References

Aikin, L. S., Stein, J. A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Structural equation analyses of clinical sub-population differences and comparative treatment outcomes: Characterizing the daily lives of drug addicts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 488–499.

Aish, A. M., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1990). A panel model for political efficacy and responsiveness: An application of LISREL 7 with weighted least squares. Quality and Quantity, 19, 716–723.

Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6^th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychologist. (1995). [Replies to Cohen (1994) article]. 50, 1098–1103.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.

Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). Amos^TM 16 user's guide. Chicago: SPSS.

Asparouov, T., & Muthén, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus (Technical Report, Version 4). Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com

Atkinson, L. (1988). The measurement-statistics controversy: Factor analysis and subinterval data. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 361–364.

Austin, J. T., & Calderón, R. F. (1996). Theoretical and technical contributions to structural equation modeling: An updated bibliography. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 105–175.

Babakus, E., Ferguson, C. E., Jr., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1987). The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 222–228.

Bacharach, S. B., Bauer, S. C., & Conley, S. (1986). Organizational analysis of stress: The case of elementary and secondary schools. Work and Occupations, 13, 7–32.

Bagozzi, R. P. (1993). Assessing construct validity in personality research: Applications to measures of self-esteem. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 49–87.

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing method variance in multitrait–multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 547–560.

Bandalos, D. L. (1993). Factors influencing cross-validation of confirmatory factor analysis models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 351–374.

Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling Journal, 9, 78–102.

Bandalos, D. L. (2008). Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 211–240.

Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–296). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Baumler, E. R., Harrist, R. B., & Carvajal, S. (2003). Analysis of repeated measures data. In S. P. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 140–156). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186–203.

Beck, A., Steer, R., & Brown, G. (1996). Beck Depression Inventory manual (2^nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Association.

Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.

Benner, A. D., & Graham, S. (2009). The transition to high school as a developmental process among multiethnic urban youth. Child Development, 80, 356–376.

Benson, J., & Bandalos, D. L. (1992). Second-order confirmatory factor analysis of the Reactions to Tests Scale with cross-validation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 459–487.

Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 419–456.

Bentler, P. M. (1988). Causal modeling via structural equation systems. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2^nd ed., pp. 317–335). New York: Plenum.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 400–404.

Bentler, P. M. (2005). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.

Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K-H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 181–197.

Bickel, R. (2007). Multilevel analysis for applied research: It's just regression! New York: Guilford.

Biddle, B. J., & Marlin, M. M. (1987). Causality, confirmation, credulity, and structural equation modeling. Child Development, 58, 4–17.

Biesanz, J. C., Deeb-Sossa, N., Papadakis, A. A., Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The role of coding time in estimating and interpreting growth curve models. Psychological Methods, 9, 30–52.

Blozis, S. A., & Cho, Y. I. (2008). Coding and centering of time in latent curve models in the presence of interindividual time heterogeneity. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 413–433.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

Bollen, K. A., & Barb, K. H. (1981). Pearson's r and coursely categorized measures. American Sociological Review, 46, 232–239.

Bollen, K. A., & Davis, W. R. (2009). Two rules of identification for structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 523–536.

Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (Eds.). (1993). Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Boomsma, A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In H. Wold & K. Jöreskog (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation (pp. 149–173). New York: Elsevier North Holland.

Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50, 229–242.

Boomsma, A. (1987). The robustness of maximum likelihood estimation in structural equation modeling. In P. Cuttance & R. Ecob (Eds.), Structural equation modelling by example (pp. 160–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In R. Cudeck, S. DuToit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

Bovaird, J. A. (2007). Multilevel structural equation models for contextual factors. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 149–182). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Breckler, S. J. (1990). Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology: Cause for concern? Psychological Bulletin, 107, 260–271.

Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

Browne, M. W. (1982). Covariance structures. In D. M.Hawkins (Ed.), Topics in applied multivariate analysis (pp. 72–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Browne, M. W. (1984a). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62–83.

Browne, M. W. (1984b). The decomposition of multitrait–multimethod matrices. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 1–21.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park CA: Sage.

Browne, M. W., MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C-T., Andersen, B. L., & Glaser, R. (2002). When fit indices and residuals are incompatible. Psychological Methods, 7, 403–421.

Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Applications of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147–158.

Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Byrne, B. M. (1988a). The Self-Description Questionnaire III: Testing for equivalent factorial validity across ability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 397–406.

Byrne, B. M. (1988b). Adolescent self-concept, ability grouping, and social comparison: Reexamining academic track differences in high school. Youth and Society, 20, 46–67.

