The pursuit of ‘quality’ has been something of an obsession within many organisations across most industries and sectors since quality gurus such as W. Edwards Deming, Josef Juran and Philip Crosby introduced the principles of Total Quality Management (TQM) to Western firms struggling to compete with quality-savvy Eastern competitors (most notably from Japan).
However, the challenge is that there are many definitions of what the term ‘quality’ means in an organisational setting. For instance, it might mean perfect aesthetics for a furniture manufacturer, colour and texture for a paper manufacturer, or ingredients and taste in a restaurant. In general, though, quality can be defined as ‘the ability of a product or service to fully meet the customer’s expectations, or fit for the intended use of the customer’. In this definition, quality is all about the customer and what is expected from the product or service and how it is delivered. TQM thought leaders such as Deming, Juran and Crosby all had the same goal – to achieve fit-for-use products and services. However, it is also important that products and services are provided at a cost that is acceptable to the supplier (to allow for a profit in commercial enterprise and to deliver within budget for a non-commercial organisation).
A quality index should therefore consist of a group of KPIs (perhaps between five and ten) that enable the supplying organisation to ensure that the customer-facing processes are operating at a level at which customer expectations are met (and, in many cases, exceeded) and are fit for intended use (often known as ‘fit for purpose’) at an acceptable cost to the supplier.
Given the cited industry/sector variances in understanding of the word ‘quality’, there is no single quality index template that can be applied within any organisation. However, example KPIs that will make up the index are:
The broad range of KPIs that might be included within a quality index means that various data collection methods will probably be employed. Data might be captured automatically within the manufacturing process (such as for first pass yield) or through various surveying tools (such as customer complaints due to quality of products or services). Other methods will be used as required.
A quality index will comprise a number of measures (perhaps between five and ten). Each measure will be weighted according to its importance (although some indexes will comprise KPIs of equal weighting). The final index score is the total points (expressed as a percentage), accounting for weightings. So if customer complaints due to quality of products or services has a 50% weighting score then its points account for half the overall score.
The frequency of quality indexes varies according to industry and sector, with some manufacturing firms compiling indexes on a near real-time basis whereas quarterly might suffice for a non-commercial organisation.
Data can come from various sources, such as process performance reports generated by manufacturing (for defect-type data) or marketing/customer management (for complaints and other customer metrics).
Initial costs might be high if data are presently not available or are in an inappropriate format. Moreover, it is not unusual for staff to be dedicated full time (or at least part time) to managing quality (and compiling an index will be within their remit), which has cost implications. But organisations should look to keeping such departments small and focused. These departments should also teach the business how to capture appropriate data, therefore making quality an everyday part of an employee’s life.
It is likely that there will be global or industry/sector-specific benchmarks for each KPI within the index. Industry/sector bodies or relevant benchmarking organisations should hold such information.
Take a manufacturing organisation with a simple quality index as an example. It decides to use three indicators in its quality index, namely: first pass yield, rework level and customer complaints (for more information on these indicators, see the KPI Library at www.ap-institute.com).
For the index, the company decides to weight first pass yield with 50% and rework level and customer complaints with 25% each.
Organisations should be careful that they don’t turn the creation and maintenance of a quality index into a ‘tick box’ exercise, but rather use the data findings for continuous improvement purposes. This is especially true when dedicated quality departments have responsibility for managing the index.
Moreover, a quality index is most powerful when the people/technology inputs into the index and customer/financial outcomes are also monitored and understood: this ensures that key internal processes are not viewed in isolation. The use of a strategic map and accompanying scorecard will be useful for this purpose.
www.leanmanufacture.net/quality.aspx
The W. Edwards Deming Institute: www.deming.org
Juran Institute: www.juran.com
3.19.56.45