Chapter 11
IN THIS CHAPTER
Exploring material lifecycle processes
Recognizing the improvement opportunities within lifecycle processes
Investigating technical and biological lifecycle processes can be optimized
Material choices play a fundamental role in designing for a circular economy. By choosing only materials that flow through a circular lifecycle, not only can you ensure safety for both humans and the environment, but you also make sure that the materials used to make your products can be reused without causing waste or toxicity. The good news is that a wide palette of such materials exists.
An important consideration when it comes to selecting circular materials is determining where they come from — how they’re sourced, in other words. (The technical term for this process is feedstock selection.) Because of the possible negative impact on the environment and local communities from raw material extraction, the preferred feedstock selection method should be to recycle and reuse materials while also relying on renewable resources.
If your material is part of a technical cycle — material that cannot be broken down and returned to the earth as a result of biological processes — you have a number of areas to explore to ensure that the material flows within a circular lifecycle. These considerations include determining whether the material can be derived from waste from another industrial process or whether it’s possible to derive it from waste sourced from the consumer. For both these options, you have to determine whether the waste stream has been properly defined so that you avoid the risk of future harm.
If your material can in fact be broken down and returned to the earth as a result of biological processes, there are also a number of different areas to explore to ensure that the material can be sourced in an ecologically responsible and renewable manner. These considerations include determining whether the material can also be derived from waste, such as agricultural byproducts or food waste, and whether resource extraction can occur while maintaining biodiversity and supporting critical ecosystems. In addition, it’s important to determine whether the consumption of the material occurs at a slower or faster rate than the resource can regenerate. Within a circular economy system, the resource should always regenerate quicker than the resource is harvested, to ensure sustainable resource management and environmental regeneration.
When you have selected a safe material and considered its lifecycle impacts, it’s important to explore how the product containing the material would fit in a circular design. These considerations apply to both biological and technical materials. Start by asking these questions:
When you have selected a safe material and considered its circular design, you can then reflect on what will happen to the product after its use phase.
Beyond the questions listed here, you have to consider some additional variables. These areas in question differ depending on which type of material you’re focused on:
The ecological impact of material processes used in the production of goods — cars, clothes, computers, whatever — poses a serious issue around the world. Many of the common materials used in the production of these goods are eventually thrown away and wasted during the production process. These materials are lost from the economy, and it would be extremely costly to reintroduce them to the global market after they arrive at the landfill. It has been calculated and estimated that roughly one-fifth of the materials extracted from the planet around the world are eventually discarded as waste. This, in terms of weight, is roughly 12 billion tons of waste material per year.
The level of economic progress and the astronomical rise in human population worldwide over the past 100 years has run parallel to extreme environment degeneration of the very resources that life itself depends on — not only the life of animals in the wild but human life as well. That means you. Around the world, humans are continuing to use more and more natural resources to fuel what Wall Street movers and shakers like to call “economic growth.” In the grand scheme of things, not much has truly changed in the way humans produce materials. We have the potential to be smart, but it turns out that we can be pretty dumb as well. (Maybe it’s that whole yin and yang balance at play?) As smart as we humans are, we continue to waste much of the raw materials we extract. One pound of every three pounds of food produced for human use is either allowed to rot before it’s consumed or is wasted altogether. To no surprise, this situation is most common in the developed nations, where wasted food doesn’t equal starvation. This continuous demand for raw materials — due to a lack of circular processes — is causing overextraction and environmental degeneration.
Over the years, the amount of material used in order to supply human needs has increased at an alarming rate. In the United States alone, in 2018, 292 million tons of waste was generated. That’s just under five pounds of waste generated per person. Although roughly a third of it was properly recycled or composted, the United State is still miles away from managing its waste in a circular fashion.
The amount of material actually used by high-income countries is greater than their own domestic material generation, indicating that consumption in those countries relies on materials from other countries through international supply chains. On a per capita basis, high-income countries rely on 9.8 metric tons of primary materials extracted elsewhere in the world.
