3

Interactions of energetic ions with polymers: chemical picture

A brief review of the chemistry and physics of polymers is presented. The polymers are characterised by molecular mass, strong intramolecular interactions between atoms in the macromolecule, and weak intermolecular interactions between neighboring macromolecules, glass transition temperature and crystallinity. Polymers can also contain stabilizers, antioxidants, vulcanizing agents, plasticizers, fillers, and other functional additives that affect their properties and responses to ion implantation. In general, under the influence of ion irradiation, macromolecules are fragmented and radicals created. Radicals are very reactive and cause a number of chemical reactions to occur in the polymer including reactions with atmospheric oxygen and nitrogen. Ion implantation generates particular kinds of radicals with high local concentration. The result of radical reactions is the formation of double bonds, conjugated aromatic structures, as well as oxygen and nitrogen containing groups. The kinetics of the radical reactions can be described by a number of different reaction rates corresponding to various local structures with time constants extending up to years.

Keywords

polymer; macromolecule; radical; unsaturated group; kinetics of reaction

A polymer is a material composed of long macromolecules with high molecular mass. The macromolecules are chains or networks of chemically bonded monomers. The monomer is the regularly repeated unit in the polymer chain. The properties of the polymer depend on the type of monomer. An example of the simplest macromolecule is the saturated hydrocarbon macromolecule. A well-known representative of this type of polymer is polyethylene (PE). The PE macromolecule contains a simple monomer unit—CH2glyphCH2—which repeats thousands or millions of times in the polymer chain. There are more complex saturated hydrocarbons, such as:

image

image

These are homopolymers because they contain only one kind of monomer in the macromolecule. There are also heteropolymers, which consists of two and more different monomer units. For example,

image

which contains two kinds of monomers: ethylene unit and octane-1 unit.

If its macromolecules contain unsaturated double or triple carbon-carbon bonds, the polymer is called an unsaturated hydrocarbon polymer, for example:

image

image

Polymer macromolecules can contain heteroatoms (oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, and others) in side chains:

image

Heteroatoms may also occur in the backbone chain, for example:

image

A special class of polymers are halogen-containing polymers such as:

image

Table 3.1 contains a number of polymers made from various monomers that were investigated after ion implantation.

Table 3.1

Types of polymers with references to works involving their treatment with ion implantation

Polymer name Monomer unit References
PE in particular:

– Low-density polyethylene (LDPE)

– Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)

image

[113 vol. 69, 1459]
Polystyrene (PS) and copolymers

image

[1,2,7,6096]
Polyethylenterephtalate (PET, Mylar)

image

[6,12,97122]
Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and copolymers

image

[1,2,26,60,62,75,81,123136]
Polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE, Teflon) and related copolymers

image

[2,75,137164]
Polyimide (PI, Kapton)

image

[1,13,125,165181]
Polyurethane (PU)

image

[68,182194]
Polyethersulfone (PSU, PES)

image

[12,71,100,165,170,173,195,196]
Silicone rubber, polysiloxane, PDMS

image

[102,103,184,197204]
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC)

image

[60,71,205,206]
Polyvinyl fluoride (PVDF)

image

[12]
Polyethylene glycol (PEG)

image

[207,208]
Polyamide (PA)

image

[4,12,58,209212]
Polycarbonate (PC)

image

[75,100,213226]
Polypropylene (PP)

image

[6,12,26,227231]
Polycaprolactone (PCL)

image

[98,207]
Polyvinylpyridine (PVP)

image

[195]
Polyvinyl acetate and copolymers (PVA)

image

[12,60,184]
Poly glycidil methacrylate-co-3-chlorostyrene

image

[60]
Poly (butane-1-sulfone)

image

[60]
Novolac

image

[60]
Polycarbosilane (PCS)

image

[165]
Polyphenylquinoxaline (PPQ)

image

[1]
Poly-p-chlorstyrene

image

[125]
Polyoxymethylene

image

[3]
Cellulose

image

[4]
Polyphenylvinylene

image

[7]
Poly (L-lactic acid) and copolymers (PLLA, PLA, PLGA)

image

[232236]
Polyacrylonitrile and copolymers

image

[77]
Poly(aryl ether ether ketone) (PEEK)

image

[237246]
Polyacetylene

image

[247]
Ethylene–propylene rubber (EPDM)

image

[12]
Poly(ethylene-tetrafluorethylene) (ETFE)

image

[12]

Image

Image

Image

Macromolecules contain hundreds and thousands of monomers. The mass (or number of monomers, or length) of the macromolecule is characterized by a molecular mass distribution function and average molecular mass (MMW). Usually, the MMW of a polymer is in the range of 104–106. Polymers with MMW in a range of 300–3000, known as oligomers, are viscous liquids.

Polymers are characterized by strong intramolecular interactions between atoms in the macromolecule, and weak intermolecular interactions between neighboring macromolecules. The intramolecular interactions in the macromolecule are usually provided by covalent bonds. In some kinds of polymers, intramolecular interactions are provided by ionic and donor–acceptor bonds. Polymer macromolecules have relatively high mobility at room temperature; they can change conformation and macromolecules can diffuse between neighbors. The macromolecular mobility is characterized by the glass-transition temperature (Tg), at which the polymer transforms from a solid (glass state) to a viscous liquid.

Polymer macromolecules can form structures like clews or globules. Due to disordering of the long chains, polymers have mostly an amorphous structure. Some polymers have partly ordered structures and some have crystalline structures. For example, PE has amorphous and crystalline fractions. The ratio of these fractions depends on the degree of structural defects in the macromolecules. The crystalline fraction in LDPE is about 40% and in UHMWPE, it is about 85–90%.

Industrial polymers contain additives: stabilizers, antioxidants, vulcanizing agents, plasticizers, fillers, and other functional additives (sometimes up to 20–30 components) to provide the required properties for their practical exploitation. Polymers can contain uncontrolled additives, such as minor products of the synthesis reactions, oxidation, and pollutants from the production processes. Polymer surfaces can contain additional components, such as lubricants used in rolling processes, antisticking powder, or even fat traces from fingers after being touched. For example, after ion beam implantation with high fluence, fingerprints are observed as carbon traces on Teflon surfaces. Such contaminants must be removed from polymer surfaces before modification. If complete removal is impossible, then the effect of the contaminants must be taken into account during analysis after ion beam implantation.

Polymer surfaces can be cleaned with solvents. The choice of solvent should be based on knowledge of compatibility of the polymer and solvent. If the polymer is immersed in solvent, the solvent will penetrate into the surface layer of the polymer during the cleaning process. Therefore, after cleaning, ion implantation will modify the mixture of polymer and solvent, and this may significantly alter the structure of the modified surface layer. Immersion in solvent can also bring low-molecular-weight components from deep in the bulk of the polymer up to the surface layer, and thus further modify the composition of surface layer prior to ion implantation. Additional effects of the solvent and other low-molecular-weight components of the polymer occur when they evaporate as volatiles in the vacuum chamber and contaminate the plasma. Such effects of small molecule evaporation into the plasma and incoming ion beam are observed, particularly for highly plasticized rubbers, which usually contain 30–40% low-molecular-weight plasticizers. Careful and consistent preparation of the polymer surface and thorough knowledge of contaminations in the polymer bulk and surface regions are a must to ensure desired and consistent results of the ion implantation treatment.

Polymer macromolecules are stable in the absence of radiation. Under radiation (for example, UV light or ion beam), some bonds are broken and macromolecules are transformed into free radicals. Such free radicals are very active and will cause a number of chemical reactions to occur in the polymer. Here, for example, we review free radical reactions in PE, which has been extensively investigated after irradiation [248250]. Two kinds of initial radicals can be generated in PE macromolecules: a radical that appears at the end of a chain after a CglyphC bond break which splits the chain in two and a radical appearing within the macromolecule after a CglyphH bond break. The following reactions involving these two kinds of free radicals can occur:

image (3.1)

image (3.2)

image (3.3)

Reactions (3.1), (3.2), and (3.3) are interpreted as a transfer of the free radical (due to H atom swapping) along a macromolecule or from the excited macromolecule to a neighboring virgin macromolecule. Reactions (3.2) and (3.3) are the most sensitive to the intermolecular environment and are favored by strong intermolecular interactions between two neighbor macromolecules. As a consequence of these reactions, the radical can move deep into the polymer, reaching regions that were not directly affected by irradiation. Such reactions can, therefore, increase the extent of a modified surface layer to depths well beyond the ion penetration depth.

image (3.4)

image (3.5)

Reactions (3.4) and (3.5), which involve two proximate radicals, lead to the appearance of cross-links between macromolecules. These result in cross-links between central regions of two neighboring macromolecules or T-junction, where the end of one macromolecule links to the center of another macromolecule.

image (3.6)

Due to reaction (3.6), the backbone of a macromolecule breaks. As the result, a double bond is formed between carbon atoms and the free radical remains active, generating further structural transformations.

image (3.7)

image (3.8)

image (3.9)

Reactions (3.7) and (3.9) occur in the presence of neighboring macromolecules, with free radicals that take hydrogen from adjacent macromolecules. As a result, a carbon-carbon double bond appears in the macromolecule. For the PE macromolecule, three kinds of double bonds can occur, resulting in: vinylene groups as a result of reaction (3.7), vinyl groups as a result of reaction (3.8), and vinylidene group as a result of reaction (3.9).

