References

AcceptanceRate.com. (2015, June 15). Acceptance rate & average GPA. Retrieved from http://www.acceptancerate.com

Adams, J. L. (1986). Conceptual blockbusting. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

Adelman, L., & Bresnick, T. A. (1992). Examining the effect of information sequence on Patriot air defense officers. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(2), 204–228.

Adelman, L., Tollcott, M. A., & Bresnick, T. A. (1993). Examing the effect of information sequence on expert judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(3), 348–369.

Ahlemann, F., Arbi, F. E., Kaiser, M. G., & Heck, A. (2013). A process framework for theoretically grounded prescriptive research in the project management field. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 43–56.

Alahuhta, P., Nordbäck, E., Sivunen, A., & Surakka, T. (2014). Fostering team creativity in virtual worlds. Journal for Virtual Worlds Research, 7(3).

Aliakabargolkar, A., & Crawley, E. F. (2014). A Delphi-based framework for systems architecting of in-orbit exploration infrastructure for human exploration beyond low earth orbit. Acta Astronautica, 94(1), 17–33.

Aloysius, J. A., Davis, F. D., Wilson, D. D., Taylor, A. R., & Kottwmann, J. E. (2006). User acceptance of multi-criteria judgments appeal differently to decision makers. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 273–285.

Alpert, M., & Raiffa, H. (1982). A progress report on the training of probability assessors. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 294–305). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, J. R., & Sunder, S. (1995). Professional traders as intuitive Bayesians. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(2), 185–202.

Arkes, H. R., Christianson, C., Lai, C., & Blumer, C. (1987). Two methods of reducing overconfidence. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 39, 133–144.

Armstrong, J. S. (2011). Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers and practitioners. Berlin, Germany: Heidelberg.

Ayyub, B. M. (2001). Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Baker, E., Bosetti, V., Jenni, K. E., & Ricci, E. C. (2014). Facing the experts: Survey mode and expert elicitation. Milan, Italy: Fandazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

Bane e Costa, C. A., De Corte, J. M., & Vansnick, J. C. (2012). MACBETH. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 11, 359–387.

Barnum, C. M. (2010). Usability testing essentials: Ready, set,…test! Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

Barron, F. H. (1992). Selecting a best multiattribute alternative with partial information about attribute weight. Acta Psychology, 80(1–3), 91–103.

Beaty, B. E., Benedek, M., Wilkins, R. W., Jauk, E., Silvia, P. J., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest. Neuropsychologia, 64, 92–98.

Bernard, R. M., Zhang, D., Abrami, P. C., Sicoly, F., Borokhovski, E., & Surkes, M. A. (2008). Exploring the structure of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal: One scale or many? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 15–22.

Bolger, F., & Önkal-Atay, D. (2004). The effects of feedback on judgmental interval predictions. International Journal of Forecasting, 20(1), 29–39.

Bolger, F., & Wright, G. (1994). Assessing the quality of expert judgment: Issues and analysis. Decision Support Systems, 11(1), 1–24.

Bottomley, P. A., Doyle, J. R., & Green, R. H. (2000). Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: Direct rating versus point allocation. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), 508–513.

Boyatzis, R. E., Rochford, K., & Jack, A. I. (2014). Antagonistic neural networks underlying differentiated leadership roles. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–15.

Bradley, R., & Terry, M. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs. Biometrica, 39, 22–38.

Brendillet, C. N., Tywoniak, S., & Dwivedula, R. (2015). Reconnecting theory and practice in pluralistic contexts: Issues and Aristotelian considerations. Project Management Journal, 46(2), 6–20.

Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571–583.

Buckingham, A., & Saunders, P. (2004). The survey methods workbook. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1124(1), 1–38.

Budzier, A., & Flyvberg, B. (2013). Double whammy—How ICT projects are fooled by randomness and screwed by political intent (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1304/1304.4590.pdf

Burgman, M., Carr, A., Godden, L., Gregory, R., McBride, M., Flander, L., & Maguire, L. (2011). Redefining expertise and improving ecological judgment. Conservation Letters, 4(2), 81–87.

