Jamal A. Siddique1, Akil Ahmad2 and Ayaz Mohd3
1Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Department of Environmental Geosciences, Kamycka 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic
2University of KwaZulu-Natal, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, Department of Chemical Engineering, 91 Ridge Rd, Scottsville, Pietermaritzburg, 3201, South Africa
3Sur College of Applied Sciences, Ministry of Higher Education Department of Applied Biotechnology, P.O. Box: 484, 411, Sur, Sultanate of Oman
Self-healing materials are no more an illusion; and due to their efficiency in diagnosing and autonomously healing the damage, such materials have been attracting rising interest of the research fraternity over the past decades. Frequent attempts have been presented every year heading toward the development of different self-healing systems as well as their assimilation to large-scale production with the best possible property–cost relationship. The day is not far when materials developed by researchers can restore their structural integrity in case of a failure.
Self-healing is the ability of a material to makeover/heal the damage autonomously and automatically without any external help. This ability of materials can also be defined by other terms such as self-repairing, autonomic healing, and autonomic repairing.
Self-healing material is not one day’s finding; it takes centuries to come to the present shape and status, and researchers have been searching to create spunky and durable structural materials. The idea of self-healing comes to mind from the inspiration provided by natural processes like blood clotting or repairing of fractured bones; initially it was difficult to introduce the same concept into engineering materials due to the complex nature of the healing processes in human bodies or other living beings [1–6]. Self-healing materials are widely recognized as an innovative field of study after the first international conference (DUT-2007) held in 2007 [7]. In the same year, a review was published on self-healing materials by Kessler [5], followed by a number of articles that were published in the field of self-healing materials after a regular interval [6, 8–19]. Yang and Urban [20] and Herbst et al. [21] also published articles in the field of intrinsic self-healing mechanisms. The first self-healing material was reported in 2001 by Sottos, with White and his fellow researcher from the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign [22]. The material was the polymer (repeating molecules of plastics, a long form of plastic) with a kind of embedded internal adhesive.
Self-healing polymers are a new class of smart materials unlike the traditional hard and inactive composites. These are synthetically created substances that have the built-in ability to repair damage automatically without any preexamination of the problem or human involvement. Continuous research is going on in this field to improve the reliability and reduce the maintenance cost of artificial composites. Drastic improvement with a number of significant achievements has been observed in the past decade in the field of self-healing materials. These materials can easily adapt to various environmental conditions according to their ductile and sensing properties [23].
Generally, materials will degrade with time due to environmental conditions, fatigue, or damage caused during operation. On the other hand, self-healing materials counter degradation through the initiation of a repair mechanism that responds to the micro-damage [24].
Since the development of self-healing materials got inspiration from biological systems, self-healing materials which have the ability to heal after being wounded are therefore referred to as biomimetic [25]. Polymers or elastomers are the most common types of self-healing materials, and they cover the major classes of materials including metals and cementitious and ceramic materials.
Polymers are an everyday material in basic life, with products like rubbers, films, plastics, fibers, or paints. This massive demand has compelled the extension of their reliability and lifespan and the designing of a new kind of polymeric materials capable of restoring their functional property after damage or fatigue was envisioned. Usually, the incorporation of self-healing properties in man-made materials cannot perform the self-healing action without an external trigger. The classification of self-healing also was inspired by the self-healing in biological systems, which can be identified by two major classes: autonomic (without any intervention) [23] and nonautonomic (needing human intervention/external triggering) self-healing materials. The same concept applies to the categorization of self-healing materials into two different groups based on the way of the self-healing mechanism: extrinsic or intrinsic [8, 12].
The self-healing polymers follow a three-step process which shows a resemblance to the biological response. The first step is triggering or actuation, and this response occurs almost immediately after undergoing damage. The second step is transport of materials to the affected area, which also happens instantly. The third step is the chemical repair process, which depends on the type of healing mechanism (e.g., entanglement, polymerization, reversible cross-linking). Modern self-healing composites can be classified into the following three groups [8, 12]:
Although in all three categories the processes are quite similar in some ways, the difference lies only in the ways that response is hidden or prevented until actual damage has occurred.