As higher-grade reserves are depleted, the quality of the remaining raw materials is degraded, leading to increases in energy and chemicals required to fill the gap. These additional requirements lead to larger releases of greenhouse gases, which then contribute to climate change. The kinds of chemicals and materials humans choose to use throughout the product lifecycle matter because they can pose risks to humans and the environment. Developing an awareness of the risks that stem from these material choices is the first step toward designing in a different way.
After drawing a circle, identify where in the circle you foresee the potential for risks at each stage of the lifecycle. Here are some questions that may help you identify some areas of concern and potential improvement:
You have now identified where material and chemical risks can occur within your lifecycle. From here, take a look at where the potential risks fall. Cam any patterns be identified? Maybe the major risks occur during the production of the material rather than during the recycling, for example. Taking a deep dive to identify these patterns helps in adjusting the lifecycle at a systems level rather than at a surface level. Once the key areas of concern have been identified, fixing these areas of concern is a different ballgame. Mitigating these risks begins with three different approaches: transparency, chemical management, and innovation.
Material transparency, historically, has been a lot like a game show, if you think about it. You know, the old series where a helpless contestant would tremble aimlessly in front of three different doors and be directed to “pick one.” Material transparency can often feel the same way. How can the consumer be expected to make the right decision when they can see the doors, but not what’s behind them? Material transparency aims to open the door for customers and allow them to make an informed decision about the materials they want to interact with, build with, and even sell.
In the context of material health, exploring the lifecycle process allows the user to create an inventory of the materials and chemicals used in a product’s manufacturing process. Compiling accurate and transparent information on the chemicals and materials used in a product is the first step toward ensuring that they comply with your standards. Activities related to the inventory approach include engaging with raw materials suppliers and creating a materials inventory or bill of materials (BOM).
The screening and eventual denial or acceptance of chemicals takes place in a number of ways. If a chemical has been identified by a governing body as safe, it’s free to circulate through an open market. If a chemical is found to be hazardous — to various degrees — that material is either removed from the market completely or its use is limited. From regulatory compliance and restricted substances lists to proactive toxicological assessments, data is used to eliminate known or suspected hazardous substances and move toward safer chemistry.
As the demand for various materials continues to evolve as new problems arise, innovation steps in to offer a solution. When suitable substitutes don’t currently exist from a chemistry perspective, design innovation can help eliminate the need for chemicals of concern while also ensuring that a product continues to meet its function, quality, performance, value, and aesthetic requirements. These innovations rarely stem from inside the system itself. The United States post office didn’t invent email, and a candle maker didn’t invent the light bulb. So, when innovation is required to solve a problem, look outside the current system for influence elsewhere.
Knowing when and where change should be implemented in a material lifecycle is difficult. That’s why things aren’t as peachy as they should be. When considering alternative lifecycle processes — for any material — it helps to know where change can actually occur. Within a circular economy framework, these three key principles break up a material lifecycle:
Let's take another look at the Ellen MacArthur Foundation Butterfly Diagram of the circular economy system — this time, in light of the three principles for creating alternative materials processes. (See Figure 11-1. For more on the foundation's Butterfly Diagram, see Chapter 10.) At the top of the diagram, you’ll find Principle 1. In this area of the Butterfly Diagram — Renewable Flows Management and Stock Management — we are addressing the source of materials. Here, there’s a separation between renewable feedstocks (called biological nutrients) and finite materials (technical nutrients, in other words). Clear features distinguish these two cycles: biological nutrients (wood, paper, cork, or cotton, for example) have the ability to decompose when returned to nature; whereas the technical nutrients (aluminum, iron, or plastic, for example) do not decompose, which is why their useful life must be prolonged by design.
Slotted in the middle of the Butterfly Diagram, you’ll find Principle 2. Within this area of the diagram, you see the meat of the lifecycle and the processes involved. When analyzing the process steps between the extraction of resources and the use of the final product, you see a number of steps. Each uses energy to accomplish its task. And each step produces waste.
