In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU makes changes to several Topics, and adds a new Topic—ASC 326.
The ASU is effective:
Early adoption is allowed for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods therein.
Except where noted in the table below, entities should use modified-retrospective approach and record a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period that the entity adopts the guidance. For example, a calendar-year private company that adopts the standard in 2021 records the cumulative effect adjustment on January 1, 2020.
The new guidance affects several topics. Readers should look to those topics for more information. This chapter will outline how ASU 2016-13 affects ASC 310. ASU 2016-13 changes the accounting for credit impairments for trade and other receivables and purchased-credit impaired (PCD) financial assets. The guidance on the latter is being deleted from ASC 310 and moved to ASC 326. Further information on accounting for PCDs under the ASU 2016-13 amendments can be found in the chapter on ASC 326.
Under the new guidance, ASC 326's current expected credit loss (CECL) model replaces the expected loss model in ASC 310-10. Entities will have to estimate expected credit losses for trade receivables and other financing receivables. Currently, an allowance or loss is recognized when it is probable. Under the new model, an allowance or loss will be recognized upon initial recognition of the asset and will reflect all future events that will lead to a recognized loss, regardless of whether it is probable that future event will occur. So, the extant guidance looks at past events and current conditions, the new guidance is forward looking and requires estimates for future expectations.
To assess credit risk, the new guidance allows entities to continue to pool assets with similar characteristics. However, entities will want to take a second look at the receivables in a pool and make sure they have similar risk characteristics.
If an entity is not able to develop a reasonable and supportable forecast for the full remaining life of a financial asset, it should go back to using historical loss information.
Perhaps the best way to understand how the new guidance works is to look at a simple example based on an example in the ASU.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20) Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.
The ASU is effective:
Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period.
An entity should apply the amendments on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Additionally, in the period of adoption, an entity should disclose a change in accounting principle.
The ASU affects all entities, including investment companies, that purchase callable debt securities at a premium. In the scope of the ASU are securities with explicit, noncontingent call features that are callable at fixed prices on present dates.
Out of the ASU's scope are:
Under existing guidance, investors generally amortize purchase premiums over the contractual life of the security. Only if the investor has a large number of similar securities is it allowed to elect to consider estimates of principal payments. Amortization of the premium over the contractual life may result in a loss when the security is called before maturity. Under the guidance in the ASU, investors must amortize the purchase premium to the first call date. The ASU should provide the following benefits:
ASC 310, Receivables, consists of four subtopics:
The scope and scope exceptions for this topic are presented at the beginning of the section on each subtopic.
Source: ASC 310, Glossary Sections. Also see Appendix A, Definitions of Terms, for definitions of Acquisition, Development, and Construction Arrangement, Amortized Cost Basis, Bargain Purchase Option, Bargain Renewal Option, Commencement Date of the Lease (Commencement Date), Commitment Fees, Contract, Control, Current Assets, Debt, Debt Security, Direct Financing Lease, Loan Origination Costs, Effective Interest Rates, Fair Value, Financial Asset, Financing Receivable, Indirectly Related to the Leased Property, Initial Investment, Lease, Lease Modification, Lease Payments, Lease Receivable, Lease Term, Lending Activities, Lessee, Lessor, Leveraged Lease, Loan Origination Fees, Market Participants, Not-for-Profit Entity, Noncancelable Lease Term, Orderly Transaction, Penalty, Probable, Public Business Entity, Recorded Investment, Purchased Financial Asset with Credit Deterioration, Recourse, Related Parties, Sales-type Lease, Standby Letter of Credit, Time of Restructuring, Troubled Debt Restructuring, and Underlying Asset.
Accretable Yield. The excess of a loan's cash flows expected to be collected over the investor's initial investment in the loan.
Blended-rate Loans. Blended-rate loans involve lending new funds at market interest rates combined with existing loans at rates currently lower than market rates. (Those funds are not advanced under a line of credit.)
Carrying Amount. For a receivable, the face amount increased or decreased by applicable accrued interest and applicable unamortized premium, discount, finance charges, or issue costs and also an allowance for uncollectible amounts and other valuation accounts. For a payable, the face amount increased or decreased by applicable accrued interest and applicable unamortized premium, discount, finance charges, or issue costs.
Cash Flows Expected at Acquisition. The investor's estimate, at acquisition, of the amount and timing of undiscounted principal, interest, and other cash flows expected to be collected. This would be the investor's best estimate of cash flows, including the effect of prepayments if considered, that is used in determining the acquisition price, and, in a business combination, the investor's estimate of fair value for purposes of acquisition price assignment in accordance with subtopic 805-20. One acceptable method of making this estimate is described in paragraphs 820-10-55-3F through 55-3G and 820-10-55-4 through 55-20, which provide guidance on present value techniques.
Class of Financing Receivable. A group of financing receivables determined on the basis of all of the following:
See paragraphs 310-10-55-16 through 55-18 and 310-10-55-22.
Collateral-dependent Loan. A loan for which the repayment is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral.
Common Risk Characteristics. Loans with similar credit risk (for example, evidenced by similar Fair Isaac Company [FICO] scores, an automated rating process for credit reports) or risk ratings, and one or more predominant risk characteristics, such as financial asset type, collateral type, size, interest rate, date of origination, term, and geographic location.
Completion of a Transfer. A completion of a transfer occurs for a transaction with any of the following characteristics:
Contractually Required Payments Receivable. The total undiscounted amount of all uncollected contractual principal and contractual interest payments both past due and scheduled for the future, adjusted for the timing of prepayments, if considered, less any reduction by the investor. For an acquired asset-backed security with required contractual payments of principal and interest, the contractually required payments receivable is represented by the contractual terms of the security. However, when contractual payments of principal and interest are not specified by the security, it is necessary to consider the contractual terms of the underlying loans or assets.