The capsule-based system was first introduced by White et al. [22], and numerous other researchers have applied this approach in their works to introduce fiber-reinforced materials [26–28]. In this method, the encapsulated healing agent directly releases into the damage zone and the agent cannot be restored once the off process has started. Numerous works have been published so far on the basis of capsule-based self-healing approaches; details are mentioned in Table 8.1 [47].
Table 8.1 Summary of healing performance of capsule-based self-healing materials.
Mechanism | Healing efficiency (%) | Healing time | Healing cycle | Healing condition | Host material | References |
Dicyclopentadiene (DCPD) + Grubbs | 75–100 | 10–48 h | 1 | Room temperature (RT) | Epoxy brown, | [21, 29, 30] |
DCPD + Grubbs | ~30 | 24 h | 1 | RT | Epoxy vinyl ester | [31] |
DCPD + Grubbs | 67–100 (depending on the extent of damage) | 48 h | 1 | RT | Epoxy + carbon fibre reinforced composites (CFRC) | [27, 28, 32] |
DCPD + WCl6 | 20–64.9 | 24 h | 1 | 22–50 °C | Epoxy | [33, 34] |
5-Ethylidene-2-norbornene (ENB) + Grubbs | 45 and 80 | 48 h | 1 | RT and 80 °C | Epoxy | [35] |
ENB/DCPD + Grubbs | 85 | 48 h | 1 | RT | Epoxy | [36] |
ENB + Hoveyda Grubbs | 95 | 2 h | 1 | 170 °C | Epoxy | [37] |
Hydroxyl end-functionalized poly(dimethylsiloxane) (HOPDMS) and poly(diethoxysiloxane) (PDES) | 100 | 48 h | 1 | 150 °C | Epoxy + FRC | [38] |
Epoxy and solvent | 82–100 | 24 h | 1 | RT | Epoxy | [39–41] |
Epoxy and solvent + scandium(III) triflate | >80 | 48 h | 1 | 80 °C | Epoxy | [42] |
Epoxy + CuBr(2) (2-MeIm)(4) | 111 | 1 h | 1 | 80–180 °C | Epoxy | [43, 44] |
Epoxy + mercaptan | 104 | 24 h | 1 | 20 °C | Epoxy | [11] |
Epoxy + materials based on maleimide (MBM) tetrathiol | 121 | 5 d | 1 | 25 °C | Epoxy | [45] |
Epoxy + antimony pentafluoride | 71 | 15–20 s | 1 | RT, 0.2 MPa pressure | Epoxy | [46] |
List of abbreviations: DCPD, dicyclopentadiene; ENB, 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene; G2, Grubbs’ second-generation catalyst; HG1, Hoveyda–Grubbs’ first-generation catalyst; HG2, Hoveyda–Grubbs; HOPDMS, hydroxyl end-functionalized poly(dimethylsiloxane); PDES, poly(diethoxysiloxane); SH, self-healing; SHFRC, self-healing fiber-reinforced composite; WCl6, tungsten chloride.
Source: Adapted from Wang 2015 [47].
Vascular- or fiber-based approaches are more appreciated compared to capsular-based self-healing approaches in fiber-reinforced polymer composite materials. Here, in this approach a network of hollow vascular-based channels, similar to blood vessels in the human tissue, are distributed in structure to introduce the healing agent. Once the damage occurs, cracks propagate via the material and reach the vascules to make a cleavage. The required liquid resin is released from the vascules to repair the damage. The main advantage in this system is the ability to continuously deliver large volumes of the repair agent and the capability to be used for repeated healing. The vascular-based concept was proposed by a number of researchers who also introduced vascules, including the use of 3D printing [48], hollow glass fibers (HGFs) [49, 50], a “lost wax” process [51, 52], and a solid preform route [53].
However, as seen in Tables 8.1 and Table 8.2, the healing performance is not determined only by the mechanisms, but factors such as temperature and healing time also play a critical role in the healing process.
Table 8.2 Summary of healing performance of vascular self-healing materials.
