Home Page Icon
Home Page
Table of Contents for
Cover
Close
Cover
by
Validating a Best Practice
Cover
Half-Title
Title
Copyright
Dedication
Contents
Foreword
Acknowledgments
Authors
SECTION I DESCRIPTION OF THE BEST-TOOL
1 Introduction
1.1 Why a Book on the Subject of “Best Practice”?
1.2 What Are the Advantages of the Application of the BEST-Method and BEST-Tool for the Reader?
1.3 But There Is More …
1.4 Additional Applications of the BEST-Tool
1.5 The Book Focuses on Two Potential Audiences for Three Major Purposes
1.6 Benchmarking, Best Practices, and Excellent Results
1.7 Objectives, Benchmarking, and Definitions
1.8 BEST-Method and BEST-Tool
1.9 Structure of the Book
2 The BEST-Method
2.1 Definition of Best Practice
2.2 Key Concepts in the Definition of a Best Practice
2.3 Characteristics of a Best Practice
2.4 Best Practice versus Best Technical Product
2.5 BEST-Method and BEST-Tool
2.6 Documenting a Best Practice
2.7 Measurement of Excellence
2.8 Enabler
2.9 The PDCA-Method
2.10 Results
2.11 Organizational Maturity
2.12 Benefits of the BEST-Tool
2.13 Use of Case Studies for Demonstrating the BEST-Tool
2.14 Why We Use Older Case Studies
2.15 Conclusion
3 The BEST-Tool: Checklist of Criteria for the Assessment of a Best Practice
3.1 Assessment of the Approaches Used in a Best Practice
3.1.1 Enabler
3.1.2 Plan
3.1.3 Do
3.1.4 Check
3.1.5 Act
3.2 Assessment of the Achieved Results
3.2.1 Results
3.2.2 Test of Results Criteria on a Real-Life Example
3.2.3 Conclusion
3.3 Assessment of the Management of the Best Practice Process
3.3.1 Definition of a Process
3.4 Assessment of the Format of a Best Practice
3.5 Use of the BEST-Tool (Complete and Detailed Checklist)
3.6 Use of the BEST Quick Scan Tool
3.7 Experiences, Tips, and Tricks
3.7.1 Incomplete Best Practices
3.7.2 Complete Best Practices
3.7.3 Scores
3.7.4 Realistic Tool
4 Writing a Best Practice
4.1 What Is a Best Practice?
4.2 A High-Level Sequence for Developing and Writing a Best Practice
4.3 Documenting a Best Practice Case Study
4.3.1 Title
4.3.2 Subject
4.3.3 Author
4.3.4 Context
4.3.5 Description of the Method and Results
4.3.6 Measurement Method
4.3.7 Process Description
4.3.8 Maturity of the Process
4.3.9 Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and Results
4.3.10 Distribution of the Results
4.3.11 Cause and Effect
4.3.12 Assessment of Enabler and Results
4.3.13 Limiting Conditions
4.3.14 Date and Revision Number
4.4 How Many Best Practices?
SECTION II USE OF THE BEST-TOOL
5 Use of the Detailed BEST-Tool: Three Case Studies
5.1 Case Study 1 Organizational Culture Change at Lion Nathan (Australia)
5.1.1 Who is Lion Nathan?
5.1.2 Organization of Lion Nathan
5.1.3 History