Although these processes of free radical transformation depend on neighboring macromolecules, phonon excitation, and the electronic states of the macromolecule fragments, they are mostly spontaneous and their evolution is best described by probability functions.

In other polymers, the free radical reactions are even more complicated. For example, the free radicals can generate depolymerization reactions. The result of depolymerization reactions is a decomposition of the macromolecules into a number of separate monomer molecules. A classic example of depolymerization reactions is the decomposition of butyl rubber into isobutylene monomers:

image (3.10)

For some polymers, the radicals can initiate reactions that result in the spontaneous release of gaseous products. These can be gaseous monomers or other molecules formed as products of free radical reactions. For example, free radical reactions in a carbonyl-containing polymer (for example, PMMA) cause the release of CO gas:

image (3.11)

All polymers can be divided into two classes: polymers where scission (depolymerization) reactions dominate, causing the polymer to depolymerize with increasing ion irradiation; and polymers where cross-linking reactions dominate, causing the polymers to become more cross-linked with increasing ion irradiation. Examples of cross-linking polymers are PE and PS; examples of scission polymers are polyisobutylene and PMMA.

In contrast to UV light, γ-irradiation, and X-rays, ion implantation generates particular kinds of radicals, which appear as a result of atoms and ions recoiling in the structure. Direct collisions of high-energy ions with macromolecules transfer substantial energy to individual atoms or fragments of the macromolecules, which then leave their position and move with high speed away from the mother macromolecule. After a number of collisions that involve disintegration of fragments into individual atoms and the loss of kinetic energy, the atoms stop. At this time, the atoms have dangling bonds (or unpaired electrons) and are located between adjacent polymer macromolecules. For example, if PE is ion implanted, carbon atoms with four free valence electrons each and hydrogen atoms with one free valence electron appear at a range of distances from the initial track of the penetrating ion. These recoiled atoms are extremely active radicals, and they cause specific chemical reactions.

The hydrogen atoms can bond to macromolecules with dangling bonds, or to an unsaturated carbon-carbon bond or to another hydrogen atom, resulting in the formation of a hydrogen molecule that can diffuse out of and leave the structure.

Recoiled carbon atoms penetrating into hydrocarbon polymers can react with the virgin macromolecules according to the following scheme:

image (3.12)

for example, in the case of PE macromolecules to produce a cross-link:

image (3.13)

Such reactions dominate at low-ion fluences when the concentration of carbon recoil atoms is low and the concentration of unchanged virgin macromolecules is high. With increasing ion fluence, the volume density of carbon recoil atoms increases and the recoiled carbon atoms have increased probability of meeting radicals and forming bonds with them.

image (3.14)

Thus, high fluences of ion implantation generate carbon clusters with irregular structures, containing unsaturated double and triple bonds, aromatic five- and six-membered rings, and conjugated structures, as depicted in (3.14) and (3.15).

image (3.15)

For high-fluence ion implantation, the modified layer no longer contains polymer macromolecules. This structure is amorphous carbon with short fragments of initial macromolecules. The size of the conjugated structures grows with increasing fluence. This is a length of polyene structures—(CglyphC)n—and a number of conjugated aromatic structures, as for example:

image (3.16)

At high fluence, nanoscale pi-conjugated carbon clusters dominate in the modified polymer surface layer. Subsequent ion implantation occurs into the carbon structures. At this fluence, the ion implantation into polymer is finished and an ion beam implantation into carbon structure is started.

The presence of radicals means that the structure and chemistry of the modified layer continues to evolve long after the completion of ion implantation. The free radicals have been observed to survive for a long time after the treatment process has ceased. Despite a rapid rate of reactions immediately after ion implantation, the presence and activity of radicals can be observed for days to many months or even years after the treatment. The modified layer continues to restructure itself over these time scales. If a modified polymer remains in high vacuum (for example, in an ion implanter chamber or in a free-space environment) after ion beam implantation, the free radical reactions that continue to take place do not significantly change the structure of modified layer. Typically however, the modified polymer is taken out of the vacuum and used in air or in another reactive environments. Due to the presence of reactive species in particular oxygen, oxidation reactions occur and significantly change the structure of polymer when stored in air. The reactions of radicals with air oxygen proceed as follows:

image (3.17)

resulting in the formation of a peroxide radical. Such reactions in the surface layer begin immediately after contact of the modified polymer with air. Reactions in deeper layers are limited by diffusion of oxygen into the modified layer. Peroxide radical groups are very active and they can react with alkyl radicals to produce peroxide cross-links:

image (3.18)

The peroxide radical can also react with neighboring hydrocarbon molecules, taking up hydrogen to form a hydroperoxide group:

image (3.19)

The peroxide radical can also take hydrogen from a neighboring group on the same molecule, resulting in the formation of a hydrocarbon radical. For example, in the context of a PE macromolecule, this reaction can occur in following way:

image (3.20)

The peroxide group is more stable than free radicals and it can exist in the modified layer of the polymer for hours and even days. With time, the peroxide group can degrade according to the following schemes:

ROOH→R*+*OOH (3.21)

ROOH→RO*+*OH (3.22)

ROOH→ROO*+*H (3.23)

or react with free radicals

ROOH+RO*→ROO*+ROH (3.24)

ROOH+R*→ROO*+RH (3.25)

Reactions (3.21), (3.23), and (3.25) are reversible and do not give new products. Reaction (3.24) produces stable hydroxyl groups. Reaction (3.22) produces an alkoxyl radical that is unstable and can be transformed into various stable groups according to:

image (3.26)

yielding a hydroxyl group,

image (3.27)

yielding an aldehyde group,

image (3.28)

yielding a ketone group,

image (3.29)

yielding an ether group.

Hydrogen transfer between two interacting alkoxyl radicals can also yield a ketone and a hydroxyl group by a reaction of disproportionation.

image (3.30)

The aldehyde group can react with an oxidizing agent and form a carboxyl group.

image (3.31)

Such reactions proceed both in the modified layer and also in the deeper layer, in which free radicals move according to reactions of free radical transfer.

The reactions of ion-modified polymers with atmospheric nitrogen are not as well known and typically ignored. When there is a low concentration of radicals in the polymer after low-energy irradiation, the probability of reaction within nitrogen molecule is low due to the stability of the NglyphN triple bond. However, for high-ion irradiation fluences, when the concentration of multiple radicals is high, the following reactions can be expected to occur with implanted nitrogen atoms:

image (3.32)

image (3.33)

image (3.34)

and with atmospheric nitrogen

image (3.35)

image (3.36)

Pyridine and pyrrole ring structures also form at fluences when the polymer macromolecules are highly damaged:

image (3.37)

At high-ion implantation fluence, the oxidation and nitration of the highly carbonized subsurface layer also occurs. In the first stage of radical-induced transformation in the modified layer, clusters of condensed aromatic rings are formed. Radicals survive predominantly on the edges of these clusters. Therefore, reactions with atmospheric oxygen and nitrogen proceed mostly on the edges of the condensed aromatic structures. An example of showing how oxygen- and nitrogen-containing groups are incorporated with the carbon cluster can be depicted as follows:

image (3.38)

The modified surface is not only active to atmospheric oxygen and nitrogen. The radicals are active to a wide number of substances with different kinds of reactive groups. One example is the alkene group, which is reacts with radicals according to the following reaction:

image (3.39)

This reaction can be exploited to graft any functional compounds to the surface of the ion-modified polymer. For example, acrylic substances can react can be grafted through the following radical reaction:

image (3.40)

finally forming a polyacrylic acid layer on the modified polymer:

image (3.41)

Alternatively, an amine layer can be grafted through reactions with allylamine:

image (3.42)

After such reactions with active substances, the modified surface acquires a new chemical activity that can be used for the attachment of further components. For example, the ion-implanted surface reacted with acrylic acid becomes active to bases as follows:

image (3.43)

where R2 could be the remainder of a linker molecule, polyamine glue, or a protein molecule. Further useful examples showing experimental data of chemically grafted substances will be considered in subsequent chapters.

