Leadership is a critical part of project success. It involves strategic skills, such as communicating the project vision, goals, and objectives, and people skills, such as emotional intelligence, motivation, and team development. Project leaders are responsible for inspiring their teams to reach the intended project outcomes. On a hybrid project, there may be some team members who require a hands‐on approach and other team members who are self‐organizing. This requires the project manager to be skilled in situational leadership in order to apply the right style of leadership at the right time.
In this chapter we will discuss emotional intelligence as a foundational skill needed to know how to best lead your team. Emotional intelligence includes motivation; however, because this is such a significant topic, we will look at several factors that influence motivation.
On hybrid projects you are likely to have Agile teams that practice servant leadership and are self‐organizing. We will look at how you can utilize situational leadership to know how and when to support these practices on hybrid projects. Regardless of whether you have a predictive, adaptive, or hybrid project, there are some key practices involved with developing high‐performing teams. These will be covered so you can apply them regardless of the structure of your teams.
According to Dr. Daniel Goleman, “A person can have the best training in the world, an incisive, analytical mind, and an endless supply of smart ideas, but he still won't make a great leader.” Emotional intelligence is a defining factor in the difference between leading based on position versus being a great leader.
There are five aspects of emotional intelligence:
Self‐awareness is recognizing and understanding your moods and emotions and how they affect you, your job performance, and your team members. Part of self‐awareness is being aware of how you are feeling in the moment and not judging those feelings. In this way, self‐awareness is similar to mindfulness. Another aspect of self‐awareness is identifying what your triggers are—what leads to you getting upset? Depressed? Apathetic? Being able to recognize and understand what you are feeling and why you are feeling that way allows you to regulate how you behave.
Self‐regulation is the ability to think before acting. It is suspending reactive behavior. When you identify emotional triggers, you can take steps to avoid those situations, but eventually you will find yourself in a situation where you are going to be upset. Therefore, once you identify your triggers, it can be helpful to think about healthy ways to disengage your emotions. For example:
Self‐regulation can help you make decisions and take actions based on thoughtful consideration rather than emotional reactions. Emotional outbursts reduce safety and trust, whereas practicing self‐regulation improves trust on your team.
Social awareness is being aware of other's viewpoints and emotions. It includes understanding nonverbal cues and displaying empathy. For example, it's pretty obvious if you come across someone who has their arms crossed, is looking down, and not meeting your eyes that they don't want to interact with you. They may be angry, or upset or sad, but their body language is definitely saying, “leave me alone.” There are more subtle cues as well, a sigh, mumbling, or speaking slowly without much intonation can also communicate a person's mood. So can smiling, nodding, and gesturing.
As leaders we should be aware of these cues. We may even want to check in with our team members and ask if there is something they want to talk about or something they need help with. Pay attention to their tone of voice, posture, facial expressions, and gestures.
Social skills are about leading and managing groups of people, such as project teams. They also include building social networks and establishing rapport. In this context, establishing rapport means building a harmonious and sympathetic connection with others. As project leaders, we rely on our ability to create rapport with team members, functional managers, senior management, and other stakeholders.
There are two types of motivation—intrinsic and extrinsic. Motivation, when considered as a component of emotional intelligence, refers to intrinsic motivation. Intrinsic motivation comes from inside a person or is connected with a task itself. It is based on finding pleasure or meaning in the work instead of the reward.
Intrinsic motivators include achievement, taking on a challenge, or being self‐directed. Other examples include believing in the work you do or knowing your work makes a difference. Most projects require creative thought, problem solving, inventing new technologies, and innovating. These types of tasks are more motivated by intrinsic factors, and the people who work in these types of jobs generally enjoy the work they do.
Extrinsic motivation is doing something based on an external reward, such as job title, bonuses, and cash rewards. Winning and avoiding failure or embarrassment are also extrinsic motivators. Extrinsic motivation works well only for a very narrow focus when there are a simple set of rules—for example, performing repetitive work that doesn't require much thought or creativity. Extrinsic motivation is, for the most part, far less effective than intrinsic motivation.
Motivation is far bigger than just understanding the emotional intelligence aspect. There are many motivation models, and most of them overlap or describe similar concepts. Most of the intrinsic motivators fit in one of the following four categories.
Because people are motivated by different things, to be effective at motivating your team you need to take time to get to know each person individually and understand what's important to them. You can do this by having candid conversations with your team members. That way you can align their work and incentives with what's important to them. For example, you may have one team member whose autonomy motivation expresses itself by wanting a more flexible schedule, or a schedule that allows them to work from home full or part time. Another team member may see autonomy as being able to sequence their work the way they want.
You can tailor motivation techniques based on a team member's dominant motivating factor. Each of us to one degree or another is motivated by the four motivators described above; however, the relative importance of each motivator varies from person to person.
Table 13‐1 shows a few examples of how to tailor the motivation techniques based on a team member's dominant motivator.