Credit Card Fees. The periodic uniform fees that entitle cardholders to use credit cards. The amount of such fees generally is not dependent upon the level of credit available or frequency of usage. Typically, the use of credit cards facilitates the cardholder's payment for the purchase of goods and services on a periodic, as-billed basis (usually monthly), involves the extension of credit, and, if payment is not made when billed, involves imposition of interest or finance charges. Credit card fees include fees received in similar arrangements, such as charge card and cash card fees.
Credit Quality Indicator. A statistic about the credit quality of a financial asset.
Expected Residual Profit. The amount of profit, whether called interest or another name, such as equity kicker, above a reasonable amount of interest and fees expected to be earned by a lender.
Idle Time. Idle time represents the time that a lender's employees are not actively involved in performing origination activities for specific loans. Idle time can be caused by many factors, including lack of work, delays in work flow, and equipment failure. Idle time can be measured through the establishment of standard costs, time studies, ratios of productive and nonproductive time, and other methods.
Incremental Direct Costs. Costs to originate a loan that have both of the following characteristics:
Initial Investment. The amount paid to the seller plus any fees paid or less any fees received.
Lending Activities. Lending, committing to lend, refinancing or restructuring loans, arranging standby letters of credit, syndicating loans, and leasing activities are lending activities.
Loan. A contractual right to receive money on demand or on fixed or determinable dates that is recognized as an asset in the creditor's statement of financial position. Examples include but are not limited to accounts receivable (with terms exceeding one year) and notes receivable.
Loan Participation. A transaction in which a single lender makes a large loan to a borrower and subsequently transfers undivided interests in the loan to groups of banks or other entities.
Loan Syndication. A transaction in which several lenders share in lending to a single borrower. Each lender loans a specific amount to the borrower and has the right to repayment from the borrower. It is common for groups of lenders to jointly fund those loans when the amount borrowed is greater than any one lender is willing to lend.
Net Investment in an Original Loan. The net investment in an original loan includes the unpaid loan principal, any remaining unamortized net fees or costs, any remaining unamortized purchase premium or discount, and any accrued interest receivable.
Nonaccretable Difference. A loan's contractually required payments receivable in excess of the amount of its cash flows expected to be collected.
Portfolio Segment. The level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic methodology to determine its allowance for credit losses. See paragraphs 310-10-55-21 through 55-22.
Private Label Credit Cards. Private label credit cards are those credit cards that are issued by, or on behalf of, a merchandising entity for the purchase of goods or services that are sold at that entity's place(s) of business.
Recorded Investment. The amount of the investment in a loan, which is not net of a valuation allowance, but which does reflect any direct write-down of the investment.
Recorded Investment in the Receivable. The recorded investment in the receivable is the face amount increased or decreased by applicable accrued interest and unamortized premium, discount, finance charges, or acquisition costs and may also reflect a previous direct write-down of the investment.
Recourse. The right of a transferee of receivables to receive payment from the transferor of those receivables for any of the following:
Revolving Privileges. A feature in a loan that provides the borrower with the option to make multiple borrowings up to a specified maximum amount, to repay portions of previous borrowings, and to then reborrow under the same loan.
ASC 310-10-15-3 lists two exceptions to the guidance in the General Subsections of ASC 310-10:
ASC 310-10-15-5 states that the Acquisition, Development, and Construction Subsections' guidance applies to all entities, but not all arrangements. It applies only to those acquisition, development, and construction arrangements in which the lender participates in expected residual profit.
Receivables come from credit sales, loans, or other transactions and may be in the form of loans, notes, or other type of financial instruments. Trade receivables and other customary trade term receivables that are due in no longer than one year, provided that management has the intent and ability to hold those receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity, payoff is measured at:
Loans receivable that management will hold until maturity or payoff are valued at outstanding principal adjusted for:
If a receivable is due on terms exceeding one year, the proper valuation is the present value of future payments to be received. These future payments are computed by using an interest (discount) rate commensurate with the risks involved, as of the date of the receivable's creation. In many situations where an explicit interest rate is provided, the rate commensurate with the risks involved is the rate stated in the agreement between the payee and the obligor. However, if the receivable is noninterest-bearing or if the rate stated in the agreement is not indicative of the market rate for a debtor of similar creditworthiness under similar terms, interest must be imputed at the market rate. The resulting discount is amortized as additional interest income over the life of the agreement, per ASC 835.
Receivables that are pledged or assigned to a lender as collateral for a lending agreement remain under the control of the reporting entity and, therefore, remain on its statement of financial position to inform readers of the financial statements about the pledge or assignment.
As an alternative to borrowing against the value of the receivables, customer obligations are sometimes sold to generate cash before their due dates. If the transferor has no continuing involvement with the transferred assets or with the transferee, it is clear that a sale has taken place, and a gain or loss on sale is measured and recognized. However, in many cases, the transferor of the receivables has continuing involvement with the transferred assets because it sells the receivables with recourse for uncollectible amounts, retains an interest in the receivables, or agrees to service the receivables after the sale. The greater the control that the transferor retains over the receivables, the more likely that the transfer will be accounted for as a secured borrowing rather than a sale.
Financing receivables include:
(ASC 310-10-55-14)
Accounts receivable, open accounts, or trade accounts are agreements by customers to pay for services received or merchandise obtained.
Notes receivable are formalized obligations evidenced by written promissory notes. Notes receivable generally arise from cash advances but could result from sales of merchandise or the provision of services.
