values of four parameters key to business strategy and planning:
All these estimates are crude, perhaps in the extreme, but, believe me, they are better than nothing. Your backer will be impressed that you have tried to create some data out of nothing. And it gives them some sort of basis upon which to work, to challenge you on your assumptions, to do some checking on the Web and over the phone.
Above all, it gives them the groundwork to come up with their own range of estimates, should they choose to do so.
One caveat. Make sure you identify the relevant market size. It has to be that of the particular segment you are addressing. If you run a deli grocery in an off-high street location in Bristol, putting down the size of the UK grocery market as your addressable market will not be helpful. It’s fine for Tesco, not for you.
Finally, here’s a simple example of the findings that can be deduced from the marketcrafting process, adapted from an engineering company I worked with a few years ago (see Table 3.1).
Competitor | Estimated index number for sales (latest year) | Implied market share (%) |
---|---|---|
The company | = 100 | 17% |
Competitor A | 120 | 21% |
Competitor B | 85 | 15% |
Competitor group C | 125 | 21% |
Competitor group D | 65 | 11% |
Competitor E | 30 | 5% |
Competitor F | 20 | 3% |
Others | 40 | 7% |
Total | 585 | 100% |
The company’s turnover in this segment was about £30 million, so the market size could be estimated at 585/100 × 30, or around £175 million. The company’s market share emerged at 17% (100/585), rather lower than the 25% that management had quoted before the marketcrafting exercise. Likewise, the market share of its Far Eastern competitors (Group C), though significant and concerning at 21%, did not seem to be as high as the one-third quoted rather sensationally in the trade press.
When we repeated the exercise to estimate market size of three years earlier, we found that the market had contracted heavily during the post-credit crunch recession, falling by one-third, or roughly 10% per year. Meanwhile, the share of Far Eastern competitors had grown greatly from 9% to 21%, with corresponding share losses by the domestic players, including that of the company, from 20% to 17%.
These were important findings. The trends were, of course, known beforehand, but their quantification through the marketcrafting process, though very rough, put some of the wilder assertions into perspective and helped focus attention on the strategic challenge ahead.
One final word on marketcrafting: it can be used not just by small companies serving markets that are too small for market research companies to investigate. It can also be used by much larger companies when analysing the market for certain of their product/market segment niches. While the company as a whole may address a broad market, which will be well covered by market research companies, some of their niche segments may well not be – and here marketcrafting can be used to gauge estimates of market size.
3.137.184.114