TABLE 13-1 Sample Motivation Techniques
Autonomy | Provide team members with freedom and flexibility in their work environment. |
Competence | Set stretch goals for team members to achieve. Make opportunities available for professional growth. |
Relatedness | Give people an opportunity to be part of a team, and establish opportunities for socializing. |
Purpose | Emphasize the difference a person makes in doing their work—make it apparent. |
Google has long encouraged its employees to devote 20% of their time to side projects they're passionate about. This represents both autonomy and purpose. If people are working with their peers, it also encompasses relatedness. As people work in these areas, they naturally improve, which includes competence.
Many of Google's most successful products have come out of this 20% time. This is one reason Google remains one of the most innovative companies in the world.
There are two leadership practices that are specific to Agile project teams, servant leadership and self‐organizing teams. These practices work well when the project environment understands and appreciates Agile practices. When working in a predictive or top‐down management environment they will need to be tempered to suit the situation.
A servant leader focuses on making sure the team has everything they need to get their work done, rather than providing direction. The intended outcome is that team members will feel fulfilled, appreciated, and supported. For teams that use scrum practices, the scrum master is a servant leader.
Some of the ways servant leaders support the team include:
An environment of servant leadership results in a more efficient and productive workspace and higher‐quality work products.
Self‐managing teams pair well with servant leadership. While the servant leader is supporting the team, the team is accountable for delivering the work. The servant leaders may function as a facilitator or coach for the team, but ultimately it is up to the team to figure out how they are going to accomplish the work, rather than a manager deciding for them.
At the start of the project the team will assess what they need as far as space, equipment, communication, and so forth. They will also determine how they want to work together, such as:
These agreements may be posted in the work environment or may be recorded in a team charter that is signed by each member of the team. Figure 13‐1 shows a version of a team charter.
During the project the team is empowered to organize and estimate their work. This occurs during iteration planning meetings. Then during the iteration, they have the autonomy to accomplish the work, resolve technical challenges, and employ the agreements they documented in the team charter.
Trusting team members to establish their own ways of working increases commitment and motivation. People work harder and take more pride in their work when they are respected and trusted as experts.
Self‐managing teams don't always start out smoothly. It can be a goal that takes time to achieve. The servant leader may need to provide coaching at the start and guidance along the way. However, as team members gain an understanding of what needs to be done and how to do it, the leader can step back.
When choosing a leadership style for a hybrid project, you will need to consider the organizational culture. If the organization embraces a top‐down management style, you should follow that approach. You can be open to suggestions, share power, and support the team, but ultimately you will maintain the final decision‐making authority.
Conversely, in a very flat organization or an organization that's very collaborative, you may be able to adopt a servant leadership style. There isn't a formula that tells you how to flex your style based on the environment. You'll need to assess the environment, the situation, and the organizational culture. That being said, here are a few guidelines for balancing predictive and Agile leadership styles.
You've probably had the opportunity to work on a team where everything clicked, even amid turmoil the team worked well together and there was a sense of synergy. You've also probably worked on teams where it was an effort to get anything done—egos were involved, people weren't committed, and it was a chore to get anything done. It's likely that in the first example you were working on a high‐performing team. High‐performing teams have several traits in common, as you'll see below.
The first thing that high‐performing teams have is a shared sense of purpose. Everyone on the team knows what the intended outcomes are, and everyone is committed to those outcomes. Along with the shared sense of purpose, team members display mutual accountability and trust for each other. Mutual accountability means that everyone on the team takes accountability for the project's success. There's no sense of “I did my job; why didn't you do yours?” The team works together and helps each other out as needed.
Mutual accountability leads to a sense of trust. Team members trust each other not only to get their work done but to consider the greater good of the team, to keep their promises, and to help each other out if needed. High‐performing teams collaborate. They don't work in silos. They work through problems and make decisions together, and they do this with open and respectful communication. These characteristics work together nicely. The sense of mutual accountability and trust leads to working together respectfully and collaboratively and vice versa.
High‐performing teams share recognition and empower each other. They share in successes and acknowledge each other's contribution to the success.
You've probably worked on projects where something completely unexpected happened and negatively affected the project. Maybe it caused rework, or perhaps a risk materialized, or maybe there was a big schedule slip. These setbacks are hard to come back from. But high‐performing teams demonstrate resilience to handle these setbacks, and they demonstrate adaptability to adjust to new ways of working to overcome negative situations.
Finally, these teams have high energy and an attitude of achievement. Team members have a positive outlook—they know that even when times are challenging, together the team can work through the challenges and deliver the project.
If you want to build a high‐performing team, start with investing time in building good relationships. Here are five key elements to developing good relationships with your team.
Making the investment in employing these elements makes the work you will do with your team more enjoyable. It also sets the stage for them to develop into a well‐functioning and high‐performing team.
In this chapter we reviewed some of the interpersonal aspects of working on hybrid projects. We began by looking at the five aspects of emotional intelligence: self‐awareness, self‐regulation, social awareness, social skills, and motivation. We then explored four intrinsic motivators: autonomy, competence, relatedness, and purpose.
There are two leadership practices that are specific to Agile projects, servant leaders and self‐managing teams. We discussed how these practices can be tailored for a hybrid project environment. We finished this chapter by describing the traits of high‐performing teams and the important of building relationships with your team to set the stage for a productive team experience.
3.145.161.228