The chemical reactions in polymer after ion implantation that we have considered above have multiple pathways. The propagation paths, rates, and products of the reactions are difficult to predict and the paths they follow depend strongly on the type of polymer implanted, the ion beam or plasma parameters, and the postmodification exposure to reactive species of the polymer. The reactions of radicals begin immediately after ion penetration into the polymer. Kinetics of the reactions are difficult to measure and investigate because of the high rates of the reactions, the dependence of the reactions on distance from the surface, and the wide range of possible reaction paths and products, as well as the influence of environmental reactive species. However, some common principles of the reactions can be elucidated by applying our basic knowledge of free radical reactions in polymers and organic substances. Such reactions and their products are experimentally observed in polymers after γ-irradiation, high-energy electron and ion beam irradiations, X-ray irradiation and irradiation with UV light. The rate of these reactions depends on the mobility of the radicals, the macromolecules, and their activity. Fundamentally, the reaction kinetics are described by the first-order reaction equation:

[Ri]t=k[Ri][RjH] (Eq. 3.1)

image (Eq. 3.1)

where [Ri]image is the concentration of the ith radical, [RjH] is the concentration of the jth unreacted macromolecular fragment, and k is the rate of the reaction, which depends on the temperature (T) according to the Arrhenius law:

k(T)=k0e(E/KT) (Eq. 3.2)

image (Eq. 3.2)

The rates and paths of the reactions depend on the local structure of the polymer (crystalline or amorphous phases), on the structure of neighboring molecules, and on the conformation of the macromolecules. The kinetics of the reactions could be described by a number of different reaction rates corresponding to different local structures. Reaction kinetics of this kind is called polychronos kinetics. The theory of polychronos kinetics is based on a distribution function, f(E), of active free radicals with activation energy, E [249], where the concentration of the active radicals at time t can be expressed as the integral over different ensembles of radicals with different activation energies of their radical reactions:

n(t,T)=n0EminEmaxf(E)·G[k(E),t]·dE (Eq. 3.3)

image (Eq. 3.3)

where G[k(E),t] is a kinetic equation for ensembles with activation energies, E, in the range from Emin to Emax, and n0 is the initial concentration of the radicals.

Experimentally, the kinetics of the radical reactions is observed as a step-by-step unfreezing of radicals with temperature elevation (Figure 3.1). The kinetic curve of the integral number density of radicals with time after irradiation can be described by a number of exponential functions with a number of preexponential coefficients. This character of free radical reactions is observed for a wide number of polymers, radical reactions, and methods of free radical generation. Ion beam implantation is not an exceptional case.

image
Figure 3.1 Model curve of polychronos kinetics showing unfreezing of free radicals with step heating (indicated by the application of successively higher temperatures T1 to T5) to the ion-modified polymer. The curve made up by symbols “×” corresponds to two steps; while the continuous curve corresponds to five steps over the same temperature range.

However, ion implantation is exceptional with respect to the high concentration of active free radicals created simultaneously at high local temperature in the small volume of the collision cascade around each ion track. Calculated phonon temperatures in the track region of the penetrating ion can reach 104 K, which is incredibly high compared to any characteristic temperature for a polymer. Therefore, immediately after ion propagation, the free radical reactions proceed in a limited volume and at extremely high temperatures.

The kinetics of reactions is sensitive to the local temperature, which depends on the ion-induced temperature spike, ion current density, temperature of the sample holder, thermal conductivity of the sample, and sample holder. Even in a low-current density regime in the absence of extrinsic sample heating, the temperature near the ion track is high and affects the kinetics of the reactions because they take place at temperatures much higher than the average temperature of the polymer. If the ion current is dense enough and a second ion penetrates the region of the polymer close to the first ion track, the temperature spikes from both ions overlap. Therefore, the radical reactions in this region of the polymer proceed at an even higher temperature. This effect changes the path and rates of radical reactions in the case of ion implantation in a high-current density regime even if the average temperature of the sample does not increase. Experimentally, this effect is observed by comparison of continuous and pulsed ion beam implantation regimes with equal average current densities. In the case of the pulsed irradiation, ions come with higher density during the pulse than in the continuous regime. Therefore, the products of free radical reactions created in continuous and pulse regimes are expected to be different, despite the fact that the average temperature of the polymer is the same.

Despite the high rates of the radical reactions, a residual concentration of free radicals remains in many irradiated polymers for years after ion implantation. For example, an estimation of the radical concentration in PS after nitrogen ion implantation shows, that 1 of 70,000 initially generated unpaired electrons remains after the first hour. The decay of these residual radicals is slow and they remain in irradiated PE, PS, and PTFE for years. This is due to the long lifetime of some kinds of free radicals and the relatively stable middle products of free radical reactions, as well as trapped free radicals at the edges of aromatic structures, where the presence of the conjugated aromatic structure with π-electrons stabilizes the unpaired electrons.

After ion implantation, reactive species in the environment can react with residual radicals in the polymer surface layer. The kinetics equation for these reactions includes the concentration of the reactive species. For example, the reactions with atmospheric oxygen depend on the concentration of oxygen at the polymer surface:

[RiOO]t=k[Ri][O2] (Eq. 3.4)

image (Eq. 3.4)

where [Ri]image is the concentration of the ith residual free radical, [RjOO]image is the concentration of the product of oxidation, and [O2] is the concentration of oxygen in the polymer layer.

Even if the concentration of oxygen is low (such as in the case of residual oxygen in a vacuum vessel), oxygen-containing groups can appear in the irradiated polymer after sufficiently long storage times in the vacuum system, despite a lack of direct contact with the atmosphere after ion beam implantation.

The same effect is observed in the presence of other residual gases in the vacuum chamber (oil from vacuum pumps, grease, or products of polymer degradation). The polymer surface becomes very active after ion implantation, and residual gases or vapors at very low concentrations can react with the radicals in the modified surface layer.

References

1. Davenas J, Xu XL, Boiteux G, Sage D. Relations between structure and electric properties of ion irradiated polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1989;39:754–763.

2. Calcagno L, Compagnini G, Foti G. Structural modification of polymer film by ion irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1992;62:413–422.

3. Mahfouz RM, Sauer M, Atwa ST, Kaiser RI, Roessler K. Interaction of MeV ions and VUV photons with polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1992;62:447–451.

4. Popok VN, Odzhaev VB, Kozlov IP, Azarko II, Karpovich IA, Sviridov DV. Ion beam effects in polymer films: structure evolution of the implanted layer. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1997;129:60–64.

5. Svorcik V, Rybka V, Vacik J, Hnatowicz V, Ochsner R, Ryssel H. Li+ grafting of ion irradiated polyethylene. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1999;149:331–335.

6. Ueda M, Tan IH, Dallaqua RS, Rossi JO, Barroso JJ, Tabacniks MH. Aluminum plasma immersion ion implantation in polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;206:760–766.

7. Davenas J, Thevenard P. Models of the hydrogen release from polymers under ion beam irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;208:170–175.

8. Rockova-Hlavackova K, Svorcik V, Bacakova L, Dvorankova B, Heitz J, Hnatowicz V. Bio-compatibility of ion beam-modified and RGD-grafted polyethylene. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2004;225:275–282.

9. Proskova K, Svorcik V, Rybka V, Hnatowicz V. Selected degradation reactions in polyethylene irradiated with Ar+ and Xe+ ions. Radiat Phys Chem. 2000;58:153–156.

10. Svorcik V, Hnatowicz V, Stopka P, et al. Amino acids grafting of Ar+ ions modified PE. Radiat Phys Chem. 2001;60:89–93.

11. Turos A, Jagielski J, Piatkowska A, Bielinski D, Slusarski L, Madi NK. Ion beam modification of surface properties of polyethylene. Vacuum. 2003;70:201–206.

12. Sasuga T, Kawanishi S, Nishii M, Seguchi T, Kohno I. Effects of ion irradiation on the mechanical properties of several polymers. Radiat Phys Chem. 1991;37:135–140.

13. Lewis MB, Lee EH. Chemical G-values of ion-irradiated polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1992;62:341–348.

14. Toth A, Bell T, Bertoti I, Mohai M, Zelei B. Surface modification of polyethylene by low keV ion beams. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1999;148:1131–1135.

15. Gavrilov N, Yakusheva D, Kondyurin A. Structure of polyethylene after pulse ion beam treatment. J Appl Poly Sci. 1998;69:1071–1077.

16. Mesyats GA, Klyachkin YS, Garilov NV, Mizgulin VN, Yakushev RM, Kondyurin AV. Ion beam modification of polyethylene and adhesion to epoxy adhesive. Vacuum. 1996;47(9):1085–1087.

17. Kondyurin A, Karmanov V, Guenzel R. Plasma immersion ion implantation of polyethylene. Vacuum. 2002;64:105–111.

18. Kondyurin A, Khaybullin R, Gavrilov N, Popok V. Pulse and continuous ion beam treatment of polyethylene. Vacuum. 2003;68:341–347.

19. Chen JS, Sun Z, Guo PS, Zhang ZB, Zhu DZ, Xu HJ. Effect of ion implantation on surface energy of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. J Appl Phys. 2003;93:5103–5108.

20. Rhee KY, Choi JH, Park SJ. Effect of 1 keV Ar+ irradiation on the residual strength of PE fiber-reinforced composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;395:288–294.

21. Turos A, Abdul-Kader AM, Grambole D, et al. The effects of ion bombardment of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2006;249:660–664.

