Index


A

  • abstract summary narrative, 170, 177–179, 273
  • academia
    • accessing sponsored program funding databases, 112–113
    • corporations funding, 111
    • external subscription-based databases, 112–113
    • federal funding for, 109–111
    • fellowship funding opportunities, 113–114
    • foundations funding, 111–112
    • grants for, 108–109
    • internal institutional databases, 112
    • terminology, 108–109
  • accountability, 147–148, 211, 238–240
  • ACOE (Army Corps of Engineers), 110
  • Address, Telephone, Email, and Website (grantfunding plan), 29–30
  • adequacy of resources section, 241–242
  • Administration for Children and Families (ACF), 110
  • agencies, 13–15, 17
  • Agency for Health Care Research and Quality (AHRQ), 110
  • Agency for International Development (USAID), 111, 117
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR), 110
  • alphagamma.eu, 100
  • American Chamber of Commerce Directory, 101
  • American National Standards Institute, 224
  • annual campaigns category, 9
  • annual report (attachment), 53
  • AOR (Authorized Organization Representative) authorization, 75–76, 284
  • Application Deadline/Giving Cycle (grantfunding plan), 29–30
  • Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) form
    • filling in, 77–79
    • overview, 170, 174–177
  • applications
    • abstract summary narrative, 170, 177–179, 273
    • accessing instructions, 77–78
    • applicant capability, 144
    • asking about, 43
    • attachments, 280–282, 287–288
    • avoiding editing mistakes, 277–279
    • budget section
      • building credibility, 267–268
      • cash-match monies, 51, 137, 250, 261–264
      • construction, 256
      • contractual, 255–256
      • cost figures, 264
      • developing for expenses, 149
      • direct and indirect costs, 257–259
      • equipment, 253–254
      • ethical expenses, 264–266
      • expenditures, 265–267
      • foreign currency, 120
      • forms regarding, 52, 78
      • including program income, 264–265
      • instructions for grant, 227
      • in-kind contributions, 261–262
      • other, 256–257
      • overview, 247–248, 249
      • personnel, 249–251
      • soft cash match, 261–262
      • summary, 248, 259–260
      • supplies, 254–255
      • sustainability and, 144
      • terminology, 248–249
      • travel, 251–253
      • uploading forms to Grants.gov, 80
      • writing, 277
    • capability-related documents, 280–281
    • components of, 17
    • cover letters
      • checking required components, 272–273
      • defined, 79
      • overview, 170–173
    • deadline for, 128–130
    • dissemination plan, 225, 275–276
    • equity statement, 242–243, 272, 276
    • evaluation plan
      • accountability and, 147–148
      • as component application, 275–276
      • as component of program design section, 210
      • data collection and analysis, 224
      • dissemination, 230
      • evaluations, 225–228
      • evaluators, 225, 228–229
      • overview, 223–224, 229–230
      • qualitative versus quantitative, 226
      • terminology, 224–226
    • executive summary narrative, 170, 177–179, 273
    • fellowships, 113–114
    • financial documents, 281–282
    • following up on, 293–295
    • guidelines
      • adhering to, 184–185
      • complying with, 170
      • e-grants, 322
      • government, 18
      • overview, 20, 36–38
      • reviewing for financial reporting, 301–302
    • kits for, 16
    • management plan section, 143–144, 239, 272, 276
    • monitoring multiple, 33
    • narrative detail, checking required components, 277
    • organization history and capability, checking required components, 273–274
    • package, 18
    • pre-narrative forms, checking required components, 273
    • program design section
      • components of, 210
      • confirming content connectivity in logic model, 220–223
      • data collection and analysis, 224
      • difference between types of goals and objectives, 212–213
      • dissemination, 230
      • evaluations, 225–229
      • implementation plan, 218–220
      • incorporating models in, 147
      • peer review, 143–144
      • purpose of this request statement, 161–165
      • purpose statement, 211
      • qualitative versus quantitative, 226
      • SMART objectives, aligning with purpose of funding, 162–164
      • SMART objectives, as component of program design section, 210
      • SMART objectives, omiting in application, 278
      • SMART objectives, overview, 50, 215–218
      • terminology, 224–226
      • writing, 274–275
      • writing about goals, 213–215
      • writing evaluation plan for, 223–224
    • reviewing online, 334
    • statement of need
      • case studies and, 200–204
      • points in peer review, 143
      • researching, 146, 198–200
      • writing, 274
    • submitting, 282–285
    • sustainability plan, 144, 276
    • table of contents, 170, 179–181, 273
    • tracking status of, 20–21, 78, 291–292
    • type of, 59
    • uploading, 283–285
  • Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), 110
  • Army Medical Research and Development Command (USAMRMC), 110
  • Army Research Laboratory (ARL), 110
  • articulating qualifications, 234–238
  • Assigned To (grantfunding plan), 29–30
  • ASSIST system, 82
  • Association of Fundraising Professionals, 330
  • Association of Nonprofits, 330
  • assurances forms, uploading to Grants.gov, 80–81
  • attachments
    • assembling, 280–282
    • compiling, 52–53
    • keeping copies of, 287–288
  • Authorized Organization Representative (AOR) authorization, 75–76, 284
  • award ceiling/floor, 130