Byrne, B. M. (1991). The Maslach Inventory: Validating factorial structure and invariance across intermediate, secondary, and university educators. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 583–605.

Byrne, B. M. (1993). The Maslach Inventory: Testing for factorial validity and invariance across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 197–212.

Byrne, B. M. (1994a). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289–311.

Byrne, B. M. (1994b). Burnout: Testing for the validity, replication, and invariance of causal structure across elementary, intermediate, and secondary teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 645–673.

Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the lifespan: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Byrne, B. M. (1999). The nomological network of teacher burnout: A literature review and empirically validated model. In M. Huberman & R. Vandenberghe (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of international research and practice (pp. 15–37). London: Cambridge University Press.

Byrne, B. M. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis. In R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 399–402). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Byrne, B. M. (2004). Testing for multigroup invariance using AMOS Graphics: A road less travelled. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 272–300.

Byrne, B. M. (2005a). Factor analytic models: Viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 17–30.

Byrne, B. M. (2005b). Factor analysis: Confirmatory. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioural science (pp. 599–606). London: Wiley.

Byrne, B. M. (2006). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2^nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psichothema, 20, 872–882.

Byrne, B. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2^nd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis/Routledge.

Byrne, B. M. (In press). Choosing SEM software: Snapshots of LISREL, EQS, AMOS, and Mplus. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

Byrne, B. M., & Baron, P. (1993). The Beck Depression Inventory: Testing and cross validating an hierarchical structure for nonclinical adolescents. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26, 164–178.

Byrne, B. M., & Baron, P. (1994). Measuring adolescent depression: Tests of equivalent factorial structure for English and French versions of the Beck Depression Inventory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 43, 33–47.

Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Balev, J. (1996). The Beck Depression Inventory: Testing for its factorial validity and invariance across gender for Bulgarian adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 641–651.

Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Balev, J. (1998). The Beck Depression Inventory: A cross-validated test of factorial structure for Bulgarian adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 241–251.

Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Campbell, T. L. (1993). Measuring adolescent depression: Factorial validity and invariance of the Beck Depression Inventory across gender. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 3, 127–143.

Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., & Campbell, T. L. (1994). The Beck Depression Inventory (French Version): Testing for gender-invariant factorial structure for nonclinical adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 9, 166–179.

Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., Larsson, B., & Melin, L. (1995). The Beck Depression Inventory: Testing and cross-validating a second-order factorial structure for Swedish nonclinical adolescents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33, 345–356.

Byrne, B. M., Baron, P., Larsson, B., & Melin, L. (1996). Measuring depression for Swedish nonclinical adolescents: Factorial validity and equivalence of the Beck Depression Inventory across gender. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 37–45.

Byrne, B. M., & Bazana, P. G. (1996). Investigating the measurement of social and academic competencies for early/late preadolescents and adolescents: A multitrait–multimethod analysis. Applied Measurement in Education, 9, 113–132.

Byrne, B. M., & Campbell, T. L. (1999). Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: A look beneath the surface. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 557–576.

Byrne, B. M., & Crombie, G. (2003). Modeling and testing change over time: An introduction to the latent growth curve model. Understanding Statistics: Statistical Issues in Psychology, Education, and the Social Sciences, 2, 177–203.

Byrne, B. M., & Goffin, R. D. (1993). Modeling MTMM data from additive and multiplicative covariance structures: An audit of construct validity concordance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 67–96.

Byrne, B. M., Lam, W. W. T., & Fielding, R. (2008). Measuring patterns of change in personality assessments: An annotated application of latent growth curve modeling. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 1–11.

Byrne, B. M., Oakland, T., Leong, F. T. L., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Hambleton, R. K., Cheung, F. M., et al. (2009). A critical analysis of cross-cultural research and testing practices: Implications for improved education and training. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 3, 94–105.

Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1986). On the structure of adolescent self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 474–481.

Byrne, B. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 599–613.

Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466.

Byrne, B. M., & Stewart, S. M. (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 287–321.

Byrne, B. M., Stewart, S. M., & Lee, P. W. H. (2004). Validating the Beck Depression Inventory-II for Hong Kong community adolescents. International Journal of Testing, 4, 199–216.

Byrne, B. M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107–132.

Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 155–175.

Byrne, B. M., & Worth Gavin, D. A. (1996). The Shavelson model revisited: Testing for the structure of academic self-concept across pre-, early, and late adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 215–228.

Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

Chen, Q., Kwok, O-M., Luo, W., & Willson, V. L. (2010). The impact of ignoring a level of nesting structure in multilevel growth mixture models: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 570–589.