Entities may enter into forward standby commitments to purchase loans at a stated price in return for a standby commitment fee. Settlement is in the hands of the seller. The seller would deliver the loans only when and if the contract price is equal to or executes the market price on the settlement date. This arrangement is, in effect, a written put option. (ASC 310-10-05-05)
Factored receivables are sold to a third party, usually a factor. The factor assumes the risk of collection, without recourse to the transferor. Debtors pay the factor directly. (ASC 310-10-05-06)
Rebates are refunds of portions of precomputed finance charges on installment loans or trade receivables. Rebate calculations are often governed by law. (ASC 310-10-05-7)
The recording of a valuation allowance for anticipated uncollectible amounts is almost always necessary. The direct write-off method, in which a receivable is charged off only when it is clear that it cannot be collected, is unsatisfactory since it overstates assets and also results in a mismatching of revenues and expenses. (Note that the direct write-off method may be required for tax purposes, but if so, this results in temporary differences for which interperiod tax allocation will generally be required.) Proper matching, which remains a valid financial reporting objective, can only be achieved if bad debts are recorded in the same fiscal period as the revenues to which they are related. Since the amount of uncollectible accounts is not known with certainty, an estimate must generally be made.
There are two popular estimation techniques, both acceptable under GAAP:
For the percentage-of-sales method, historical data are analyzed to ascertain the relationship between bad debts and credit sales. The derived percentage is then applied to the current period's sales revenues to arrive at the appropriate debit to bad debts expense for the year. The offsetting credit is made to allowance for uncollectible accounts. When specific customer accounts are subsequently identified as uncollectible, they are written off against this allowance.
Care must be taken to ensure that the bad debt ratio computed will be representative of uncollectibility of the current period's credit sales. A ratio based on historical experience may require an adjustment to reflect the current economic climate. For example, if a large percentage of customers are concentrated in a geographic area that is experiencing an economic downturn, the rate of default may increase over that previously suffered. Changes in credit terms and in customer mix may also affect the relationship between sales and bad debts, and should be given consideration in determining the bad debt percentage to be applied to current period credit sales. In practice, these relationships evolve slowly over time and may not always be observed over the short term.
When aging the accounts, an analysis is prepared of the customer receivables at the date of the statement of financial position. Each customer's balance is categorized by the number of days or months the underlying invoices have remained outstanding. Based on the reporting entity's past experience or on other available statistics, such as industry trends, historical bad debts percentages are applied to each of these aggregate amounts, with larger percentages being applied to the older accounts. The end result of this process is a computed total dollar amount that implies the proper ending balance in the allowance for uncollectible receivables at the date of the statement of financial position. The computed amount is compared to the balance in the valuation account, and an adjustment is made for the differences.
Both of the estimation techniques should produce approximately the same result over the course of a number of years. Nonetheless, these adjustments are based upon estimates and will never precisely predict ultimate results. There are two possible accounting treatments for adjustments, depending on the circumstances.
If a receivable is due on terms exceeding one year, the proper valuation is the present value of future payments to be received, determined by using an interest rate commensurate with the risks involved at the date of the receivable's creation. In many situations the interest rate commensurate with the risks involved is the rate stated in the agreement between the payee and the debtor. However, if the receivable is noninterest-bearing or if the rate stated in the agreement is not indicative of the market rate for a debtor of similar creditworthiness under similar terms, interest is imputed at the market rate. A valuation allowance is used to adjust the face amount of the receivable to the present value at the market rate. The balance in the valuation allowance is amortized as additional interest income so that interest income is recognized using a constant rate of interest over the life of the agreement. Initial recording of such a valuation allowance also results in the recognition of an expense, typically (for customer receivables) reported as selling expense or as a contra revenue item (sales discounts). ASC 835-30 specifies when and how interest is to be imputed when the receivable is noninterest-bearing or the stated rate on the receivable is not reasonable. It applies to transactions conducted at arm's length between unrelated parties, as well as to transactions in which captive finance companies offer favorable financing to increase sales of related companies. Detailed information and examples can be found in the chapter on ASC 835.
Receivables generally arise from extending credit to others.
If the reporting entity has the intent and ability to hold trade receivables or loans for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff, those receivables are reported in the statement of financial position at their outstanding principal (face) amounts less any write-offs and allowance for uncollectible receivables or at fair value. Loans originated by the reporting entity are reported net of deferred fees or costs of originating them, and purchased loans are reported net of any unamortized premium or discount. If a decision has been made to sell loans, those loans are transferred to a held-for-sale category on the statement of financial position and reported at the lower of cost or fair value. Any amount by which cost exceeds fair value is accounted for as a valuation allowance.
When a trade receivable or loan is deemed uncollectible, the balance is written off against the allowance for uncollectible receivables. Recoveries of loans and trade receivables that were previously written off are recorded when received—either by a credit directly to earnings or by a credit to the allowance for uncollectible receivables. A credit loss on a financial instrument with off-statement-of-financial-position risk is recorded as a liability rather than being included in a valuation allowance netted against a recognized financial instrument. When settled, the credit loss is deducted from the liability. (ASC 835-10-35-3)
ASC 310-10-25 also includes standards for recognizing fees related to receivables. Delinquency fees are recognized when chargeable, provided that collectibility is reasonably assured. Prepayment fees are not recognized until prepayments have occurred. Rebates of finance charges due because payments are made earlier than required are recognized when the receivables are prepaid and are accounted for as adjustments to interest income. (ASC 310-10-25-11 through 25-13)
An organization can alter the timing of cash flows resulting from sales to its customers by using its accounts receivable as collateral for borrowings or by selling the receivables outright. A wide variety of arrangements can be structured by the borrower and lender, but the most common are pledging, assignment, and factoring.