B

  • board of directors with affiliations (attachment), 52
  • Boardsmanship (Robert’s Rules of Order) website, 27
  • Bowdoin College Student Fellowships and Research, 113
  • Budget Information for Non-Construction Programs (SF-424-A), 78
  • budget period, 132
  • budget section
    • building credibility, 267–268
    • cash-match monies, 51, 137, 250, 261–264
    • cost figures, 264
    • developing for expenses, 149
    • ethical expenses, 264–266
    • expenditures, 265–267
    • foreign currency, 120
    • forms regarding, 52, 78
    • including program income, 264–265
    • instructions for grant, 227
    • in-kind contributions, 261–262
    • overview, 247–248, 249
    • soft cash match, 261–262
    • summary, 248
    • sustainability and, 144
    • terminology
      • construction, 256
      • contractual, 255–256
      • direct and indirect costs, 257–259
      • equipment, 253–254
      • other, 256–257
      • overview, 248–249
      • personnel, 249–251
      • summary, 259–260
      • supplies, 254–255
      • travel, 251–253
    • uploading forms to Grants.gov, 80
    • writing, 277
  • building/renovation funds category, 9
  • Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA), 110
  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), 64
  • business plan competition, 100–101

C

  • Canadian Directory to Foundations and Corporations, 118
  • Candid
    • conducting funding search in, 34–35, 89
    • e-newsletters by,' 85
    • Foundation Directory Online, 89–92
    • GuideStar, 86–87, 113
    • overview, 15
  • capability-related documents, 280–281
  • capital support category, 9
  • case studies, 160–161, 200–204
  • cash-match monies, 51, 137, 250, 261–264
  • Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number, 77, 176
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 110, 127
  • Central Contractor Registry (CCR), 176
  • challenge monies category, 10
  • checklist for submission, 272
  • chief financial officer (CFO), 240
  • christianvolunteering.org, 92
  • citing sources, 49, 146, 207
  • clear audit trail, 302
  • cloud-based storage, 288
  • College Board’s Search for Scholarships website, 98
  • college scholarships, 98
  • community reinvestment programs
    • building relationships with corporations, 309–310
    • following up with, 316
    • overview, 307–308
    • writing corporate letter request/letter proposal, 311–315
  • Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) program, 14
  • Competition Identification Number/Title, 176
  • competitive grants, 13, 58, 64
  • conferences/seminars category, 10
  • Congressional Districts Office, 176–177
  • consulting services category, 10
  • contact person/title (grantfunding plan), 29–30
  • content connectivity, confirming in logic model, 220–223
  • continuing support/continuation category, 10
  • cooperative agreement, 8, 58
  • copyediting services, offering, 333
  • corporate letter request/letter proposal, 311–315
  • corporations
    • academia and, 111
    • community engagement from, 16
    • community reinvestment programs
      • building relationships with, 309–310
      • following up with, 316
      • making initial contact with, 309
      • overview, 307–308
      • sponsorship request form, 308
      • writing corporate letter request/letter proposal, 311–315
    • conducting funding search on, 34–35, 84–86
    • determining whether request is under review, 294
    • filing request for grants to, 18–20
    • following up on grant requests, 293–295
    • grants from, 16
    • handling rejection from to grant request, 306
    • waiting time for application, 291
  • cost figures, 264
  • cover letters
    • checking required components, 272–273
    • defined, 79
    • overview, 170–173
  • creativity in writing, 156–160
  • credibility, building, 267–268

D

  • data collection and analysis, 217, 224, 226
  • Data Universal Number System (D-U-N-S) number, 45, 74–75
  • De Minimis Indirect Cost Rate, 258
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), 110
  • deliverables, 108
  • Department of Agriculture (USDA), 109, 127
  • Department of Commerce (DOC), 109
  • Department of Defense (DOD), 109
  • Department of Education (ED), 110, 127
  • Department of Energy (DOE), 110
  • Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), 82, 110
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), 99
  • Department of Justice (DOJ), 39, 82, 110, 154
  • Department of Labor (DOL), 110
  • Department of State (DOS), 110
  • Department of the Interior (DOI), 110
  • Department of Transportation (DOT), 110
  • description of funding statement, 126
  • direct purpose statement, 211
  • Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) form, 78, 81–82
  • dissemination plan, 225, 275–276
  • Dropbox, 288
  • Dun & Bradstreet website, 74–75
  • D-U-N-S (Data Universal Number System) number, 45, 74–75

E

  • E-Biz POC (E-Business Point of Contact), 75–76
  • Economic Development Agency Directory, 101
  • Economic Research Institute, 326
  • ed2go, 326
  • eFax, 44
  • e-grants
    • checking for guidelines, 322
    • confirming due date time and time zone, 323
    • filling in organizational information, 320
    • formatting, 322
    • graphics, 207, 322
    • overview, 319
    • page limits and page numbers, 141
    • re-creating template in word processor, 321
    • reviewing online application template, 320–321
    • setting up for, 319–320
    • submitting, 323
    • writing limitations, 321
  • elected officials tracking application status, 291–292
  • eligibility
    • grantor ensuring of applicant, 11
    • for grants, 11–12
    • for Grants.gov, 73–74
    • NOFAs and, 125–127
    • partnerships and, 43, 134–137
    • for state funding, 59
    • verifying, 125–126
  • Employer Identification Number (EIN), 44, 75
  • endowments
    • category, 10
    • defined, 83
  • entitlement grant, 58
  • Environmental Protection Agency, 127
  • EPA: Grant and Cooperative Agreement Desk Top Resource for Non-Profit Recipients, 110
  • equity statement, 242–243, 272, 276
  • eRA Systems, 82
  • ethical expenses, 264–266
  • European Foundation Centre (EFC), 118
  • evaluation consultants as third-party evaluator, 152
  • evaluation plan
    • accountability and, 147–148
    • as component in application, 275–276
    • writing
      • as component of program design section, 210
      • data collection and analysis, 224
      • dissemination, 230
      • evaluations, 225–228
      • evaluators, 225, 228–229
      • overview, 223–224, 229–230
      • qualitative versus quantitative, 226
      • terminology, 224–226
  • evaluation standards, 224
  • executive summary narrative, 170, 177–179, 273
  • ExLibris Pivot-RP, 112
  • expenditures, 265–267
  • External Free Database, 113
  • extramurally sponsored projects, 108–109