Cheng, T. A., & Williams, P. (1986). The design and development of a use in community studies of mental disorders in Taiwan. Psychosomatic Medicine, 16, 415–422.

Cheong, J. W., MacKinnon, D. P., & Khoo, S. T. (2003). Investigation of mediational processes using parallel process latent growth curve modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 238–262.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255.

Cheung, M. W-L., & Au, K. (2005). Applications of multilevel structural equation modeling to cross-cultural research. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 598–619.

Cheung, M. W-L., Leung, K., & Au, K. (2006). Evaluating multilevel models in cross-cultural research: An illustration with social axioms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 522–541.

Chinese Behavioral Sciences Society. (2000). The Chinese version of the Beck Depression Inventory (2^nd ed., Licensed Chinese translation, Psychological Corporation). New York: Harcourt Brace.

Chou, C-P., & Bentler, P. M. (1990). Model modification in covariance structure modeling: A comparison among likelihood ratio, Lagrange multiplier, and Wald tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 115–136.

Chou, C-P., Bentler, P. M., & Pentz, M. A. (1998). Comparisons of two statistical approaches to study growth curves: The multilevel model and the latent curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 247–266.

Chou, C-P., Bentler, P. M, & Pentz, M. A. (2000). A two-stage approach to multilevel structural equation models: Application to longitudinal data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and scientific examples (pp. 33–49). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Chou, C-P., Bentler, P. M., & Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: A Monte Carlo study. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 44, 347–357.

Cliff, N. (1983). Some cautions concerning the application of causal modeling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 115–126.

Coenders, G., & Saris, W. E. (2000). Testing nested additive, multiplicative, and general multitrait–multimethod models. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 219–250.

Coenders, G., Satorra, A., & Saris, W. E. (1997). Alternative approaches to structural modeling of ordinal data: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 261–282.

Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.

Cole, D. A., Ciesla, J. A., & Steiger, J. (2007). The insidious effects of failing to include design-driven correlated residuals in latent-variable covariance structure analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 381–398.

Collins, L. M., & Sayer, A. G. (2001). New methods for the analysis of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Comrey, A. L. (1992). A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Conway, J. M., Scullen, S. E., Lievens, F., & Lance, C. E. (2004). Bias in the correlated uniqueness model for MTMM data. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 535–559.

Cooke, D. J., Kosson, D. S., & Michie, C. (2001). Psychopathy and ethnicity: Structural, item, and test generalizability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) in Caucasian and African American participants. Psychological Assessment, 13, 531–542.

Corten, I. W., Saris, W. E., Coenders, G., van der Veld, W., Aalberts, C. E., & Kornelis, C. (2002). Fit of different models for multitrait-multimethod experiments. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 213–232.

Courvoisier, D. S., Nussbeck, F. W., Eid, M., Geiser, C., & Cole, D. A. (2008). Analyzing the convergent and discriminant validity of states and traits: Development and applications of multimethod latent state-trait models. Psychological Assessment, 20, 270–280.

Cudeck, R. (1989). Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317–327.

Cudeck, R., & Browne, M. W. (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 147–167.

Cudeck, R., du Toit, S., & Sörbom, D. (2001). Structural equation modeling: Present and future. Lincolnwood IL: Scientific Software International.

Cudeck, R., & Henly, S. J. (1991). Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the “problem” of sample size: A clarification. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 512–519.

Cudeck, R., & MacCallum, R. C. (2007). Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Curran, P. J., Bauer, D. J., & Willoughby, M. T. (2004). Testing main effects and interactions in latent curve analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 220–237.

Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2003). The use of latent trajectory models in psychopathology research. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 526–544.

Curran, P. J., Muthén, B. O., & Harford, T. C. (1998). The influence of changes in marital status on developmental trajectories of alcohol use in young adults. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 647–658.

Curran, P. J., West. S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.

DeCarlo, L. T. (1997). On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2, 292–307.

Dedrick, R. F., & Greenbaum, P. E. (2010). Multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of a scale measuring interagency collaboration of children's mental health agencies. Journal of Emotional and Behavioural Disorders, 10, 1–14.

Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 39, 1–38.

DiStefano, C. (2002). The impact of categorization with confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 327–346.

Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (1994). Modeling incomplete longitudinal substance use data using latent variable growth curve methodology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 313–338.

Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (1995). Modeling the processes of development via latent growth curve methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 187–205.

Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Okut, H., Stryker, L. A., & Li, F. (2002). An extension of the general latent variable growth modeling framework to four levels of the hierarchy. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 303–326.

Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Stryker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2^nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ecob, R., & Der, G. (2003). An iterative method for the detection of outliers in longitudinal growth data using multilevel models. In S. P. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 229–254). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Eid, M. (2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65, 241–261.

Eid, M., Nussbeck, F. W., Geiser, C., Cole, D. A., Gollwitzer, M., & Lischetzke, T. (2008). Structural equation modeling of multitrait–multimethod data: Different models for different types of methods. Psychological Methods, 13, 230–253.

Enders, C. K. (2001). A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 128–141.

Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford.

Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457.

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.

Fan, X. (2003). Power of latent growth modeling for detecting group differences in linear growth trajectory parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 380–400.

Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale for two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 343–367.

Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 42, 509–529.

Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56–83.

Fielding, A. (2003). Ordered category responses and random effects in multilevel and other complex structures. In S. P. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 181–208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Finch, J. F., West, S. G., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1997). Effects of sample size and nonnormality on the estimation of mediated effects in latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 87–107.

Flora, D. B., & Curran, P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods, 9, 466–491.

Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Rourke, B. P. (1988). Discriminant validity of lateral sensorimotor tests in children. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 779–799.

Geiser, C., Eid, M., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2008). On the meaning of the latent variables in the CT-C(M-1) model: A comment on Maydeu-Olivares and Coffman (2006). Psychological Methods, 13, 49–57.

Georgas, J. (1999). Family as a context variable in cross-cultural psychology. In J. Adamopoulos & Y. Kashima (Eds.), Social psychology and cultural context (pp. 163–175). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Kagitcibasi, C., & Poortinga, Y. H. (2006). Families across cultures: A 30-nation psychological study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40–65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Gold, M. S., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Treatments of missing data: A Monte Carlo comparison of RBHDI, iterative stochastic regression imputation, and expectation-maximization. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 319–355.

Gonzalez, R., & Griffin, D. (2001). Testing parameters in structural equation modeling: Every “one” matters. Psychological Methods, 6, 258–269.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Green, S. B., Akey, T. M., Fleming, K. K., Hershberger, S. L., & Marquis, J. G. (1997). Effect of the number of scale points on chi-square fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 108–120.

Green, S. B., & Babyak, M. A. (1997). Control of Type I errors with multiple tests of constraints in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 39–51.

Green, S. B., Thompson, M. S., & Poirier, J. (1999). Exploratory analyses to improve fit: Errors due to misspecification and a strategy to reduce their occurrence. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 113–126.

Green, S. B., Thompson, M. S., & Poirier, J. (2001). An adjusted Bonferroni method for elimination of parameters in specification addition searches. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 18–39.

Grimm, K. J., Pianta, R. C., & Konold, T. (2009). Longitudinal multitrait–multitrait models for developmental research. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 44, 233–258.

Grimm, K. J., & Ramm, N. (2009). Nonlinear growth models in Mplus and SAS. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 676–701.

Hagtvet, K. A., & Nasser, F. M. (2004). How well do item parcels represent conceptually defined latent constructs? A two-facet approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 168–193.

Hancock, G. R. (1999). A sequential Sheffé-type respecification for controlling Type I error in exploratory structural equation model modification. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 158–168.

Hancock, G. R., Kuo, W-L., & Lawrence, F. R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 470–489.

Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (Eds.). (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A lifespan perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 67–97). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Hau, K-T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modeling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology, 57, 327–351.

Hayashi, K., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). Examining identification issues in factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 631–645.

Heck, R. H. (2001). Multilevel modeling with SEM. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2009). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (2^nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Hernández, A., & González-Romá, V. (2002). Analysis of multitrait–multioccasion data: Additive versus multiplicative models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 59–87.

Hoffman, L. (2007). Multilevel models for examining individual differences in within-person variation and covariation over time. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 609–629.

Horn, J. L., & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement equivalence in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117–144.

Hox, J. J. (2000). Multilevel analyses of grouped and longitudinal data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and scientific examples (pp. 15–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2^nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Hox, J. J., & de Leeuw, E. D. (2003). Multilevel models for meta-analyses. In S. P. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 90–111). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hox, J. J., & Kleiboer, A. M. (2007). Retrospective questions or a diary method? A two-level multitrait–multimethod analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 311–325.

Hox, J. J., & Maas, C. J. M. (2001). The accuracy of multilevel structural equation modeling with psuedobalanced groups and small samples. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 157–174.

Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hoyle, R. H. (In press). Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.