22. Veres M, Fule M, Toth S, et al. Raman scattering of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene treated by plasma-based ion implantation. Thin Solid Films. 2005;482:211–215.

23. Kostov KG, Ueda M, Tan IH, Leite NF, Beloto AF, Gomes GF. Structural effect of nitrogen plasma-based ion implantation on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Surf Coat Technol. 2004;186:287–290.

24. Shi W, Li XY, Dong H. Improved wear resistance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene by plasma immersion ion implantation. Wear. 2001;250:544–552.

25. Valenza A, Visco AM, Torrisi L, Campo N. Characterization of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) modified by ion implantation. Polymer (Guildf). 2004;45:1707–1715.

26. Krezhov K, Velitchkova K, Balabanov S. Transport properties of selenium implanted polymer composites. Vacuum. 2002;69:113–118.

27. Kondyurin AV. Destruction of polyethylene after ion beam treatment under environment. Plasticheskie Massi 1997;10–12.

28. Kondyurin AV. Degradation of polyethylene after ion-beam treatment under the action of the external environment. Int Polymer Sci Technol. 1998;25 T/59.

29. Gavrilov NV, Emlin DR, Kondyurin AV, Mizgulin VN. Influence of ion irradiation on adhesion of Cu coating to polyethylene. Khimicheskaya fizika i mesoskopiya. 1999;1:48–59.

30. Gavrilov NV, Mizgulin VN, Stinnett R, Kondyurin AV. Modification of polymer films of PE, PTFE, PC, PI by pulse ion beams. Khimicheskaya fizika i mesoskopiya. 1999;1:39–47.

31. Nosworthy NJ, Ho JPY, Kondyurin A, McKenzie DR, Bilek MMM. The attachment of catalase and poly-L-lysine to plasma immersion ion implantation-treated polyethylene. Acta Biomater. 2007;3:695–704.

32. Kondyurin A, Naseri P, Fisher K, McKenzie DR, Bilek MMM. Mechanisms for surface energy changes observed in plasma immersion ion implanted polyethylene: the roles of free radicals and oxygen-containing groups. Polym Degrad Stab. 2009;94:638–646.

33. Klyachkin YS, Kondyurin AV. Ion beam treatment of polymer materials, Abstract. In: IV Russian conference on modification of construction materials by charged particles beams. Tomsk; May 13–17, 1996. p. 343–5.

34. Kondyurin AV, Naseri P, Tilley JMR, Nosworthy NJ, Bilek MMM, McKenzie DR. Mechanisms for covalent immobilization of horseradish peroxidase on ion-beam-treated polyethylene. Scientifica 2012; Article ID 126170, http://dx.doi.org/10.6064/2012/126170.

35. Bacakova L, Walachova K, Svorcik V, Hnatowicz V. Adhesion and proliferation of rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) on polyethylene implanted with O+ and C+ ions. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2001;12:817–834.

36. Walachova K, Svorcik V, Bacakova L, Hnatowicz V. Colonization of ion-modified polyethylene with vascular smooth muscle cells in vitro. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2989–2996.

37. Davenas J, Thevenard P, Philippe F, Arnaud MN. Surface implantation treatments to prevent infection complications in short term devices. Biomol Eng. 2002;19:263–268.

38. Duffour E. Molecular dynamic simulation of the interaction, at high energy, between the N2 molecule and polyethylene. J Chem Phys. 2000;113:8187–8193.

39. Svorcik V, Walachova K, Proskova K, et al. Adhesion and proliferation of keratinocytes on ion beam modified polyethylene. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000;11:655–660.

40. Hnatowicz V, Vacik J, Cervena J, et al. Doping of ion implanted polyethylene with metallocarborane. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1995;105:241–244.

41. Jankovskij O, Svorcik V, Ribka V, Hnatowicz V, Popok V. Diffusion of iodine into polyethylene implanted with 150 keV As+ ions. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1995;95:192–196.

42. Svorcik V, Arenholz E, Hnatowicz V, Ribka V, Ochsner R, Ryssel H. AFM surface investigation of polyethylene modified by ion bombardment. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1998;142:349–354.

43. Odzhaev VB, Popok VN, Kozlova EI, Jankovskij ON, Karpovich IA. Electrical properties of polyethylene modified by ion implantation and diffusion. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2000;166–167:655–659.

44. Chen J, Zhu F, Pan H, et al. Surface modification of ion implanted ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2000;169:26–30.

45. Popok VN, Azarko II, Odzhaev VB, Toth A, Khaibullin RI. High fluence ion beam modification of polymer surfaces: EPR and XPS studies. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2001;178:305–310.

46. Oka T, Kanbe H, Yatagai F, Hama Y. Changes in the chemical structure and the mechanical properties of single-site polyethylene induced by ion-beam irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;208:181–184.

47. Lacoste A, Pelletier J. Processing considerations with plasma-based ion implantation of polymers: theoretical aspects, limitations, and experimental results. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;208:260–266.

48. Svorcık V, Tomasova P, Dvorankova B, Hnatowicz V, Ochsner R, Ryssel H. Fibroblasts adhesion on ion beam modified polyethylene. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2004;215:366–372.

49. Urkac ES, Oztarhan A, Tihminlioglu F, et al. Thermal characterization of Ag and Ag+N ion implanted ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2007;261:699–703.

50. Singh R, Samra KS, Kumar R, Singh L. Proton (3 MeV) and copper (120 MeV) ion irradiation effects in low-density polyethylene (LDPE). Radiat Phys Chem. 2008;77:53–57.

51. Chen JS, Lau SP, Sun Z, et al. Structural and mechanical properties of nitrogen ion implanted ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Surf Coat Technol. 2001;138:33–38.

52. Ikeda D, Ogawa M, Hara Y, et al. Effect of nitrogen plasma-based ion implantation on joint prosthetic material. Surf Coat Technol. 2002;156:301–305.

53. Dangsheng X, Jin ZM. Tribological properties of ion implanted UHMWPE against Si3N4 under different lubrication conditions. Surf Coat Technol. 2004;182:149–155.

54. Sze JY, Tay BK. Carbon ion implantation of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene using filtered cathodic vacuum arc with substrate pulse biasing. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;200:4104–4110.

55. Kim Y, Lee Y, Han S, Kim K-J. Improvement of hydrophobic properties of polymer surfaces by plasma source ion implantation. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;200:4763–4769.

56. Delcorte A, Weng LT, Bertrand P. Secondary molecular ion emission from aliphatic polymers bombarded with low energy ions: effects of the molecular structure and the ion beam induced surface degradation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1995;100:213–216.

57. Deslandes A, Ionescu M, Karatchevtseva I, Siegele R, Cohen DD. Oxidation of polyethylene implanted with low energy magnesium ions. Phys Res Sec B. 2013;307:624–629.

58. Tóth A, Kereszturi K, Mohai M, Bertóti I. Plasma based ion implantation of engineering polymers. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;204:2898–2908.

59. Kumar V, Ghadei B, Krishna JBM, Bhattacharya SC, Saha A. High-energy C+ ion-irradiated low-density polyethylene (LDPE): spectroscopic and morphological investigation. Radiat Phys Chem. 2009;78:351–355.

60. Hall TM, Wagner A, Thompson LF. Ion beam exposure characteristics of resists: experimental results. J Appl Phys. 1982;53:3997–4010.

61. Licciadello A, Puglisi O, Calcagno L, Foti G. Crosslinking yield in particle beam irradiated polystyrene. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1990;46:338–341.

62. Davenas J, Thevenard P, Boiteux G, Fallavier M, Xu XL. Hydrogenated carbon layers produced by ion beam irradiation of PMMA and polystyrene films. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1990;46:317–323.

63. Foti G, Reitano R. Structure and bonding in ion irradiated polystyrene. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1990;46:306–308.

64. Calcagno L, Foti G. Ion irradiation of polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1991;59/60:1153–1158.

65. Suzuki Y, Kusakabe M, Lee J-S, Kaibara M, Iwaki M, Sasabe H. Endothelian cell adhesion to ion implanted polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1992;62:142–147.

66. Calcagno L, Percolla R, Foti G. Interdiffusion in polystyrene crosslinked by ion irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1994;91:426–430.

67. Abel F, Quillet V, Schott M. Degradation of polystyrene thin films under d, 4He and 12C irradiation studied by ion beam analysis: effects of energy loss, sample thickness and isotopic content. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1995;105:86–90.

68. Iwaki M, Nakao A, Kaibara M, et al. Ion bombardment into inner wall surfaces of tubes and their biomedical applications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1995;106:618–623.

69. Klaumunzer S, Zhu QQ, Schnabel W, Schumacher G. Ion-beam-induced crosslinking of polystyrene—still an unsolved puzzle. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1996;116:154–158.

70. Georhegan M, Abel F. High resolution elastic recoil detection analysis of polystyrene depth profiles using carbon ions. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1998;143:371–380.