F

  • fact sheets, 151
  • FastLane, 82
  • feasibility standards, 224
  • federal funding
    • for academia, 109–111
    • agencies, 17
    • competitive grants, 13, 58, 64
    • conducting search on, 34
    • cooperative agreement awards, 8, 58
    • direct grants, 60–63
    • D-U-N-S number, 45, 74–75
    • eligibility for, 59
    • entitlement grant, 58
    • fiscal year, 67
    • forecasted funding announcements, 66
    • formula grant, 14, 58, 64
    • as grantor, 8, 12
    • for individuals, 101–104
    • international grantfunding opportunities, 117
    • key personnel section, 238
    • management plan, 238
    • for NGOs, 117
    • NOFAs
      • criteria, 134
      • determining eligibility and capability, 125–130
      • general terms, 130–132
      • overview, 17, 62, 123–124
      • program-specific terms, 130
      • reading, 124
      • terminology, 130–133
      • writing requirements on, 140–141
    • non-competitive, 68
    • opportunities for, 58–59
    • overview, 14–15, 57–58, 60–61
    • partnerships and, 43, 134–137
    • pass-through, 60–64
    • SAM.gov, 45
    • searching for opportunities for, 59–60
    • style of writing for, 188
    • waiting time for application, 291
  • Federal Register, 301
  • Federal Research/Research and Development (R/R&D), 101–102
  • fellowships, 10, 98, 113–114
  • financial accountability/reporting, 108
  • financial documents, 52, 281–282, 301–302
  • first person, writing in, 188
  • first-time homebuyer grants, 99
  • fiscal responsibility, 240–241, 302
  • fiscal sponsor, 267–268
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 110
  • forecasted cash needs, 80
  • forecasted funding announcements, 66
  • foreign applicants, 74, 119–120
  • form rejection letter, 292–293, 295
  • formative evaluation, 225–226
  • forms
    • budget information, 80–81
    • Budget Narrative Attachment, 78
    • common grant application form, 170
    • filling out, 79
    • Form-990, 87–89
    • Key Contacts, 78
    • Non-Constructions Programs Budget Information form, 80
    • Project Abstract Summary, 78
    • Project Narrative Attachment Form, 78
    • SF-424, 77–79, 174–177
    • SF-LLL, 78, 81–82
    • sponsorship request form, 308
    • uploading to Grants.gov, 79–82
  • formula grant, 14, 58, 64
  • for-profit organizations, 73
  • Foundation Directory Online, 89–92
  • foundations
    • academia and, 111–112
    • awarding grants, 15
    • conducting funding search on, 34–35, 84–86
    • determining whether request is under review, 294
    • filing request for grants to, 18–20
    • following up on grant requests, 293–295
    • Form-990, 87–89
    • GuideStar, 86–87
    • handling rejection from to grant request, 306
    • private and public, 15
    • waiting time for application, 291
  • free grant research websites, 89–92
  • Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 63, 292, 303–305
  • Fulbright Program, 110
  • Funding Information Network (FIN), 14
  • Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs), 17, 62
  • Funding Opportunity Number/Title, 176
  • funding plan, 12–13, 27–31
  • funding priority, 144
  • funding search, conducting, 34–35, 84–86, 89
  • Funding Source (grantfunding plan), 29–30
  • Fundsnet Services website, 35, 91