Burgman, M. A., McBride, M., Aston, R., Speirs-Bridge, A., Flander, L., Wintle, B., & Twardy, C. (2011). Expert status and performance. PLoS One, 6(7).

Campitelli, G., & Labollita, M. (2010). Correlations of cognitive reflection with judgments and choices. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(3), 182.

Carr, A. J. (2004). Why do we need community science? Social Natural Resources, 17, 1–9.

Catenacci, M., Bosetti, V., Fiorese, G., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Expert judgment elicitation protocols. In V. Bosetti & M. Catenacci (Eds.), Innovation under uncertainty: The future of carbon-free energy technology (pp. 1–8). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Catenacci, M., Verdolini, E., Bosetti, V., & Fiorese, G. (2013). Going electric: Expert survey on the future of battery technologies for electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 61, 403–413.

Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenber (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309-336). New York, NY: Routledge.

Clemen, R. T. (1989). Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Forecasting, 5(4), 559–583.

Clemen, R. T. (2008). Comments on Cooke’s classical method. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(5), 760–765.

Clemen, R. T., & Winkler, R. L. (1999). Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 19(2), 187–203.

Clemen, R., & Reily, T. (2001). Making hard decisions with decision tools. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury Press.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155.

Collaros, P. A., & Anderson, L. R. (1969). Effect of perceived expertness upon creativity of members of brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 159–163.

COLLEGEdata.com. (2015, June 15). Admissions information & college data. CollegeData. Retrieved from http://www.collegedata.com/cs/data/college/college_pg02_tmpl.jhtml?schoolId=xyz

Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Comer, M. K., Seaver, D. A., Stillwell, W. G., & Gaddy, C. D. (1984). Generating human reliability errors using expert judgement. In NUREG/CR-3688. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC.

Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(6), 821–836.

Cooke, R. M. (1999). Experts in uncertainty: Opinion and subjective probability in science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cooke, R. M. (2015). The aggregation of expert judgment: Do good things come to those who weight? Risk Analysis, 35(1), 12–15.

Cooke, R. M., & Goossens, L. L. (2008). TU Delft expert judgment data base. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(5), 657–674.

Cooke, R., & Goossens, L. (2000). Procedures guide for structured expert judgment. Brussels, Belgium: European Union Atomic Energy Community.

Cornelissen, J. P. (2005). Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 30, 751–764.

Couper, M. P. (2000). Review: Web surveys: A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 464–494.

Crawford-Brown, D. (2001). Scientific methods of human health risk analysis in legal and policy decisions. Human Health Risk Analysis, 64(4), 63–81.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crosetto, P., & Filippin, A. (2013). The “bomb” risk elicitation task. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 47, 31–65.

Curtis, A., & Wood, R. (2004). Optimal elicitation of probabilistic information from experts. Geological Society of London Special Publication, 239, 127–145.

Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method. Management Science, 9, 458–467.

Dawes, R. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York, NY: Free Press.

DeGroot, M. H., & Fienberg, S. E. (1982). Assessing probability assessors: Calibration and refinement. In S. S. Gupta & J. O. Berger (Eds.), Statistical decision theory and related topics III (Vol. 1, pp. 291–314). New York, NY: Academic.

Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning. Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman.

Dennis, A. R., Minas, R. K., & Bhagwatwar, A. P. (2013). Sparking creativity: Improving electronic brainstorming with individual cognitive priming. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29(4), 195–216.

Deuja, A., Kohn, N. W., Paulus, P. B., & Korde, R. M. (2014). Taking a broad perspective before brainstorming. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 18(3), 222–231.

Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 497–509.