71. Evelyn AL, Ila D, Zimmerman RL, et al. Ion beam modification of PES, PS and PVC polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1999;148:1141–1145.

72. Netcheva S, Bertrand P. Surface topography development of thin polystyrene films under low energy ion irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1999;151:129–134.

73. Yokoyama Y, Tsukamoto T, Kobayashi T, Iwaki M. Immobilization of collagen by ion bombardment. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;206:512–516.

74. Zaporojtchenko V, Zekonyte J, Wille S, Schuermann U, Faupel F. Tailoring of the PS surface with low energy ions: relevance to growth and adhesion of noble metals. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2005;236:95–102.

75. Zekonyte J, Zaporojtchenko V, Faupel F. Investigation of the drastic change in the sputter rate of polymers at low ion fluence. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2005;236:241–248.

76. Calcagno L, Compagnini G, Foti G. Ion-beam effects on optical and rheological properties of polystyrene. Phys Rev B. 1992;46:10573–10578.

77. Schnabel W, Klaumunzer S. The effects of ion-beam irradiation of polymers. Radiat Phys Che. 1991;37:131–134.

78. Kumar R, Prasad R. 70 MeV Carbon C5+ ion induced modification in polystyrene by positron annihilation. Radiat Meas. 2005;40:750–753.

79. Tsuji H, Satoh H, Ikeda S, Ikemoto N, Gotoh Y, Ishikawa J. Surface modification by silver-negative-ion implantation for controlling cell-adhesion properties of polystyrene. Surf Coat Technol. 1998;103–104:124–128.

80. Kondyurin A, Gan BK, Bilek MMM, Mizuno K, McKenzie DR. Etching and structural changes of polystyrene films during plasma immersion ion implantation from argon plasma. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2006;251:413–418.

81. Komarov FF, Leontyev AV, Grigoryev VV, Kamishan MA. Ion implantation for local change of the optical constants of polymer films. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2002;191:728–732.

82. Gan BK, Bilek MMM, Kondyurin A, Mizuno K, McKenzie DR. Etching and structural changes in nitrogen plasma immersion ion implanted polystyrene films. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2006;247:254–260.

83. Tran CTH, Nosworthy NJ, Kondyurin A, McKenzie DR, Bilek MMM. CelB and β-glucosidase immobilization for carboxymethyl cellulose hydrolysis. RSC Adv. 2013;3:23604–23611.

84. Kosobrodova E, Kondyurin A, McKenzie DR, Bilek MMM. Kinetics of post-treatment structural transformations of nitrogen plasma ion immersion implanted polystyrene. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2013;304:57–66.

85. Tran CTH, Kondyurin A, Chrzanowski W, Bilek MMM, McKenzie DR. Influence of pH on yeast immobilization on polystyrene surfaces modified by energetic ion bombardment. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;104:145–152.

86. Kosobrodova EA, Kondyurin AV, Fisher K, Moeller W, McKenzie DR, Bilek MMM. Free radical kinetics in a plasma immersion ion implanted polystyrene: theory and experiment. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2012;280:26–35.

87. Chrzanowski W, Kondyurin A, Lee JH, Lord MS, Bilek MMM, Kim H-W. Biointerface: protein enhanced stem cells binding to implant surface. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23:2203–2215.

88. Hirsh SL, Nosworthy NJ, Kondyurin A, dos Remedios CG, McKenzie DR, Bilek MMM. Linker-free covalent thermophilic β-glucosidase functionalized polymeric surfaces. J Mater Chem. 2011;21:17832–17841.

89. Muller D, Ivanov DA, Vidal L, Simon L, Kondyurin A, Luchnikov VA. Electrically conductive hexagonally ordered nanoporous membranes produced by ion-beam induced carbonization of block-copolymer precursors. Nanotechnology. 2011;22:305603.

90. Hirsh SL, Bilek MMM, Nosworthy NJ, Kondyurin A, dos Remedios CG, McKenzie DR. A comparison of covalent immobilization and physical adsorption of a cellulase enzyme mixture. Langmuir. 2010;26:14380–14388.

91. Kondyurin A, Gan BK, Bilek MMM, McKenzie DR, Mizuno K, Wuhrer R. Argon plasma immersion ion implantation of polystyrene films. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2008;266:1074–1084.

92. Luchnikov V, Kondyurin A, Formanek P, Lichte H, Stamm M. Moiré patterns in superimposed nanoporous thin films derived from block-copolymer assemblies. Nanoletters. 2007;7:3628–3632.

93. Gan BK, Kondyurin A, Bilek MMM. Comparison of protein surface attachment on untreated and plasma immersion ion implantation treated polystyrene: protein Islands and carpet. Langmuir. 2007;23:2741–2746.

94. Nosworthy NJ, Kondyurin A, Bilek MMM, McKenzie DR. Ion implantation treatment of beads for covalent binding of molecules: application to bioethanol production using thermophilic beta-glucosidase. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2014;54:20–24.

95. Sommani P, Tsuji H, Kojima H, et al. Line-width of ion beam-modified polystyrene by negative carbon ions for fine adhesion pattern of mesenchymal stem cells. Surf Coat Technol. 2011;206:897–899.

96. Ma M, Wu S, Lin J, Sun Y, Jin Y, Zhu Z. Properties of ion track in polystyrene irradiated with high energy 56Fe ions. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2012;286:233–237.

97. Wang J, Huang N, Yang P, et al. The effects of amorphous carbon films deposited on polyethylene terephthalate on bacterial adhesion. Biomaterials. 2004;25:3163–3170.

98. Satriano C, Spinella N, Manso M, Licciardello A, Rossi F, Marletta G. Ion beam induced nanometric structure and oligopeptide adsorption on patterned polymer surfaces. Mater Sci Eng C. 2003;23:779–786.

99. Papaleo RM, de Araujo MA, Livi RP. Study of the ion beam induced amorphisation, bond breaking and optical gap change processes in PET. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1992;62:442–446.

100. Steckenreiter T, Balanzat E, Fuess H, Trautmann C. Pyrolytic effects induced by energetic ions in polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1999;151:161–168.

101. Singh N, Sharma A, Avasthi DK. Effects of high energy (MeV) ion beam irradiation on polyethylene terephtalate. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;206:1120–1123.

102. Satriano C, Scifo C, Marletta G. Study of albumin adsorption on ion beam irradiated polymer surfaces. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2000;166–167:782–787.

103. Satriano C, Carnazza S, Guglielmino S, Marletta G. Surface free energy and cell attachment onto ion-beam irradiated polymer surfaces. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;208:287–293.

104. Wang J, Chen JY, Yang P, et al. In vitro platelet adhesion and activation of polyethylene terephthalate modified by acetylene plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2006;242:12–14.

105. Ranganathaiaha C, Shariff G, Avasthi DK. Carbon-ion-induced modifications of the diffusion kinetics in poly (ethylene terephthalate): a free volume study. Radiat Meas. 2003;36:629–634.

106. Ueda M, Kostov KG, Beloto AF, Leite NF, Grigorov KG. Surface modification of polyethylene terephthalate by plasma immersion ion implantation. Surf Coat Technol. 2004;186:295–298.

107. Wang J, Huang N, Pan CJ, et al. Bacterial repellence from polyethylene terephthalate surface modified by acetylene plasma immersion ion implantation–deposition. Surf Coat Technol. 2004;186:299–304.

108. Ektessabi AM, Yamaguchi K. Changes in chemical states of PET films due to low and high energy oxygen ion beam. Thin Solid Films. 2000;377–378:793–797.

109. Posudievski OY, Myasnikova NG, Chuiko AA. Growth of electroconductivity of polymers, caused by implantation of molecular ions. Dokladi Akademii Nauk. 1992;324:131–132.

110. Dworecki K, Hasegawa T, Sudlitz K, Wsik S. Modification of electrical properties of polymer membranes by ion implantation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2000;166–167:646–649.

111. Mizuno K, Gan BK, Kondyurin A, Bilek MMM, McKenzie DR. Reducing water permeability while maintaining transparency of PET: a plasma immersion ion implantation study. Plasma Process Polym. 2008;5:834–839.

112. Ding W, Ju D, Chai W. The effect of working pressure on the chemical bond structure and hydrophobic properties of PET surface treated by N ion beams bombardment. Appl Surf Sci. 2010;256:6876–6880.

113. Kumar V, Sonkawade RG, Chakarvarti SK, Singh P, Dhaliwal AS. Carbon ion beam induced modifications of optical, structural and chemical properties in PADC and PET polymers. Radiat Phys Chem. 2012;81:652–658.

114. Soliman BA, Abdelrahman MM, Abdelsalam FW, Aly KA. Irradiation effect on PET surface using low energy argon ion beam. J Nucl Mater. 2013;432:444–449.

115. Li L, Liu H, Zou L, Ding W, Ju D, Chai W. The effect of oxygen ion beam bombardment on the properties of tin indium oxide/polyethylene terephthalate complex. Thin Solid Films. 2013;545:365–370.

