Every interaction you have is going to be different, but your best chance of success is to understand the vital part you play in your communication. You can’t just talk, focus only on your own agenda, have no clear point and expect the listener to do all the work.
The first step to being a great communicator is to take responsibility for the experience you are creating when you speak. To be a great communicator you must do three things:
We communicate every single day to:
Too often, the communication doesn’t achieve its goal and fails. More often than not, we open our mouths and words come tumbling out. The right words, the wrong words and everything in between. Words we hadn’t planned, words we didn’t mean and sometimes words we wish we could take back.
We open our mouth and we talk. And it is the talking that gets us into trouble.
Words have a great power. Every time you speak you have the potential to build or un-build a relationship.
It is for this reason you need to:
You also need to plan to pause, plan to listen and plan what questions you will ask.
Finally, you need to plan for the unexpected – plan to manage your emotion and plan for the worst-case scenario.
Phew! That is a lot of planning, I know. I love planning (seriously, I do), but I realise this is not a universal feeling so let me change the word ‘plan’ for you in the hope of making this as easy as possible.
Think. You simply need to think before you talk. That’s it.
Most people’s approach to verbal communication is to talk without thinking. You must change this fundamental approach if it is yours. You must stop and think before you speak.
You must move from simply speaking in a freestyle manner, with no consideration for your words or their impact, and begin to prepare your communication, your everyday business interactions, in a listener-focused way.
The talking approach to communication happens when the speaker:
Listener-focused communication happens when the speaker:
It is your communication. You must own it. Be clear on the purpose, the point and the path before you speak.
‘Handle words with care. They may damage you as well as others.’
TASNEEM HAMEED
Great communication is an active process that involves engagement, energy and movement.
The purpose of great communication is to get your listener from one point to another in the best possible way. To do this you must:
To achieve this you must consider your listener and how you are going to connect with them.
You can do this in three ways:
One of my favourite shows on television at the moment is called Criminal Minds. It is about a special team of FBI profilers who analyse criminals to determine their next move so that they can catch them.
They begin by understanding all they can about the criminal. They look at their past behaviour, emotions and circumstances to figure out how they will behave in the future. They gather as much information as they can about the criminal. This is the art of profiling someone.
Profiling is about understanding someone, how they think and what is important to them. To be a great communicator you must profile your listener before you speak.
You must gain an understanding of where they are coming from, what your communication will mean to them and how they might react to it, before you speak.
Profiling is about getting into someone’s head, standing in their shoes and understanding where your listener is at before you speak.
Your listeners will always fall into one of three categories:
This is someone who is already doing, thinking or feeling the things you want them to before you speak.
The converted may feature in business scenarios like these:
The converted may be present when you communicate but they are not your primary listener.
When your listener is in this position they can’t be converted.
‘We were on a break!’
As well as Criminal Minds, I also watch re-runs of Friends on TV. If you do too you will know Ross and Rachel and their on-again/off-again relationship in the sitcom.
On one of their most memorable breaks, Ross went off with another woman. Rachel saw this as a betrayal because they only broke up for one night. Ross maintained they were ‘on a break’ and he did not betray her.
This was to become a recurring fight as, despite Rachel trying to convince Ross otherwise, he stood firm right to the end that he did nothing wrong as they were ‘on a break’.
Ross is an example of the unconvertible (as is Rachel). No matter what anyone said, they both held their positions.
If we look at our business scenarios from the unconvertible position, this is what they look like:
You will come across unconvertibles in your work life. The usual reason they are unconvertible is because your information has no impact on them whatsoever at that time.
The key message I want to deliver to you on this is: when someone is in this unconvertible position in relation to your communication, it means they cannot be converted at this time on this topic.
You may still deliver your messages and give them your information. They may listen and understand, yet still not do what you hoped. They may not listen to you at all.
You can give your information to an unconvertible but you can’t expect them to convert.
The floaters are the group open to being communicated with, and your aim is to turn them into the converted.
A floater will listen to you. A floater will engage with you. A floater can be converted, convinced and changed.
But… there is a ‘but’.
You still have to do the work to make the movement from floater to converted happen. You must figure out why the person is still floating and what information they need to be converted.
Let’s look at our scenarios one more time:
To convert your floater you must give them more information or explain to them what they don’t understand. You must figure out what questions they have about your topic, before you speak, and you must answer them as simply and clearly as possible.
Any listener you ever find yourself in front of will listen to you for three reasons only:
Probably the biggest mistake I see made by the people I work with is that they speak assuming they have the interest of the listener.
They guess, often wrongly, that the listener knows the relevance and importance of the information to be communicated. They assume the listener is genuinely interested. They protest that the listener should be interested.
Maybe the listener will listen, maybe they won’t. Maybe they should, maybe they shouldn’t. Maybe they know the importance of the message, maybe they don’t. The truth is, you really have no idea or control if you rely on interest alone. So don’t.
Don’t place the burden on the listener to listen. Instead place it on you, the speaker, to give the reason to listen.
Your listener will only listen to you if there is a reason for them to listen.
