There are a number of problems associated with implementing major organizational changes. Managers who are not sensitive to these problems and attempt to implement organizational changes in an autocratic manner will find themselves imposing an enormous cost on the organization, as well as to the individuals involved and, indeed, to the very objectives that they had hoped to accomplish. Oxtoby, McGuiness, and Morgan (2002) note that people generally do not destroy what they themselves have created. This explains why it is important to implement change from within instead of importing a model for organizational change from elsewhere.
Management should provide an analysis indicating the need for organizational change and articulating the objectives and goals that need to be achieved as a result of this change. Implementation of major changes in an organization can present significant problems and must be dealt with in such a way as to minimize their adverse impact on organization effectiveness.
Nadler (1982, p. 449) identified three major problems that occur when implementing major organizational changes:
Since change represents some uncertainty, it has an impact on the stability and security of the individuals affected. For the individual, this could mean finding new ways of coping with new situations and new environments.
Change can cause people to fall into six readiness states (Hritz, 2008). The six states are:
Indifference. Seeing no need to change. This may result in behaviors such as apathy, disregard, and unwillingness to produce change.
Rejection. Unwilling to change. This might result in behaviors such as fear of change, refusal to change, challenging the business case of change, and discouragement of others from changing.
Doubt. Looking at the downside. Behaviors may include skepticism, suspicion, hesitancy, or even questioning.
Neutrality. Willingness to participate but unlikely to initiate change. May be seen as indecisive, and noncommitted.
Experimentation. Providing momentum for change but unknowingly doing so. Can be seen as willing to participate and move change forward.
Commitment. Embracing change. With regard to behavior they will be eager to learn and perform change.
Organizational change may alter the existing system of management control and may change some of the existing power distribution. Organizational change may also make it difficult to monitor performance and make corrections during the transitions.
Since an organization is in a way a political system consisting of different individuals, groups, and coalitions holding and competing for power, an organizational change that alters the power distribution is likely to cause some political activity.
Implications and specific action steps to overcome the problems are identified in table 13.1. Each situation is different and each organization is unique with regard to its history, individuals involved, and specific problems being addressed by the organizational change. Consequently, the general action steps suggested can serve only as a guide for developing an organizational change plan and strategy.
3.145.107.66