Chapter 20
In This Chapter
Navigating investing road bumps
Committing to picking up better investing habits
Just as with raising children or as in one’s career, “success” with personal investing is in the eye of the beholder. In my work as a financial counselor, instructor, and writer, I’ve come to define a successful investor as someone who, with a modest commitment of time, develops an investment plan to accomplish financial and personal goals and who earns competitive returns given the risk he’s willing to accept.
In this chapter, I point out ten common obstacles that may keep you from being successful and fully realizing your financial goals. I also share tips and advice for overcoming those obstacles on the road to investing success.
Some investors assume that an advisor is competent and ethical if she has a lofty title (financial consultant, vice president, and so on), dresses well, and works in a snazzy office. Unfortunately, such accessories are often indicators of salespeople — not objective advisors — who recommend investments that will earn them big commissions that come out of your investment dollars.
If you overtrust an advisor, you may not research and monitor your investments as carefully as you should. Figuring that Mr. Vice President is an expert, some investors go along without ever questioning his advice or watching what’s going on with their investments. Too many investors blindly follow analysts’ stock recommendations without considering the many conflicts of interest that such brokerage firm employees have. Brokerage analysts are often cheerleaders for buying various companies’ stock because their firms are courting the business of new stock and bond issuance of the same companies. And just because a big-name accounting firm has blessed a company’s financial statements (Enron) or a company’s CEO says everything is fine (Bear Stearns) doesn’t make a firm’s financial statements accurate or its conditions sound.
Feeling strength and safety in numbers, some investors are lured into buying hot stocks and sectors (for example, industries like technology, healthcare, biotechnology, retail, and so on) after major price increases. Psychologically, it’s reassuring to buy into something that’s going up and gaining accolades. The obvious danger with this practice is buying into investments selling at inflated prices that will soon deflate.
By the late 1990s, investors in the U.S. stock market were being spoiled with gains year after year in excess of the historic average annual return of 9 to 10 percent. Numerous surveys conducted during this period showed that many investors expected to earn returns in the range of 15 to 20 percent annually, nearly double the historic average. As always happens, though, after a period of excessively high returns such as those of the 1990s, returns were below average in the subsequent period beginning in 2000 (and were quite negative in the early and late 2000s). During the market slump in the early 2000s, real estate–related stocks continued to do well; some folks mistakenly believed that the housing sector was immune to setbacks and were surprised by the slump in that sector in the late 2000s.
As I discuss in Part V, newsletters, books, blogs, and financial periodicals lead investors to believe that they can be the next Peter Lynch or Warren Buffett if they follow a simple stock-picking system. The advent of the Internet and online trading capabilities has spawned a whole new generation of short-term (sometimes even same-day) traders.
In my work as a financial counselor, I came across plenty of people who lost a lot of money after they had an early winner and had attributed that success to their investing genius. These folks usually landed on my doorstep after great and humbling losses woke them up.
Inexperienced or nervous investors may be tempted to bail out when it appears that an investment isn’t always profitable and enjoyable. Some investors dump falling investments precisely when they should be doing the reverse: buying more. Sharp stock market pullbacks attract a lot of attention, which leads to concern, anxiety, and, in some cases, panic. This situation occurred during the financial crisis of 2008. As layoffs mushroomed and stocks sank, fear and talk of another Great Depression took hold.
Investing always involves uncertainty. Many people forget this, especially during good economic times. I find that investors are more likely to feel comfortable with riskier investments, such as stocks, when they recognize that all investments carry uncertainty and risk — just in different forms.
Unfortunately, the short-term focus that the media so often takes causes some investors to worry that their investments are in shambles during the inevitable bumps in the road. As I discuss in Part V, the media are often to blame because they hype short-term events and blow those events out of proportion to captivate viewers and listeners. History has shown that financial markets and economies generally recover. If you invest for the long term, then the last six weeks — or even the last couple of years — is a short period. Plus, countless studies demonstrate that no one can predict the future, so you gain little from trying to base your investment plans on predictions. In fact, you can lose more money by trying to time the markets.
Larger-than-normal market declines hold a significant danger for investors: They may encourage decision-making that’s based on emotion rather than logic. Just ask anyone who sold after the stock market collapsed in 1987 — the U.S. stock market dropped 35 percent in a matter of weeks in the fall of that year. Since then, even with the significant declines in the early and late 2000s, the U.S. market has risen about tenfold!
Investors who can’t withstand the volatility of riskier growth-oriented investments, such as stocks, may be better off not investing in such vehicles to begin with. Examining your returns over longer periods helps you keep the proper perspective. If a short-term downdraft in your investments depresses you, avoid tracking your investment values closely. Also, consider investing in highly diversified, less-volatile funds that hold stocks worldwide as well as bonds (see Chapter 8).
Although some investors realize that they can’t withstand losses and sell at the first signs of trouble, other investors find that selling a losing investment is so painful and unpleasant that they continue to hold a poorly performing investment despite the investment’s poor future prospects. Psychological research backs these feelings — people find the pain of accepting a given loss twice as intense as the pleasure of accepting a gain of equal magnitude.
The investment world seems so risky and fraught with pitfalls that some people believe that closely watching an investment can help alert them to impending danger. “The constant tracking is not unlike the attempt to relieve anxiety by fingering worry beads. Yet paradoxically, it can increase emotional distress because it requires a constant state of vigilance,” says psychologist Dr. Paul Minsky.
In my work as a financial counselor, I noticed that investors who were the most anxious about their investments and most likely to make impulsive trading decisions were the ones who watched their holdings too closely, especially those who monitored prices daily. The proliferation of Internet sites and stock market cable television programs offering up-to-the-minute quotations gives these investors even more temptation to over-monitor investments.
Investing is more complicated than simply setting your financial goals (see Chapter 3) and choosing solid investments to help you achieve them. Awareness and understanding of the less tangible issues can maximize your chances for investing success.
I know plenty of high-income earners, including more than a few who earn six figures annually, who have little to invest. Some of these people have high-interest debt outstanding on credit cards and auto loans, yet they spend endless hours researching and tracking investments. I also know folks who built significant personal wealth despite having modest-paying jobs. The difference is the ability to live within their means.
Saving money is only half the battle. The other half is making your money grow. Over long time periods, earning just a few percent more makes a big difference in the size of your nest egg. Earning inflation-beating returns is easy if you’re willing to invest in stocks, real estate, and small businesses. Figure 20-1 shows you how much more money you’ll have in 25 years if you earn investment returns that are greater than the rate of inflation (which historically has been about 3 percent).
As I discuss in Chapter 2, ownership investments (stocks, real estate, and small business) have historically generated returns that are 6 or more percent greater than the inflation rate, while lending investments (savings accounts and bonds) tend to generate returns of only 1 to 2 percent greater than inflation. However, some investors keep too much of their money in lending investments out of fear of holding an investment that can fall greatly in value. Although ownership investments can plunge in value, you need to keep in mind that inflation and taxes eat away at your lending investment balances.
Stock market declines, like earthquakes, bring all sorts of prognosticators, soothsayers, and self-anointed gurus out of the woodwork, particularly among those in the investment community, such as newsletter writers, who have something to sell. The words may vary, but the underlying message doesn’t: “If you had been following my sage advice, you’d be much better off now.”
Clearly, in the world of investing, the most successful investors earn much better returns than the worst ones. But what may surprise you is that you can end up much closer to the top of the investing performance heap than the bottom if you follow some relatively simple rules, such as regularly saving and investing in low-cost growth investments.
18.227.111.58