63
Bibliography
Ahn, J. W., Brusilovsky, P., He, D., Grady, J., and Li, Q. (2008). Personalized web exploration with
task models. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp.
1–10). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1367497.1367499. 7
Aula, A., Khan, R. M., and Guan, Z. (2010). How does search behavior change as search becomes
more dicult? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems (pp. 35–44). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753333. 11, 27
Azzopardi, L. (2014). Modelling interaction with economic models of search. In Proceedings of the
37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information
Retrieval (pp. 3–12). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2600428.2609574. 52
Azzopardi, L., Kelly, D., and Brennan, K. (2013). How query cost aects search behavior. In Pro-
ceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in
Information Retrieval (pp. 23–32). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2484028.2484049. 7
Bateman, S., Teevan, J., and White, R. W. (2012). e search dashboard: How reection and com-
parison impact search behavior. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors
in Computing Systems (pp. 1785–1794). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2207676.2208311. 31, 46
Belkin, N. J. (1990). e cognitive viewpoint in information science. Journal of Information Science,
16(1), 11-15. DOI: 10.1177/016555159001600104. 1, 2
Belkin, N. J. (2000). Helping people nd what they don’t know. Communications of the ACM, 43(8),
58-61. DOI: 10.1145/345124.345143. 13
Belkin, N. J. (2008). Some (what) grand challenges for information retrieval. In ACM SIGIR Forum,
42(1), 47–54. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1394251.1394261. 15, 53
Belkin, N. J. (2015). Salton award lecture: people, interacting with information. In Proceedings of
the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information
Retrieval (pp. 1–2). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2766462.2767854. 16 , 57
Belkin, N., Dumais, S., Scholtz, J., and Wilkinson, R. (2004). Evaluating interactive information
retrieval systems: Opportunities and challenges. In CHI’04 Extended Abstracts on Human
Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1594–1595). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/985921.986162. 13
64 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Borisov, A., Kiseleva, J., Markov, I., and de Rijke, M. (2018). Calibration: A simple way to improve
click models. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and
Knowledge Management (pp. 1503–1506). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3269206.3269260. 52
Borlund, P. (2016). A study of the use of simulated work task situations in interactive information
retrieval evaluations: A meta-evaluation. Journal of Documentation, 72(3), 394–413.DOI:
10.1108/JD-06-2015-0068. 30
Bron, M., Van Gorp, J., Nack, F., Baltussen, L. B., and de Rijke, M. (2013). Aggregated search
interface preferences in multi-session search tasks. In Proceedings of the 36th Interna-
tional ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp.
123–132). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2484028.2484050. 35, 40, 47
Büschel, W., Mitschick, A., and Dachselt, R. (2018). Here and now: Reality-based information
retrieval: Perspective paper. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information
Interaction and Retrieval (pp. 171–180). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3176349.3176384. 8
Byström, K. and Hansen, P. (2005). Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. Journal
of the American Society for Information science and Technology, 56(10), 1050–1061. DOI:
10.1002/asi.20197. 30, 39, 52
Capra, R., Arguello, J., Crescenzi, A., and Vardell, E. (2015). Dierences in the use of search assis-
tance for tasks of varying complexity. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR
Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 23–32). ACM. DOI:
10.1145/2766462.2767741. 21
Capra, R., Arguello, J., O’Brien, H., Li, Y., and Choi, B. (2018). e eects of manipulating task
determinability on search behaviors and outcomes. In the 41st International ACM SIGIR
Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 445–454). ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/3209978.3210047. 30
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded eory. Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA. 21
Chen, Y., Zhou, K., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., and Ma, S. (2017). Meta-evaluation of online and oine
Web search evaluation metrics. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Con-
ference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 463–472). ACM. DOI:
10.1145/3077136.3080804. 13, 26, 34
Cole, M. J., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C., Belkin, N. J., and Zhang, X. (2013). Inferring user knowledge level
from eye movement patterns. Information Processing and Management, 49(5), 1075–1091.
DOI: 10.1145/2637002.2637011. 2, 28, 34
65BIBLIOGRAPHY
Cole, M. J., Hendahewa, C., Belkin, N. J., and Shah, C. (2015). User activity patterns during in-
formation search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 33(1), 1. DOI:
10.1145/2699656. 20. 20
Cole, M. J., Hendahewa, C., Belkin, N. J., and Shah, C. (2014). Discrimination between tasks
with user activity patterns during information search. In Proceedings of the 37th Interna-
tional ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp.
567–576). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2600428.2609591. 7, 47
Cole, M., Liu, J., Belkin, N., Bierig, R., Gwizdka, J., Liu, C., Zhang, J. and Zhang, X. (2009). Use-
fulness as the criterion for evaluation of interactive information retrieval. In Proceedings
of the ird Workshop on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval (HCIR),
1–4. DOI: 10.1.1.221.1557&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=7. 47
Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews. Sage Publications:
Newbury Park, CA. 15
Deveaud, R., Mothe, J., Ullah, M. Z., and Nie, J. Y. (2018). Learning to adaptively rank document
retrieval system congurations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 37(1),
3. DOI: 10.1145/3231937. 3
Dumais, S., Cutrell, E., Cadiz, J. J., Jancke, G., Sarin, R., and Robbins, D. C. (2016). Stu I’ve seen:
A system for personal information retrieval and re-use. In ACM SIGIR Forum, 49(2), pp.