G

  • Gantt chart, 50, 218–220
  • General Services Administration website, 252
  • general/operating expenses category, 10
  • goals
    • aligning with purpose of funding, 162–164
    • as component of program design section, 210
    • measurable and nonmeasurable, 211–214
    • objectives versus, 212–213
    • omiting in application, 278
    • writing about, 50, 213–215
  • Google Drive, 288
  • Google Scholar, 150
  • governing boards
    • building capacity of, 26–27
    • sustainability plan, 244–245
  • government funding
    • for academia, 109–111
    • agencies, 17
    • competitive grants, 13, 58, 64
    • conducting search on, 34
    • cooperative agreement awards, 8, 58
    • direct grants, 60–63
    • D-U-N-S number, 45, 74–75
    • eligibility for, 59
    • entitlement grant, 58
    • fiscal year, 67
    • forecasted funding announcements, 66
    • formula grant, 14, 58, 64
    • as grantor, 8, 12
    • for individuals, 101–104
    • international grantfunding opportunities, 117
    • key personnel section, 238
    • management plan, 238
    • for NGOs, 117
    • NOFAs
      • criteria, 134
      • determining eligibility and capability, 125–130
      • general terms, 130–132
      • overview, 17, 62, 123–124
      • program-specific terms, 130
      • reading, 124
      • terminology, 130–133
      • writing requirements on, 140–141
    • non-competitive, 68
    • opportunities for, 58–59
    • overview, 14–15, 57–58, 60–61
    • partnerships and, 43, 134–137
    • pass-through, 60–64
    • SAM.gov, 45
    • searching for opportunities for, 59–60
    • style of writing for, 188
    • waiting time for application, 291
  • government organizations, 73
  • grant agreements, 295, 301
  • grant applicant
    • compiling attachments before writing, 52–53
    • eligibility
      • grantor ensuring of applicant, 11
      • for grants, 11–12
      • for Grants.gov, 73–74
      • NOFAs and, 125–127
      • partnerships and, 43, 134–137
      • for state funding, 59
      • verifying, 125–126
    • fiscal responsibility of, 240–241, 302
    • foreign, 74, 119–120
    • information required of
      • amount requested, 46–47
      • dates for project, 46
      • geographic area served, 47
      • organization’s mission, 46
      • overview, 41–42
      • project name, 46
      • providing facts about organization, 42–45
      • purpose of request, 46
      • signatures, 47
      • storytelling with facts, 47–51
      • total project cost, 47
      • writing about project in need of funding, 45–47
    • letter of inquiry and, 19, 36–39
    • overview, 9
    • tab on Grants.gov, 72
    • writing Letter of Intent, 35–39
  • grant application form, 170
  • grant award notification, 292, 294–295
  • Grant Connect, 118
  • Grant Professionals Association, 328, 333
  • Grant Writing Training Foundation, 245
  • grantees
    • form rejection letter, 292–293, 295
    • grant award notification, 292, 294–295
    • initial approach and, 32
    • overview, 8–9
  • grantfunding plan, 28–31
  • grantors
    • adhering to writing guidelines set by, 184–185
    • building relationship with, 19
    • communicating with, 43, 59–60, 292
    • community reinvestment programs
      • building relationships with, 309–310
      • following up with, 316
      • making initial contact with, 309
      • overview, 307–308
      • sponsorship request form, 308
      • writing corporate letter request/letter proposal, 311–315
    • convincing
      • case studies, 200–204
      • researching relevant information, 198–200
    • defined, 8
    • denying request, 22
    • dissemination and, 230
    • ensuring eligibility of grant applicant, 11
    • goals versus objectives, 212
    • information requests of, 173–174
    • information required by
      • amount requested, 46–47
      • dates for project, 46
      • geographic area served, 47
      • organization’s mission, 46
      • overview, 41–42
      • project name, 46
      • providing facts about organization, 42–45
      • purpose of request, 46
      • signatures, 47
      • storytelling with facts, 47–51
      • total project cost, 47
      • writing about project in need of funding, 45–47
    • initial approach and, 32
    • overview, 8
    • tab on Grants.gov, 73
    • talking to potential, 35–36
    • writing about long-term impact of, 164–165
    • writing list of, 84
  • grants
    • accepting, 292, 294–295, 298–299
    • annual campaigns category, 9
    • building/renovation funds category, 9
    • capital support category, 9
    • cash commitments, 137
    • challenge monies category, 10
    • college scholarships, 98
    • competitive, 13, 58, 64
    • conferences/seminars category, 10
    • consulting services category, 10
    • continuing support/continuation category, 10
    • cooperative agreement awards and, 8, 58
    • determining whether to apply for, 127–130
    • direct, 60–63
    • e-grants
      • checking for guidelines, 322
      • confirming due date time and time zone, 323
      • filling in organizational information, 320
      • formatting, 322
      • graphics, 207, 322
      • overview, 319
      • page limits and page numbers, 141
      • re-creating template in word processor, 321
      • reviewing online application template, 320–321
      • setting up for, 319–320
      • submitting, 323
      • writing limitations, 321
    • eligibility
      • grantor ensuring of applicant, 11
      • for grants, 11–12
      • for Grants.gov, 73–74
      • NOFAs and, 125–127
      • partnerships and, 43, 134–137
      • for state funding, 59
      • verifying, 125–126
    • endowments, 10, 83
    • entitlements, 58
    • fellowships, 10, 98, 113–114
    • filing request for to foundations and corporations, 18–20
    • formula, 14, 58, 64
    • general/operating expenses category, 10
    • handling rejection to request, 303–306
    • for homebuyer, 99
    • in-kind contributions
      • finding corporations that award, 16
      • funding for personnel, 250
      • matching funds, 241–242, 261–262
      • receiving, 137
    • managing, 26, 299–300, 302–303
    • matching funds category, 10
    • for NGOs, 116–119
    • not for personal use, 7–8
    • overview, 7–12
    • preparing before applying for, 24–25
    • process after receiving, 26
    • program development category, 10
    • for research, 10, 99, 237
    • research websites, 89–92
    • returning, 265
    • reusing failed request, 305–306
    • scholarship funds, 11
    • seed money, 11
    • seeking, 27
    • specific funder-directed assistance grants, 98
    • student loans, 98
    • submitting request for, 16–21
    • technical assistance, 11
    • types of, 9–11
  • Grants Management System (GMS), 82
  • Grants.gov
    • accessing application package instructions, 77–78
    • APPLICANTS tab, 72
    • applying for SBIR and STTR grants, 102
    • archived funding opportunity, 66
    • assurances forms, 80–81
    • budget information forms, 80
    • CFDA number, 73, 77
    • closed funding opportunity, 66
    • conducting funding search in, 34
    • CONNECT tab, 73
    • D-U-N-S number, 45, 74–75
    • familiarizing oneself, 11
    • forecasted grantfunding opportunity, 66
    • FORMS tab, 73
    • HOME tab, 72
    • individuals, 76
    • international grantfunding opportunities, 117
    • LEARN GRANTS tab, 72
    • navigating, 64–65, 72–73
    • NOFAs
      • criteria, 134
      • determining eligibility and capability, 125–130
      • general terms, 130–132
      • overview, 17, 62, 123–124
      • program-specific terms, 130
      • reading, 124
      • terminology, 130–133
      • writing requirements on, 140–141
    • notifications from, 62
    • Opportunity Status listings, 66
    • organizations and, 74–76
    • overview, 71–72
    • published funding opportunity, 66
    • registering on, 74–76
    • SEARCH GRANTS tab, 72
    • SF-LLL form, 81–82
    • submitting application, 284–285
    • SUPPORT tab, 73
    • SYSTEM-TO-SYSTEM tab, 73
    • tutorials on workplace, 76–77
    • understanding grant applicant eligibility, 73–74
    • uploading required forms, 79–82
    • website, 14
  • GrantStation, 91–92
  • grantwriting
    • career in
      • becoming peer reviewer or research specialist, 332
      • determining fees for services as consultant, 327
      • getting certification, 328
      • getting consulting coach, 329
      • joining professional association, 328
      • joining team, 328
      • networking, 327, 329–330
      • overview, 325
      • salary ranges, 326–327
      • sharpening skills, 328
      • training, 325–326
      • using updated technology, 329
    • contacting private-sector funders, 94–95
    • contacting public-sector agencies, 13–15
    • continuing formal education, 334
    • end of process, 21–22
    • fiscal responsibility, 240–241, 302
    • importance of funding development plan, 12–13
    • importance of using updated information, 150–151
    • offering copyediting services, 333
    • overview, 7–12, 331
    • reviewing applications online, 334
    • software for, 95
    • terminology, 8–9
    • volunteering services, 332
    • working with experienced writer, 333
    • writing and publish articles, 334
  • guidelines
    • adhering to, 184–185
    • complying with, 170
    • e-grants, 322
    • government, 18
    • overview, 20, 36–38
    • reviewing for financial reporting, 301–302
  • GuideStar, 86–87, 113