If that is not genuine interest on their part, you, the speaker, must provide the reason to listen in the form of a benefit (gain) or negative consequence (loss) if the listener doesn’t listen.
When you are about to communicate in any situation, the person you are talking to has two simple questions in their mind:
In other words… Why should I listen?
Listeners decide if something is worth listening to very quickly: they decide if they care about your communication in the first 45 seconds.
You must tell you listener clearly and simply in the first 45 seconds why they should listen to you. You must tell them why your information is of value to them or tell them the gain or the loss for them. You must do this in the first 45 seconds of your communication so you can hook them into the conversation.
Many people do not prepare for their day-to-day interactions. As a result they speak off the cuff. Talking off the cuff can lead to a style of communication where you give a lot of background information and general facts before you actually get to the point you are making. By many listeners this is judged as waffling or rambling. Some, and I mean some, of this background information may be helpful or relevant but it is probably still in the wrong place.
The theoretical term for giving background information and reversing your way into your key point is deductive reasoning.
This means talking from the general to the more specific:
Deductive reasoning is a very legitimate approach to communication, but you really must ask yourself if your listener is going to wait until the end to get what they need. Would you wait?
I believe the answer is sometimes. Sometimes you will have a listener who does not mind this approach and is happy or willing to listen to the detailed background. I also believe there are many listeners who just want you to get to the point and get to the point fast. There are many who feel their precious time is being wasted when you use this approach. There are also many listeners who don’t even know why they should be listening to you in the first place. For this reason it is essential to hook them in at the beginning by telling them the relevance and value of your information before you go into detail.
If you wish to engage a listener and get their attention, you need to turn the triangle the right way around.
This is what is called inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning moves from the specific to the more general yet relevant material. You must start with your most relevant and engaging point for your listener at the beginning. You can then go into detail explaining your point and backing it up for your listener.
This way the listener knows why they are listening and what’s in it for them from the start.
This is a great start. This is the right start.
Now you have their attention.
Now you have a chance.
We see the world not as it is but as it is for us. Our view of the world can be as unique as our finger print.
We can only see the world from the part of the window we are looking out from and this can be different for all of us. A vital element of great communication is to try and see the world through someone else’s part of the window, as well as our own.
Why?
Because communication, at its very core, by its very definition, is about creating understanding and being understood. In order to do this we must be able to empathise. We must work to see with another’s eyes, hear with another’s ears and feel with another’s heart.
This is the ability to understand what others might be feeling and thinking. It is the ability to view the world through another person’s eyes.
If you behave in an empathetic way towards someone, what you are doing is validating them. It says to another person that you have heard what they said, you see them and understand their viewpoint.
When you fail to empathise, you are failing to validate another person’s view from their window.
This means you are actually rejecting the person you are speaking to. Not empathising when someone speaks is like putting your hand over their mouth when they are talking. Real connection is therefore impossible.
‘Empathy fuels connection. Sympathy drives disconnection.’
DR BRENE BROWN
Empathising does not mean you agree or disagree. It simply means you see, hear, feel and understand how it is for someone else.
Sympathy is feeling for: sympathy and empathy are both acts of feeling, but with sympathy you feel for the person – you’re sorry for them or pity them, but you don’t specifically understand what they’re feeling.
Empathy is feeling with: empathy is feeling with the person. It means you have a good sense of what they feel and you understand their feelings as far as is possible.
Sympathy is acknowledging there is another part of the window that someone might look through, but empathy is actually being able to see the world through that window pane.
One of the ways you can display empathy is through active listening, which we will explore in our next section.
Our everyday interactions involve three elements:
These three elements are woven together inextricably to make up our daily conversations.
I would like to take each element and give you some insight into the skills of speaking, questioning and listening.
Speaking is the part where you have something to say – a message to deliver or a story to tell.
Most people I work with tell me they are not good at delivering a point or message, because they:
The truth is, too often this self-diagnosis is correct. I continually meet individuals who make the mistakes listed above.
The good news is, there is a very simple reason why they can’t deliver a clear point or message: they are not preparing a clear point before they speak.
I am going to repeat that again as it is very important.
You can’t deliver a clear point if you haven’t prepared one… and preparing in your head doesn’t count.
Mulling it over in your head, believing you know what you are going to say in your mind, will never materialise into clear, concise spoken communication. There are many different ways to say things, and that is why the words you speak may be different to how you planned to speak in your head.
‘Everything becomes a little different as soon as it is spoken out loud.’
HERMANN HESSE
If you don’t prepare relevant and structured verbal communication, you will end up subjecting your listener to what I call the ‘all you can speak buffet’ . Have you been to a restaurant or event where a buffet meal was served?
It’s where there is every possible variety of food available and you must go with your plate and pick the food you want and leave the food you don’t want.
In communication terms, the ‘all you can speak buffet’ is giving lots of information when you speak (some relevant and some not so relevant) and expecting your listener to pick and choose what points they want and what points they don’t.
You are expecting your listener to pick and choose from all the information you are offering.
The ‘all you can speak buffet’ involves a lot of work on the part of your listener to sort through your words.
The question: Is your listener willing to work that hard?