Dwivedi, Y. K., Ravichandran, K., Williams, M. D., Miller, S., Lal, B., Antony, G. V., & Kartik, M. (2013). IS/IT project failures: A review of extant literature for deriving a taxonomy of failure factors. In Y. K. Dwivedi, H. Z. Henriksen, D. Wastell, & R. De’ (Eds.), Grand successes and failures in IT, public and private sectors (pp. 73–88). London, UK: Springer.

Dyer, J. S. (1990). Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 36(3), 249–258.

Dzindolet, M. T., Paulus, P. B., & Glazer, C. (2012). Brainstorming in virtual teams. In C. Nunes Silva (Ed.), Online research in urban and planning studies: Design and outcome (pp. 138–156). Lisbon, Portugal: IGI Global.

Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4), 281–295.

Evans, R. (2008). The sociology of expertise: The distribution of social fluency. Social Compass, 2, 281–298.

Fasolo, B., & Bana e Costa, C. A. (2014). Tailoring value elicitation to decision makers’ numeracy and fluency: Expressing value judgments in numbers or words. Omega, 44, 83–90.

Fischhoff, B. (1982). Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 422–444). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Flyvberg, B. (2006). From Nobel Prize to project management: Getting risks right. Project Management Journal, 37(3), 5–15.

Flyvberg, B., Holm, M. K., & Buhl, S. L. (2002). Underestimating costs in public works projects: Error or lie? Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 279–295.

Flyvberg, B., Holm, M. K., & Buhl, S. L. (2005). How (in)accurate are demand forecasts in public works projects? The case of transportation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 131–146.

Fong, T. G., Gleason, L. J., Wong, B., Habtemariam, D., Jones, R. N., Schmitt, E. M.,…Inouye, S. K. (2015). Cognitive and physical demands of activities of daily living in older adults: Validation of expert panel ratings. PM & R, In Press.

Fox, M. D., Corbetta, M., Snyder, A. Z., & Vincent, J. L. (2006). Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguished human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103(36), 10046–10051.

Frederick, S. “Cognitive reflection and decision making.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 19, no. 4 (2005): 25–42.

French, S. (1985). Group consensus probability distributions: A critical survey. In J. M. Bernardo, M. H. DeGroot, D. V. Lindley, & A. F. Smith (Eds.), Bayesian statistics 2. North-Holland, Netherlands: Elsevierience Publishers.

French, S. (2011). Aggregating expert judgments. Revista de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales. Serie A. Matematicas, 105(1), 181–206.

Furnham, A. (2000). The brainstorming myth. Business Strategy Review, 11(4), 21–28.

Gadzella, B. M., Hogan, L., Masten, W., Stacks, J., Stephens, R., & Zascavage, V. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal for different academic groups. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(2), 141–149.

Garcia, C. B., Garcia-Perez, J., & Sanchez-Granero, M. A. (2012). An alternative for robust estimation in project management. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(2), 443–451.

Genest, C., & McConway, K. J. (1990). Allocating the weights in the linear opinion pool. Journal of Forecasting, 9, 53–73.

Genest, C., & Zidek, J. V. (1986). Combining probability distributions: A critique and annotated bibliography. Statistical Science, 114–148.

Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Gobble, M. A. (2014). The persistence of brainstorming. Research Technology Management, 57(1), 64–70.

Golenko-Ginzburg, D. (1989). PERT assumptions revisited. Omega, 17, 393–396.

Grigore, B., Peters, J., Hyde, C., & Stein, K. (2013). Models to elicit probability distributions from experts: A systematic review of reported practice in health technology assessment. Pharmaco Economics, 31, 991–1003.

Grinblatt, M., & Keloharju, M. (2009). Sensation seeking, overconfidence, and trading activity. The Journal of Finance, 64(2), 549–578.

Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology (Vol. 561). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

Groves, R. M., Fowler F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2013). Survey methodology. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Guilford, J. P., & Guilford, J. S. (1980). Christensen-Guilford fluency tests: Manual of instruction and interpretations. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.

Gustafson, D., Shulka, R., Delbecq, A., & Walster, G. (1973). A comparitive study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, Delphi groups, and nominal groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 280–291.