Mechanism | Healing efficiency (%) | Healing condition | Healing cycle | Host material | References |
DCPD + Grubbs’ catalyst | 70 | 12 h 25 °C | 7 | Epoxy | [48, 54] |
Epoxy resin + Hardener | 60–90 | 48 h 30 °C | 30 | Epoxy | [54, 55] |
Epoxy resin + Hardener | 74 and 27 | 6 h 70 and 30 °C | 1 | Epoxy | [56] |
Epoxy resin + Hardener | 87–100 | Normally higher than room temperature (RT) | 1 | Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) | [8, 50, 57–66] |
Two-stage chemistry | 62 | 20 min to fill impacted regions, 3 h to restore mechanical function, 125 °C | 1 | PMMA | [67] |
List of abbreviations: DCPD, dicyclopentadiene; ENB, 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene; FRC, fiber-reinforced composite; G2, Grubbs’ second-generation catalyst; HG1, Hoveyda–Grubbs’ first-generation catalyst; HG2, Hoveyda–Grubbs; HOPDMS, hydroxyl end-functionalized poly(dimethylsiloxane); PDES, poly(diethoxysiloxane); SH, self-healing; SHFRC, self-healing fiber-reinforced composite; WCl6, tungsten chloride; PMMA, poly(methylmethacrylate).
Source: Adapted from Wang 2015 [47].
The intrinsic self-healing approach is comparatively less complex than the capsule- and vascular-based self-healing approaches. Here, in this approach the matrix is implicitly self-healing, and sequestration of the healing agent is not required. This property helps avoid a number of problems related to integration and healing compatibility that are very common in vascular- and capsule-based self-healing materials, while evaluation of healing can be judged by the same protocols used for vascular- and capsule-based approaches. Table 8.3 shows the detail of work related to self-healing polymer approaches.
Table 8.3 Self-healing polymer systems under quasi-static fracture.
Mechanism | Healing efficiency (%) | Healing measure | Loading condition | Host material | References |
DA-rDA reaction | 94 | Strain energy | Mode I three-point bend | Mendomer 401/carbon FRC | [68] |
DA-rDA reaction | 83 | Fracture toughness | Mode I CT | 2MEP4F polymer | [69] |
Meltable secondary additive | 77 | Fracture toughness | Mode I CT | Epoxy/thermoplastic phase | [70] |
Molecular diffusion of residual functionality | 68 | Peak fracture load | Mode I CT | Epoxy | [71] |
DA-rDA reaction | 57 | Fracture toughness | Mode I CT | 2M4F polymer | [72] |
DA-rDA reaction of gel phase | 21 | Peak fracture load | Mode I CT | Epoxy/furan/maleimide gel phase | [73] |
DA-rDA reaction | 100 | Fracture toughness | Mode I DCDC | 2MEP4F polymer | [74] |
Meltable secondary additive | >100a | Peak fracture load | Mode I SENB | Epoxy/PCL phase | [75] |
DA-rDA reaction | 60 | Fracture toughness | Mode I SENB | Polymers 400 and 401 intrinsic | [76] |
Noncovalent bonding: supramolecular | N/Ab | Visual | Mixed-mode cut | Hydrogen-bonded molecules | [77] |
Molecular diffusion | N/Ab | Visual | Mixed-mode cut | Weak polyurethane gel | [78] |
Molecular diffusion | 80 | Tear strength | Mode III tear test | Weak polyurethane gel | [79] |
List of abbreviations: CT, compact tension; DA, Diels–Alder; DCB, double-cantilever beam; DCDC, double-cleavage drilled compression; DCPD, dicyclopentadiene; FRC, fiber-reinforced composites; PCL, poly(caprolactone); PDMS, polydimethylsiloxane; rDA, retro-Diels–Alder; SENB, single-edge notched beam; SMA, shape-memory alloy; TDCB, tapered double-cantilever beam; WTDCB, width-tapered double-cantilever beam.
a Reported healing is >100% because quantified healing measure in the healed case is greater than in the virgin case.
b Qualitative healing capability is based on visual observation of the crack healing or on the ability of the healed polymer to deform under tension.