Accounts receivable pledging is an agreement in which accounts receivable are used as collateral for loans. The customers whose accounts have been pledged are not aware of this event, and their payments are still remitted to the original entity to which the debt was owed. The pledged accounts merely serve as security to the lender, giving comfort that sufficient assets exist to generate cash flows adequate in amount and timing to repay the debt. However, the debt is paid by the borrower whether or not the pledged receivables are collected and whether or not the pattern of their collection matches the payments due on the debt.
The only accounting issue relating to pledging is that of adequate disclosure. See the Disclosure and Presentation Checklist for Commercial Businesses at www.wiley.com/go/GAAP2018 .
Accounts receivable assignment is a more formalized transfer of the receivables to the lending institution. The lender investigates the specific receivables that are being proposed for assignment and will approve those that it deems worthy as collateral. Usually customers are not aware that their accounts have been assigned and they continue to forward their payments to the original obligee (the borrowing entity). In some cases, the assignment agreement requires that collection proceeds be immediately delivered to the lender. The borrower is, however, the primary obligor of the debt and is required to make timely payment on the debt whether or not the receivables are collected as anticipated. The borrowing is with recourse, and the general credit of the borrower is pledged to the payment of the debt.
Since the lender knows that not all the receivables will be collected on a timely basis by the borrower, only a fraction of the face value of the receivables will be advanced as a loan to the borrower. Typically, this amount ranges from 70 to 90%, depending upon the credit history and collection experience of the borrower.
Assigned accounts receivable remain the assets of the borrower and continue to be presented in its financial statements, with appropriate disclosure of the assignment similar to that illustrated for pledging. Prepaid finance charges would be recorded as a prepaid expense and amortized to expense over the period to which the charges apply.
In the typical case involving the assignment of receivables, the borrower retains control of the receivables, and it is clear that the transaction is a secured borrowing rather than a sale. If it is unclear whether the borrower has retained control of the receivables, a determination must be made as to whether to account for the transfer as a sale or as a secured borrowing. Making that determination is discussed in the chapter on ASC 860, Transfers of Financial Assets under ASC 860.
Accounts receivable factoring traditionally involves the outright sale of receivables to a finance company known as a factor. These arrangements involve (1) notification to the customer to remit future payments to the factor and (2) the transfer of receivables to the factor without recourse to the transferor. The factor assumes the risk of an inability to collect. Thus, once a factoring arrangement is completed, the transferor has no further involvement with the accounts, except for a return of merchandise.
In its simplest form, the receivables are sold and the difference between the cash received and the carrying value is recognized as a gain or loss.
The classic factoring arrangement provides two financial services to the business:
The factor is compensated for each of these services. Interest is charged based on the anticipated length of time between the date the factoring arrangement is consummated and the expected collection date of the receivables sold. A fee is charged based upon the factor's anticipated bad debt losses.
Some companies factor receivables as a means of transferring bad debt risk, but leave the cash on deposit with the factor until the weighted-average due date of the receivables, thereby avoiding interest charges. This arrangement is still referred to as factoring, since the customer receivables have been sold. However, the borrowing entity does not receive cash but instead records a new receivable, usually captioned “Due from Factor.” This receivable, in contrast to the original customer receivables, is essentially without risk and is presented in the statement of financial position without a deduction for estimated uncollectible receivables.
Merchandise returns are normally the responsibility of the transferor, who must then make the appropriate settlement with the factor. To protect against the possibility that merchandise returns will diminish the total of receivables to be collected, a factor will frequently advance only a portion of the face amount of the factored receivables (less any interest and factoring fee deductions). The factor will retain a certain fraction of the total proceeds relating to the portion of sales that are anticipated to be returned by customers. This sum is known as the factor's holdback. When merchandise is returned to the transferor, an entry is made offsetting the receivable from the factor. At the end of the return privilege period, any remaining holdback will become due and payable to the transferor.
The factor's holdback receivable recorded by the seller is required by ASC 860 to be an allocation of the carrying value of the receivables ($190,000) between the assets sold (the receivables) and the assets retained (the holdback) based on their relative fair values at the date of the factoring agreement. The factor holds back 5% of the face value ($200,000) for a total of $10,000. Upon settlement the loss or gain recorded at the origination of the factoring arrangement needs to be adjusted because the factor pays the remaining holdback of $5,200 ($10,000 holdback – $4,800 returns) in settlement of an asset with a carrying value of $4,700 ($9,500 – $4,800).
Factoring results in a transfer of title to the factored receivables. Where there is a no recourse provision or other continuing involvement with the receivables, the removal of the receivables from the borrower's statement of financial position is clearly warranted.
Another variation is known as factoring with recourse. Accounting for factoring with recourse requires a determination of whether the transfer is a sale or a secured borrowing. That determination is made by applying ASC 860. See the chapter on ASC 860 for more information.
ASC 310-10-35 applies to all creditors and to all loans except:
(ASC 310-10-35-13)
If it is probable that a creditor will not collect all amounts (principal and interest) owed to the degree specified in the loan agreement, a loan is considered impaired. (ASC 310-10-35-16) A delay does not impair the loan if the creditor collects all amounts due, including interest accrued during the delay, at the contractual rate.
An impaired loan can be measured on a loan-by-loan basis or aggregated with other loans with common risk factors. The impaired loan can be measured in any of the following ways:
(ASC 310-10-35-22)
When foreclosure becomes probable, the creditor must measure impairment based on the fair value of the collateral. This must be done so that the impairment is not delayed until actual impairment occurs. (ASC 310-10-35-32)
Other measurement considerations include:
(ASC 310-10-35-25)
The choice must be consistently applied. Projections of factor changes should not be made. (ASC 310-10-35-28)
After impairment, creditors should use the methods described above to record, measure, and present impairment. If the existing policy results in a recorded investment less than fair value, no additional impairment is recognized. (ASC 310-10-35-37)
ASC 310-20-15-3 specifically excludes from ASC 310-20 guidance:
These fees should be deferred and recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment of interest income. If there are any related direct loan origination costs, the origination fees and origination costs should be netted, and only the net amount should be deferred and amortized via the interest method. Origination costs include those incremental costs such as credit checks and security arrangements, among others, pertaining to a specific loan.
