Chapter 3
Avoiding Ethical and 3 Legal Landmines
In This Chapter
• Avoiding common pitfalls
• Sources of general legal and ethical guidance
• Understanding the Federal Acquisition Regulation
• Learning from case law
• Things allowed and not allowed
• Assuring compliance
It’s your worst nightmare. You and your proposal team are plugging away, working long and hard to create a winning proposal for a government contract that would be huge for your company. Your own top management has built a strong team with your company as the prime contractor and including a group of subcontractors known to be “in tight” with the customer. The customer loves you and your team, so you’re whistling while you work and are confident this one is just about in the bag. Then listening to the radio on the way into work one morning, you hear that another division of your company, two time zones away from your location, has been charged with massive irregularities in time accounting, meaning your entire company is now threatened with debarment from government contracting.
In other words, through no fault of your own, for something that has (allegedly) happened in another time zone, there’s now a real possibility that your division will suffer by no longer being eligible to get the contract you’re seeking. Your subcontractors will suffer as well through even less fault of their own.
What’s the lesson here? You cannot be successful in government contracting for long unless you know and adhere to the ethical and legal restrictions in this field. Failure to abide by “the rules” can sink your ship quickly and permanently. On the other hand, if you know and obey those rules, you and your company have the opportunity to have successful business relationships with the public sector.
This chapter gives you guidance on how to avoid the described contractor’s nightmare by focusing on common pitfalls and how to stay away from them. We also cover the sources of general guidance, an acquaintance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), highlights of case law, a short list of what’s okay and what’s not okay, and end with suggestions on how to be assured you’re in compliance with government rules.

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Markets have their own special vocabulary, practices, and conventions, and the government market is no different. If you’re coming from the commercial world (the nongovernment world), you must acquaint yourself with the practices that apply to dealing with governments.
010
Red Flag
This book contains no legal advice. If you‘re uncertain how any of the general guidelines and other material provided here apply to your specific situation, consult an attorney. Choose an attorney familiar with the “tribal customs” of whichever government you’re dealing with, not just general contracting law. There is no substitute for competent, relevant legal advice.
This chapter focuses on the federal government rules and regulations. S&Ls (state and local governments) have corresponding and analogous rules and regulations, but each government has somewhat different rules. If you’re going after S&L work, your best guidance is to rely first on your in-locality partner and the contracts and legal staff of that company for any differences between federal laws and regulations and S&L laws and regulations.
If you’re new to getting government contracts, you may sometimes feel as if you’re a stranger in a strange land. But don’t worry; everyone was new once. Experienced hands come to know what’s permissible and what’s not, and in time you will, too. Until that time comes, consider this book, especially this chapter, as a chance to learn from the mistakes of others and not have to make your own.
Common pitfalls to watch out for include:
• You don’t understand that you can’t speak to anyone in the customer community involved in any way in the selection process after the solicitation is released. The exception is that you may communicate with the customer’s Contracting Officer (KO).
• You are not aware that some customers impose that “cone of silence” even before the final solicitation comes out.
• You don’t understand that you cannot give anyone in the customer community anything of value (certain low-value items are excluded). This applies regardless of the intent of that gift.
• You don’t understand that you are not allowed to collude with other offerors to fix prices or to limit competition.
These are just a handful of the potential pitfalls that could trip you up, but they are the most common, so if you can avoid these, you’re a big step ahead. It’s impossible to anticipate every potential misstep you could make, but you can get yourself much closer to a smooth road by following trusted sources of guidance on ethical and legal issues in contracting.

Sources of General Guidance

Before turning to any official sources, look within yourself and your own sense of good judgment to guide you. You are already equipped to do three things:
• Do what’s right because it’s right.
• If you would not want what you are about to do to appear in the front section of tomorrow morning’s Washington Post (and then all over the Internet, too), don’t do it.
• In the words of Jiminy Cricket, from Walt Disney’s Pinocchio “ ... always let your conscience be your guide.”