Hahn, E. D. (2008). Mixture densities for project management activity times: A robust approach to PERT. European Journal of Operational Research, 188, 450–459.

Haran, U., Moore, D., & Morewedge, C. (2010). A simple remedy for overprecision in judgment. Judgment and Decision Making, 5(7), 467–476.

Herrerías, R., García, J., & Cruz, S. (2003). A note on the reasonableness of PERT hypotheses. Operations Research Letters, 31, 60–62.

Herrerías-Velasco, J. M., Herrerías-Pleguezuelo, R., & van Dorp, J. R. (2011). Revisiting the PERT mean and variance. European Journal of Operational Research, 210, 448–451.

Herzog, S., & Hertwig, R. (2009). The wisdom of many in one mind: Improving individual judgments with dialectic bootstrapping. Psychological Science, 20(2), 231–237.

Higgins, J. M. (1994). 101 creative problem solving techniques. Winter Park, FL: The New Management Publishing Co.

Hill, G. W. (1982). Groups vs. individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517–539.

Hogarth, R. (1975). Cognitive processes and the assessment of subjective probability distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 271–289.

Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 101(46), 16385–16389.

Hora, S. C. (2004). Probability judgments for continuous quantities: Linear combinations and calibration. Management Science, 50(5), 597–604.

Hora, S., & von Winterfeldt, D. (1997). Nuclear waste and future societies: A look into the deep future. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 56, 155–170.

Jack, A. I., Dawson, A. J., & Norr, M. (2013). Seeing human: Distinct and overlapping neural signatures. Neuroimage, 79, 313–328.

Jacobs, C. D., Oliver, D., & Heracleous, L. (2013). Diagnosing organizational identity beliefs by eliciting complex, multimodal metaphors. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(4), 485–507.

Jain, K., Mukherjee, K., Bearden, J. N., & Gaba, A. (2013). Unpacking the future: A nudge toward wider confidence intervals. Management Science, 59(9), 1970–1987.

Jannis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Jannis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. New York, NY: Free Press.

Johnson, E. N. (1995). Effects of information order, group assistance, and experience on auditors’ sequential belief revision. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 137–160.

Jones, C. (2004). Software project management practices: Failure versus success. Cross Talk: The Journal of Defense Software Engineering, 5–9.

Jørgensen, M. (2004). A review of studies on expert estimation of software development effort. Journal of Systems and Software, 70(1), 37–60.

Jørgensen, M., Halkjelsvik, T., & Kitchenham, B. (2012). How does project size affect cost estimation error? Statistical artifacts and methodological challenges. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 839–849.

Jørgensen, M., & Shepperd, M. (2007). A systematic review of software development cost estimation studies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(1), 33–53.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2000). Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Kaplan, S. (1990). “Expert information” vs. “expert judgments”: Another approach to eliciting/combining using expert knowledge in PRA. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 35(1), 61–72.

Kara, H. (2015). Creative research methods in the social sciences: A practical guide. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

Keith, D. W. (1996). When is it appropriate to combine expert judgments? A critique and annotated bibliography. Statistical Science, 19(2), 187–203.

Kennedy, M. K., & Vargus, B. (2001). Challenges in survey research and their implications for philanthropic studies research. Nonprofit and Volutary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 483–494.

Kent, S. (1964). The words of estimative probability. Intelligence Studies, 8, 49–64.

Kerzner, H. (2012). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (11th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

Kerzner, H. R. (2011). Using the project management maturity model: Strategic planning for project management. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

Kim, B. C., & Reinschmidt, K. F. (2011). Combination of project cost forecasts in earned value management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 137(11), 958–966.

Kleibeuker, S. W., Koolschijn, P. C., Jolles, D. D., de Dreu, C. K., & Crone, E. A. (2013). The neural coding of creative idea generation across adolescence and early adulthood. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7.