The only exception to the foregoing rule would be in the instance of certain loans that also qualify as debt instruments under ASC 320. For those carried in the “trading securities” portfolio, related loan origination fees should be charged to expense when incurred; the requirement that these be carried at fair value would make adding these costs to the asset carrying amounts a useless exercise.
Often fees are received in advance in exchange for a commitment to originate or purchase a loan. These fees should be deferred (ASC 310-20-25-4) and recognized upon exercise of the commitment as an adjustment of interest income over the life of the loan (ASC 310-20-35-2), as in Example 1 for origination costs and fees. (ASC 310-20-25-11) If a commitment expires unexercised, the fees should be recognized as income upon expiration.
As with loan origination fees and costs, if both commitment fees are received and commitment costs are incurred relating to a commitment to originate or purchase a loan, the net amount of fees or costs should be deferred and recognized over the life of the loan. (ASC 310-20-25-12)
If there is a remote possibility of exercise, the commitment fees may be recognized on a straight-line basis over the commitment period as “service fee income.” If there is a subsequent exercise, the unamortized fees at the date of exercise should be recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment of interest income, as in the previous example.
In certain cases, commitment fees are determined retroactively as a percentage of available lines of credit. If the commitment fee percentage is nominal in relation to the stated rate on the related borrowing, with the borrowing earning the market rate of interest, the fees shall be recognized in income as of the determination date. (ASC 310-20-35-3)
(Assume this is not a troubled debt restructuring.) When the terms of a refinanced/restructured loan are as favorable to the lender as the terms for loans to customers with similar risks who are not in a restructuring, the refinanced loan is treated as a new loan, and all prior fees of the old loan are recognized in interest income when the new loan is made. This condition is met if:
(ASC 310-20-35-9)
When the above situation is not satisfied, the fees or costs from the old loan become part of the net investment in the new loan.
Fees paid or fees received when purchasing a loan or group of loans should normally be considered part of the initial investment, to be recognized in income over the lives of the loans. However, if the loans qualify as debt securities under ASC 320 and are held in the lender's “trading securities” portfolio, these fees should be reported in income when paid or received, and not added to the cost of the loans.
Often lenders provide demand loans (loans with no scheduled payment terms). In this case, any net fees or costs should be recognized on a straight-line basis over a period determined by mutual agreement of the parties, usually over the estimated length of the loan.
Under a revolving line of credit, any net fees or costs are recognized in income on a straight-line basis over the period that the line of credit is active. If the line of credit is terminated due to the borrower's full payment, any unamortized net fees or costs are recognized in income.
Some ancillary costs do not qualify for deferral and should be expensed. The following exhibit lists some of those costs and others that do qualify for deferral.
Exhibit—Other Lending-Related Costs Incurred by Lender
Cost | Treatment |
Advertising | Expense as incurred |
Soliciting potential borrowers | Expense as incurred |
Servicing existing loans | Expense as incurred |
Establishing and monitoring credit policies, supervision, and administration | Expense as incurred |
(ASC 320-20-25-3) | |
Software for loan processing and origination | Expense as incurred |
(ASC 320-20-25-4) | |
Fees paid to service loans for loan processing and origination | Expense as incurred |
(ASC 320-20-25-5) | |
Employee bonuses related to loan origination activities | Portion directly related are deferrable |
(ASC 320-20-25-6) | |
Commission-based compensation directly related to time spent | Deferrable |
Allocation of total compensation between origination and other activities so that costs associated with lending activities deferred for completed loans | Deferrable |
(ASC 320-20-25-7) |
This subtopic applies to loans acquired by completion of a transfer for which it is probable at the time of acquisition that the new investor will not be able to collect all the contractually required payments. The loans have evidence of deterioration of credit quality since their origination. ASC 310-30-15-2 excludes the following transactions from ASC 310-30 guidance:
ASC 310-30-15-4 further excludes the following transactions and activities:
ASC 310-30 requires the preparer to differentiate between securities investments acquired directly from the issuer and those obtained on the secondary market. It imposes accounting requirements for debt instruments acquired in transfers when the purchase price reflects a change in the debtor's credit standing since the original issuance of the instrument. This guidance is applicable to all acquirers of loans or debt securities (bonds, securitized loans, etc.), not merely financial institutions, although fewer commercial or industrial entities would tend to be making such purchases.
Debt instruments (whole loans or loan participations, as well as securities) will generally trade in the secondary market at prices that vary from the amount at which they were issued originally. The prices may be higher or lower than the face amount, depending on the confluence of several factors. Because interest rates change almost continually, it is rare that market rates will correspond to the nominal rate on any given loan or debt security, even if the loan or instrument originally carried a market yield. Furthermore, many instruments are issued at premiums or discounts at inception, for various reasons. In the secondary market, prices will be adjusted continually to reflect current market conditions related to the loan's (or security's) coupon rate and the credit standing of the issuer/borrower, within the context of market rates of interest and other factors. If current rates are higher than the instrument's coupon (i.e., contractual) rate, it will trade at a discount from par value, while if the current rates are below the coupon rate, it will sell for a premium, if other variables are held constant.