Hsieh, C-A., von Eye, A. A., & Maier, K. S. (2010). Using a multivariate multilevel polytomous item response theory model to study parallel processes of change: The dynamic association between adolescents’ social isolation and engagement with delinquent peers in the National Youth Survey. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 508–552.

Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.

Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

Hu, L-T., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted? Psychological Bulletin, 112, 351–362.

Hung, L-F. (2010). The multigroup multilevel categorical latent growth curve models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 359–392.

Jo, B., & Muthén, B. O. (2003). Longitudinal studies with intervention and noncompliance: Estimation of causal effects in growth mixture modeling. In S. P. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 112–139). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Jones, L. V., & Tukey, J. W. (2000). A sensible formulation of the significance test. Psychological Methods, 5, 411–414.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1971a). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109–133.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1971b). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1990). New developments in LISREL: Analysis of ordinal variables using polychoric correlations and weighted least squares. Quality and Quantity, 24, 387–404.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294–316). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Jöreskog, K. G. (1994). On the estimation of polychoric correlations and their asymptotic covariance matrix. Psychometrika, 59, 381–389.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Jöreskog, K. G., & van Thillo, M. (1972). A general computer program for estimating a linear structural equation system involving multiple indicators of unmeasured variables (Research Bulletin No. RB-72-56). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Julian, M. W. (2001). The consequences of ignoring multilevel data structures in nonhierarchical covariance modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 325–352.

Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 285–305.

Kaplan, D. (1998). Methods for multilevel data analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 337–358). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kaplan, D., & Elliott, P. R. (1997). A didactic example of multilevel structural equation modeling applicable to the study of organizations. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 1–24.

Kaplan, D., & George, R. (1995). A study of power associated with testing factor mean differences under violations of factorial invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 101–118.

Kaplan, D., Kim, J-S., & Kim, S-Y. (2009). Multilevel latent variable modeling: Current research and recent developments. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 592–613). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kenny, D. A. (1976). An empirical application of confirmatory factor analysis to the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 247–252.

Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.

Kenny, D. A., & Kashy, D. A. (1992). Analysis of the multitrait–multimethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 165–172.

Kerlinger, F. N. (1984). Liberalism and conservatism: The nature and structure of social attitudes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kim, S., & Hagtvet, K. A. (2003). The impact of misspecified item parceling on representing latent variables in covariance structure modeling: A simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 101–127.

Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746–759.

Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757–765.

Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioural research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3^rd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.

Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Kwok, O-M., West, S. G., & Green, S. B. (2007). The impact of misspecifying the within-subject covariance structure in multiwave longitudinal multilevel models: A Monte Carlo study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 557–592.

La Du, T. J., & Tanaka, J. S. (1989). Influence of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on goodness-of-fit assessments in structural equation modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 625–636.

LaGrange, B., & Cole, D. A. (2008). An expansion of the trait–state–occasion model: Accounting for shared method variance. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 241–271.

Lance, C. E., Noble, C. L., & Scullen, S. E. (2002). A critique of the correlated trait correlated method and correlated uniqueness models for multitrait–multimethod data. Psychological Methods, 7, 228–244.

Leiter, M. P. (1991). Coping patterns as predictors of burnout: The function of control and escapist coping patterns. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12, 123–144.

Li, F., Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., McAuley, E., Chaumeton, N. R., & Harmer, P. (2001). Enhancing the psychological well-being of elderly individuals through Tai Chi exercise: A latent growth curve analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 53–83.

Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53–76.

Little, T. D. (In press). Longitudinal structural equation modeling: Interindividual differences and panel models. New York: Guilford Press.

Little, T. D., Card, N. A., Slegers, D. W., & Ledford, E. C. (2007). Representing contextual effects in multiple-group MACS models. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 121–147). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173.

Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192–211.

Little, T. D., Schnabel, K. U., & Baumert, J. (2000). Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and scientific examples. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Little, T. D., Slegers, D. W., & Card, N. A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 59–72.

Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analyses. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Long, J. S. (1983a). Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Long, J. S. (1983b). Covariance structure models: An introduction to LISREL. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

MacCallum, R. C. (1986). Specification searches in covariance structure modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 107–120.

MacCallum, R. C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

MacCallum, R. C., & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201–226.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Cai, L. (2006). Testing differences between nested covariance structure models: Power analysis and null hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 11, 19–35.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.

MacCallum, R. C., & Kim, C. (2000). Modeling multivariate change. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and scientific examples (pp. 51–68). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

MacCallum, R. C., Kim, C., Malarkey, W., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. (1997). Studying multivariate change using multilevel models and latent curve models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 215–253.

MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Mar, M., & Reith, J. V. (1994). Alternative strategies for cross-validation of covariance structure models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 1–32.

MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., & Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490–504.

MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., Uchino, B. N., & Fabrigar, L. R. (1993). The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 185–199.

MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.

Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.). (1996). Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519–530.

Mardia, K. V. (1974). Applications of some measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis in testing normality and robustness studies. Sankhya, B36, 115–128.

Marsh, H. W. (1988). Multitrait–multimethod analyses. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research methodology, measurement, and evaluation: An international handbook (pp. 570–578). Oxford: Pergamon.

Marsh, H. W. (1989). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait–multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47–70.

Marsh, H. W. (1992). Self Description Questionnaire (SDQ) I: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: A test manual and research monograph. Macarthur, NSW: Faculty of Education, University of Western Sydney.

Marsh, H. W. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial equivalence: A multifaceted approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 5–34.

Marsh, H. W. (2007). Application of confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in sport/exercise psychology. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3^rd ed., pp. 774–798). New York: Wiley.

Marsh, H. W., & Bailey, M. (1991). Confirmatory factor analyses of multitrait multimethod data: A comparison of alternative models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 47–70.

Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410.

Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M., & Craven, R. (1992). Overcoming problems in confirmatory factor analyses of MTMM data: The correlated uniqueness model and factorial invariance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 489–507.

Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1994). Longitudinal stability of means and individual differences: A unified approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 317–359.

Marsh, H. W., & Grayson, D. (1995). Latent variable models of multitrait–multimethod data. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 177–198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K-T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD's brief self-report measure of educational psychology's most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6, 311–360.

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K-T., Balla, J. R., & Grayson, D. (1998). Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 181–220.

Marsh, H. W., Hey, J., & Roche, L. A. (1997). Structure of physical self-concept: Elite athletes and physical education students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 369–380.

Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). Maslach Burnout Inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1986). Maslach Burnout Inventory manual (2^nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Random intercept item factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 11, 344–362.

McArdle, J. J., & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58, 110–133.

McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (1996). Multilevel models from a multiple group structural equation perspective. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumaker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling (pp. 89–124). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

McGaw, B., & Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Factorial invariance of ability measures in groups differing in intelligence and socioeconomic status. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 24, 154–168.

Mehta, P. D., & Neale, M. C. (2005). People are variables too: Multilevel structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 10, 259–284.

Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.

Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122.

Millsap, R. E., & Kwok, O-M. (2004). Evaluating the impact of partial factorial equivalence on selection in two populations. Psychological Methods, 9, 93–115.

Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479–515.

Moustaki, I. (2001). A review of exploratory factor analysis for ordinal categorical data. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 461–480). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.

Mplus Product Support. (2010, various dates). Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/support/index.shtml

Mulaik, S. A. (2009). The foundations of factor analysis (2^nd ed.). London: CRC Press.

Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Altine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430–445.

Muthén, B. (1978). Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables. Psychometrika, 43, 551–560.

Muthén, B. (1983). Latent variable structural equation modeling with categorical data. Journal of Econometrics, 22, 48–65.

Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115–132.

Muthén, B. (1987). LISCOMP: Analysis of linear structural equations with a comprehensive measurement model: Theoretical integration and user's guide. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

Muthén, B. O. (1993). Goodness of fit with categorical and other nonnormal variables (pp. 205–234). In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Muthén, B. O. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 22, 376–398.

Muthén, B. O. (1997). Latent variable modeling of longitudinal and multilevel data. In A. E. Raftery (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1997 (pp. 453–481). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Muthén, B. (2010). Bayesian analysis in Mplus: A brief introduction (Technical report, Version 3). Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/IntroBayesVersion%203.pdf

Muthén, B., & Asparouov, T. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus (Mplus Webnotes No. 4). Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/CatMGLong.pdf

Muthén, B. O., & Curran, P. J. (1997). General longitudinal modelling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods, 2, 371–402.

Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. In P. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1995 (pp. 216–316). Boston: Blackwell.

Muthén, B., du Toit, S. H. C., & Spisic, D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modelling with categorical and continuous outcomes (Technical Report). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles.

Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189.

Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52, 431–462.

Muthén, B., Khoo, S-T., Francis, D. J., & Boscardin, C. K. (2003). Analysis of reading skills development from kindergarten through first grade: An application of growth mixture modeling to sequential processes. In S. P. Reise & N. Duan (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 71–89). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2000). The development of heavy drinking and alcohol-related problems from ages 18 to 37 in a U.S. national sample. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 290–300.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007–2010). Mplus user's guide (6^th ed.). Los Angeles: Authors.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus short courses: Topic 3. Los Angeles: Authors.