Kohn, N. W., & Smith, S. M. (2011). Collaborative fixation: Effects of others’ ideas on brainstorming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(3), 359–371.

Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology and Human Learning Memory, 107–118.

Koskela, L., & Howell, G. (2002). The underlying theory of project management is obsolete. In Proceedings of the PMI Research and Education Conference (pp. 293–302). Seattle, WA: Project Management Institute.

Kraaijenbrink, J. (2010). Rigor and relevance under uncertainty: Toward frameworks as theories for practice (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://kraaijenbrink.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Rigor-and-relevance-under-uncertainty-Kraaijenbrink-20-12-2010.pdf

Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kullback, S. (1959). Information theory and statistics. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.

Kynn, M. (2008). The 'heuristics and biases’ bias in expert elicitation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 171(1), 239–264.

Labovitz, S. (1970). The assignment of numbers to rank order categories. American Sociological Review, 515–524.

Lamn, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming). European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361–387.

Larichev, O. I., & Brown, R. V. (2000). Numerical and verbal decision analysis: Comparison on practical cases. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 9(6), 263–273.

Lawrence, M., Goodwin, P., O’Connor, M., & Onkal, D. (2006). Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25 years. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(3), 493–518.

Li, Y. F., Xie, M., & Goh, T. N. (2009). A study of project selection and feature weighting for analogy based software cost estimation. Journal of Systems and Software, 82(2), 241–252.

Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 20, 159–183.

Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1981). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Eugene, OR: Decision Research.

Lin, S. W., & Bier, V. M. (2008). A study of expert overconfidence. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 93(5), 711–721.

Linsey, J. S., & Becker, B. (2011). Effectiveness of brainwriting techniques: Comparing nominal groups to real teams. In T. Taura, & Y. Nagai (Eds.), Design creativity 2010 (pp. 165–171). London, UK: Springer.

Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44.

Liu, L., & Napier, Z. (2010). The accuracy of risk-based cost estimation for water infrastructure projects: preliminary evidence from Australian projects. Construction Management and Economics, 28(1), 89–100.

Malcolm, D. G., Roseboom, C. E., Clark, C. E., & Fazar, W. (1959). Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation. Operations Research, 7, 646–649.

Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., & Sutton, M. M. (2010). Project management in practice (4th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.

Matheson, J. E., & Winkler, R. L. (1976). Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions. Management Science, 22, 1087–1096.

McDonald, S., Zhao, T., & Edwards, H. M. (2013). Dual verbal elicitation: The complementary use of concurrent and retrospective reporting within a usability test. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(10), 647–660.

Mendell, M., & Sheridan, T. (1989). Filtering information from human experts. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 36, 6–16.

Merrick, J., van Dorp, J. R., & Singh, A. (2005). Analysis of correlated expert judgments from extended pairwise comparisons. Decision Analysis, 2(1), 17–29.

Meyer, M. A., & Booker, J. M. (2001). Eliciting and analyzing expert judgment. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

Morris, P. A. (1977). Combining expert judgments—A Bayesian approach. Management Science, 23, 679–693.

Mosleh, A., & Apostalakis, G. (1982). Models for the use of expert opinion. In R. Walker, & V. Covello, Low-probability high-consequence risk analysis. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Murphy, A. (1972a). Scalar and vector partitions of the probability score: Part I. Two-state situation. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 11, 273–282.

Murphy, A. (1972b). Scalar and vector partitions of the probability score: Part II. N-state situation. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 11, 1183–1192.

O’Hagan, A., Buck, C., Daneshkhah, A., Eiser, J. R., Garthwaite, P., Jenkinson, D.,…Rakow, T. (2006). Uncertain judgements: Eliciting experts’ probabilities. Chichester, UK: Wiley & Sons.

Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York, NY: Scribner.

Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 261–265.