Furthermore, the borrower's creditworthiness may have changed since the loan was originated or the debt instrument was issued. This also impacts the price at which the loan or security will trade. A decline in credit standing results in a drop in value, while an improvement in credit standing causes a rise in the value of the entity's debt. Creditworthiness pertains to the risk of default, and a number of well-regarded private sector companies closely monitor the outstanding debt of publicly held and private corporations and various governmental agencies and political subdivisions. Examples of rating agencies or measures are Moody's, Standard & Poor's, and Fitch's for publicly held companies and the Fair Isaac credit score (FICO) for private companies.
Loans or debt securities may trade in the secondary market at their original issuance prices as the coincidental result of offsetting changes in the variables noted above. Thus, market yields may have declined—which would cause a rise in the price of fixed coupon debt instruments, but concurrently the issuer's creditworthiness may have been downgraded by rating agencies, which would cause the price of the debt to decline. In tandem, the credit downgrade may have essentially negated the price increase from lower market interest rates. In applying ASC 310-30, entities must:
ASC 310-30 only applies if there has been a change in the issuer's credit quality since the inception of the debt.
The purpose of ASC 310-30 is to prescribe the accounting for debt instruments (comprising most loans and debt securities, with certain exceptions) which are acquired via a transfer (i.e., in the secondary market) and which have been affected by changes in credit quality. The guidance requires that the accretable yield be determined. The accretable yield is derived from:
The accretable yield is distinguished from the nonaccretable difference, which is generally the excess of the total of contractual future cash flows over the expected cash flows.
Neither the accretable yield nor the nonaccretable difference can be displayed in the financial statements. For example, consider a loan that contractually is obligated to pay a total of $85,000 in future interest and principal, but which can be purchased for $50,00 and is expected to provide future cash flows of only $73,500. The $23,500 ($73,500 – 50,000) spread between the purchase price and the undiscounted expected future cash flows is the accretable yield. The further $11,500 ($85,000 – 73,500) spread between expected and contractual cash flows, however, is the nonaccretable difference, which cannot be given accounting recognition under ASC 310-30. That is, the loan (which is an investment in the hands of the transferee) cannot be recorded or displayed at the higher $85,000 amount, with a contra account or valuation allowance pertaining to the pretransfer estimated uncollectible amount being reported. Instead, the purchase cost, $50,000, must be the initial representation of this acquired asset, which is later increased by virtue of the accretion of yield (and reduced by collections).
Upon acquisition, the effective yield is computed based on the expected pattern (i.e., timings and amounts) of future cash flows, so that interest can be accreted on the level-yield basis (a constant rate on a changing base). Over the holding term of the investment, expected cash flows may change. They may:
The accounting for such changes varies, with decreases in expectations triggering immediate impairment loss recognition, while increases will generally be reported prospectively over the holding period of the instrument. The precise accounting for changes in expected future cash flows also depends, per ASC 310-30, on whether the instrument is accounted for as a:
Under ASC 310-30, reductions in expected future cash flows trigger the recognition of a loss in the current reporting period.
Loans acquired by transfer (i.e., in the secondary market) are recorded initially at acquisition cost. If the acquisition price differs from the par or face amount (i.e., there is a premium or a discount), the effective yield has to be computed and used to accrete the discount (or, if a premium, amortize it) over the expected term of the instrument. The estimation of the amounts of expected future cash flows, and the timing of those cash flows, is obviously a matter of some complexity and inevitable subjectivity. For example, if payments from a credit-impaired obligor are expected to be made, say, fifteen days late on average, this will impact the computed effective yield on the loan and is to be given explicit consideration in ascertaining the effective yield, subject to the usual materiality threshold concerns. The calculation of accretable yield is made at the acquisition date, but it may later have to be adjusted as expectations regarding future cash flow amounts change. Subsequent reduced expectations of cash flows will result in the recognition of impairment, while expectations of enhanced or improved cash flows may result in reversal of previously recognized impairment (if any), or increased effective yield over the instrument's remaining holding period.
At the date of transfer, if there is evidence of a decline in creditworthiness since the instrument's inception, such that the full amount of contractual cash flows will not be received, the provisions of ASC 310-30 must be applied. In this context, the loan is considered impaired for purposes of applying ASC 450 or, if applicable, ASC 310-10. To apply the guidance in ASC 310-10-35-10 through 35-11, the investor must meet certain criteria. It must be unable to collect all cash flows expected to be collected by the investor plus any additional cash flows expected to collected arising from a change in estimate after acquisition.
In such cases, the investor must estimate cash flows to be received, and accrete the initial carrying amount to that amount, rather than to the gross amount of future contractual cash flows. An uncertainty regarding future cash flows that suggests only a possible shortfall versus contractual amounts owed would not qualify for the accounting in Subtopic ASC 310-30. In such a situation, there would be disclosure of reasonably possible contingent losses, and if at a later date the loss is deemed to have become probable, a loss accrual would be recognized per ASC 450 as a change in estimate. (ASC 310-30-35-10)
Loans that are acquired as a pool present special accounting considerations. Each individual loan must meet the criteria of ASC 310-30 in order to apply the accounting set forth in this standard. Thus, if a group of loans are acquired together and in the aggregate have expected future cash flows in an amount lower than the aggregate contractual cash flows, this does not qualify each of the loans to be accounted for under ASC 310-30. Rather, each loan must be reviewed for impairment due to credit quality, and only those individual loans exhibiting the defined characteristic would be subject to the specified accounting.
