Network intrusions and footprints

Consider a scenario where we have received a PCAP file for analysis and some logs from a Linux server. By analyzing the file in Wireshark, we get the following packet data:

It looks like the data belongs to the Secure Shell (SSH), and, by browsing through the Statistics | Conversations in Wireshark, we get the following:

There are mainly two hosts present on the PCAP file, which are 192.168.153.130 and 192.168.153.141. We can see that the destination port is 22, which is a commonly used port for SSH. However, this doesn't look like a standard SSH connection, as the source port is different and are in plenty. Moreover, the port numbers are not from the well-known (1-1024) and registered set of ports (1024-41951). This behavior is quite common for a example for brute force attacks.

However, we are currently not sure. Let's scroll through the PCAP and investigate more, as follows:

Plenty of key exchanges are happening, as we can see from the preceding screenshot. However, there isn't a sure shot way to figure out whether the attacker succeeded in conducting a brute-force attack or not.

We can compare lengths, but different servers may send out different information, so it won't be that reliable.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.220.16.184