On the technical side of the Butterfly Diagram (refer to Figure 11-1), note that the component parts of any product are designed and manufactured to be uniform so that they can be reused after they've been safely and easily disassembled. Allowing this to take place facilitates their continuous reintroduction into the production system. Doing so eliminates unnecessary waste and keeps down the demand for raw materials. Looking at this through a business lens, rather than have product sellers, we have service providers that optimize the use of resources through a wide range of strategies, such as modular design, durability, and repairability. Decreasing the amount of raw materials required eliminates the cost of extraction, resulting in a competitive advantage. By reducing the need to produce new components, we also reduce our dependence on virgin resources.
On the biological nutrients side, the first opportunity for the user to eliminate waste and maximize the value of a resource is called cascading. This creates a platform for products to be cyclically reused for several purposes. For example, clothes made of organic cotton can be reused to produce new articles of clothing, which in turn can be reused to produce insulation material for construction or for filling pillows or beanbags. The same statement applies to materials such as cork or wood. Once a material has reached the end of its life, value remains in the material, in the form of energy. Through various biochemical extraction techniques, the same energy that was required to grow the original product can be extracted once more for further use. Finally, the remaining biological nutrients can be safely returned to the biosphere in the form of compost, thus regenerating the soil and its fertility and closing the nutrient cycle.
At the bottom of the Butterfly Diagram (refer to Figure 11-1), you find Principle 3. Within this area of the diagram, the goal is to eliminate negative externalities — waste from the system, in other words. It’s possible to not only minimize the volume of resources that end up in a landfill but also recapture the waste generated within lifecycle processes.
The first opportunity for optimization is through potential sharing services. By sharing certain materials and products, the use rate of whatever it is that’s being shared is optimized, at no additional cost. Those willing to share gain more freedom to live their lives unencumbered — and some extra cash as well. Share what you own and what others own. Share almost anything, including cars, extra rooms, tools, books, kitchen utensils — anything that’s used only occasionally. It’s probably best to shy away from sharing underwear, spouses, and other intimate items, though. But other than that, go for it!
Aside from cars, others have discovered opportunities for optimization by sharing. By utilizing accommodations that would otherwise be sitting empty, Airbnb and the other accommodation services reduce the need for new construction of hotels and motels. With companies like Uber and Lyft, you can hail a ride from drivers in their personal vehicles. With services like Turo and Zipcar, you can rent a vehicle, owned by a for-profit or nonprofit organization, and pay only for the time you drive it. And with newer companies like GetAround, you can rent privately owned cars by the hour or day when their owners don’t need them.
We can see the confusing look on some of your faces. Where’s the opportunity for optimization in Uber and Lyft? Anyone who has been to New York City in the past decade has seen the wave of yellow taxicabs crash down Broadway to provide rides to the ever-expanding population of the Big Apple. Though taxis and rentals aren’t new concepts and have made successful business models for quite some time, sharing these personal vehicles offers a lot of additional incentives and can cost close to half as much as a traditional taxi ride. Knowing that some people won’t want to rent a car for an entire day — maybe they just need a car for a quick grocery run — companies like Zipcar instead charge only for the time and the distance driven. This allows companies like these to increase their competitive edge by charging their customers much less than a conventional rental car company. I’m sure it hurts some business’s bottom line, but sharing is the future. Got to catch up or get left behind.
Say goodbye to the endless and repetitive purchase of things. Now that companies are providing a product as a service, you pay for the performance of a product rather than for the privilege of owning it. Rather than be responsible for the purchase, maintenance, repair, and replacement of a product, companies are now providing the full use of an item but without the costs and hassle of owning them — and at a much lower cost and at higher rates of efficiency.