28–35). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2888422.2888425. 12
Edwards, A. and Kelly, D. (2017). Engaged or frustrated? Disambiguating emotional state in search.
In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Develop-
ment in Information Retrieval (pp. 125–134). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3077136.3080818. 8,
10, 18, 34, 42, 43
Eickho, C., Dungs, S., and Tran, V. (2015). An eye-tracking study of query reformulation. In Pro-
ceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in
Information Retrieval (pp. 13–22). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2766462.2767703. 34
Eugster, M. J., Ruotsalo, T., Spapé, M. M., Kosunen, I., Barral, O., Ravaja, N., Jacucci, G. and Kaski,
S. (2014). Predicting term-relevance from brain signals. In Proceedings of the 37th Interna-
tional ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp.
425–434). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2600428.2609594. 34
Feild, H. and Allan, J. (2013). Task-aware query recommendation. In Proceedings of the 36th Interna-
tional ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp.
83–92). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2484028.2484069. 3
66 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ferro, N., Fuhr, N., Järvelin, K., Kando, N., Lippold, M., and Zobel, J. (2016). Increasing repro-
ducibility in IR: ndings from the Dagstuhl Seminar on reproducibility of data-ori-
ented experiments in e-science. In ACM SIGIR Forum, 50(1), pp. 68–82). ACM. DOI:
10.1145/2964797.2964808. 55
Ferro, N. and Kelly, D. (2018). SIGIR initiative to implement ACM artifact review and badging.
In ACM SIGIR Forum, 52(1), pp. 4–10). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3274784.3274786. 55
Gwizdka, J. (2010). Distribution of cognitive load in web search. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science and Technology, 61(11), 2167–2187. DOI: 10.1002/asi.21385. 11, 56
Gwizdka, J., Hosseini, R., Cole, M., and Wang, S. (2017). Temporal dynamics of eye‐tracking and
EEG during reading and relevance decisions. Journal of the Association for Information
Science and Technology, 68(10), 2299–2312. DOI: 10.1002/asi.23904.
Gwizdka, J. and Mostafa, J. (2017). NeuroIIR: Challenges in bringing neuroscience to re-
search in human-information interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on
Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (pp. 437–438). ACM. DOI:
10.1145/3020165.3022165. 48, 52
Gwizdka, J. and Zhang, Y. (2015). Dierences in eye-tracking measures between visits and revisits
to relevant and irrelevant web pages. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR
Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 811–814). ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/2766462.2767795. 34, 48
Harvey, M. and Pointon, M. (2017). Searching on the go: the eects of fragmented attention on
mobile web search tasks. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Confer-
ence on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 155–164). ACM. DOI:
10.1145/3077136.3080770. 32
He, J. and Yilmaz, E. (2017). User behaviour and task characteristics: A eld study of daily infor-
mation behaviour. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information
Interaction and Retrieval (pp. 67–76). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3020165.3020188. 7, 19, 21,
30, 33
Hong, S. R., Suh, M. M., Henry Riche, N., Lee, J., Kim, J., and Zachry, M. (2018). Collaborative
dynamic queries: Supporting distributed small group decision-making. In Proceedings of
the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 66). ACM. DOI:
10.1145/3173574.3173640. 12
Htun, N. N., Halvey, M., and Baillie, L. (2017). An interface for supporting asynchronous
multi-level collaborative information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on
67BIBLIOGRAPHY
Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (pp. 225–234). ACM. DOI:
10.1145/3020165.3020172. 46
Huvila, I. (2008). Work and work roles: A context of tasks. Journal of Documentation, 64(6), 797–
815. DOI: 10.1108/00220410810912406. 39
Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a
cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3–50. DOI: 10.1108/eb026960. 2, 57
Jansen, M., Bos, W., van der Vet, P., Huibers, T., and Hiemstra, D. (2010). TeddIR: Tangible
information retrieval for children. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on
Interaction Design and Children (pp. 282–285). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1810543.1810592. 1
Jiang, J., He, D., and Allan, J. (2014). Searching, browsing, and clicking in a search session: Changes
in user behavior by task and over time. In Proceedings of the 37th International ACM
SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 607–616).
ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2600428.2609633. 11
Jiang, J., He, D., and Allan, J. (2017). Comparing in situ and multidimensional relevance judgments.
In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Develop-
ment in Information Retrieval (pp. 405–414). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3077136.3080840. 3,
13, 48, 49, 53, 61
Jiang, Z., Wen, J. R., Dou, Z., Zhao, W. X., Nie, J. Y., and Yue, M. (2017). Learning to diversify
search results via subtopic attention. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR
Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 545–554). ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/3077136.3080805.
Kamvar, M. and Baluja, S. (2006). A large-scale study of wireless search behavior: Google mobile
search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
(pp. 701–709). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1124772.1124877. 1
Kato, M. P., Yamamoto, T., Ohshima, H., and Tanaka, K. (2014). Investigating users’ query formu-
lations for cognitive search intents. In Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR
Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 577–586). ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/2600428.2609566. 7
Kelly, D. (2009). Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users. Foun-
dations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 3(1–2), 1-224. DOI: 10.1561/1500000012. 1,
2, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 20, 21, 27, 38, 57
Kelly, D., Arguello, J., Edwards, A., and Wu, W. C. (2015). Development and evaluation of search
tasks for IIR experiments using a cognitive complexity framework. In Proceedings of the
..................Content has been hidden....................
You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.