After making a determination that each loan in a proposed pool has met the threshold conditions set forth under ASC 310-30 (i.e., that there has been evidence of credit quality deterioration subsequent to the origination, and that it is probable that, as of the transfer date, the transferee will not collect all the contractually required payments), a further determination must be made that the loans share common risk characteristics. Under provisions of ASC 310-30, loans with similar credit risk or risk ratings, and one or more predominant risk characteristics, such as financial asset type, collateral type, size, interest rate, date of origination, term, and geographic location, will be considered to have common risk characteristics. Credit risk can be assessed by reference to publicly available ratings of publicly held companies or by automated ratings such as that produced by FICO.
The aggregate cost of the loans to be aggregated is apportioned to the loans in the pool in proportion to their respective fair values at date of acquisition. The aggregate accretable yield of the pool is allocated among the loans in this same manner.
Only loans acquired in a given fiscal quarter (not year!) are subject to aggregation for financial reporting purposes. Once a pool is established, its integrity must be maintained, and thus loans can only be removed from the pool upon sale, foreclosure, write-off, or settlement. (ASC 330-30-40-1) New loans cannot be added to an existing pool. The excess of contractually required cash flows over the acquisition cost of the pool may not be used to offset or absorb changes to anticipated cash flows associated with other loans or pools of loans having other common risk characteristics.
Removal of a loan from a portfolio is effected at the loan's then-carrying value (ASC 330-30-40-2), and accordingly a gain or loss would be reflected in income of the period, measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the amount received in settlement (e.g., cash or collateral). Any difference between the carrying amount of the loan being removed from the pool and the fair value of the amount received will not impact the percentage yield being used to accrete value on the remainder of the pool. (ASC 330-30-35-15)
If the debt instrument acquired in a transfer to be accounted for under ASC 310-30 meets the definition of a security, as set forth in ASC 320 (namely, that it constitutes a share, participation, or other interest that is represented by a registered or bearer instrument or by book entry, and is one of a class or series of participations, interests, or obligations), then ASC 310-30 prescribes a slightly different mode of accounting for changes in expected cash flows.
If the fair value of the debt security is less than its amortized cost, the entity should apply the impairment guidance in ASC 320-10-35. To conform to ASC 320's requirements, an anticipated downward change in expected future cash flows must be examined to determine whether the change is merely a temporary change or whether an other than temporary decline has occurred. While temporary impairment is not impossible, if in fact the transferee of debt securities now anticipates further reduced cash flows from the security, there is a substantial likelihood that the impairment in value is other than temporary. Under ASC 320, other-than-temporary impairment must be recognized by writing down the carrying value of the investment and reflecting the change in current earnings, whether the security is being held in the available-for-sale portfolio or is being held to maturity.
If, on the other hand, the entity expects the debt security's cash flows to increase from the amounts anticipated at transfer, then similar to what was illustrated above, the accretable yield must be recomputed and periodic interest income thereafter appropriately adjusted. This is considered a change in accounting estimate under ASC 250. (ASC 330-30-35-8 and 35-9)
To illustrate, consider the same facts as set forth above, except now assume that the loan is a debt security meeting the definition set forth in ASC 320. When acquired, it was treated as being available-for-sale, but for this example no changes in value are addressed other than that associated with the changed expectation of cash flows.
The total cash collected, $660,000, is accounted for as interest income, in the total amount $301,039, and recovery of the “principal” of the investment, net of the impairment recorded in 20X3, amounting to $358,961.
A TDR occurs under specific circumstances: when a creditor “for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.” Therefore, a TDR does not apply to restructurings that merely reflect general economic conditions that may lead to a reduction in interest rates. It also does not apply if a debt is refunded with new debt having an effective interest rate that approximates that of similar debt issued by nontroubled debtors.
ASC 310-40 focuses on the substance of debt modifications—their effect on future cash receipts or payments. Timing, interest, or principal may be modified under a TDR. These all affect cash flows and a creditor's total return on the receivable. Evaluating whether a modification of debt terms is in substance a TDR is critical to determining whether ASC 310-40 applies. Therefore, the scope and scope exceptions of this subtopic take on added significance.
ASC 310-40 applies to all troubled debt restructurings by creditors. Accounting by debtors is found in ASC 470-60. Interestingly the two subtopics use different applicability tests and so creditors and debtors applying the same facts and circumstances may not reach the same conclusion as to whether a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) has occurred.
TDRs may include, but are not limited to, one or a combination of two basic transaction types:
The following are excluded for consideration under the TDR guidance:
(ASC 310-40-15-11)
Even if a debtor is experiencing some financial difficulties, a debt restructuring may not be a troubled debt restructuring for the purposes of ASC 310-40. None of the following situations are considered TDRs:
(ASC 310-40-15-12)
The first thing the creditor should consider in determining whether a TDR has occurred is whether it expects to collect all amounts due. A TDR receivable is one that is restructured or modified for economic or legal reasons where these conditions are present:
(ASC 310-40-15-5)
The creditor's motivation is to recoup as much of the debt as possible. A TDR may be a result of negotiation between the parties or may be imposed by a court, for example, in an arrangement under the Federal Bankruptcy Protection Act. “Concession” and “financial difficulties” have specific meanings under the guidance.
The Codification offers specific instances describing when concessions have occurred.