For example, HP realized that selling ink cartridges created a high product-to-waste ratio and ended up costing both the company and end user a lot of money in the end by constantly requiring the input of new, raw materials. HP realized the opportunity for optimization via reuse and changed their operations in response. Now, HP’s new printers are able to notify the company when its user’s ink cartridge is running low and automatically order them a new one. Once the user receives their new cartridge, they can send back their old cartridge via a prepaid envelope. This process allows HP to reuse its plastic cartridges multiple times, which reduces its supply costs and optimizes its profits through reuse.
HP is not the only company that has realized the opportunity for optimization via reuse. eBay and Craigslist are built for reuse! They allow you to buy, sell, and trade new and used goods with little or no face-to-face interaction. You can pretty much find anything you’re looking for on these websites, which has led to their continued use and popularity. Though you can find almost anything you want on these platforms, others — like Kidizen (www.kidizen.com
), an online marketplace exclusively for children’s toys and clothing — successfully focus on specific niches.
Buying anything new is rough because you will, without a doubt, be paying more than what the product is actually worth. Online and in-person retail centers will always charge extra to keep their services up and running. When you buy a previously used item on eBay, Craigslist, or other reuse sites, however, those costs are avoided.
Machines of all types are spread out across the globe. Before they were constructed, thousands of man-hours, as well as large sums of money and time, were invested to create these extremely detailed machines. The advantage of machines is that tedious work can be eliminated to focus instead on creative and organizational activities. The disadvantage of machines is that they have a limited lifespan and can often be difficult and/or expensive to repair and maintain.
When a machine stops working, traditionally it has often been more economical to replace the machine completely rather than hire someone to troubleshoot and repair it, with little to no certainty that something else won't go wrong with the machine the following day! Having one machine down can cost a company thousands, if not millions, of dollars, as its rate of production drops. This understanding results in a high level of technical waste.
This doesn’t have to be the case, however. There’s an opportunity for optimization via the remanufacturing of these machines. If machinery is remanufactured rather than built from scratch with virgin materials, components could be cheaper to make — at the same time saving large amounts of money in material inputs and reducing emissions. Guangzhou Huadu Worldwide Transmission, a Chinese auto parts supplier, acts as a useful case study to illustrate the value of remanufacturing as a service. This company not only creates effective channels for the collection and distribution of used and remanufactured transmissions but has also been authorized by more than 30 major auto companies to provide maintenance services.
Once a natural material can no longer be used, it’s often immediately considered waste and thrown out. There are, however, numerous opportunities to extract the very energy that was used to grow that material to begin with. Bioenergy is energy derived from any fuel that originated from biomass — timber, for example. Biomass is a renewable resource, just like wind and solar — even if it often isn’t recognized as such by the general public — and therefore is an alternative (and resilient) source of sustainable energy. Historically, biomass in the form of firewood has been used to provide energy through direct combustion.
The value of biochemical extraction is that biomass residues and waste resources are able to be converted into new resources. (Keep in mind that this is waste that would otherwise have been left to decompose.) Although some biomass is specifically grown to be used as fuel, biochemical extraction allows additional energy to be extracted from residue as well as waste resulting from resources that were grown for other purposes, like food or fiber. Though this conversion of biowaste to a new energy source involves many complex processes that don’t need to be addressed in this book, the main takeaway is that additional value can be extracted from waste material.
Examples of extending the value of a biological material through biochemical extraction are described in this list:
Biodigesters: As difficult as they are to build and develop, biodigesters are fairly simple to understand. Organic materials that are decomposed by bacteria in an airless environment release biogas, as part of the respiratory process of these microorganisms. As long as farmers continue to funnel continuous amounts of livestock waste into the digesters, the living organisms within the system that produce the natural gas will continue to feed on the organic waste and maintain a consistent flow of renewable energy. (That’s a pretty good deal, if you ask us!)
The best part about the closed loop process of biodigesters is that it is truly a closed loop. After all the gas is extracted, the slurry within the digester can also be extracted and sprayed onto fields as a form of fertilizer. This fertilizer then helps to grow the same crops that will feed the cows, who then generate the livestock waste that will again be funneled into the digester and circle back to the beginning again.
3.17.5.68