Satisfying or, more likely, ‘delighting’ customers has, in recent times, become nothing less than a corporate mantra, the belief being that it is by satisfying the needs of customers that organisations can make a profit and therefore grow and prosper.
Although the basic argument is fundamentally sound (organisations can only make money if their customers buy the supplying organisation’s products or services), there is a caveat: not all customers are equal. Some customers contribute substantially to an organisation’s profit line, while others actually lead to the supplying organisation losing money – that is, the cost of delivering the product or service is more than the revenue generated from that transaction.
In their zeal to ‘delight’ customers, organisations run the serious risk of moving into a loss-making situation. Organisations offer, but do not recover the costs of delivering, additional product features and services to their customers.
This customer profitability ‘inequality’ has been known for several decades and verified by numerous studies. As one powerful example, a customer analysis of a US-based insurance company found that 15–20% of customers generate 100% (or more) of profits. Further analysis found that the most profitable customers generate 130% of annual profits, the middle 55% of customers break even and the least profitable 5% of customers incur losses equal to 30% of annual profits (see the practical example on page 16).
Simply put, a measure of customer profitability ensures that an organisation does not lose sight of its ultimate objective: to make a profit from selling products or services.
Data are collected through the analysis of marketing and accounting data as well as the output from activity-based costing exercises.
Customer profitability is the difference between the revenues earned from and the costs associated with the customer relationship in a specified period. Put another way, customer profitability is the net contribution made by individual customers to an organisation.
As customer profitability covers several time-frames, it is not in itself a single measure. There are four primary measurements of customer value:
As part of their assessment of customer profitability, organisations will often also use time-based, activity-based costing, which essentially measures the present total cost of providing services or products to a customer. This requires obtaining information on only two parameters: the cost per hour of each group of resources performing work, such as a customer support department, and the unit times spent on these resources by specific activities for products, services and customers. For example, if a customer support department has a cost of $70 per hour, and a particular transaction for a customer takes 24 minutes (0.4 hours), the cost of this transaction for this customer is $28. This can be readily scaled up to companies with hundreds of thousands of products and services and thousands of customers.
When customer profitability is measured depends on the metric being assessed (see the What formula do I use? section). Remember that there is no single measure of customer profitability as they relate to different time periods.
These data can be extracted from the accounting and marketing data, but also from time-based, activity-based costing analyses.
Measuring customer profitability is certainly important but it can be expensive, especially when an organisation is analysing the profitability of many customers. Many companies will use time-based activity-based costing to allocate appropriate costing. This requires training, resourcing and management, and requires the costing staff to spend some time in the business.
Companies should look to move loss-making or break-even customers up the profitability categories.
Here is an example of calculating customer profitability in a bank.
Customer A:
Customer B:
Organisations need to ensure that they look holistically at the information generated from customer profitability metrics. For example, customers who are presently unprofitable can have high customer lifetime values (and vice versa). Therefore, organisations should not be in a rush to cease trading with unprofitable customers.
A further warning is that, in acquisitions, organisations often focus heavily on the lifetime value profitability metric, without taking into account that there is usually high volatility in the purchasing behaviour of ‘new’ customers.
Robert S. Kaplan, A balanced scorecard approach to measure customer profitability, 8 August 2005, Working Knowledge, Harvard Business School, http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/4938.html
18.224.66.196