Kevin was a new manager. He was learning how to track milestones, monitor risks and issues, and keep costs under control. He was a quick study and was learning the basics well. When it came to status reports, Kevin was thorough, concise, and relevant in what he reported. He spent a tremendous amount of time working on his status reports. He focused so much on producing perfect reports that he sent them a week after the "as-of" date. The content was great, the recipients were appropriate, and the e-mails were well written. But because the content was so out of date, the status reports were beyond action by the recipients and management.
He focused so much on producing perfect status reports that he sent them a week after the "as-of" date.
Imagine opening the newspaper to look at stock quotes, and the quotes you see are from a week ago. Or going to the sports section and seeing sports scores from last month. Or getting a status report that documents a significant management issue, only to find out that a project will miss its delivery date because the issue wasn't addressed in time. Getting information late is irritating and frustrating and can be costly to an organization. When it comes to status reports, late delivery of information is very avoidable. So if it is so avoidable, why is it a problem? There are several causes:
On a project I managed at Microsoft, we refined our status reporting process to where status reports were sent within 30 minutes of our weekly status meeting. Our status reports were relevant, fresh, and timely. There was no magic, just some discipline and cooperation. Here are some techniques you can apply:
You owe it to your recipients, your management, and your team to send timely status reports that don't contain stale or outdated information. Sending status reports that are not only clear and concise but timely will better ensure that your recipients understand the current project status and will help you with issues you may be experiencing.
3.14.130.24