116. Kitamura A, Yamaki T, Yuri Y, Sawada S, Yuyama T. Microscopic evaluation of the absolute fluence distribution of a large-area uniform ion beam using the track-etching technique. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2013;314:47–50.

117. Abdesselam M, Muller D, Djebara M, Ouichaoui S, Chami AC. MeV H+ ion irradiation effect on the stoichiometry of polyethylene terephthalate films. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2013;307:635–641.

118. Nagata S, Katsui H, Takahiro K, Tsuchiya B, Shikama T. Radiation-induced luminescence of PET and PEN films under MeV ion and pulsed UV laser irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2010;268:3099–3102.

119. Mackova A, Malinsky P, Miksova R, et al. Annealing of PEEK, PET and PI implanted with Co ions at high fluencies. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2013;307:598–602.

120. Awasthi K, Stamm M, Abetz V, Vijay YK. Large area Cl9+ irradiated PET membranes for hydrogen separation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011;36:9374–9381.

121. Stolterfoht N, Hellhammer R, Bundesmann J, Fink D. Density effects on the guided transmission of 3 keV Ne7+ ions through PET nanocapillaries. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2009;267:226–230.

122. Zhou G, Wang R, Zhang TH. Analysis of surface morphological change in PET films induced by tungsten ion implantation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2010;268:2698–2701.

123. Hong W, Woo H-J, Choi H-W, Kim Y-S, Kim G. Optical property modification of PMMA by ion-beam implantation. Appl Surf Sci. 2001;169–170:428–432.

124. He W, Poker DB, Gonsalves KE, Batina N. Micro/nano machining of polymeric substrates by ion beam techniques. Microelectronic Eng. 2003;65:153–161.

125. Leontyev AV, Ostretsov EF, Grigoryev VV, Komarov FF. Analytical methods for investigation of ion-implanted polymer layers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1992;62:438–441.

126. Pignataro B, Fragala ME, Puglisi O. AFM and XPS study of ion bombarded poly(methyl methacrylate). Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1997;131:141–148.

127. Li DJ, Cui FZ, Gu HQ. Cell adhesion of F+ ion implantation of intraocular lens. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1999;152:80–88.

128. Compagnini G, Angilella GGN, Raudino A, Puglisi O. Memory effect on ion beam-induced depolymerization of PMMA. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2001;175–177:559–563.

129. Kondyurin A, Bilek M. Etching and structure changes in PMMA coating under argon plasma immersion ion implantation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2011;269:1361–1369.

130. Bilek MMM, Bax DV, Kondyurin A, et al. Free radical functionalization of surfaces to prevent adverse responses to biomedical devices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:14405–14410.

131. Wolff S, Lagel B, Trellenkamp S. Incident angle dependent damage of PMMA during Ar+-ion beam etching. Microelectronic Eng. 2010;87:1444–1446.

132. Kochumalayil JJ, Meiser A, Soldera F, Possart W. Focused ion beam irradiation—morphological and chemical evolution in PMMA. Surf Interface Anal. 2009;41:412–420.

133. Unai S, Puttaraksa N, Pussadee N, et al. Influence of MeV H+ ion beam flux on cross-linking and blister formation in PMMA resist. Maejo Int J Sci Technol. 2012;6:70–76.

134. Kumar R, Ali SA, Singh P, De U, Virk HS, Prasad R. Physical and chemical response of 145 MeV Ne6+ ion irradiated polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) polymer. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2011;269:1755–1759.

135. Hadjichristov GB, Gueorguiev VK, Ivanov TE, Marinov YG, Ivanov YG, Faulques E. Electrical properties of PMMA ion-implanted with low-energy Si(+) beam. J Phys Conf Ser. 2010;207:012022.

136. Guibert G, Rossel T, Weder G, Betschart B, Meunier C, Mikhailov S. Surface treatment of polymers by ion beam irradiation to control the human osteoblast adhesion: fluence and current density study. In: AIP conference proceedings, vol. 1099. 2009. p. 511–5.

137. Zhang J, Yu X, Li H, Liu X. Surface modification of polytetrafluoroethylene by nitrogen ion implantation. Appl Surf Sci. 2002;185:255–261.

138. Zhang J, Zhang X, Zhou H. Effect of aging on surface chemical bonds of PTFE irradiated by low energy Ti ion. Appl Surf Sci. 2003;205:343–352.

139. Zhang J, Wua Q, Yu X, Zha P, Li H. Effect of aging on the morphology and wettability of polytetrafluoroethylene. Mater Lett. 2001;48:362–368.

140. Arnold GW, Rye RR. Ion beam analysis of the effects of radiation on the chemical etching of poly(tetrafluorethylene). Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1990;46:330–333.

141. Zhang Y, Huan ACH, Tan KL, Kang ET. Surface modification of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) films by low energy Ar+ ion-beam activation and UV-induced graft copolymerization. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2000;168:29–39.

142. Parada MA, Delalez N, de Almeida A, Muntele C, Muntele I, Ila D. Low energy ion beam induced changes in ETFE polymer. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2006;242:550–552.

143. Schiller TL, Sheeja D, McKenzie DR, et al. Plasma immersion ion implantation of poly(tetrafluoroethylene). Surf Coat Technol. 2004;177–178:483–488.

144. Zhang J, Zhang X, Zhou H. Surface-restructuring behavior of aged PTFE irradiated by a high-flux nitrogen ion beam. Surf Coat Technol. 2004;187:250–256.

145. Mesyats G, Klyachkin Y, Gavrilov N, Kondyurin A. Adhesion of polytetrafluorethylene modified by an ion beam. Vacuum. 1999;52:285–289.

146. Colwell JM, Wentrup-Byrne E, Bell JM, Wielunski LS. A study of the chemical and physical effects of ion implantation of micro-porous and nonporous PTFE. Surf Coat Technol. 2003;168:216–222.

147. Suzuki Y, Iwaki M, Tani S, Oohashi G, Kamio M. Ion implantation into ePTFE for application of a dural substitute. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;206:538–542.

148. Tran CTH, Kondyurin A, Hirsh SL, McKenzie DR, Bilek MMM. Ion-implanted polytetrafluoroethylene enhances Saccharomyces cerevisiae biofilm formation for improved immobilization. J R Soc Interface. 2012;9:2923–2935.

149. Kondyurina IV, Nechitailo GS, Kondyurin AV. Ion beam implantation of polytetrafluorethylene and cell adhesion. Plasticheskie Massi. 2011;1:15–21.

150. Kondyurin A, Nosworthy NJ, Bilek MMM. Attachment of horseradish peroxidase to polytetrafluorethylene (teflon) after plasma immersion ion implantation. Acta Biomater. 2008;4:1218–1225.

151. Kondyurin A, Pecheva E, Pramatarova L. Calcium phosphate formation on plasma immersion ion implanted low density polyethylene and polytetrafluorethylene surfaces. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:1145–1153.

152. Kitamura A, Kobayashi T, Meguro T, Suzuki A, Terai T. Control of cell behavior on PTFE surface using ion beam irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2009;267:1638–1641.

153. Delgado AO, Rizzutto MA, Severin D, Seidl T, Neumann R, Trautmann C. Latent track radius of PTFE irradiated with high energy ion beam. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2012;273:55–57.

154. Kitamura A, Kobayashi T, Meguro T, Suzuki A, Terai T. The mechanism of protrusion formation on PTFE surface by ion-beam irradiation. Surf Coat Technol. 2009;203:2406–2409.

155. Lee SW, Hong JW, Wye MY, Kim JH, Kang HJ, Lee YS. Surface modification and adhesion improvement of PTFE film by ion beam irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2004;219–220:963–967.

156. Tsubokura H, Oshima A, Oyama TG, et al. Study on direct etching of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) by high-energy heavy ion beams. Radiat Phys Chem. 2013;92:37–42.

157. Atta A, Fawzy YHA, Bek A, Abdel-Hamid HM, El-Oker MM. Modulation of structure, morphology and wettability of polytetrafluoroethylene surface by low energy ion beam irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2013;300:46–53.

158. Kitamura A, Kobayashi T, Suzuki A, Terai T. Fabrication of fine micro protrusions on fluoropolymer surface using ion beam irradiation. Surf Coat Technol. 2011;206:841–844.

159. Yoshikawa T, Oshima A, Murakami T, Washio M. ESR study for ion beam induced phenomena in poly (tetrafluoroethylene-co-hexafluoropropylene) (FEP). Radiat Phys Chem. 2012;81:1904–1909.

160. Sommani P, Tsuji H, Kojima H, et al. Irradiation effect of carbon negative-ion implantation on polytetrafluoroethylene for controlling cell-adhesion property. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2010;268:3231–3234.

161. Kitamura (Ogawa) A, Satoh T, Koka M, Kamiya T, Kobayashi T. Modification of Teflon surface by proton microbeam and nitrogen ion beam. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2013;314:82–85.