Researchers and engineers have been paying immense attention to the development of self-healing polymeric materials to improve their safety and lifetime [80]. Development of a material having a combination of properties like elasticity and mechanical, functional, and intrinsic self-healing ability is highly desirable. Electrically conductive polymer composites consist of a nonconductive polymer matrix and are widely used in various commercial applications due to their good manufacturability, light weight, corrosion resistance, and excellent electrical conductivity [81–88]. Since introduction of conductivity in polymeric systems will make the material suitable for electronic applications, electrically conductive healable materials are therefore highly fascinating and important for the development of various modern electronics. The conductivity in healable polymeric materials can transfer information on the structural reliability through electronic assessment, which might give an insight into the most challenging task of identify and quantifying microcracks. Materials having abilities like conductivity and self-healing capability are highly advantageous, especially in deep sea or space applications. Some researchers have been successful in enhancing the conductivity in self-healing polymer materials and have already set a milestone. Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) were used by Guo et al. [89] to design composites by connecting self-healing conductive composites poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) and SWCNTs through host–guest interactions. This PHEMA–SWCNT composite provides bulk proximity sensitivity, humidity sensitivity, and electrical conductivity and is able to self-heal under surrounding conditions without an external impulse. A hybrid gel-based conductive material on self-assembled supramolecular gel and nanostructure polypyrrole was developed by Shi et al. [90], which synergizes the dynamic assembly or disassembly nature of the metal–ligand supramolecule and the conductive nanostructure of polypyrrole hydrogel. Synthesized self-healing conductive materials show features of high conductivity (12 S m−1), meet mechanical and electrical self-healing properties without any external influence, and enhance flexibility and mechanical strength. Another idea introduced by Williams et al. [91], where the interaction between N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) and transition metals is found to be reversible, has been well studied along with the electronic communication of these systems [92, 93]. Carbon nanotubes are very promising as electrically conductive fillers. Remarkable work has been done by Sandler et al. [81], who reported percolation thresholds below 0.01% in a carbon nanotube/epoxy system. Li et al. [94] fabricated electrically conductive self-healing films by depositing silver nanowires on top of healable polyelectrolyte multilayer films consisting of a layer-by-layer assembled branched poly-(ethylenimine) and poly(acrylic acid)–hyaluronic acid blend. Kitajima et al. [95] fabricated anisotropic electrically conductive polymer composites by applying a strong magnetic field to orient fillers. Incorporation of bulky N-alkyl moieties into carbenes reduced the viscosity upon depolymerization, which will boost its flow into the cracks. Higher conductivities (∼1 S cm−1) should be achieved to have practical self-healing applications. Feller et al. have successfully incorporated multiwalled nanotubes (MWNTs) in glass fiber–epoxy composites [86]. Another material made up of silicone rubber nanocomposites with electrical conductivity activated by temperature and self-healing capabilities has been reported by Italian scientist Bittolo Bon and Valentini [96]. A combination of silicon rubber (SR) filled with graphite nanoplatelets (GNPs) and synthesized via a liquid mixing method has found promising applications for seals and hoses and in the automotive field. Another example of electrical conductivity healing was introduced by Tee et al. They prepared a composite having electrical and mechanical properties using a supramolecular polymeric hydrogen-bonding network with self-healing ability filled with chemically compatible micro-nickel particles with nanoscale surface features [97]. Palleau et al. [98] reported self-healing of electrical properties in stretchable wires by combining the self-healing Reverlink polymer produced by Arkema with liquid metal. Another example of a self-healing electrically conductive polymer composite was reported by Wang et al. using fabricated silicon microparticle (SiMP) anodes for high-energy lithium-ion batteries. In this work, they coated the material with a self-healing polymer composite consisting of a randomly branched hydrogen-bonding polymer matrix and carbon black nanoparticles [99].
Electrically conductive materials are those functional materials which are essential for the development of different modern electronics. These conductive healable materials are vital in many advanced electronics such as batteries, conductors, and electronic skin, and greatly improve the accuracy of these devices. Similarly, irreversible healing-type electrical materials that have remarkable applications for electrical conductors were developed by applying healed capsules as healing agents [100–103]. A mixture of polymer binders, conductive particles, and dispersing solvents, collectively used in making conductive inks, have been used in the metallization of microcircuits [104], large-area electronic structures [105], solar cells [106], and solders for microelectronics packages [107]. Such conductive healable materials also have been used in conductive text, electronic art print, flexible silver microelectrodes [108], circuits on curvilinear surfaces [109], and 3D antennas on paper [110]. With ink-jet printing [111], e-jet printing [112], direct screen printing [113], dip-pen nanolithography [114], and direct writing [115, 116], many traditional processing steps can be eliminated, including the use of photoresists and etching. Such functional materials have a great potential for building advanced sensing electronics. Moreover, considering that many other functional particles, such as quantum dots, magnetic fluid particles, could also simply customized by CD, provide a wide range of functional systems. While materials exhibiting both self-healing and conductive properties can be expected to suggest obvious advantages in universal consumer electronics, they may also provide practical alternatives to sophisticated profusion and other types of backup systems commonly used under highly adverse conditions such as deep-sea and space travel.