H

  • Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), 110

I

  • impact objectives, 210, 218
  • implementation plan, 50, 210, 218–220
  • Independent Sector’s website, 242
  • indirect purpose statement, 211
  • individuals
    • grants for
      • application, 98–99
      • federal funding, 100–104
      • overview, 10–11
    • Grants.gov and, 74, 76
    • SBIR and STTR programs, 101–105
    • UEI and, 76
  • initial approach
    • importance of, 30
    • international funders and, 119
    • making initial contact with, 309
  • in-kind contributions
    • finding corporations that award, 16
    • funding for personnel, 250
    • matching funds, 241–242, 261–262
    • receiving, 137
  • Inputs column (logic model), 221–222
  • Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS), 110
  • institutional databases, 112
  • Instrumentl website, 91
  • internal evaluation, 225
  • International Center for Non-For-Profit Law (ICNL), 116
  • IRS 501(c)(3) letter, 281
  • IRS Form-990, 87–89

J

  • JustGrants, 82
  • Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program, 64

K

  • Key Contacts form, 78
  • key personnel section
    • accountability and responsibility, 238–240
    • adequacy of resources section, 241–242
    • articulating qualifications, 234–238
    • basic profile, 235–236
    • demonstrating federal compliance in, 242–244
    • fiscal responsibility, 240–241, 302
    • overview, 231–232, 276
    • presenting credentials of project management team, 232–234
    • profile for personnel paid by cash match, 238
    • profile with page limitations, 236–237
    • writing management plan, 239
    • writing sustainability statement, 244–245

L

  • LearningPath.org, 334
  • letter of inquiry, 19, 36–39
  • Letter of Intent, 35–39
  • letters of commitment, 52, 135, 282
  • Library of Congress (LC), 126
  • lobbyist, 81
  • logic model, 210, 220–223
  • Long-term impact or impact statement column (logic model), 221–222

M

  • management capacity, analyzing, 27
  • management plan section, 143–144, 239, 272, 276
  • maps, including in applications, 206
  • matching funds category, 10
  • measurable goals, 211–214
  • measurement tools, 224
  • Medicine Assistance Tool, 98
  • Memoranda of Agreement (MOAs), 24, 53, 133, 135, 137
  • Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), 24, 53, 133, 135, 137
  • mileage reimbursement, 251

N

  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), 110
  • National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), 111
  • National Digital Newspaper Program (NDNP), 126
  • National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), 111
  • National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), 111, 126
  • National Grants Management Association Annual Grants Training, 333
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 109
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH), 99, 110
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 109
  • National Science Foundation (NSF), 82, 99, 111
  • NOFA announcement. See Notice of Funding Availability announcement
  • non-competitive funding, 68
  • nonfederal resources, 80
  • nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)
    • acquiring status, 116
    • adapting to submission differences, 119–120
    • European Foundation Centre, 118
    • federal funding, 117
    • foreign, 74, 119–120
    • grants for, 116–119
    • Imagine Canada, 118–119
    • preparing budget, 120
    • proof or registration, 43
  • nonmeasurable goals, 213–214
  • nonprofit organizations
    • before applying for grant, 24–25
    • assessing capacity to seek grants, 27
    • building credibility of, 267–268
    • building governing board’s capacity, 26–27
    • EIN number, 75
    • as grant applicant category, 73
    • grantseeking readiness priorities for, 23–27
    • NOFAs, 132
    • procedures for risk management, 26
    • receiving grant, 26
    • resources for, 27
    • writing about
      • background/history of, 48
      • boilerplate information, 42–45, 185–188
      • facts, 42–45
      • mission of, 46
      • project in need of funding, 45–47, 50
      • providing EIN and TIN, 44, 75
      • requesting funding amount, 46–47
  • Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) announcement
    • criteria, 134
    • determining eligibility and capability, 125–130
    • general terms, 130–132
    • overview, 17, 62, 123–124
    • program-specific terms, 130
    • reading, 124
    • terminology, 130–133
    • writing requirements on, 140–141