A concession has been granted as a result of a restructuring when the creditor does not expect to collect all amounts due, including interest accrued at the original contract rate. The creditor should also consider changes to underlying collateral if the principal payment is dependent on the value of the collateral. (ASC 310-40-15-13)
The Codification does not specify how a creditor should determine that it will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a loan. (ASC 310-40-35-9) A creditor should apply its normal loan review procedures in making that judgment. However, the Codification does specifically prohibit creditors from using the borrower's effective rate test in ASC 470-60-55-10 in evaluating whether a concession has been granted to a borrower. (ASC 310-40-15-8A)
A creditor may restructure a debt in exchange for additional collateral or guarantees from the debtor. If the nature and amount of that additional collateral or guarantees received as part of a restructuring do not serve as adequate compensation for other terms of the restructuring, the creditor needs to consider whether a concession has occurred. (ASC 310-40-15-14)
In a declining-rate environment, the loan may be restructured with a lower interest rate. The creditor needs to evaluate whether the debtor would be able to get the same terms and market rate from another lender. If so, a concession has not occurred. If not, the restructuring would be considered to be at a below-market rate and this may indicate that the creditor has granted a concession. (ASC 310-40-15-15)
The borrower cannot assume that a temporary or permanent increase in the contractual interest rate as a result of a restructuring is not a concession. The new contractual interest rate could still be below market interest rates for new debt with similar risk characteristics. Borrowers have to perform the TDR evaluation based on consideration of any other changes as a result of the restructuring. (ASC 310-40-15-16)
A delay in payments is not considered a concession if the delay is insignificant. This is aligned with the impairment guidance in ASC 310-10. A delay may be insignificant depending on the following factors:
(ASC 310-40-15-17)
The preparer should use judgment in evaluating the factors listed. Other factors may also be considered in evaluating whether an insignificant delay has occurred, including the cumulative effect of past restructurings.
Lenders should consider the following factors when evaluating the first condition for a TDR—borrower's financial difficulty:
(ASC 310-40-15-20)
Accounting treatment of a TDR depends on the facts and circumstances, that is, the type of restructuring.
ASC 310-40-40-1 addresses the situation of a sale of real estate collateral by a debtor in a troubled debt situation, with the acquirer assuming the obligation to the creditor (the reporting entity) such that the fair value of the obligation (the present value of payments, less than the net investment) was less than the creditor's carrying value of the loan receivable. In such circumstances, the creditor would be required to recognize a loss on the original loan in the amount by which the net investment in the loan exceeds the fair value of the assets received. The fair value of the payments should be recorded as an asset by the creditor.
A creditor may receive from the debtor receivables from third parties, real estate, or other assets or equity interest in the debtor.
(ASC 310-40-40-2 through 40-4)
The creditor may receive assets in partial satisfaction of a receivable and agree to modify the terms of the remaining receivable. The recorded investment in the receivable is reduced by the fair value less cost to sell of the assets received. If the creditor receives cash, it reduces the investment in the receivable by the amount of cash received. This treatment is used even if the terms of the remaining receivable are not modified. (ASC 310-40-35-7)
Often a loan whose terms are modified in a TDR has already been treated as an impaired loan under ASC 310-10. However, if it has not, the creditor should use the effective interest rate based on the original contract rate to discount cash flows. (ASC 310-40-35-12) The creditor should recognize a loss on the original loan and an asset at fair value for the payment to be received. The creditor measures the loss in the same way as in receipt of asset in full satisfaction of a receivable (see above). (ASC 310-40-40-1)
A TDR may be an in-substance repossession or foreclosure whether or not a formal foreclosure has taken place. The creditor may have received the debtor's assets in full or partial satisfaction of the receivable. In that case, the creditor treats the transaction in the same way as receipts of asset in full satisfaction of a receivable (see above). (ASC 320-40-40-6) The creditor is considered to have physical possession of the property and the receivable should be derecognized and the real property recognized only when either:
(ASC 310-40-55-10A)
If the transaction has certain characteristics, the foreclosed property is recorded at the lower of the net amount of the receivable or the fair value of the property. (ASC 310-40-40-7) Those characteristics are:
(ASC 310-40-40-6A)
This is a narrow-scope topic designed to eliminate inconsistencies in financial reporting.
Certain government-sponsored loan guarantee programs, such as those offered by the FHA, HUD, and the VA, allow qualifying creditors to extend mortgage loans to borrowers with a guarantee that entitles the creditor to recover all or a portion of the unpaid principal balance from the government if the borrower defaults. The Codification offers specific guidance on how to classify or measure foreclosed mortgage loans that are government guaranteed.
ASC 310-40 requires that the entity derecognize a mortgage loan and recognize a separate other receivable upon foreclosure if all the following conditions are met:
(ASC 310-40-40-7B)
Upon foreclosure, the entity should measure the separate other receivable based on the amount of the loan balance (principal and interest) expected to be recovered from the guarantor. (ASC 310-40-40-7A)
See ASC Location—Wiley GAAP Chapter | For information on… |
ASC 405-30-25-8 | Receivables related to recovery of insurance-related assessments. |
ASC 450-20 | Loss contingencies, including accrual of an estimated loss from a loss contingency. |
ASC 460 | Accounting by a guarantor at the inception of a guarantee issued. |
ASC 460 on guarantees and ASC 815 on guarantees accounted for as a derivative. | Loan guarantees, in which an entity lends its creditworthiness to another party for a fee and enhances the other party's ability to borrow funds. |
ASC 860-20 | Transfers of all financial assets, including receivables. |
ASC 860-50 | Servicing assets and liabilities related to loans and other receivables. |
(ASC 310-10-60) | |
ASC 320-10-15 | The determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment of beneficial interests exists and on interest income recognition on beneficial interests. |
ASC 325-40-15 | Determination of whether an other-than-temporary impairment of beneficial interests exists and on interest income recognition on beneficial interests. |
(ASC 310-10-20-60) | |
ASC 325-40 | Transferor's interests in securitized transactions accounted for as sales and purchased beneficial interests. |
ASC 470 | Borrower's accounting for a participating mortgage loan if the lender is entitled to participate in appreciation in the fair value of the mortgaged real estate project, the results of operations of the mortgaged real estate project, or in both. |
ASC 470-60 | Troubled debt restructurings by debtors. |
(ASC 310-30-60) |
3.147.54.108