162. Wang H, Kwok DTK, Wang W, et al. Osteoblast behavior on polytetrafluoroethylene modified by long pulse, high frequency oxygen plasma immersion ion implantation. Biomaterials. 2010;31:413–419.

163. Hubáček T, Siegel J, Khalili R, Slepičková-Kasálková N, Švorčík V. Carbon coatings on polymers and their biocompatibility. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;275:43–48.

164. Hiruma H, Toida H, Hanawa T, Sakuragi H, Suzuki Y. Ion beam modification of ePTFE for improving the blood compatibility. Surf Coat Technol. 2011;206:905–910.

165. Kurmaev EZ, Winarski RP, Pivin J-C, et al. Chemical reactions in polymers induced by ion beam mixing: fluorescence X-ray measurements. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenomena. 2000;110–111:87–103.

166. Davenas J, Boiteux G, Xu XL, Adem E. Role of the modifications induced by ion beam irradiation in the optical and conducting properties of polyimide. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1988;32:136–141.

167. Davenas J, Thevenard P. Electronic structure characterization of ion beam modified polyimide by optical absorption and reflection. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1991;59/60:1249–1252.

168. Wallace WE, Chiou TT, Rothman JB, Composto RJ. Gas absorption during ion-irradiation of a polymer target. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1995;103:435–439.

169. Sahre K, Eichhorn K-J, Simon F, Pleul D, Janke A, Gerlach G. Characterization of ion-beam modified polyimide layers. Surf Coat Technol. 2001;139:257–264.

170. Guenther M, Gerlach G, Suchaneck G, et al. Ion-beam induced chemical and structural modification in polymers. Surf Coat Technol. 2002;158–159:108–113.

171. Aleshin AN, Gribanov AV, Dobrodumov AV, Suvorov AV, Shlimak IS. Electrophysical properties of polyimide PM films treated by ion bombardment. Solid State Phys. 1989;31:12–18.

172. Aleshin AN, Suvorov AV. Influence of electron-electron interactions on low temperature conductivity of polyimide films irradiated by ions. Solid State Phys. 1990;32:1717–1720.

173. Guenther M, Gerlach G, Suchaneck G, et al. Physical properties and structure of thin ion-beam modified polymer film. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2004;216:143–148.

174. Ahmed F, Lee K-R, Yoon J, Moon M-W. Nanoporous structures of polyimide induced by Ar ion beam irradiation. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;258:3841–3845.

175. Deslandes A, Murugaraj P, Mainwaring DE, Ionescu M, Cohen DD, Siegele R. Formation of energetic heavy ion tracks in polyimide thin films. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2013;314:90–94.

176. Pylypenko S, Artyushkova K, Fulghum JE. Application of XPS spectral subtraction and multivariate analysis for the characterization of Ar+ ion beam modified polyimide surfaces. Appl Surf Sci. 2010;256:3204–3210.

177. Kudo H, Sudo S, Oka T, et al. Ion-beam irradiation effects on polyimide-UV–vis and infrared spectroscopic study. Radiat Phys Chem. 2009;78:1067–1070.

178. Seidl T, Plotnikov A, Mustafin E, et al. Influence of swift heavy ion beams and protons on the dielectric strength of polyimide. Polym Degrad Stab. 2012;97:2396–2402.

179. Sun C, Wu Y, Yue L, Shi Y, Xiao J. Investigation on the recombination kinetics of the pyrolytic free-radicals in the irradiated polyimide. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2012;271:61–64.

180. Wu Y, Sun C, Xiao J, Li R, Yang D, He S. A study on the free-radical evolution and its correlation with the optical degradation of 170 keV proton-irradiated polyimide. Polym Degrad Stab. 2010;95:1219–1225.

181. Zhang J, Zhao H, Ji T, Wu G-L, Kou K. Microhardness and tribological properties of polyimide composites modified by 200 keV Ar ion implantation. Surf Coat Technol. 2012;213:21–25.

182. Kurotobi K, Kaibara M, Suzuki Y, Iwaki M, Nakajima H, Kaneko S. Ion implantation into collagen-coated surfaces for the development of small diameter artificial grafts. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2000;19:227–235.

183. Dejun L, Jie Z, Hanqing G, Mozhu L, Fuqing D, Qiqing Z. Surface modification of medical polyurethane by silicon ion bombardment. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1993;82:57–62.

184. Murphy JJ, Patel M, Skinner AR, Horn IM, Powell SJ, Smith PF. Volatile evolution from polymer materials induced by irradiation with He++ ions and comparative pyrolysis experiments. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2005;215:423–435.

185. Wong KH, Zinke-Allmang M, Wan WK, Zhang JZ, Hu P. Low energy oxygen ion beam modification of the surface morphology and chemical structure of polyurethane fibers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2006;243:63–74.

186. Murphy JJ, Patel M, Powell SJ, Smith PF. Volatile evolution induced by energetic He++ ions in a poly(ester) based polyurethane. Radiat Phys Chem. 2002;63:101–108.

187. Kondyurin A, Romanova V, Begishev V, Kondyurina I, Guenzel R, Maitz M. Crosslinked polyurethane coating on vascular stents for enhanced X-ray contrast. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2005;20:77–93.

188. Kondyurin AV, Maitz MF, Romanova VA, Begishev VP, Kondyurina IV, Guenzel R. Drug release from polyureaurethane coating modified by plasma immersion ion implantation. J Biomater Sci Polymer Ed. 2004;15:145–159.

189. Begishev V, Gavrilov N, Mesyats G, Klyachkin Y, Kondyurina I, Kondyurin A, et al. Modification of polyurethane endoprosthetics surface by pulse ion beam. In: Markovits M, Shiloh J, editors. Proceedings of the 12th international conference on high-power particle beams. Haifa, Israel; June 7–12, 1998. vol. 2. p. 997–1000.

190. Singh P, Ali SA, Kumar R. Modifications of structural, optical and chemical properties of Li3+ irradiated polyurethane and polyetheretherketone. Radiat Phys Chem. 2014;96:181–185.

191. Özkucur N, Richter E, Wetzel C, Funk RHW, Monsees TK. Biological relevance of ion energy in performance of human endothelial cells on ion-implanted flexible polyurethane surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res. 2010;93A:258–268.

192. Osorgina IV, Begishev VP, Kondyurina IV, Kondyurin AV. Polyurethanes for endoprosthetics, Abstract. In: Polymer materials and double technologies of technical chemistry conference. Perm; 1999.

193. Li DJ, Cui FZ, Feng QL, Zhao J. Oxygen ion beam and plasma induced blood compatibility of polyetherurethane. Chin Phys Lett. 1997;7:531–534.

194. Barnbauer R, Mestres P, Schiel R, Klinkrnann J, Sioshansi P. Surface-treated catheters with ion beam-based process evaluation in rats. Artif Organs. 1997;21:1039–1041.

195. Marletta G. Chemical reactions and physical property modifications induced by keV ion beams in polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1990;46:295–305.

196. Samra KS, Thakur S, Singh L. Structural, thermal and optical behavior of 84 MeV oxygen and 120 MeV silicon ions irradiated PES. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2011;269:550–554.

197. Suzuki Y, Swapp C, Kusakabe M. Aging effects on wettability and structure of ion implanted silicone. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1990;46:354–357.

198. Khaibullin RI, Osin YN, Stepanov AL, Khaibullin IB. Synthesis of metal/polymer composite films by implantation of Fe and Ag ions in viscous and solid state silicone substrates. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1999;148:1023–1028.

199. Khaibullin RI, Zhikharev VA, Osin YN, et al. Structural and magnetic properties of iron and cobalt implanted silicone polymers. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2000;166:897–902.

200. Khaibullin RI, Rameev BZ, Popok VN, et al. An influence of the viscosity of polymer substrate on ion beam synthesis of iron granular films. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;206:1115–1119.

201. Tsuji H, Izukawa M, Ikeguchi R, et al. Improvement of polydimethylsiloxane guide tube for nerve regeneration treatment by carbon negative-ion implantation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2003;206:507–511.

202. Szilasi SZ, Budai J, Pápa Z, Huszank R, Tóth Z, Rajta I. Refractive index depth profile and its relaxation in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) due to proton irradiation. Mater Chem Phys. 2011;131:370–374.

203. Ionescu M, Winton B, Wexler D, et al. Enhanced biocompatibility of PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) polymer films by ion irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2012;273:161–163.

204. Winton BR, Ionescu M, Dou SX, Wexler D, Alvarez GA. Structural and morphological modification of PDMS thick film surfaces by ion implantation with the formation of strain-induced buckling domains. Acta Mater. 2010;58:1861–1867.

205. Zhang W, Chu PK, Ji J, et al. Plasma surface modification of polyvinylchloride for improvement of antibacterial properties. Biomaterials. 2006;27:44–51.