Office of Government Ethics (OGE)

Okay, so you want something a little more official than Jiminy Cricket? Maybe some place where people have diplomas on the wall or papers published? I can understand that. So let me suggest the Office of Government Ethics (OGE), established in 1978 by The Ethics in Government Act. Although this office was established as a part of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), the Office of Government Ethics Reauthorization Act of 1988 made it a separate agency.
The OGE’s charter is to prevent conflicts of interest by government employees and to resolve those conflicts when they do happen. OGE establishes policy and provides guidance about ethics issues. It is unlikely that you, as a government contractor, would have occasion to contact this office. However, it does exist and does help determine what is and is not acceptable practice.

The Federal Acquisition Regulation

The FAR is the government-wide procurement regulation mandated by Congress and issued by the Department of Defense (DOD), the General Services Administration (GSA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). All federal agencies are authorized to issue regulations implementing the FAR.
011
Government Insider
You can read the complete Federal Acquisition Regulation at www.acqnet.gov/Far.
def•i•ni•tion
Debarment is an official action taken to exclude a contractor from contracting and subcontracting for a reasonable, specified period because of actions so serious or compelling in nature that it affects the present responsibility of a government contractor or subcontractor.
Typically, the FAR clauses are written to describe what is absolutely prohibited or to state what is permitted up to a certain limit. For example, anything given to a government employee for influencing that employee to give something of value in return, such as awarding your company a contract, is strictly prohibited and punishable by fines and imprisonment. Doing other things that are prohibited can result in debarment, which is the act of shutting out (that is, preventing) you and perhaps your company from winning future government contracts.
The relevant clauses in the FAR are in Part 3—Improper Business Practices and Personal Conflicts of Interest. You and your company staff members should review this information. The best way to avoid running afoul of the regulation is to know what the FAR says. The clauses are within Part 52 of the FAR, specifically at 52.203.1 through 52.203.14. Part 3 provides the policy and guidance.
012
Red Flag
Many large agencies, most prominently the Department of Defense, have agency-specific supplements to the FAR (see www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/index.html). If you’re dealing with one of these agencies, you must also be aware of those regulations. If in doubt about whether the agency you’re dealing with has supplemental regulations to FAR, go to the agency’s website and search for “FAR Supplements.”

Case Law Made Simple

Not only laws and regulations set the limits on ethical behavior. Case law also helps dictate appropriate behavior.
A great deal of case law has been recorded as a result of legal questions about government procurements. Again, you must seek competent, relevant legal advise on how, if at all, the case law applies to your situation. With any luck, you won’t find yourself appearing in any future case law!
def•i•ni•tion
Case law is the body of legal opinions of various courts from individual legal actions, such as criminal and civil suits.
Case law has motivated changes in the FAR and other governing regulations. For example, if the outcome of a specific case results in the court deciding that something is not illegal but the government believes it should be illegal, the response is to put into place new regulations or pass new laws to apply to future such acts.
013
Government Insider
Many useful white papers on legal and ethical issues are available to the general public through the National Contract Management Association (NCMA) website (www.ncmahq.org). The NCMA is a highly respected professional organization. It provides research and training programs, thereby lifting the performance standards and the actual performance, of individuals with the government having contract management responsibilities. These activities also assist in raising the performance standards and the performance of those in the private sector with corresponding responsibilities for contract management.

What Is Permissible and What Is Not

Remember that this chapter emphasizes only the highlights of some of the most common aspects of government regulations for contractors. This list of acceptable and not acceptable actions is a good starting point, covering some common situations you are likely to find yourself in, but don’t forget to read the FAR and confer with legal counsel when you need to know about situations we’ve not covered here.

