x Preface
the shopper and investor would be unlikely to risk not insuring their
house or car and yet mention the use of derivatives, and the chances
are they would be either confused or fearful or indeed both!
Such is the ignorance of derivatives in many quarters that in the
wake of the Nick Leeson debacle there were calls, many from leading
politicians and the so-called experts to make them illegal. How little
these politicians and ‘experts’ understand the real world.
Derivatives did not cause the collapse of Barings Bank, but
abysmal management and inadequate controls did. Call for a ban on
derivatives use and in effect you are calling for a ban on insurance
policies.
Thankfully in spite of, or maybe because of, episodes like Leeson
there is today a greater understanding of derivatives, how they work
and what they do, but it is still the case that to many within and
without the financial services industry they are shrouded in mystery.
Many peoples’ first real awareness of derivatives then was when
Nick Leeson famously destroyed a 200-year-old UK Bank. Perhaps
more surprising was the fact that many of those people worked in the
financial markets. In the aftermath of the collapse of Barings in
1995, many wild and somewhat ludicrous assertions were made
about derivatives by the so-called experts who had suddenly materi-
alised. They collectively blamed derivatives for nearly every problem
in the world, bandied around words and phrases like ‘catastrophe’,
‘disaster’, ‘ highly dangerous products’, ‘total gambles’, etc. No doubt
this sensationalism made good news stories in the media but just
like so much news it was just media hype.
The bank went bust because of poor management and non-existent
and ineffective controls, as simple as that. Derivatives were simply
the products Leeson traded. It might have been fair to say that the
characteristics of the product made it possible for the loss to accu-
mulate in a relatively short time, but other than that derivatives were
incidental and not the cause of the problem.
Another misconception bandied around was that these were ‘new’
products. But they were not; in fact they are products whose origin
can be traced back to the days before cash when ‘trades’ were an
exchange of goods or what today we might call a commodity swap.
Much later, in the 1800s a more formalised style of trading in com-
modities saw the creation of futures contracts that could be traded
on an organised exchange, the Chicago Board of Trade, which was
established in 1848 for the trading of contracts on grains.
The creation of these standardised contracts and an organised
market enabled farmers and merchants to hedge against risk by