206. Kondyurin A, Nosworthy NJ, Bilek MMM. Effect of low molecular weight additives on immobilization strength, activity, and conformation of protein immobilized on PVC and UHMWPE. Langmuir. 2011;27:6138–6148.

207. Manso M, Valsesia A, Lejeune M, Gilliland D, Ceccone G, Rossi F. Tailoring surface properties of biomedical polymers by implantation of Ar and He ions. Acta Biomater. 2005;1:431–440.

208. Silvan MM, Valsesia A, Gilliland D, Ceccone G, Rossi F. An evaluation of poly(ethylene-glycol) films stabilized by plasma and ion beam methods. Appl Surf Sci. 2004;235:119–125.

209. Fu RKY, Cheung ITL, Mei YF, et al. Surface modification of polymeric materials by plasma immersion ion implantation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2005;237:417–421.

210. Kondyurin A, Volodin P, Weber J. Plasma immersion ion implantation of Pebax polymer. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2006;251:407–412.

211. Kondyurin A, Nosworthy NJ, Bilek MMM, Jones R, Pigram PJ. Surface attachment of horseradish peroxidase to nylon modified by plasma-immersion ion implantation. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;120:2891–2903.

212. Kalácska G, Zsidai L, Keresztes R, Tóth A, Mohai M, Szépvölgyi J. Effect of nitrogen plasma immersion ion implantation of polyamide-6 on its sliding properties against steel surface. Wear. 2012;290–291:66–73.

213. Yap E, McCulloch DG, McKenzie DR, Swain MV, Wielunski LS, Clissold RA. Modification of the mechanical and optical properties of a polycarbonate by 50 keV Ar+ and H+ ion implantation. J Appl Phys. 1998;83:3404–3412.

214. Guzman L, Celva R, Miotello A, Voltolini E, Ferrari F, Adami M. Polymer surface modification by ion implantation and reactive deposition of transparent films. Surf Coat Technol. 1998;103–104:375–379.

215. Rodríguez RJ, García JA, Sánchez R, Pérez A, Garrido B, Morante J. Modification of surface mechanical properties of polycarbonate by ion implantation. Surf Coat Technol. 2002;158–159:636–642.

216. Kosobrodova E, Mohamed A, Su Y, et al. Cluster of differentiation antibody microarrays on plasma immersion ion implanted polycarbonate. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;35:434–440.

217. Sharma T, Mahendia S, Aggarwal S, Kumar S, Kanjilal D. 100 keV nitrogen ion beam implanted polycarbonate: A possibility for UV blocking devices. Opt Mater. 2011;33:1741–1744.

218. Goyal PK, Kumar V, Gupta R, Mahendia S, Anita, Kumar S. Modification of polycarbonate surface by Ar+ ion implantation for various opto-electronic applications. Vacuum. 2012;86:1087–1091.

219. Resta V, Calcagnile L, Quarta G, et al. Optical and electrical properties of polycarbonate layers implanted by high energy Cu ions. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2013;312:42–47.

220. Kumar V, Sonkawade RG, Dhaliwal AS. High electronic excitation induced modifications by 100 MeV O7+ and 150 MeV Ni11+ ions in Makrofol KG polycarbonate film. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2012;287:4–9.

221. Hareesh K, Pintu Sen, Ravishankar Bhat, et al. Proton and alpha particle induced changes in thermal and mechanical properties of Lexan polycarbonate. Vacuum. 2013;91:1–6.

222. Gál GAB, Rajta I, Szilasi SZ, et al. Scanning transmission ion microscopy of polycarbonate nanocapillaries. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2011;269:2322–2325.

223. Park J-W, Lee J-S, Lee B, et al. Modifications of optical properties of PC/ABS by dual ions beam irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem. 2013;84:126–128.

224. Sertova N, Balanzat E, Toulemonde M, Trautmann C. Investigation of initial stage of chemical etching of ion tracks in polycarbonate. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2009;267:1039–1044.

225. Leal R, Souza CT, da Silva MR, Fakhraai Z, Forrest JA, Papaléo RM. Relaxation of surface tracks on polycarbonate thin films induced by MeV heavy-ion impacts. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2010;268:3080–3083.

226. Apel P Yu, Blonskaya IV, Cornelius TW, et al. Influence of temperature during irradiation on the structure of latent track in polycarbonate. Radiat Meas. 2009;44:759–762.

227. Svorcik V, Rybka V, Volka K, Hnatowicz V, Kvitek J, Seidl P. Ion implantation into polypropylene. Jpn J Appl Phys. 1992;31:L287–L390.

228. Oka T, Oshima A, Motohashi R, et al. Changes to the chemical structure of isotactic-polypropylene induced by ion-beam irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem. 2011;80:278–280.

229. Ahmed SF, Rho G-H, Lee JY, et al. Nano-embossed structure on polypropylene induced by low energy Ar ion beam irradiation. Surf Coat Technol. 2010;205(Suppl. 1):S104–S108.

230. Dhillon RK, Singh S, Kumar R. Physical and chemical response of polypropylene irradiated with 70 MeV carbon and 150 MeV nickel-ions. Radiat Meas. 2012;47:1018–1022.

231. Abdesselam M, Muller D, Djebara M, Chami AC, Montgomery P. Polypropylene compositional evolution under 3.5 MeV He+ ion irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2012;278:88–92.

232. Yotoriyama T, Nakao A, Suzuki Y, Tsukamoto T, Iwaki M. Analysis of cell-adhesion surface induced by ion-beam irradiation into biodegradable polymer. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2006;242:51–54.

233. Tsuji H, Sasaki H, Sato H, Gotoh Y, Ishikawa J. Neuron attachment properties of carbon negative-ion implanted bioabsorbable polymer of poly-lactic acid. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2002;191:815–819.

234. Kondyurin A, Kondyurina I, Bilek M. With reference to article: “Impact of the first-generation drug-eluting stent implantation on periprocedural myocardial injury in patients with stable angina pectoris” Dewetting problem. J Cardiol. 2013;62:265–266.

235. Tanaka T, Tsuchiya K, Yajima H, Suzuki Y, Fukutome A. In vitro degradation properties of ion-beam irradiated poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid) mesh. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2011;269:2130–2132.

236. Tanaka T, Suzuki Y, Tsuchiya K, Yajima H. Improvement of cell attachment capabilities of poly-L-lactic acid films by modification of surface properties with ion-beam irradiation. Surf Coat Technol. 2013;218:162–166.

237. McKenzie DR, Newton-McGee K, Ruch P, Bilek MM, Gan BK. Modification of polymers by plasma-based ion implantation for biomedical applications. Surf Coat Technol. 2004;186:239–244.

238. Fink D, Vacik J, Cervena J, et al. On the uptake of aqueous tracer solutions by pristine and ion-irradiated PEEK. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 1998;134:61–72.

239. Švorčík V, Prošková K, Rybka V, Vacík J, Hnatowicz V, Kobayashi Y. Changes of PEEK surface chemistry by ion irradiation. Mater Lett. 1998;36:128–131.

240. Macková A, Havránek V, Švorčík V, Djourelov N, Suzuki T. Degradation of PET, PEEK and PI induced by irradiation with 150 keV Ar+ and 1.76 MeV He+ ions. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2005;240:245–249.

241. Sasuga T, Kudoh H. Ion irradiation effects on thermal and mechanical properties of poly(ether–ether–ketone) (PEEK). Polymer (Guildf). 2000;41:185–194.

242. Vacík J, Hnatowicz V, Cervena J, Apel P, Posta S, Kobayashi Y. Study of damaged depth profiles of ion-irradiated PEEK. Surf Coat Technol. 2007;201:8370–8372.

243. Powles RC, McKenzie DR, Meure SJ, Swain MV, James NL. Nanoindentation response of PEEK modified by mesh-assisted plasma immersion ion implantation. Surf Coat Technol. 2007;201:7961–7969.

244. Hnatowicz V, Havránek V, Bočan J, Macková A, Vacík J, Švorčík V. Modification of poly(ether ether ketone) by ion irradiation. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2008;266:283–287.

245. Tavenner E, Meredith P, Wood B, Curry M, Giedd R. Tailored conductivity in ion implanted polyetheretherketone. Synth Met. 2004;145:183–190.

246. Tavenner E, Wood B, Curry M, Jankovic A, Patel R. Graphitic structure formation in ion implanted polyetheretherketone. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;283:154–159.

247. Koshida N, Suzuki Y, Aoyama T. Low energy ion implantation studies of polyacetylene films. Nucl Instr Meth B. 1989;37–38:708–711.

248. Ranby B, Rabek JF. Photodegradation, photo-oxidation and photostabilization of polymers New York, NY: Wiley; 1975.

249. Emanuel NM, Buchachenko AL. Chemical physics of polymer degradation and stabilization Utrecht: VNU science press; 1987.

250. Grassie N, Scott G. Polymer degradation and stabilization Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.

..................Content has been hidden....................

You can't read the all page of ebook, please click here login for view all page.
Reset
18.219.36.41