Otto, K., & Wood, K. (2001). Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Parke, B., Hunter, K. F., Strain, L. A., Marck, P. B., Waugh, E. H., & McClelland, A. J. (2013). Facilitators and barriers to safe emergency department transitions for community dwelling older people with dementia and their caregivers: A social ecological study. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50, 1206–1218.

Pascarella, E. T. (1989). The development of critical thinking: Does college make a difference? Journal of College Student Development.

Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407–413.

Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Poetz, M. K., & Schreier, M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 245–256.

Premachandra, I. M. (2001). An approximation of the activity duration distribution in PERT. Computers & Operations Research, 28(5), 443–452.

Project Management Institute. (2012). PMI lexicon of project management terms. Newtown Square, PA: Author.

Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) – Fifth edition. Newtown Square, PA: Author.

Project Management Institute. (2014, December 1). Hong Kong natural gas pipeline. Retrieved from http://www.pmi.org/Business-Solutions/˜/media/PDF/Case%20Study/HK_Pipeline_casestudy_v3.ashx

Project Management Institute. (2015, April). PMI fact file. PMI Today, p. 4.

Pulkkinen, U. (1993). Method for combination of expert judgments. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 40, 111–118.

Rauhut, H., & Lorenz, J. (2010). The wisdom of crowds in one mind: How individuals can simulate the knowledge of diverse societies to reach better decisions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(2), 191–197.

Roelofs, V. J., & Roelofs, W. (2013). Using probability boxes to model elicited information: A case study. Risk Analysis, 33(9), 1650–1660.

Saaty, T. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Sackman, H. (1975). Delphi critique, expert opinion, forecasting and group processes. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338–360.

Sasieni, M. W. (1986). Note—A Note on Pert Times. Management Science, 32(12), 1652–1653.

Shah, J. J. (1998). Experimental investigation of progressive idea generation techniques in engineering design. Proceedings of the Design Engineering Technical Conference (pp. 13–16). Atlanta, GA: ASME.

Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V., & Vargas-Hernández, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Transactions of the ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 122, 377–384.

Shah, J. J., Smith, N. N., & Vargas-Hernández, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24, 111–134.

Shah, J. J., Vargas-Hernández, N., Summers, J. S., & Kulkarni, S. (2001). Collaborative sketching (C-Sketch)—An idea generation technique for engineering design. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 168–198.

Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 53, 252–266.

Simola, K., Mengolini, A., Bolado-Lavin, R., & Gandossi, L. (2005). Training material for formal expert judgment (Technical Report 21770). Brussels, Belgium: EU.

Smerek, R. (2014). Why people think deeply: Meta-cognitive cues, task characteristics and thinking dispositions. Handbook of Research Methods on Intuition, 3–14.

Söderlund, J. (2004). Building theories of project management: Past research, questions for the future. International Journal of Project Management 22(3), 183–191.

Soll, J. B., & Klayman, J. (2004). Overconfidence in interval estimates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 299.

Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2009). Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 780.

Soll, J. B., Milkman, K. L., & Payne, J. W. (2014). A user’s guide to debiasing. In K. Gideon & G. Wu (Eds.), Handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 924–951). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

Song, L. (2010). Earned value management: A global and cross-industry perspective on current EVM practice. Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.

Specter, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232.

Speirs-Bridge, A., Fidler, F., McBride, M., Flander, L., Cumming, G., & Burgman, M. (2010). Reducing overconfidence in the interval judgments of experts. Risk Analysis, 30(3), 512–523.

Spreen, O., & Strauss, E. (1998). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Advancing the rationality debate. Behavioral and brain sciences, 23(05), 701–717.

Stevens, S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680.

Stone, M. (1961). The opinion pool. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 1339–1342.

Subramaniam, K., Kounios, J., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2009). A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive effect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 415–432.

Sudhakar, G. P. (2013). The Key functions and best practices of software product management. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 13(2), 13–21.

Susel, I. (2011). Issues to be addressed when eliciting expert judgments for operational risk scenarios. Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security.

Svejvig, P., & Andersen, P. (2015). Rethinking project management: A structured literature review with a critical look at the brave new world. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 278–290.