Permissible Conduct

Several years ago, a Washington Redskins quarterback beat his own head against a concrete block wall after a particularly pivotal play. The player injured his neck and missed several games. When asked, the Redskins coach said he never thought to tell his players not to beat their head against a block wall.
The same holds true with ethical guidelines when dealing with the government in contracting situations. It’s not accurate to say, “If it’s not prohibited, then it’s permissible.” Similarly, it’s not a worthwhile exercise to try to list everything that’s permissible. It’s not wise to conduct relations with your government customer on the basis that you’ve never seen it on a list of prohibited actions.
The best guidance we can give is to proceed with care in any relations you have with your government customer personnel. And here are two examples of reasonable things you can do for and with government employees:
• Taking a government employee out to lunch or giving gifts, subject to a limit of $20 on any one occasion and $50 in a calendar year (see 5 CFR Para 2635.204(a).) So as a contractor or an offeror or prospective offeror, it’s acceptable to buy a government employee a sandwich once in a while.
• Inviting a government employee having procurement responsibilities for an outing, as long as the employee pays a fair share of the costs associated with that outing.

Conduct That Is Not Permissible

Here’s a short list of sample conduct not permissible by government contractors:
• Providing bribes to government officials.
• Giving a gratuity (value not stated) to a government official or employee and intended to obtain a contract or favorable treatment under a contract as a result of providing that gratuity.
• Hiring a government employee if the prospective employer (you as the contractor) has interests that could be affected by performance or nonperformance of the government employee’s current duties (Procurement Integrity Act—PIA). This addresses the problem of the “revolving door” of government employees taking jobs with the very contractors they previously were responsible for evaluating or managing. Recent history has a half dozen individuals—some from government and some from private industry—convicted of conflicts of interest. These individuals and their companies paid heavy fines, and the individuals were guests of the government in involuntary confinement.
• Hiring former federal officials within a period of one year (subject to detailed qualifications). (See the PIA.)

Compliance, Integrity, and Ethics

Many companies doing business with the federal government set their own rules and regulations, a code of conduct that details permissible behaviors as well as nonpermissible behaviors. You and your company should have a program in place to ensure compliance with, at minimum, the government’s rules and regulations. Here are four simple suggestions for how to do that:
• Include a specific section in your policies and procedures (P&P) manuals covering these issues. Make sure it’s up-to-date with the latest rules and regulations. The principles remain largely unchanged, but the detailed interpretations do change, and often, various government agencies promulgate new regulations to prevent newly discovered loopholes in the current ones.
• Make training in ethics a part of all new employees’ (and contractors’!) orientations. All employees need to understand the important elements of your company’s own policies and procedures, and how your own company seeks to avoid ethics violations.
• Make ethics training a part of your annual retraining and updating. Believe it or not, the ethics rules change from time to time.
• Have a clear path for all employees and contractors to report any instance of a possible ethics violation. This path should allow individuals to report suspected violations without fear of retaliation, under protection as a whistleblower.
Beltway Buzz
Some people on your proposal team have an even greater need to know about ethical and legal expectations. These include relationship managers, marketing managers, program managers (particularly those working at a customer site, where daily contact is expected, and where violations—however innocent—are most likely to occur), and even support personnel working on a customer site.
Over and above these guidelines, FAR, Part 3.1002, states, in part:
• Government contractors must conduct themselves with the highest degree of integrity and honesty.
• Contractors should have a written code of business ethics and conduct. To promote compliance with such code of business ethics and conduct, contractors should have an employee business ethics and compliance training program and an internal system that:
• Are suitable to the size of the company and extent of its involvement in government contracting;
• Facilitate timely discovery and disclosure of improper conduct in connection with government contracts; and
• Ensure corrective measures are promptly instituted and carried out.”
The Least You Need to Know
• The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is your primary source of general guidance on legal and ethical issues in government contracting, especially Part 3 of FAR.
• Some government agencies have additional rules and regulations specific to them that are supplements to FAR and are usually available on the agency’s website.
• Find reliable sources within your company to turn to for advice on any contemplated action that might be outside the laws and regulations.
• You must have an ethics program appropriate to your level of government contracting, whether federal, state, or local.
• Everyone in your company must know where to go within your company to report any perceived ethics problems.
• There is no substitute for focused, competent expert legal advice in specific situations.
..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.223.170.63