O

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 111
  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 80, 258, 292, 301
  • Office of Naval Research (ONR), 110
  • Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), 110
  • Onehub, 288
  • online subscriptions to private-sector funders, 90–91
  • Open Philanthropy website, 117
  • organizations
    • analyzing capacity of, 27
    • AOR authorization, 75–76
    • building credibility of, 267–268
    • chart of, 239
    • conducting funding search, 34–35, 84–86, 89
    • current operating budget, 44
    • describing programs and activities of, 189–190
    • D-U-N-S number, 74–75
    • E-Biz POC, 75–76
    • EIN number, 75
    • funding plan, 27–31
    • increasing chances of obtaining grant, 32–35
    • letter of inquiry and, 19, 36–39
    • Letter of Intent and, 35–39
    • partnerships and
      • eligibility, 43, 134–137
      • writing about, 192–195
    • presenting milestones of, 187–188
    • procedures for risk management, 26
    • process of seeking and receiving grants, 23–27
    • for-profit, 73
    • providing signatures, 47
    • proving capability of to manage project, 148–149
    • registering on Grants.gov as, 74–76
    • resources for, 27
    • stating history, mission, values, and geographic logistics of, 186–187
    • talking to potential funders, 35–36
    • writing about
      • background/history of, 48
      • boilerplate information, 42–45, 185–188
      • facts, 42–45
      • history and capacity, 273–274
      • mission of, 46
      • project in need of funding, 45–47, 50
      • providing EIN and TIN, 44, 75
      • requesting funding amount, 46–47
  • outcome evaluation, 147, 226
  • Outputs column (logic model), 221–222
  • overhead costs, 258

P

  • page limits and page numbers, 141
  • pagination, 278
  • paid grant research websites, 89–92
  • partnerships
    • communicating with, 290
    • gaining eligibility, 43, 134–137
    • writing about, 192–195
  • pass-through funding, 60–64
  • peer review process
    • becoming reviewer, 332
    • complying with technical review requirements, 140–141
    • defined, 64, 124
    • demonstrating accountability with evaluation plan, 147–148
    • deploying analyzation acumen to meet scoring process, 144–145
    • determining number of pages in narrative sections, 142–144
    • developing expense budget, 149
    • Freedom of Information Act, 292
    • importance of, 142–145
    • incorporating models in program implementation strategies, 147
    • joining team, 153–154
    • key personnel section, 233
    • overview, 153–154
    • proving organization's capability to manage project, 148–149
    • requesting comments, 303–305
    • researching, writing, and validating statement of need, 146
    • using third-party evaluators, 152–153
    • validating needs and implementation strategies, 150–152
    • writing to requirements, 145–149
  • personnel profile, writing, 235–236
  • Philanthropy News Digest (Candid), 85
  • political advocates, enlisting, 67–69
  • pre-award and post-award phases, 24–26
  • preliminary documents
    • complying with application package requirements, 170
    • cover letters
      • checking required components, 272–273
      • defined, 79
      • overview, 170–173
    • executive summary narrative, 170, 177–179, 273
    • funder information requests, 173–174
    • SF-424, 77–79, 174–177
    • table of contents, 170, 179–181, 273
  • pre-review process, 140–141
  • presenting, credentials of project management team, 232–234
  • principal investigator (PI), 108, 233, 237
  • Private Funding for Arts and Humanities, 113
  • private-sector funders
    • for academia, 111–112
    • Candid and, 89
    • community reinvestment programs
      • building relationships with, 309–310
      • following up with, 316
      • making initial contact with, 309
      • overview, 307–308
      • sponsorship request form, 308
      • writing corporate letter request/letter proposal, 311–315
    • conducting funding search, 34–35, 84–86
    • contacting, 94–95
    • corporations
      • academia and, 111
      • community engagement from, 16
      • conducting search on, 84–86
      • filing request for grants to, 18–20
      • grants from, 16
    • following up on grant requests, 293–295
    • foundations
      • academia and, 111–112
      • awarding grants, 15
      • conducting search on, 84–86
      • filing request for grants to, 18–20
      • Form-990, 87–89
      • GuideStar, 86–87
      • private and public, 15
    • free versus paid grant research websites, 89–92
    • handling rejection from to grant request, 306
    • matching criteria of, 92–94
    • online grant research databases and, 91–92
    • overview, 83
    • subscribing to resources, 85–86, 90–91
  • process evaluation, 147
  • process objectives, 210, 216–217
  • ProFellow, 113
  • profile of personnel, writing, 236–238
  • Program, Service, or Activity (grantfunding plan), 28, 30
  • program design section
    • components of, 210
    • confirming content connectivity in logic model, 220–223
    • difference between types of goals and objectives, 212–213
    • implementation plan, 218–220
    • incorporating models in, 147
    • peer review, 143–144
    • purpose of this request statement, 161–165
    • purpose statement, 211
    • SMART objectives
      • aligning with purpose of funding, 162–164
      • as component of program design section, 210
      • omiting in application, 278
      • overview, 50, 215–218
    • writing, 274–275
    • writing about goals, 213–215
    • writing evaluation plan for
      • data collection and analysis, 224
      • dissemination, 230
      • evaluations, 225–229
      • overview, 223–224, 229–230
      • qualitative versus quantitative, 226
      • terminology, 224–226
  • program development category, 10
  • Project Abstract Summary form, 78
  • project administrator, 233
  • project management statement, 148
  • Project Narrative Attachment Form, 78
  • Project SAFE grant program, 127
  • projects
    • defined, 108
    • determining whether to take on, 126–127
    • evaluation plan for
      • data collection and analysis, 224
      • evaluations, 225–228
      • evaluators, 225, 228–229
      • overview, 223–224, 229–230
      • qualitative versus quantitative, 226
      • terminology, 224–226
    • including income from, 264–265
    • key personnel section
      • accountability and responsibility, 238–240
      • adequacy of resources section, 241–242
      • articulating qualifications, 234–238
      • basic profile, 235–236
      • demonstrating federal compliance in, 242–244
      • fiscal responsibility, 240–241, 302
      • management plan, 239
      • overview, 231–232
      • presenting credentials of project management team, 232–234
      • profile for personnel paid by cash match, 238
      • profile with page limitations, 236–237
      • sustainability statement, 244–245
    • management plan section, 143–144, 239, 272, 276
    • overfunded, 302–303
    • writing about
      • capability of organization, 148–149
      • giving dates for the, 132
      • overview, 45–47
      • significance, 50
      • sustainability, 51
  • proof of tax-exempt status (attachment), 52
  • public-sector grants
    • for academia, 109–111
    • cooperative agreement awards, 8, 58
    • enlisting political advocates, 67–69
    • government funding
      • for academia, 109–111
      • agencies, 17
      • competitive grants, 13, 58, 64
      • conducting search on, 34
      • cooperative agreement awards, 8, 58
      • direct grants, 60–63
      • D-U-N-S number, 45, 74–75
      • eligibility for, 59
      • entitlement grant, 58
      • fiscal year, 67
      • forecasted funding announcements, 66
      • formula grant, 14, 58, 64
      • as grantor, 8, 12
      • for individuals, 101–104
      • international grantfunding opportunities, 117
      • key personnel section, 238
      • management plan, 238
      • for NGOs, 117
      • non-competitive, 68
      • opportunities for, 58–59
      • overview, 14–15, 57–58, 60–61
      • partnerships and, 43, 134–137
      • pass-through, 60–64
      • SAM.gov, 45
      • searching for opportunities for, 59–60
      • style of writing for, 188
      • waiting time for application, 291
    • for individuals, 101–104
  • purpose of funding statement, 126, 161
  • purpose statement, 210–211