Szwed, P. S. (2014). Making the case for (re)defining expert judgment (elicitation) in project management. Proceedings of the PMI Research and Education Conference. Portland, OR: Project Management Institute.

Szwed, P. S., van Dorp, J. R., Merrick, J. R., & Singh, A. (2006). A Bayesian paired comparison approach for relative accident probability assessment with covariate information. International Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 157–177.

Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Hashizume, H., Sassa, Y., Nagase, T., Nouchi, R., & Kawashima, R. (2011). Failing to deactivate: The association between brain activity during working memory task and creativity. Neuroimage, 55(2), 681–687.

Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 23–47.

Teigen, K. H., & Jørgensen, M. (2005). When 90% confidence intervals are 50% certain: On the credibility of credible intervals. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(4), 455–475.

Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34(4), 273–281.

Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The cognitive reflection test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275–1289.

Torgersen, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York, NY: Wiley.

Trendowicz, A., Munch, J., & Jeffery, R. (2011). State of practice in software effort estimation: A survey and literature review. In Software Engineering Techniques (pp. 232–245). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Tsai, C. I., Klayman, J., & Hastie, R. (2008). Effects of amount of information on judgment accuracy and confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(2), 97–105.

Tumonis, V., Šavelskis, M., & Žalytė, I. (2013). Judicial Decision-Making From An Empirical Perspective. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 6(1), 140–162.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.

Uddin, L. Q., Kelly, A. M., Biswal, B. B., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2009). Functional connectivity of default mode network components: Correlation, anticorrelation, and causality. Human Brain Mapping, 30(2), 625–637.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2009). Expert Elicitation Task Force White Paper, GPO: Washington, DC.

Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.

van Dorp, J. R. (2012). Indirect parameter elicitation procedures for some distributions with bounded support-with applications in Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT). Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 8(4), 393–401.

VanGundy, A. B. (1988). Techniques for structured problem solving. New York, NY: Can Nostrand Reinhold Co.

Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2008). Measuring the crowd within: Probabilistic representations within individuals. Psychological Science, Short Report, 19, 645–647.

Wachowicz, T., & Blaszczyk, P. (2013). TOPSIS based approach to scoring negotiating offers in negotiation support systems. Group Decision & Negotiation, 22(6), 1021–1050.

Walker, K. D., Evans, J. S., & MacIntosh, D. (2001). Use of expert judgment in exposure assessment. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology—Part I, 11, 308–322.

Watson, G. (1980). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Welsh, M., Lee, M., & Begg, S. (2008). More-or-less elicitation (MOLE): Testing a heuristic elicitation method. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of Cognitive Science Society, 493–498.

Welsh, M., Lee, M., & Begg, S. (2009). Repeated judgments in elicitation tasks: Efficacy of MOLE method. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of Cognitive Science Society, 1529–1534.

Winman, A., Hansson, P., & Juslin, P. (2004). Subjective probability intervals: how to reduce overconfidence by interval evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1167.

Woloshin, S., Schwartz, L. M., Moncour, M., Gabriel, S., & Tosteson, A. N. (2001). Assessing values for health: Numeracy matters. Medical Decision Making, 21, 382–390.

Woods, L. E., & Ford, J. M. (1993). Structuring interviews with experts during knowledge elicitation. In K. M. Ford & J. M. Bradshaw (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition as modeling (pp. 71–90). New York, NY: Wiley.

Yates, J. F. (1994a). Analyzing the accuracy of probability judgments for multiple events: An extension of the covariance decomposition. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 381–410). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Yates, J. F. (1994b). Subjective probability accuracy analysis. In G. Wright & P. Ayton (Eds.), Subjective probability (pp. 381–410). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Smith, D. M., Ubel, P. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2007). Validation of the subjective numeracy scale (SNS): Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communication and utility evaluations. Medical Decision Making, 27, 663–671.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
3.145.58.246