5.1.4 Three Pillars of Cultural Transformation Strategy
5.1.5 Leadership Drives Cultural Transformation
5.1.6 Human Synergistics Measurement Instruments
5.1.7 Organizational Culture Inventory® (OCI®)
5.1.8 Cultural Transformation is Done in Five Phases:
5.1.9 Life Styles Inventory™ (LSI 1 and LSI 2)
5.1.10 Assessment of Case Study: Lion Nathan
5.1.11 Important Preliminary Remarks
5.1.12 Building Block: Enabler
5.1.12.1 Analysis of the Plan Step of the BEST-Method
5.1.12.2 Analysis of the Do Step of the BEST-Method
5.1.12.3 Analysis of the Check Step of the BEST-Method
5.1.12.4 Analysis of the Act Step of the BEST-Method
5.1.13 Building Block: Results
5.1.13.1 Scope and Relevance
5.1.13.2 Segmentation
5.1.13.3 Targets
5.1.13.4 Comparison with Benchmarks
5.1.14 Building Block: Management of Process
5.1.15 Building Block: Process Format
5.1.16 Summary of the Assessment of the Lion Nathan Case Study and Conclusion
5.2 Case Study 2: Corporate Social Responsibility at Loblaw
5.2.1 Who is Loblaw?
5.2.2 Loblaw Companies CSR Vision
5.2.3 Loblaw Purpose
5.2.4 Core Values of Loblaw
5.2.5 The Way of Doing business
5.2.6 Loblaw CSR Pillars
5.2.7 CSR Annual Reports
5.2.8 Long-Term Targets and Stakeholder Engagement
5.2.8.1 Long-Term Targets
5.2.8.2 Stakeholder Engagement
5.2.9 What Customers Tell Loblaw
5.2.10 Insights from Valued Stakeholders
5.2.11 Moving Forward in Reduction of the Carbon Footprint
5.2.12 Improving Energy Efficiency and Cutting Carbon Emissions
5.2.13 Converting Refrigerants and Reducing Leak Intensity
5.2.14 Building Energy Consumption
5.2.15 Converting Fleet to Electric
5.2.16 Reducing and Diverting Waste
5.2.17 Important Preliminary Remark
5.2.18 Assessment of the Loblaw CSR Case Study
5.2.19 Building Block 1: Enabler (22 criteria and 44 characteristics)
5.2.19.1 Analyze the Plan Phase of the BEST-Method
5.2.19.2 Analyze the Do-Step of the BEST-Method
5.2.19.3 Analysis of the Check Step of the BEST-Method
5.2.19.4 Analysis of the Act Step of the BEST-Method
5.2.20 Results (7 criteria and 20 characteristics)
5.2.21 Management of Process (nine criteria)
5.2.22 Maturity of the Management of the Process
5.2.23 Assessment of the Format of the Best Practice of Loblaw
5.2.24 Summary of the Assessment of the CSR Loblaw Case Study and Conclusion
5.2.25 Good Practice
5.3 Case Study 3 Dream Hotel
5.3.1 Organization of the Company
5.3.2 Description of the Key Process Check-out
5.3.3 Conclusion
6 Application of BEST Quick Scan Tool on Case Studies
6.1 Business Process Benchmarking: Finding and Implementing Best Practices (Robert Camp)
6.1.1 Case Study: Housekeeping System Cycle Time Reduction at The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company