R

  • Request (grantfunding plan), 29–30
  • Request for Applications (RFAs), 17, 62
  • Request for Proposals (RFPs), 17, 62
  • research grants, 10, 99, 237
  • research specialist, becoming, 332
  • resolution, writing, 298
  • Responsibilities of board committees website, 27
  • retirees, as third-party evaluators, 152
  • RFP Bulletin (Candid), 85
  • risk management, procedures for, 26

S

  • salary ranges in grantwriting, 326–327
  • SAM.gov, 45, 75–76
  • scholarships, 11, 98
  • seed money, 11
  • set of specific aims, 108
  • 7(j) Management and Technical Assistance Program, 101, 104
  • SF-424 (Application for Federal Assistance) form
    • filling in, 77–79
    • overview, 170, 174–177
  • SF-424-A (Budget Information for Non-Construction Programs), 78
  • SF-LLL (Disclosure of Lobbying Activities) form, 78, 81–82
  • Short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes column (logic model), 221–222
  • single audit trail, 302
  • Small Business Administration (SBA), 74, 101
  • Small Business Development Center Directory, 101
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, 101–105
  • Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) program, 101–105
  • small businesses
    • business plan competition, 100–101
    • federal funding for, 101–104
    • grants for, 98–99, 103
  • SMART objectives
    • aligning with purpose of funding, 162–164
    • as component of program design section, 210
    • omiting in application, 278
    • overview, 50, 215–218
  • soft cash match, 261–262
  • specialized allocation, 263
  • specific funder-directed assistance grants, 98
  • specific period of performance, 108
  • specific scope of work, 108
  • SPIN database, 112
  • sponsored programs, 108, 112–113
  • sponsorship request form, 308
  • stakeholders, staying connected to, 288–290
  • stakeholder’s evaluation, 227
  • State Single Point of Contact (SPOC), 177
  • statement of need
    • case studies and, 200–204
    • points in peer review, 143
    • researching, 146, 198–200
    • writing, 274
  • Status/Results (grantfunding plan), 29–30
  • storytelling with facts, 47–51
  • Strategic planning for sustainability website, 27
  • Strategies column (logic model), 221–222
  • student loans, 98
  • submittal process
    • accessing application instructions, 77–78
    • adapting to differences in, 119–120
    • assembling attachments, 280–282
    • avoiding editing mistakes, 277–279
    • capability-related documents, 280–281
    • checking required components
      • abstract summary narrative, 273
      • budget summary, 277
      • cover materials, 272–273
      • equity statement, 272, 276
      • evaluation and dissemination, 275–276
      • executive summary narrative, 273
      • IRS 501(c)(3) letter, 281
      • management plan, 272, 276
      • narrative detail, 277
      • organization history and capability, 273–274
      • pre-narrative forms, 273
      • program design section, 274–275
      • statement of need, 274
      • sustainability plan, 276
      • table of contents, 273
    • creating checklist, 272
    • determining whether request is under review, 294
    • e-grants
      • checking for guidelines, 322
      • confirming due date time and time zone, 323
      • filling in organizational information, 320
      • formatting, 322
      • graphics, 207, 322
      • overview, 319
      • page limits and page numbers, 141
      • re-creating template in word processor, 321
      • reviewing online application template, 320–321
      • setting up for, 319–320
      • submitting, 323
      • writing limitations, 321
    • financial documents, 281–282
    • getting form rejection letter, 292–293, 295
    • getting grant award notification, 292, 294–295
    • hard-copy, 79
    • keeping accessible copies of attachments, 287–288
    • overview, 16–20, 282–285, 287
    • paying attention to protocol, 283
    • peer review
      • becoming reviewer, 332
      • complying with technical review requirements, 140–141
      • defined, 64, 124
      • demonstrating accountability with evaluation plan, 147–148
      • deploying analyzation acumen to meet scoring process, 144–145
      • determining number of pages in narrative sections, 142–144
      • developing expense budget, 149
      • Freedom of Information Act, 292
      • importance of, 142–145
      • incorporating models in program implementation strategies, 147
      • joining team, 153–154
      • key personnel section, 233
      • proving organization's capability to manage project, 148–149
      • requesting comments, 303–305
      • researching, writing, and validating statement of need, 146
      • using third-party evaluators, 152–153
      • validating needs and implementation strategies, 150–152
      • writing to requirements, 145–149
    • staying connected to stakeholders, 288–290
    • supporting documentation, 282
    • tracking status of, 20–21, 78, 285, 291–292
    • uploading forms to Grants.gov, 79–82
    • win or lose communications plan
      • accepting grants, 298–299
      • failed foundation or corporate funding requests, 306
      • managing grants, 299–300, 302–303
      • overview, 297
      • rejection to grant request, 303–306
      • requesting peer review comments, 303–305
      • reusing failed grant request, 305–306
      • reviewing guidelines for financial reporting, 301–302
      • writing resolution, 298
  • subscription-based databases, 112–113
  • summative evaluation, 226
  • supporting documentation, 282
  • sustainability statement
    • budgets and, 144
    • Strategic planning for sustainability website, 27
    • writing, 51, 244–245, 276
  • System for Award Management (SAM), 75

