Will people ever stop coming up with tangents to disrupt your meeting? Let's think about that one … hmm, no!
How many times have you sat in a meeting designated for a particular purpose and out of left field flies a comment, concern, or suggestion that occupies a great portion of that meeting going forward? What's worse, the tangent creator (who may well offer a valid point) might feel the need to explain, discuss, and develop a solution right then and there. It could even involve a group of attendees who have little or nothing to do with that issue. Do these tangent creators realize they just want to hear themselves talk, or are they looking for a way to add superficial importance to their value to the organization?
When a dog gets off its leash like this, what happens? As an attendee, you look at your watch, start complaining about time being wasted, and think about the project you need to finish before the end of the day. As a facilitator, you watch as time ticks away, and you witness the rapidly diminishing engagement of your uninvolved attendees.
As the facilitator, please respect the time constraints of the attendees you've invited and make sure you accomplish the objectives set out in your agenda. If the tangential “dog-off-the-leash” idea is critical to your discussion and a stopper for moving forward, break off the meeting for those not involved. Let them get back to what they need to do. Then reconvene in a stated amount of time after a specific group has taken this tangent to the point where it plays into the initial agenda.
If you routinely have attendees who put noncritical tangents into play, and that dog keeps flying off the leash, set the example by yanking back on the chain. Do it quickly and directly to effectively ward off future challenges.
If you're a facilitator, it's important to not put down the attendees who present the tangents or make them feel like outcasts in any way. Their input could be extremely valid and valuable if it's an issue that must be addressed.
Do this: Accept their ideas and empower them to develop solutions before occupying the precious time of non-involved attendees. You'd say, “That's a great idea, Vern, and we need to look at that. Why don't you put together your thoughts and data on this, and we'll review them after this meeting.”
A bigger question is how will you, if you're a mere attendee of said meeting, teach the “heel” command? By stepping up and taking action. As part of the Bore No More! movement, you have equal rights and responsibilities to make meetings more effective. If you sit back and allow Left-Field Leroy to take the meeting off track, then you've forfeited your right to complain.
Whatever position you're in, you'd better learn quickly. If you don't, you're out for a long walk instead of a boring meeting. Bring along the plastic baggie for the crap that will result.
Get Out!
If the tangent appears to be a stopper for your originally planned agenda or objectives, and you have no involvement in those objectives, you need to get out. Combine politeness and assertiveness to serve your greater purpose. You can:
It's possible that addressing your concerns this way will trigger the meeting to get back on track. Of course, you could also wait it out and not complain, but that's no fun—and not the purpose of this agenda item.
We've looked at why and how we meet, but what about where?
When was the last time you thought about the physical location or attributes of your meeting space? Was it extra space that a conference table and whiteboard could fit in without much thought? Is your conference room a place where old chairs and furniture go before they die? When attendees enter a 1970s crusty, wallpapered, stinky room (you know the one I mean), how does it make them feel?
Attendees or even facilitators don't commonly think about these aspects of a meeting room, but they should. Let's consider what you might do, and heed advice from a few experts as well.
In a recent blog post I asked, “Where have your best and worst meetings taken place?” Here are just a few of my favorite responses. Pick which ones are yours.
Worst-Case Scenario
My toughest conference room environment in which I was presenting was the Breakers Hotel in West Palm Beach, Florida—about 20 attendees in total with 10 on either side of a huge table. The 10 on the opposite side of where I stood wouldn't have known if a brick hit them. While half the people looked across the table at them, they could stare out the windows and see the beach. And right in front of the window was a path where beachgoers walked back and forth wearing skimpy beach attire.
Chalk that up as Jon Petz = 0, Beach = 1.
Some of these examples are far out, and didn't come cheap, but here's the point. Your meeting doesn't have to take place in a room with a long table and chairs. The instant your team members walk into that room, they might instinctively want to settle in and become brain dead. Why? Because that's what they've always done in this room.