Nasser-Abu, F., & Wisenbaker, J. (2006). A Monte Carlo study investigating the impact of item parceling strategies on parameter estimates and their standard errors in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 204–228.

O'Brien, R. M. (1985). The relationship between ordinal measures and their underlying values: Why all the disagreement? Quality and Quantity, 19, 265–277.

Pettegrew, L. S., & Wolf, G. E. (1982). Validating measures of teacher stress. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 373–396.

Pettit, G. S., Keiley, M. K., Laird, R. D., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2007). Predicting the developmental course of mother-reported monitoring across childhood and adolescence from early proactive parenting, child temperament, and parents’ worries. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 206–217.

Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2010). Specification searches in multilevel structural equation modeling: A Monte Carlo investigation. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 42–65.

Pohl, S., & Steyer, R. (2010). Modeling common traits and method effects in multitrait multimethod analysis. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 45, 45–72.

Pomplun, M., & Omar, M. H. (2003). Do minority representative reading passages provide factorially invariant scores for all students? Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 276–288.

Preacher, K. J., & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13–43.

Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233.

Raftery, A. E. (1993). Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163–180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2^nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Raykov, T., & Penev, S. (2010). Evaluation of reliability coefficients for two-level models via latent variable analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 629–641.

Raykov, T., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Issues in structural equation modeling research. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 289–318.

Reise, S. P. & Duan, N. (2003). Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, P. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552–566.

Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 369–379.

Rigdon, E. (1998). Structural equation models. In G. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 251–294). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Rindskopf, D., & Rose, T. (1988). Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 51–67.

Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behaviors of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351–357.

Rodgers, J. L. (2010). The epistemology of mathematical and statistical modeling: A quiet methodological revolution. American Psychologist, 65, 1–12.

Rogers, W. M., & Schmitt, N. (2004). Parameter recovery and model fit using multidimensional composites: A comparison of four empirical parcelling algorithms. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 379–412.

Rogosa, D. R., Brandt, D., & Zimowski, M. (1982). A growth curve approach to the measurement of change. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 726–748.

Rogosa, D. R., & Willett, J. B. (1985). Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika, 50, 203–228.

Rozeboom, W. W. (1960). The fallacy of the null hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416–428.

Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: Wiley.

Ryu, E., & West, S. G. (2009). Level-specific evaluation of model fit in multilevel structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 583–601.

Saris, W. E., & Aalberts, C. (2003). Different explanations for correlated disturbance terms in MTMM studies. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 193–213.

Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & Sörbom, D. (1987). The detection and correction of specification errors in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 17, 105–129.

Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 561–582.

Saris, W., & Stronkhorst, H. (1984). Causal modeling: Nonexperimental research: An introduction to the LISREL approach. Amsterdam: Sociometric Research Foundation.

Sass, D. A., & Smith, P. L. (2006). The effects of parceling unidimensional scales on structural parameter estimates in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 566–586.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1986). Some robustness properties of goodness of fit statistics in covariance structure analysis. In 1986 American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Business and Economics Section (pp. 549–554). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi-square statistics in covariance structure analysis. In 1988 American Statistical Association Proceedings of the Business and Economics Section (pp. 308–313). Alexandria VA: American Statistical Association.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1990). Model conditions for asymptotic robustness in the analysis of linear relations. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 10, 235–249.

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.

Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for training of researchers. Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129.

Schmitt, N., & Stults, D. M. (1986). Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 1–22.

Schnabel, K. U., Little, T. D., & Baumert, J. (2000). Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and scientific examples (pp. 9–13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2^nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.

Selig, J. P., Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2008). Latent variable structural equation modelling in cross-cultural research: Multigroup and multilevel approaches. In F. J. R. van de Vijver, D. A. van Hemert, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Multilevel analysis of individuals and cultures (pp. 93–119). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Shafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.

Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.

Sobel, M. F., & Bohrnstedt, G. W. (1985). Use of null models in evaluating the fit of covariance structure models. In N. B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1985 (pp. 152–178). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structures between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229–239.

Sörbom, D. (1989). Model modification. Psychometrika, 54, 371–384.

Sörbom, D. (2001). Karl Jöreskog and LISREL: A personal story. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future: A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.

Steiger, J. H. (1998). A note on multiple sample extensions of the RMSEA fit index. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 411–419.

Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, June). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society annual meeting, Iowa City, IA.

Steiger, J. H., Shapiro, A., & Browne, M. W. (1985). On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chi-square statistics. Psychometrika, 50, 253–264.