T

  • table of contents, 170, 179–181, 273
  • target population members, 12
  • taxpayer identification number (TIN), 44
  • technical review process, 140–141, 145
  • third person, writing in, 188
  • third-party evaluators, 152–153, 225
  • timeline, 50, 218–220

U

  • Unique Entity Identifier (UEI), 76
  • United States Agency for International Development (USAID), 111
  • United States Institute of Peace (USIP), 111
  • USAMRMC (Army Medical Research and Development Command), 110
  • USDA (Department of Agriculture), 109, 127

V

  • validating
    • implementation strategies, 150–152
    • presenting needs and, 157–160
    • statement of need
      • case studies, 200–204
      • researching, 146, 198–200
    • target population, 191–192
  • volunteers, 257

W

  • win or lose communications plan
    • accepting grants, 298–299
    • failed foundation or corporate funding requests, 306
    • managing grants, 299–300, 302–303
    • overview, 297
    • rejection to grant request, 303–306
    • requesting peer review comments, 303–305
    • reusing failed grant request, 305–306
    • reviewing guidelines for financial reporting, 301–302
    • writing resolution, 298
  • W.K. Kellogg website, 223
  • Workplace tutorials, Grants.gov, 76–77
  • writing
    • about benefits to participants, 218
    • about long-term impact of funder’s investment, 164–165
    • about organization
      • adequacy of resources, 51
      • background/history of, 48
      • boilerplate information, 185–188
      • capability to manage project, 148–149
      • complying with guidelines, 36–38
      • goals, 50, 213–215
      • management plan, 51
      • milestones, 187–188
      • mission of, 46
      • overview, 42–45
      • programs and activities of, 50, 189–190
      • providing EIN and TIN, 44
      • storytelling with facts, 47–51
      • structure of, 42, 51–52
    • about partnerships, 192–195
    • about projects
      • citing sources, 49
      • dissemination of findings, 51
      • expense budget, 149
      • overview, 45–47
      • proposal, 17
      • providing name of, 46
      • requesting funding amount, 46–47
      • significance of, 50
      • sustainability, 51
      • target population, 47, 191–192
      • timeframe for, 46, 50
      • total cost of, 47
    • abstract summary narrative, 170, 177–179, 273
    • adhering to guidelines, 184–185
    • articles about grantwriting, 334
    • avoiding mistakes in, 279
    • boosting credibility with, 192–195
    • case studies, 48, 160–161
    • citing sources, 146, 207
    • compiling attachments before, 52–53
    • corporate letter request/letter proposal, 311–315
    • cover letters
      • checking required components, 272–273
      • defined, 79
      • overview, 170–173
    • creativity in, 156–160
    • determining number of pages, 142–144
    • dissemination plan, 225, 275–276
    • evaluation plan
      • data collection and analysis, 224
      • demonstrating accountability with, 147–148
      • evaluations, 225–228
      • evaluators, 225, 228–229
      • meeting scoring process, 144–145
      • overview, 223–224, 229–230
      • qualitative versus quantitative, 226
      • terminology, 224–226
    • executive summary narrative, 170, 177–179, 273
    • in first person versus third person, 188
    • font type and size, 141, 279
    • graphics and, 205–207
    • to international funders, 119
    • key personnel section
      • accountability and responsibility, 238–240
      • adequacy of resources section, 241–242
      • articulating qualifications, 234–238
      • basic profile, 235–236
      • demonstrating federal compliance in, 242–244
      • fiscal responsibility, 240–241, 302
      • management plan, 239
      • overview, 231–232
      • presenting credentials of project management team, 232–234
      • profile for personnel paid by cash match, 238
      • profile with page limitations, 236–237
      • sustainability statement, 244–245
    • letter of inquiry, 19, 36–39
    • Letter of Intent, 35–39
    • letters of commitment, 52, 135, 282
    • line spacing, 141
    • list of grantors, 84
    • management plan section, 143–144, 239, 272, 276
    • narrative, 140
    • overview, 155
    • to peer review requirements, 145–149
    • presenting need with validation, 157–160
    • program design section
      • components of, 210
      • confirming content connectivity in logic model, 220–223
      • data collection and analysis, 224
      • difference between types of goals and objectives, 212–213
      • dissemination, 230
      • evaluation plan, 223–224
      • evaluations, 225–229
      • goals, 213–215
      • implementation plan, 218–220
      • incorporating models in, 147
      • overview, 161–165, 274–275
      • peer review, 143–144
      • purpose of this request statement, 161–165
      • purpose statement, 211
      • qualitative versus quantitative, 226
      • terminology, 224–226
    • purpose of this request statement, 161
    • resolution, 298
    • SMART objectives
      • aligning with purpose of funding, 162–164
      • as component of program design section, 210
      • omiting in application, 278
      • overview, 50, 215–218
    • statement of need, 143
      • case studies, 200–204
      • researching, 146
      • researching recent and relevant information, 198–200
    • stating history, mission, values, and geographic logistics of organization, 186–187
    • storytelling, 156–160
    • style of for government grants, 188
    • table of contents, 170, 179–181, 273
    • validating needs and implementation strategies, 150–152
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.218.188.95