Besides the well-worn groove in the carpet that acts as the guiding light to your conference room, do you always need to have your meetings there? In fact, do you even need to call it a conference room? The very word conference doesn't energize 'em. How about you? Because most meetings are collaborative in nature, let's go with collaboration room, or better yet, let's learn more about what's known as collaboration space.
Mark Henson, founder and chief imagination officer of Sparkspace, offers great advice on creating better conference space. Meeting planners from around the country have visited his facility in Columbus, Ohio, to see what he does so well.
Sparkspace is a one-of-a-kind conference, teamwork, and personal development center where it's impossible to have an ordinary, boring business meeting. From the overstuffed chairs, full-wall working spaces, and interactive nature of each specialized room, it's been designed and built from the ground up to provide space built around collaboration and inspiration.
Mark says that the majority of conference rooms are built with efficiency in mind instead of group interaction and dynamics.
So rather than build three rooms designed to be all things to all people, why not look at specific functions for each room, with carryover effects? No need to have a kitchen table in every room of the house, is there? Think lots of variety.
Many meeting rooms are also being “overtechnified,” which means technology is put into place without the participants understanding why they should use it or even how to do so. I've been to many a venue or conference center with the fancy tech-savvy podiums or devices, but the only people who can get those devices to work are the audio-visual specialists on-site. Breaking up your meeting to call in the AV guy isn't what you had in mind when you planned your meeting, was it? It breaks into the whole “attendee engagement” thing you're striving for. Don't abuse the technology just because the designer/builder says you need the next cool thing in the marketplace.
Brandon Dupler, the principal at Dupler Office, specializes in creating places that enable and inspire workers to achieve their best. He believes that the right design of an office space can inspire performance, enhance productivity, increase morale, and create exceptional value. The key word I hear from Brandon, many times over is space, not room.
“Take down the walls and get rid of the table,” Brandon says. “Seating should be comfortable, flexible, and mobile so meeting hosts can arrange the space however they want for optimal interaction based on their goals. As personal space continues to shrink, people need their collaborative space to increase—space in which they can interact with each other and with their technology seamlessly. If they can't, the space is useless.”
In place of a standard break room, perhaps you could create a caf e with a mix of high-top tables, wooden stools, lounge seating, coffee tables, and fast, secure wireless connectivity. Which do you think would be used more? And why not set up a collaboration space among sections of cubicles for quick meet-and-greet sessions with your team?
If you want to build or rent some of the greatest meeting space imaginable, Mark and Brandon are two people you'll want to meet. But what about all the not-so-hip folks who have only a conference room and no time or budget to build a new one? Here are suggestions for what you can do.
Get out of the stinkin' box:
Stuck with your box? Do this:
Mark Henson (www.Sparkspace.com) adds these suggestions:
What every conference room should have: Space to move. If your conference room is 8′ × 10′ and your conference table is 7′ × 9′, there is something seriously wrong with the table-size-to-room-size ratio. Sometimes the best ideas come when we get up and change our perspective.
What conference rooms should never have: Photos of the founders of the company or pictures of ships on a stormy ocean. I've seen both in conference rooms and they're creepy. Dogs playing poker would be acceptable, though.
Brandon Dupler (www.DuplerOffice.com) offers these ideas:
What every conference should have: Great chairs and great refreshments.
What conference rooms should never have: One of those old podiums where the speaker is built into the front of it, and you have to deal with that long, silver, bendy microphone holder that makes a horrendous sound when you move it.
Get Out!
Arrive at the conference room early to nab the seat by the door for your planned exit strategy. At least you're in a position to see the people on the outside, and they can pass you signs of encouragement. If the room does smell, the nausea excuse works, too. No one wants to see you hurl while you huddle.
Meetings are inevitable. Because they're so prevalent, anyone and everyone involved in any kind of meeting needs to help plan and execute whatever meeting is at hand—including the after-meeting activities. Once everyone takes responsibility, then the meeting can actually accomplish what it's supposed to!
13.59.151.128