Sugawara, H. M., & MacCallum, R. C. (1993). Effect of estimation method on incremental fit indexes for covariance structure models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 365–377.

Tanaka, J. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In J. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1984). Confirmatory hierarchical factor analysis of psychological distress measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 621–635.

Thompson, B. (1996). AERA editorial policies regarding statistical significance testing: Three suggested reforms. Educational Researcher, 25, 26–30.

Tomarken, A. J., & Waller, N. G. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 2.1–2.35.

Tomás, J. M., Hontangas, P. M., & Oliver, A. (2000). Linear confirmatory factor models to evaluate multitrait–multimethod matrices: The effects of number of indicators and correlation among methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 469–499.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.

van de Vijver, F. J. R., Mylonas, K., Pavlopoulos, V., & Georgas, J. (2006). Results: Cross-cultural analyses of the family. In J. Georgas, J. W. Berry, F. J. R. van de Vijver, C. Kagitcibasi, & Y. H. Poortinga (Eds.), Families across culture: A 30-nation psychological study (pp. 126–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wang, S., Wang, N., & Hoadley, D. (2007). Construct equivalence of a national certification examination that uses dual languages and audio assistance. International Journal of Testing, 7, 255–268.

Welkenhuysen-Gybels, J., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Cambré, B. (2007). A comparison of methods for the evaluation of construct equivalence in a multigroup setting. In G. Loosveldt, M. Swyngedouw, & B. Cambré (Eds.), Measuring meaningful data in social research (pp. 357–371). Leuven, Belgium: Acco.

Weng, L-J., & Cheng, C-P. (1997). Why might relative fit indices differ between estimators? Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 121–128.

West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 118–154.

Whittaker, T. A., & Stapleton, L. M. (2006). The performance of cross-validation indices used to select among competing covariance structure models under multivariate nonnormality conditions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 295–335.

Widaman, K. F. (1985). Hierarchically tested covariance structure models for multitrait multimethod data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 1–26.

Widaman, K. F., & Reise, S. P. (1997). Exploring the measurement equivalence of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, & S. G. West (Eds.), The science of prevention (pp. 281–324). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Wilkinson, L., and the Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.

Willett, J. B. (1988). Questions and answers in the measurement of change. In E. Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 15, pp. 345–422).

Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Willett, J. B. (1989). Some results on reliability for the longitudinal measurement of change: Implications for the design of studies of individual growth. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 587–602.

Willett, J. B., & Keiley, M. K. (2000). Using covariance structure analysis to model change over time. In H. E. A. Tinsley & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 665–694). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363–381.

Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1996). Cross-domain analyses of change over time: Combining growth modeling and covariance structural analysis. In G.A. Marcoulides & R.E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 125–157). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Williams, L. J., & Holahan, P. J. (1994). Parsimony-based fit indices for multipleindicator models: Do they work? Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 161–189.

Wolfle, L. M. (2003). The introduction of path analysis to the social sciences, and some emergent themes: An annotated bibliography. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 1–34.

Wood, J. M., Tataryn, D. J., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1996). Effects of under- and overextraction on principal axis factor analysis with varimax rotation. Psychological Methods, 1, 354–365.

Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256–293). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Wothke, W. (1996). Models for multitrait–multimethod matrix analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 7–56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wu, W., West, S. G., & Taylor, A. B. (2009). Evaluating model fit for growth curve models: Integration of fit indices from SEM and MLM frameworks. Psychological Methods, 14, 183–201.

Yoon, M., & Millsap, R. R. (2007). Detecting violations of factorial invariance using data-based specification searches: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 435–463.

Yu, C-Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles). Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/.

Yuan, K-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Three likelihood-based methods for mean and covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological Methodology, 30, 165–200.

Yuan, K-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2002). On normal theory based inference for multilevel models with distributional violations. Psychometrika, 67, 539–562.

Yuan, K-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004a). On chi square difference and z-tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737–757.

Yuan, K-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004b). On the asymptotic distributions of two statistics for two-level covariance structure models within the class of elliptical distributions. Psychometrika, 69, 437–457.

Yuan, K-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2007). Multilevel covariance structure analysis by fitting multiple single-level models. Sociological Methodology, 37, 53–82.

Yuan, K-H., & Hayashi, K. (2005). On Muthén's maximum likelihood for two-level covariance structure models. Psychometrika, 70, 147–167.

Yuan, K-H., Lambert, P. L., & Fouladi, R. T. (2004). Mardia's multivariate kurtosis with missing data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 413–437.