I don’t believe they are. They want you to do the work for them. They want you to serve them up tailored, relevant messages.
What if, instead of the ‘all you can speak buffet’, you treated your listener to ‘Michelin-star communication’?
A Michelin star is awarded to select restaurants globally, based on the excellent overall experience they deliver to their customers. Michelin-star restaurants serve the finest food, in bite-size portions, that flow from one course to another creating a pleasurable overall experience.
I want you to start preparing Michelin-star communication, where you:
You can do this by following the ‘communication rule of three’.
In order to give your listener clear points and tailored information you will need to decide what your key points are before you speak. If you have lots of information, you will need to organise or package this information into groups so that your information is digestible and memorable for the listener. One of the most effective ways to do this is by following the ‘communication rule of three’.
The ‘communication rule of three’ is a very general rule in speaking, writing and music that says ideas presented in threes are inherently more interesting, more understandable and more memorable.
Stories have a beginning, middle and end. Many movies and books are works of trilogy.
There are many famous speeches and taglines that follow this rule, for example: ‘Work, rest and play’, ‘Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness’, ‘Stop, look and listen’.
In order to give your audience Michelin-star communication you must examine your information and ask yourself, what are my three key points?. If you have a lot of information to deliver, you must group all this information into three key areas – like a story with a beginning, middle and end section.
Questions are a vital part of our communication tool kit. We ask questions to:
There are four main question types you need to be most aware of:
These questions get you started. They are general, information-gathering questions to which there is no right or wrong answer.
These questions usually begin with the words ‘what’, ‘where’, ‘why’ or ‘how’. For example:
These are the best types of questions for getting a conversation started. They are thought-provoking and elicit a variety of possible answers. These questions are used to start a discussion and to get the ball rolling.
These questions pick up on the main issues (usually from a response to the open question) and move the discussion further along. They are the ‘tell me more’ questions. They allow an issue to be probed into in more detail. You ask the person to tell you more about the issue.
These types of questions check for understanding, as the issue is being discussed in detail. A mirroring question uses the other person’s words to confirm that they really meant what they said.
These questions always produce a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answer. They are very useful in summing up and confirming actions at the end of an interaction.
Good questioning is about using these four question types to get to and gain a proper understanding of the underlying information, the real need or the heart of an issue.
There are three steps involved in ‘the funnel effect’:
Let’s look at an example of the funnel effect in action.
Louise just went in to see her boss, Alan, to ask for two weeks off work. Let’s see how she got on:
Open question
‘What happened with Alan when you went into his office to ask for two weeks off?’
Probing questions
‘What is the first thing you said to him?’
‘How did he react?’
‘Were you surprised by his reaction?’
Mirroring question
‘You felt very shocked and a little disappointed about his refusal to give you the time off?’
Closed question
‘So you don’t have the full two weeks off, but he has agreed to give you a week off?’
You have no control over how someone responds to your questions, but there are things you can do to help the questioning process run more smoothly.
You need to try hard to develop the ability to ask a good concise question, and then keep quiet.
If you are feeling nervous or impatient then a short silence can feel like an eternity, but if you fill silences too quickly you will seriously damage your ability to have good conversations.
It may help to visualise your question as a ball that you have thrown to the other person. When you have thrown the ball by asking a good, clear question, be silent. Don’t say anything else until they have answered your question and thrown the ball back.
And if you are the one being asked the questions:
I have to admit something to you. I am an interrupter.
Sometimes I do it because I am too impatient to wait for the other person to get their entire answer out. Sometimes I interrupt because I think I know what the other person is going to say (because I am clairvoyant, you know). Most of the time I do it because something the other person said has triggered something in my head that I have to say straight away or I will burst!
Our daily working lives contain a bombardment of information from multiple sources and an uncountable number of distractions within and beyond our control. It can be very hard to be a good listener while battling the tsunami of daily data we face.
Some of the biggest barriers to being a good listener are:
There are three main ways you can listen in your everyday interactions;
Both of the first two listening styles can have a negative impact on your objectives of building and deepening relationships with your colleagues and clients. You need to be self-aware and try to not let yourself slip into these modes. To show interest, empathise and build good relationships you must listen actively.
Real listening is an active not passive process. You have to choose to give your undivided attention.
How to become an active listener:
Quiz time!
I want you to elect a new world leader, and your vote counts.
Here are the facts about the three leading candidates:
Who do you choose as your world leader?
We all make decisions and judgements based on the information we have. And often we make decisions in assessing whether something is right or wrong before seeking the full story.
Without the full story, without asking the right questions and listening to the answers fully, we can make bad judgements that, in turn, cause bad decisions.
Make sure you have the full story before you make a decision. Why?
Here are your world leader candidates’ names:
…I voted for Hitler, too.
When our daily interactions fail it is very easy to focus on and blame the elements we have no control over, as there are many. It’s more comfortable to look at others and see how they are communicating badly. It’s effortless to accuse someone else of being difficult rather than putting our own behaviours and attitudes under a microscope and asking questions such as:
Ultimately, this is about you getting what you need from your communication. This is possible if you take responsibility for your communication, understand your listener and prepare to speak.
3.147.77.250