Managing in the Gray
144
Of course, the conventional wisdom says that a pragmatic,
get-the-job-done approach undermines sensitivity to serious
human concerns. And this is often true. Pragmatism can
simply mean putting on blinders and setting the ethical nice-
ties aside. But ethically sensitive pragmatists approach this
challenge differently. They work hard and often struggle to
find ways through gray areas that work for their organiza-
tions, their teams, and themselves and, at the same time, are
sensitive to serious human concerns.
Ethically sensitive pragmatists accept complexity, ethical
and practical. They also embrace this complexity—not because
this makes decisions easier, but because it makes them better.
They believe that, by putting decisions in their full, realistic,
human context, they raise the chances they will really under-
stand what is at stake when they face hard decisions and will
then have the right foundation for making good decisions.
This was one of the critical lessons that David Lilienthal,
one of the most widely experienced and successful executives
of the last century, drew from his career. During the 1930s,
Lilienthal helped design and then led the Tennessee Valley
Authority when it was constructing a vast, multistate net-
work of dams and electrical infrastructure. In the 1940s, he
helped create and then ran the Atomic Energy Commission,
at a time when this new technology promised to transform
human life and threatened to extinguish it. Then, during the
1950s, Lilienthal founded an engineering consulting firm.
For decades, Lilienthal kept a detailed diary in which he
reflected on his work and his life. Late in his career, Lilienthal
looked back at his wide experience and summarized his view
of managers’ work. “The managerial life,” he wrote, “is the
Chapter_06.indd 144 11/06/16 2:28 AM