You can create the most compelling content in the world. Yet, if people cannot see it while they’re multitasking their hearts out, it is invisible. And so is your brand. The day I understood online users are only loosely committed to content consumption turned my entire strategy upside down—and it might just do the same for yours.
Design is your silent storyteller. The visual aesthetic you share with the world tells a story about the values you uphold. When your audience isn’t ready or willing to listen, a strong visual can capture even the most evasive of minds. Design isn’t ornamental or secondary: it can propel your stories far beyond the spaces you initially planned.
Design is about clear, cohesive aesthetics. But it is also about good construction and organization—looks and user-friendliness, feel and clarity. Good design is a transcendental part of the reading experience, the video or presentation flow, and the structure of the content hub. Design is, in Steve Jobs’s words, not just how something looks and feels—design is how it works.
In the upcoming pages, we will explore how design can affect the frequency and intensity with which your content is consumed by others. I will share a few essential principles to make your content scannable—and therefore ready for twenty-first-century users.
We are faced with the incredible challenge of creating high-quality content for an audience of skimmers. The faster you understand this, the more effective your content tactics will become. Remember the low-involvement readers we discussed in Chapter 3? There is ample evidence to suggest that most online users spend mere seconds on a page before they jump to something else, hence capturing only a fraction of the words you have so carefully crafted.
The Nielsen Norman Group ran a study on how users read online and concluded that, on the average web page, users have time to read at most 28 percent of the words. Chartbeat looked at two billion online visits over the course of a month and found that 55 percent of all users spent less than 15 seconds appreciating the content on the page. So, here we are: investing valuable resources in pieces that are barely read by users who are barely there. The solution? Design.
The following design choices can make your content pieces significantly more scannable for an audience of skimmers:
How many times has a graphic stopped you in your tracks as a result of a mere color choice? When you create supporting graphics to go along with your content or integrate a design element in your multimedia piece, consider if there is enough contrast to give the message a competitive advantage in the channel in which you are dropping it. Users are exposed to thousands of messages surrounding yours, and your visuals need to stand out within that saturated space.
As social platforms and search engines evolve, so do their algorithms. Many of them place a premium on user engagement. In other words, there is a tendency to show more of what people are most engaged with—a virtuous cycle, if you will. Create content that makes users stop/click/like/share, and in turn it will be served to more users who can stop/click/like/share.
Contrast is what will allow a content piece to stand out in any context or platform: if content is king, contrast is crown.
There are many ways to create contrast. For example, typography can generate tension with different sizes, weights, and styles. Color appeals to an even more basic human instinct that is triggered regardless of the language you speak, or the topics you are interested in. For more details about the meanings behind certain color choices, see Chapter 6.
Scientists working in the user experience field have been fascinated with the consequences of certain type choices in the reading experience. We have now spent enough time around screens to make human–computer interaction a worthwhile academic pursuit, and there are entire labs devoted to understanding how we engage with different kinds of monitors and displays.
The following are some valuable typography insights derived from academic studies:
Which text seems easier to read? Why?
Which text would you be most inclined to continue reading?
In 1943, readability expert Rudolph Flesch published a formula to measure reading ease. In his formula, Flesch included two factors: the average sentence length in words, and the average word length in syllables. Since then, his readability score (Flesch Reading Ease) has been incorporated in many text processing programs, including Microsoft Word.
Scientist J. Peter Kincaid developed another readability formula using Flesch’s principles. This formula, called the Flesch-Kincaid Readability Test, was originally created for the United States Navy to estimate how easy it would be for an eighth-grader to understand a piece of writing. This formula is also widely available in text processing tools and plug-ins for content management systems like WordPress.
Want to stay up to date with new data related to fonts and readability? Here are two highly reputable sources to follow:
The Nielsen Norman Group
The Software Usability Research Laboratory (SURL) in the Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) Laboratory at Wichita State University
According to Comscore, the majority of all digital media consumption now takes place in mobile devices, either via apps or the mobile web. According to its 2017 Cross-Platform Report (USA), smartphone usage has driven virtually all of the growth in digital media time spent. Meanwhile, desktop usage continues to decline in favor of the flexibility brought about by powerful smartphones. In addition, Comscore’s Mobile Hierarchy of Needs Study (2017) showed how mobile devices dominate total minutes spent online in at least nine markets, surpassing 90 percent in Indonesia. Make no mistake: we are living in the age of mobile content.
It comes as no surprise, then, that many companies have decided on a mobile-first strategy for everything related to web design. Search engines such as Google are officially penalizing sites that are not mobile-friendly, and are using device responsiveness as a ranking signal. Put simply, users’ content experiences are now largely shaped by the capabilities of the mobile device they are able to carry with them. This scenario has many important implications for content creators. Here are some recommendations:
Avoid ads that interrupt or otherwise ruin the mobile experience.
Ensure that interactive content types like slideshows are easily accessible from a mobile device.
Put a responsive, adaptive, or fluid web design strategy in place to ensure that your content hub is optimized for mobile devices. A web designer will be able to point you in the right direction with regard to the best option to make your site flexible enough to cater to different users’ devices.
Along the same lines, consider font size adaptations for certain screen sizes. This is true for headings as well as body copy.
Keep your images and other media files lightweight enough to load or stream quickly. For video, for example, this will involve making sure that the player works properly for mobile devices without Flash.
Facilitate mobile reading with a clear text hierarchy. Use resources like headings, lists, styling, and summaries.
Luckily for us, the ubiquitous character of mobile devices has led the companies behind popular Content Management Systems to implement responsive features out of the box. Most of the templates available for WordPress, Joomla, and Drupal adapt to mobile devices in some way. Look out for mobile friendliness when you are selecting a template for your content hub.
Designing compelling content is, first and foremost, a communication challenge. Even before you get your hands dirty with software, tools, and specifications, there are general ideas that should dictate the types of design decisions that will benefit your content the most. In working with design teams over the years, I have found the following principles to be a solid starting point for any kind of content design work. Together, these characteristics spell out CLEAR:
Take a hard, deep look at your current design pieces. Check for the following common mistakes:
3.138.125.2