New developments in the field of self-healing materials have been going on in the Netherlands since 2010. Researchers are not only focusing on structural self-healing materials, which carry loads or have a protective function, but their functional counterparts are also the subject of research. These materials are used in devices for energy generation such as solar cells, fuel cells, energy storage devices like batteries, light-generating devices such as light-emitting diodes (LEDs), and in microelectronics. Research on the self-healing of functional properties like electrical, electromagnetic, electromechanical, magnetic, and thermal conductive is still in its early stages of development. The self-healing thermally conductive polymer composites are presumed to have great potential in the electronics and lighting industry applications [117]. However, with the increasing demand for functional polymer composites, it is expected that the main aim of researchers will broaden the development of materials that are capable of healing both structural and functional properties in the coming years.
The principle of conductive approach of self-healing materials has already been proved. To boost conductivity, electrically conductive fibers appear to be much more efficient than nonfibrous fillers. When practical tests are conducted successfully, this method can be applied commercially in about 5 years from then.
Self-healing materials are efficient, as fewer raw materials will be necessary per unit product. This forms a perfect match with our sustainable investment approach.
Jan Willem Hofland–Managing Director, Triodos MeesPierson
In future, self-healing materials are expected to be used in places where dependability and/or stability play a key role; we can conclude them in the following six major points:
Over the past decade, research on self-healing polymers and composites has set up elevated performance levels for multiple materials system surroundings by a wide diversity of damage approaches and self-healing concepts. Continued progress in the field will give new healing chemistries that occupy greater stability, higher reactivity, and faster kinetics. Although this new field of research has made some great advancement over the past several years, many technical challenges still remain, which require persistent research efforts to address several areas of concern. The long-term sustainability of conductive self-healing materials on environmental exposure is still an unsolved mystery. Advanced environmental testing of self-healing systems is crucially required. However, the good majority of research on self-healing in response to fracture has focused on pseudostatic performances. Self-healing designs will most likely carry out into the targeted and localized distribution of self-healing components in vast applications to enhance efficiency while diminishing cost with deciding effects to the matrix material.
Current efforts for design and optimization of engineering models are still lacking in potential. Anticipating the life-cycle performance of a self-healing polymer composite is also beyond the capability of available analytical tools. However, so far the commercial successful demonstration of self-healing is achieved in the short term in all industrial applications and their modest mechanical performance requirements. However, speedy efforts are needed to transform laboratory demonstrations into constructive and practical applications across a broader platform of industries.
Facelift of properties such as conductivity may be highly favorable for many applications in the microelectronics industry, in which the current solution is usually chip replacement. Williams et al. [91] synthesized an organometallic polymer with semiconductor-level conductivity and the ability to self-heal with applied heat. Capsule-based or vascular approaches using conductive healing agents also show impact for restoring electrical conductivity. Many researchers [35, 118–120] have modeled and experimentally observed nanoparticle segregation to material defects, which may be applied to conductive particles in conductive substrates. Revival of optical properties may also be an encouraging path for self-healing research. Intrinsic self-healing of optically relevant materials may also abolish scattering by healing any generated cracks. The full range of mechanical, optoelectronic and chemical properties of materials, from dielectric character to optical transmission to chemical stability, may be met using self-healing concepts.
Self-healing concepts may lead to enhanced utility of materials. All potential applications for self-healing concepts benefit by longer life, fade-resistant fabrics, safer self-healing batteries, resealing tires, and anti-tamper electronics. Biological systems provide a way out for potential research developments. Many crucial biological materials, like bones, regenerate and remodel in a new way. The day is not far off when materials may be capable of responding to damage in a more synchronized manner so that remodeling and regeneration take place over the lifetime of the material in response to mechanical loading. Efforts toward these targets, as well as exploring the potential of distribution of these materials in many of the aforementioned applications, are currently under way. Collectively, we discussed that self-healing characteristics were scrutinized in materials with electrically conductive properties. However, many challenges remain before their potential is fully utilized. Most importantly, their dependency on solvent vapor to facilitate healing must be eliminated.
18.223.160.61