6.1.1.1 Who Is The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company?
6.1.1.2 Assessment of the Case Study The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company
6.1.1.3 Conclusion
6.2 Case Studies from Healthy Workplaces: A Selection of Global Good Practices
6.2.1 Case study: Lån & Spar Bank Denmark
6.2.1.1 Who Is Lån & Spar Bank?
6.2.1.2 Health in Business Strategy
6.2.1.3 Assessment of Case Study Lån & Spar Bank
6.2.1.4 Conclusion
6.2.2 Case Study: GlaxoSmithKline UK
6.2.2.1 Who Is GSK?
6.2.2.2 Health in Business Strategy
6.2.2.3 Assessment of Case Study GSK
6.2.2.4 Conclusion
6.2.3 Case Study: Baxter International Inc. USA
6.2.3.1 Who Is Baxter?
6.2.3.2 Health in Business Strategy
6.2.3.3 Assessment of Case Study Baxter International Inc. USA
6.2.3.4 Conclusion
6.2.3.5 Conclusions from Healthy Workplaces: A Selection of Global Good Practices
6.3 Case Studies from APQC CONNECTING PEOPLE TO CONTENT: Create, Surface, and Share Knowledge for a Smarter Organization
6.3.1 Preface
6.3.2 Case study: Nalco
6.3.2.1 Initial Comment
6.3.2.2 Who Is Nalco?
6.3.2.3 Assessment of Case Study Nalco
6.3.2.4 Conclusion Case Study Nalco
6.3.3 Case study: MWH Global Inc.
6.3.3.1 Who Is MWH Global Inc.?
6.3.3.2 Assessment of Case Study MWH Global Inc.
6.3.3.3 Conclusion Case MWH Global Inc.
6.3.3.4 Global Conclusion on the APQC Case Studies (Nalco and MWH Global Inc.)
6.3.4 Case Study: Already Doing It and Not Knowing It
6.3.4.1 Who Is Metro Public Health Department (MPHD) Nashville, Tennessee?
6.3.4.2 Assessment of Case Study Metro Public Health Department (MPHD) Nashville, Tennessee
6.3.4.3 Conclusion of the Nashville, TN Case Studies
6.3.5 Case Study: Why Is Singapore’s School System So Successful and Is It a Model for the West?
6.3.5.1 Assessment of Case Study Singapore’s School System
6.3.5.2 Conclusion
6.3.5.3 Additional Comments
6.4 Case Study: HR Certification Institute & Top Employers Institute
6.4.1 About HRCI
6.4.2 About Top Employers Institute
6.4.3 Assessment of the Case Study HR Certification Institute & Top Employers Institute
6.4.3.1 Summary Assessment of Case Study 9 (see Figure 6.6)
6.4.4 Conclusion of the Assessment of HRCI & TEI
6.5 Case Study: ExxonMobil Safety, Health, and the Workplace
6.5.1 Who Is ExxonMobil?
6.5.2 Assessment of Case Study ExxonMobil Safety, Health, and the Workplace
6.5.3 Conclusion
6.6 Observations Gained from the Assessment of Ten BEST Quick Scan Studies
7 Orange County Health Department Case Study
7.1 Original Case Study: Orange County Health Department, STD Quality Improvement Case Study
7.2 The Situation
7.3 Step 1: Describe the Problem
7.4 Step 2: Describe the Current Process
7.5 Step 3: Identify Root Cause(s) of the Problem
7.6 Step 4: Develop a Solution and Action Plan
7.7 Step 5: Implement the Solution
7.8 Step 6: Review and Evaluate Results of the Change
7.9 Step 7: Reflect and Act on Learnings
7.10 Looking Back: Fall 2008
7.11 Apply the BEST-Method: Updating to 2019
7.11.1 Improvement: Trends
7.11.2 Area for Improvement: Stakeholders
7.11.3 Improvement Audit
7.12 Looking Back: Experiences from 2008 till 2019
7.12.1 2019 Assessment of Case Study Orange County Health Department, STD Quality Improvement
7.12.2 Full BEST-Tool Assessment of Orange County Health Department STD Blood Draw Process Case Study
7.12.3 Current Status of Best Practice: Summer 2019
7.12.4 Conclusion
7.13 Lessons Learned
8 Conclusion
8.1 Lessons Learned
8.2 Complete Best Practice
8.3 Facts and Figures
8.4 Definitions
8.5 Is This Approach Bureaucracy?
8.6 “Poor” Best Practices
8.7 Journey toward Excellence
8.8 Pitfalls
8.9 Super Quick Assessment
8.10 Choice of the CEO
8.11 Static or Dynamic?
Appendix
Index
Search in book...
Toggle Font Controls
Playlists
Add To
Create new playlist
Name your new playlist
Playlist description (optional)
Cancel
Create playlist
Sign In
Email address
Password
Forgot Password?
Create account
Login
or
Continue with Facebook
Continue with Google
Sign Up
Full Name
Email address
Confirm Email Address
Password
Login
Create account
or
Continue with Facebook
Continue with Google
Next
Next Chapter
Half-Title
Add Highlight
No Comment
..................Content has been hidden....................
You can't read the all page of ebook, please click
here
login for view all page.
Day Mode
Cloud Mode
Night Mode
Reset